Outcomes after percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: Patients view 6 years after the procedure

Does Cuff Design Impact Insertion and Removal Force of Tracheostomy Tubes? A Bench Model

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure in intensive care units. Unrecognized tracheal ring fracture has been suggested as a possible factor for tracheal stenosis. The degree of tracheal compression relates to the amount of force required to cannulate the trachea. The objective of this study was to determine the force required to insert two types of tracheostomy tubes with different cuff designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This bench model measured the insertion and removal force of two tracheostomy tubes; one with a barrel-shaped, high-volume, low-pressure cuff (traditional Shiley tracheostomy tube) and another with a taper-shaped, low-volume, low-pressure cuff (Shiley flexible tracheostomy tube). Three sizes of tracheostomy tubes either with a barrel- or taper-shaped cuff were tested (Jackson sizes 4, 6, and 10, corresponding to 6.5-, 7.5-, and 10-mm ISO sizes, respectively). A model representing the tissue that the tube traverses to enter the tracheal lumen was designed, and the tracheostomy tube was mounted on a universal testing machine to measure the force necessary to insert and remove the tube.

RESULTS

Across all tracheostomy tubes' sizes tested, significantly less force was required to insert the Shiley flexible tracheostomy tube compared to the traditional Shiley tracheostomy tube. Significantly less force was also required to remove the flexible tracheostomy tube compared to the traditional tracheostomy tube.

CONCLUSIONS

This model suggests that less force is required to insert the Shiley flexible tracheostomy tube, which could result in less tracheal compression. This may be because of the smaller taper-shaped cuff that, when deflated, occupies less volume compared to the barrel-shaped cuff. As a result, less tracheal injury may occur when using the Shiley flexible tracheostomy tube during percutaneous tracheostomy procedures.

Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) with the rigid tracheotomy endoscope (TED): a 6-month follow-up multicenter investigation

Background

The rigid tracheotomy endoscope (TED) was recently introduced to improve the fiberoptic technique during percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) in critically ill patients. The aim was to evaluate the long-term complications of PDT using TED equipment in a prospective multicenter investigation.

Methods

One hundred eighty adult patients underwent PDT using TED in four German hospitals. Patients who were alive or their guardians were contacted via telephone and interviewed using a structured questionnaire 6 months following the tracheostomy procedure. Patients with airway complaints were invited for outpatient clinical ENT examination. The incidence of adverse events related to PDT was registered.

Results

Of 180 patients who received tracheostomy, 137 (76.1%) were alive at the time of follow-up. None of the 43 lethal events was related to the PDT. Fifty-three (38.7%) patients were available for follow-up examination, whereas 14 (10.2%) were able to visit ENT physicians. Two (3.8%) out of 53 patients developed tracheocutaneous fistula with required surgical closure of tracheostoma. Dyspnea (7.5%), hoarseness (5.7%), stridor and swallowing difficulties (both with 3.8%) were the most common complaints. Tracheal stenosis was confirmed in 1 patient (1.88% [95% CI: 0.33; 9.93]).

Conclusion

The use of TED for PDT in the clinical setting is safe regarding adverse events at 6-month follow-up. The incidence of tracheal stenosis after PDT with TED is comparable with that of flexible bronchoscopy; however, its role for PDT at the intensive care unit should be clarified in further investigations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01264-2.

Percutaneous Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients: Experience from 30 Consecutive Procedures

Introduction  Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a well-established practice that shows a reduced risk of wound infection compared with surgical tracheostomy, thus facilitating mechanical ventilation, nursing procedures, reduction in sedation and early mobilization. Objective  This is an observational case-control study that compares the results of PT in ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prospectively enrolled to a similar group of subjects, retrospectively recruited, without COVID-19. Methods  Ninety-eight consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU at Pisa Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana between March 11th and May 20 ^th , 2020 were prospectively studied. Thirty of them underwent PT using different techniques. Another 30 non-COVID-19 ICU patients were used as a control-group. The main outcome was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PT in COVID-19 patients. We measured the rate of complications. Results  Percutaneous tracheostomy was performed with different techniques in 30 of the 98 COVID-19 ICU patients admitted to the ICU. Tracheostomy was performed on day 10 (mean 10 ± 3.3) from the time of intubation. Major tracheal complications occurred in 5 patients during the procedure. In the control group of 30 ICU patients, no differences were found with regards to the timing of the tracheostomy, whereas a statistically significant difference was observed regarding complications with only one tracheal ring rupture reported. Conclusion  Percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients showed a higher rate of complications compared with controls even though the same precautions and the same expertise were applied. Larger studies are needed to understand whether the coronavirus disease itself carries an increased risk of tracheal damage.