Chinese consensus on the prevention of colorectal cancer (2016, Shanghai)

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in general population and high-risk population: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many nutritional supplements and pharmacological agents have been reported to show preventive effects on colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). We performed a network meta-analysis to summarize such evidence and assess the efficacy and safety of these agents.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published in English until October 31, 2021 that fit our inclusion criteria. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of candidate agents (low-dose aspirin [Asp], high-dose Asp, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors [coxibs], calcium, vitamin D, folic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid [UDCA], estrogen, and progesterone, alone or in combination) for preventing colorectal adenoma and CRC. Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was employed to evaluate the quality of each included study.

RESULTS

Thirty-two randomized controlled trials (278,694 participants) comparing 13 different interventions were included. Coxibs significantly reduced the risk of colorectal adenoma (risk ratio [RR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.79, six trials involving 5486 participants), advanced adenoma (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.92, four trials involving 4723 participants), and metachronous adenoma (RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.79, five trials involving 5258 participants) compared with placebo. Coxibs also significantly increased the risk of severe adverse events (RR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.13-1.47, six trials involving 7109 participants). Other interventions, including Asp, folic acid, UDCA, vitamin D, and calcium, did not reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma in the general and high-risk populations compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the balance between benefits and harms, regular use of coxibs for prevention of colorectal adenoma was not supported by the current evidence. Benefit of low-dose Asp for chemoprevention of colorectal adenoma still requires further evidence.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, No. CRD42022296376.

Physical Activity and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk: A Review

Introduction: Western lifestyle characterized by increased consumption of red meat, fat, processed food, smoking, alcohol drinking, lower consumption of vegetables and physical inactivity has been associated with a higher gastrointestinal cancer risk. Digestive system cancers are diagnosed at late stages when they show poor response to treatment and are associated with a high mortality rate. Colorectal, gastric, esophageal and pancreatic cancers are among the most common cancers worldwide. Studies show that more than 50% of gastrointestinal cancers develop as a result of inappropriate lifestyle. An inverse association between physical activity and many chronic diseases has been proved so far. However, the association between physical activity and some gastrointestinal cancers is still controversial. This study was aimed to determine the association between physical activity and gastrointestinal cancers risk.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of English and Persian databases from February 2007 till December 2017, for studies investigating the association of physical activity and risk of gastrointestinal cancers. Finally, after reading full text of articles, 123 studies were included.

Results: Physical activity can be helpful in reducing the risk of gastrointestinal cancer, especially colon and pancreatic cancers. The risk reduction is not similar for different types of gastrointestinal cancers and also among males and females.

Conclusion: Different types of physical activity are associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal cancer. However, it is unknown which type and intensity of physical activity are associated with a protective effect against gastro-intestinal cancer.

Clinicopathological features of advanced colorectal serrated lesions: A single-center study in China

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of evidence indicates that patients with colorectal serrated lesions, especially advanced serrated lesions (ASLs), are at risk of subsequent malignancy. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of ASLs and the association between ASLs and synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (sACN) in a single center of China.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive symptomatic patients and healthy individuals who underwent colonoscopy between January 2010 and March 2016 was performed. Clinicopathological characteritics of the patients with ASLs were documented from the colonoscopy database.

RESULTS

Colorectal serrated lesions were pathologically confirmed in 277 (N = 38 981, 0.7%) cases. Among them, 156 (56.3%) were found to have ASLs, with a total of 161 lesions including 71 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) and 90 traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). There were no differences in age and gender between the ASL and non-ASL patients. Among the 161 ASLs, 29 (18.0%) were ≥10 mm in diameter. Compared with non-ASLs, ASLs appeared more in the proximal colon (P = 0.007). Flat and subpedunculated lesions were more commonly found in the ASL group compared with the non-ASL group. Nearly all ASLs (160/161) had dysplasia. Moreover, 16 sACN lesions were found in 156 ASL patients, and large diameter (≥10 mm) might be a significant risk factor for sACN (odds ratio 4.35, 95% confidence interval 1.467-12.894, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ASLs are more likely to occur in the proximal colon, and mainly present as flat and sub-pedunculated types. Large ASLs are significantly associated with sACN.

Rise of PD-L1 expression during metastasis of colorectal cancer: Implications for immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) was implicated in predicting anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy efficacy. However, therapeutic response has also been found in patients without PD-L1 expression in the primary tumor. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the prevalence of PD-L1 in primary and metastatic CRC.

METHODS

The expression of PD-L1 was determined by immunohistochemistry in matched primary and metastatic CRC.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was significantly more prevalent in metastatic CRCs than in primary tumors, and the expression of PD-L1 in primary CRC may not represent the tumors that spread to distant organs. Positive expression of PD-L1 was found in 81.8% of metastatic CRC, being significantly more prevalent than in primary CRC (40.9%; P = 0.012, Fisher's exact test). While comparing the primary and metastatic lesions of the same patients, we found that PD-L1 expression frequently increased during the metastatic process. However, PD-L1 expression was rarely decreased in metastatic lesions. Intratumoral heterogeneity expression of PD-L1 was found in both metastatic CRC (22.2%) and primary CRCs (33.3%). PD-L1 was prevalently expressed in metastatic CRC, and increased PD-L1 expression was frequently found in metastatic CRC as compared to primary tumors.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression in metastatic CRC should be considered as an independent factor while evaluating the suitability of patients for immunotherapy.