1
|
Abud-Mendoza C, Aceves-Ávila FJ, Arce-Salinas CA, Álvarez Nemegyei J, Barile-Fabris L, Durán-Barragán S, Flores-Alvarado DE, Hernández-Núñez E, Irazoque-Palazuelos F, Moctezuma-Ríos JF, Pascual-Ramos V, Portela-Hernández M, Silveira LH, Andrade-Ortega L, Barrera-Vargas A, Carrillo-Vázquez S, Castro-Colin Z, Cuevas-Orta E, Flores-Suárez LF, Guaracha-Basáñez GA, Hernández-Cabrera MF, de Jesús Hernández-Galarza I, Herrera-vanOostdam DA, Lobato-Belmonte AC, Martínez-Martínez LA, Martínez-Martínez MU, Medrano-Ramírez G, Merayo-Chalico FJ, Meza-López Y Olguín G, Olan F, Peña-Santos G, Ramos-Remus C, Reyes-Cordero G, Rivera-Terán V, Rojas-Serrano J, Serna-Peña G, Sicsik-Ayala S, Sifuentes-Cantú CA, Vega-Morales D, Villaseñor-Ovies P, Xibillé-Friedmann D, Pacheco-Tena C. Update of the guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the Mexican College of Rheumatology 2023. REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA 2024; 20:263-280. [PMID: 38796394 DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A group of experts representative of different geographical regions and various medical services catering to the Mexican population with RA was formed. Questions based on Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) were developed, deemed clinically relevant. These questions were answered based on the results of a recent systematic literature review (SLR), and the evidence's validity was assessed using the GRADE system, considered a standard for these purposes. Subsequently, the expert group reached consensus on the direction and strength of recommendations through a multi-stage voting process. RESULTS The updated guidelines for RA treatment stratify various therapeutic options, including different classes of DMARDs (conventional, biologicals, and JAK inhibitors), as well as NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and analgesics. By consensus, it establishes the use of these in different subpopulations of interest among RA patients and addresses aspects related to vaccination, COVID-19, surgery, pregnancy and lactation, and others. CONCLUSIONS This update of the Mexican guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of RA provides reference points for evidence-based decision-making, recommending patient participation in joint decision-making to achieve the greatest benefit for our patients. It also establishes recommendations for managing a variety of relevant conditions affecting our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Abud-Mendoza
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Sergio Durán-Barragán
- Departamento de Clínicas Médicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Virginia Pascual-Ramos
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Margarita Portela-Hernández
- Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Humberto Silveira
- Departamento de Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología «Ignacio Chávez», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lilia Andrade-Ortega
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Dr. Gustavo A. Rovirosa Pérez, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico; Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital CMN 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ana Barrera-Vargas
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sandra Carrillo-Vázquez
- Hospital Regional 1.◦ de Octubre, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Zully Castro-Colin
- Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional La Raza «Antonio Fraga Mouret», IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Enrique Cuevas-Orta
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | - Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez
- Clínica de Vasculitis Sistémicas Primarias, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Iván de Jesús Hernández-Galarza
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - David Alejandro Herrera-vanOostdam
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier Merayo-Chalico
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Francisco Olan
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Dr. Gustavo A. Rovirosa Pérez, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico
| | | | - César Ramos-Remus
- Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, S.C. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Greta Reyes-Cordero
- Hospital Angeles Chihuahua, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
| | - Vijaya Rivera-Terán
- Registro Mexicano de Acotamientos Adversos de Terapias Biológicas en Enfermedades Reumatológicas (Biobadamex), Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Griselda Serna-Peña
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Sandra Sicsik-Ayala
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
| | | | - David Vega-Morales
- Reumatología y Centro de Infusión, Hospital General de Zona No. 17, IMSS, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Pablo Villaseñor-Ovies
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital General de Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
| | | | - César Pacheco-Tena
- Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin A, Lee JH, You-Jung H, Lee YJ, Lee EB, Kang EH. Infectious risk of add-on leflunomide or tacrolimus versus TNF inhibitors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate: a population-based cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2022; 55:152019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
3
|
Yoo WH, Lee SI, Kim TH, Sung JJ, Kim SM, Hua F, Sumarsono B, Park SH. Safety of Tacrolimus in Autoimmune Disease: Results From Post-marketing Surveillance in South Korea. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES 2021; 28:202-215. [PMID: 37476363 PMCID: PMC10324909 DOI: 10.4078/jrd.2021.28.4.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Objective Tacrolimus, a macrolide immunosuppressant, is approved in Korea for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), lupus nephritis (LN) and myasthenia gravis (MG) We report three prospective post-marketing surveillance studies of tacrolimus conducted in South Korea in these indications. Methods Studies were conducted according to South Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety requirements Patients were followed up for the duration of the study (up to 4 years) or until treatment discontinuation Occurrence and likely relationship with tacrolimus of adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs; defined as AEs where causal relationship to tacrolimus could not be excluded) and serious AEs were recorded Association of AEs with demographic and medical factors was evaluated by multivariable analysis. Results The studies included 740 (RA), 307 (LN) and 104 (MG) patients The incidence of AEs was 127% in RA (642% of AEs potentially related to tacrolimus), 209% (378% potentially related) in LN and 298% (568% potentially related) in MG The incidence of ADRs was 84%, 98% and 202%, respectively Serious AEs were reported in 07%, 72% and 87%, respectively The most common AEs were abdominal pain (RA), pharyngitis (LN) and diarrhea (MG) Unexpected AEs occurred in 35% of patients with RA, 29% in LN and 87% in MG; no pattern of unexpected AEs was apparent Multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients with comorbidity had higher probability of experiencing an AE in RA and MG studies. Conclusion The incidence of AEs and the safety profile of tacrolimus in each indication was consistent with previous reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Hee Yoo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Sang-Il Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Joon Sung
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Min Kim
- Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Fan Hua
- Astellas Pharma Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore, Korea
| | | | - Sung Hwan Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jung SY, Koh JH, Kim KJ, Park YW, Yang HI, Choi SJ, Lee J, Choi CB, Kim WU. Switching from TNFα inhibitor to tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in rheumatoid arthritis after achieving low disease activity with TNFα inhibitors and methotrexate: 24-week result from a non-randomized, prospective, active-controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2021; 23:182. [PMID: 34233727 PMCID: PMC8265052 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02566-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tapering or stopping biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has been proposed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission, but it frequently results in high rates of recurrence. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) as maintenance therapy in patients with established RA in remission after receiving combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and methotrexate (MTX). Methods This 24-week, prospective, open-label trial included patients who received TNFi and MTX at stable doses for ≥24 weeks and had low disease activity (LDA), measured by Disease Activity Score-28 for ≥12 weeks. Patients selected one of two arms: maintenance (TNFi plus MTX) or switched (TAC plus MTX). The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients maintaining LDA at week 24, which was assessed using a logistic regression model. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study period. Results In efficacy analysis, 80 and 34 patients were included in the maintenance and switched arms, respectively. At week 24, LDA was maintained in 99% and 91% of patients in the maintenance and switched arms, respectively (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–1.59). Drug-related adverse effects tended to be more common in the switched arm than in the maintenance arm (20.9% versus 7.1%, respectively) but were well-tolerated. Conclusion This controlled study tested a novel treatment strategy of switching from TNFi to TAC in RA patients with sustained LDA, and the findings suggested that TNFi can be replaced with TAC in most patients without the patients experiencing flare-ups for at least 24 weeks. Trial registration Korea CDC CRIS, KCT0005868. Registered 4 February 2021—retrospectively registered Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02566-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Youn Jung
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jung Hee Koh
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ki-Jo Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong-Wook Park
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Hyung-In Yang
- College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Jae Choi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea
| | - Jisoo Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chan-Bum Choi
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wan-Uk Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Center for Integrative Rheumatoid Transcriptomics and Dynamics, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu X, Shen X, Hou X, Luo Y, Fu X, Cao M, Feng Z. Total glucosides of paeony for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Int Immunopharmacol 2020; 88:106920. [PMID: 32871476 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the methodological, reporting and evidence quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of total glucosides of paeony (TGP) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS We comprehensively searched the literature in numerous databases from inception to July 29th, 2020. Two appraisers collected data and assessed the methodological and reporting quality of the included reviews by revised A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA), respectively. The level of evidence quality was evaluated by employing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS Eleven relevant articles were collected. The results from AMSTAR-2 showed that the methodological quality of all included reviews was critically low; no authors met the standard of those critical domains (0%), particularly in item 2, item 4 and item 7. The PRISMA scores ranged from 16.5 to 25, and one meta-analysis almost conformed to the PRISMA structure. According to GRADE, the 11 studies included 59 outcomes: 27 had very low quality, 22 had low quality, 10 had moderate quality, and none had high quality evidence. The most prominent downgrading factors were risk of bias, followed by publication bias, inconsistency, imprecision, and indirectness. CONCLUSIONS Although included studies summarized that TGP was effective and safe in the treatment of RA, the methodological and reporting quality and the quality of evidence was poor overall; decision-makers should be prudent when using TGP in treating RA patients. High-quality and multicenter studies investigating TGP for RA are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Zhu
- Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
| | - Xiaolan Shen
- Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Hou
- Institute of Rheumatology, the First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443003, China
| | - Yanan Luo
- Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
| | - Xianyun Fu
- Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
| | - Meiqun Cao
- Shenzhen Institute of Geriatrics, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.
| | - Zhitao Feng
- Third-Grade Pharmacological Laboratory on Chinese Medicine Approved by State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; Institute of Rheumatology, the First College of Clinical Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van Vollenhoven R, McInnes IB, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, de Wit M, Falzon L, Landewé R. Efficacy of pharmacological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:744-759. [PMID: 32033937 PMCID: PMC7286044 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To inform the 2019 update of the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A systematic literature research (SLR) to investigate the efficacy of any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) (conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD, biological (b) and biosimilar DMARD, targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD) or glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in patients with RA was done by searching MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between 2016 and 8 March 2019. RESULTS 234 abstracts were selected for detailed assessment, with 136 finally included. They comprised the efficacy of bDMARDs versus placebo or other bDMARDs, efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi) across different patient populations and head-to-head of different bDMARDs versus JAKi or other bDMARDs. Switching of bDMARDs to other bDMARDs or tsDMARDs, strategic trials and tapering studies of bDMARDs, csDMARDs and JAKi were assessed. The drugs evaluated included abatacept, adalimumab, ABT-122, baricitinib, certolizumab pegol, SBI-087, CNTO6785, decernotinib, etanercept, filgotinib, golimumab, GCs, GS-9876, guselkumab, hydroxychloroquine, infliximab, leflunomide, mavrilimumab, methotrexate, olokizumab, otilimab, peficitinib, rituximab, sarilumab, salazopyrine, secukinumab, sirukumab, tacrolimus, tocilizumab, tofacitinib, tregalizumab, upadacitinib, ustekinumab and vobarilizumab. The efficacy of many bDMARDs and tsDMARDs was shown. Switching to another tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi bDMARDs after TNFi treatment failure is efficacious. Tapering of DMARDs is possible in patients achieving long-standing stringent clinical remission; in patients with residual disease activity (including patients in LDA) the risk of flares is increased during the tapering. Biosimilars are non-inferior to their reference products. CONCLUSION This SLR informed the task force regarding the evidence base of various therapeutic regimen for the development of the update of EULAR's RA management recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Broen JCA, van Laar JM. Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus: mechanisms in rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 16:167-178. [PMID: 32055040 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-020-0374-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of biologic DMARDs into rheumatology has resulted in a substantial reduction of the burden of many rheumatic diseases. In the slipstream of the success achieved with these biologic DMARDs, some conventional immunosuppressive drugs have also found use in new indications. Notably, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus have made their way from solid organ transplantation drugs to become useful assets in rheumatology practice. Mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine inhibit the purine pathway and subsequently diminish cell proliferation. Both drugs have a pivotal role in the treatment of various rheumatic diseases, including lupus nephritis. Tacrolimus inhibits lymphocyte activation by inhibiting the calcineurin pathway. Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus are, among other indications, increasingly being recognized as useful drugs in the treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic rheumatic diseases and skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. A broad array of trials with mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and/or tacrolimus are ongoing within the field of rheumatology that might provide further novel avenues for the use of these drugs. In this Review, we discuss the historical perspective, pharmacodynamics, clinical indications and novel avenues for mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus in rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper C A Broen
- Regional Rheumatology Center, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven and Veldhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|