1
|
Richardson M, Hirchak K, Bajet K, Brigman M, Shaffer R, Keyes B, Oliver KA, Kropp F, McDonell MG, Venner KL, Campbell ANC. Provider perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on treatment of substance use and opioid use disorders among American Indian and Alaska Native adults. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1356033. [PMID: 38898893 PMCID: PMC11186410 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1356033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities are more likely to suffer negative consequences related to substance misuse. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the opioid poisoning crisis, in combination with ongoing treatment barriers resulting from settler-colonialism, systemic oppression and racial discrimination. AI/AN adults are at greatest risk of COVID-19 related serious illness and death. In collaboration with an Indigenous community advisory board and Tribal leadership, this study explored AI/AN treatment provider perceptions of client-relatives' (i.e., SUD treatment recipients) experiences during the pandemic from 2020 to 2022. Methods Providers who underwent screening and were eligible to participate (N = 25) represented 6 programs and organizations serving rural and urban areas in Washington, Utah, and Minnesota. Participants engaged in audio-recorded 60-90 min semi-structured individual interviews conducted virtually via Zoom. The interview guide included 15 questions covering regulatory changes, guidance for telemedicine, policy and procedures, staff communication, and client-relatives' reactions to implemented changes, service utilization, changes in treatment modality, and perceptions of impact on their roles and practice. Interview recordings were transcribed and de-identified. Members of the research team independently reviewed transcripts before reaching consensus. Coding was completed in Dedoose, followed by analyses informed by a qualitative descriptive approach. Results Five main domains were identified related to client-relative experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, as observed by providers: (1) accessibility, (2) co-occurring mental health, (3) social determinants of health, (4) substance use, coping, and harm reduction strategies, and (5) community strengths. Providers reported the distinctive experiences of AI/AN communities, highlighting the impact on client-relatives, who faced challenges such as reduced income, heightened grief and loss, and elevated rates of substance use and opioid-related poisonings. Community and culturally informed programming promoting resilience and healing are outlined. Conclusion Findings underscore the impact on SUD among AI/AN communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying treatment barriers and mental health impacts on client-relatives during a global pandemic can inform ongoing and future culturally responsive SUD prevention and treatment strategies. Elevating collective voice to strengthen Indigenous informed systems of care to address the gap in culturally-and community-based services, can bolster holistic approaches and long-term service needs to promote SUD prevention efforts beyond emergency response efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meenakshi Richardson
- Human Development, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, United States
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health (PRISM) Collaborative, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Katherine Hirchak
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health (PRISM) Collaborative, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Kelsey Bajet
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health (PRISM) Collaborative, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Mariah Brigman
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health (PRISM) Collaborative, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | | | - Beverly Keyes
- Independent Researcher, Tribal Lands, WA, United States
| | | | - Frankie Kropp
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Michael G. McDonell
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- Promoting Research Initiatives in Substance Use and Mental Health (PRISM) Collaborative, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, WA, United States
- College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Kamilla L. Venner
- Department of Psychology and Center on Alcohol, Substance Use & Addiction, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Aimee N. C. Campbell
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Savinkina A, Jurecka C, Gonsalves G, Barocas JA. Mortality, incarceration and cost implications of fentanyl felonization laws: A modeling study. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 121:104175. [PMID: 37729682 PMCID: PMC10840895 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid overdose continues to be a major cause of death in the United States. One effort to control opioid use has been to implement policies that enhance criminalization of opioid possession. Laws to further criminalize possession of fentanyl have been enacted or are under consideration across the country, including at the national level. OBJECTIVE Estimate the long-term effects on opioid death and incarceration resulting from increasingly strict fentanyl possession laws . DESIGN We built a Markov simulation model to explore the potential outcomes of a 2022 Colorado law which made possession of >1 g of drug with any amount of fentanyl a Level 4 drug felony (and escalation of the previous law, where >4 g of any drug with any amount of fentanyl in possession was considered a felony). The model simulates a cohort of people with fentanyl possession moving through the criminal justice system, exploring the probability of overdose and incarceration under different scenarios, including various fentanyl possession policies and potential interventions. SETTING Colorado PARTICIPANTS: A simulated cohort of people in possession of fentanyl. MEASUREMENTS Number of opioid overdose deaths, people incarcerated, and associated costs over 5 years. RESULTS When >4 g of a drug containing any amount of fentanyl is considered a felony in Colorado, the model predicts 5460 overdose deaths (95% CrI 410-9260) and 2,740 incarcerations for fentanyl possession (95% CrI: 230-10,500) over 5 years. When the policy changes so that >1 g possession of drug with fentanyl is considered a felony, opioid overdose deaths increase by 19% (95% CRI: 16-38%) and incarcerations for possession increase by 98% (CrI: 85-98%). Diversion programs and MOUD in prison help alleviate some of the increases in death and incarceration, but do not completely offset them. LIMITATIONS The mathematical model is meant to offer broad assessment of the impact of these policies, not forecast specific and exact numerical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our model shows that lowering thresholds for felony possession of fentanyl containing drugs can lead to more opioid overdose deaths and incarceration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Savinkina
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.
| | - Cole Jurecka
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Gregg Gonsalves
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Joshua A Barocas
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Winiker AK, Heidari O, Pollock S, Sodder S, Tobin K. Barriers to Assessing and Treating Trauma in Primary Care and Opportunities for Improvement: Perspectives from Prescribers of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:1651-1659. [PMID: 37495397 PMCID: PMC10758239 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2238301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Background: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) is a best practice for treating individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), and primary care-based MOUD management can reduce treatment barriers among OUD patients. Individuals with OUD experience disproportionately high rates of trauma and violence, highlighting the importance of addressing trauma, mental health, and substance use concurrently. However, clear guidelines for trauma-informed treatment in a primary care setting remain poorly established. Methods: A qualitative approach was engaged to explore primary care providers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to assessing and treating trauma among MOUD patients. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted in 2021 with Baltimore-based MOUD prescribers, including primary care physicians and nurse practitioners. Interview questions assessed experiences with identifying and treating trauma among MOUD patients, including challenges and opportunities. Results: Providers reported extensive histories of trauma experienced by MOUD patients. Barriers to addressing trauma include a lack of standardized protocols/procedures for identifying trauma, insufficient training/time to assess and treat trauma, and the limited availability of external mental health providers and specialty services. Opportunities included building strong, mutually respectful patient-provider relationships, providing individualized, person-centered care, and establishing connections to coordinated multidisciplinary treatment networks. Conclusions: MOUD treatment within primary care is an important way to increase OUD treatment access, but clearer standards are needed for the treatment of trauma within this patient population. These findings demonstrate opportunities to improve standards and systems such that primary care providers are better equipped to assess and treat the complex histories of trauma experienced by individuals with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail K. Winiker
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Omeid Heidari
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Sarah Pollock
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Shereen Sodder
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Karin Tobin
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winiker AK, Schneider KE, Hamilton White R, O'Rourke A, Grieb SM, Allen ST. A qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to drug treatment services among people who inject drugs in west Virginia. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:69. [PMID: 37264367 PMCID: PMC10233537 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00795-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The opioid overdose crisis in the USA has called for expanding access to evidence-based substance use treatment programs, yet many barriers limit the ability of people who inject drugs (PWID) to engage in these programs. Predominantly rural states have been disproportionately affected by the opioid overdose crisis while simultaneously facing diminished access to drug treatment services. The purpose of this study is to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement in drug treatment among PWID residing in a rural county in West Virginia. METHODS From June to July 2018, in-depth interviews (n = 21) that explored drug treatment experiences among PWID were conducted in Cabell County, West Virginia. Participants were recruited from locations frequented by PWID such as local service providers and public parks. An iterative, modified constant comparison approach was used to code and synthesize interview data. RESULTS Participants reported experiencing a variety of barriers to engaging in drug treatment, including low thresholds for dismissal, a lack of comprehensive support services, financial barriers, and inadequate management of withdrawal symptoms. However, participants also described several facilitators of treatment engagement and sustained recovery. These included the use of medications for opioid use disorder and supportive health care workers/program staff. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that a range of barriers exist that may limit the abilities of rural PWID to successfully access and remain engaged in drug treatment in West Virginia. Improving the public health of rural PWID populations will require expanding access to evidence-based drug treatment programs that are tailored to participants' individual needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail K Winiker
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Kristin E Schneider
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Rebecca Hamilton White
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Allison O'Rourke
- DC Center for AIDS Research, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2125 G St. NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
| | - Suzanne M Grieb
- Center for Child and Community Health Research, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| | - Sean T Allen
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zobayer A, Ullah MS, Ariful Kabir KM. A cyclic behavioral modeling aspect to understand the effects of vaccination and treatment on epidemic transmission dynamics. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8356. [PMID: 37221186 PMCID: PMC10205038 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35188-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Evolutionary epidemiological models have played an active part in analyzing various contagious diseases and intervention policies in the biological sciences. The design in this effort is the addition of compartments for treatment and vaccination, so the system is designated as susceptible, vaccinated, infected, treated, and recovered (SVITR) epidemic dynamic. The contact of a susceptible individual with a vaccinated or an infected individual makes the individual either immunized or infected. Inventively, the assumption that infected individuals enter the treatment and recover state at different rates after a time interval is also deliberated through the presence of behavioral aspects. The rate of change from susceptible to vaccinated and infected to treatment is studied in a comprehensive evolutionary game theory with a cyclic epidemic model. We theoretically investigate the cyclic SVITR epidemic model framework for disease-free and endemic equilibrium to show stable conditions. Then, the embedded vaccination and treatment strategies are present using extensive evolutionary game theory aspects among the individuals in society through a ridiculous phase diagram. Extensive numerical simulation suggests that effective vaccination and treatment may implicitly reduce the community risk of infection when reliable and cheap. The results exhibited the dilemma and benefitted situation, in which the interplay between vaccination and treatment evolution and coexistence are investigated by the indicators of social efficiency deficit and socially benefited individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abu Zobayer
- Department of Mathematics, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
| | | | - K M Ariful Kabir
- Department of Mathematics, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stewart RE, Cardamone NC, Loscalzo E, French R, Lovelace C, Mowenn WK, Tarhini A, Lalley-Chareczko L, Brady KA, Mandell DS. "There's absolutely no downside to this, I mean, except community opposition:" A qualitative study of the acceptability of vending machines for harm reduction. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:25. [PMID: 36855064 PMCID: PMC9971672 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00747-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vending machines for harm reduction (VMHR) are an innovative approach to deliver life-saving materials, information, and treatment for hard-to-reach populations, particularly for persons who inject drugs. The current study explores stakeholders' perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of VMHR in Philadelphia. METHODS From October 2021 to February 2022, we conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with potential end users, staff, and leadership at a local federally qualified health center, and community members. Trained coders extracted themes from interview transcripts across four key domains: materials and logistics, location, access, and community introduction. RESULTS Interviewees from all stakeholder groups endorsed using VMHR to provide supplies for wound care, fentanyl test strips, naloxone, and materials to connect individuals to treatment and other services. Dispensing syringes and medications for opioid use disorder were commonly endorsed by health center staff but were more controversial among potential end users. Even within stakeholder groups, views varied with respect to where to locate the machines, but most agreed that the machine should be placed in the highest drug use areas. Across stakeholder groups, interviewees suggested several strategies to introduce and gain community acceptance of VMHR, including community education, one-on-one conversations with community members, and coupling the machine with safe disposal of syringes and information to link individuals to treatment. CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders were generally receptive to VMHR. The current study findings are consistent with qualitative analyses from outside of the USA and contribute new ideas regarding the anticipated community response and best methods for introducing these machines to a community. With thoughtful planning and design, VMHR could be a feasible and acceptable modality to reduce death and disease transmission associated with the opioid and HIV epidemics in cities like Philadelphia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Stewart
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Nicholas C Cardamone
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily Loscalzo
- Philadelphia FIGHT Community Health Centers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel French
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Collin Lovelace
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Winna Koe Mowenn
- Philadelphia FIGHT Community Health Centers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ali Tarhini
- Philadelphia FIGHT Community Health Centers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kathleen A Brady
- Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David S Mandell
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saunders EC, Satcher MF, Monico LB, McDonald RD, Springer SA, Farabee D, Gryczynski J, Nyaku A, Reeves D, Kunkel LE, Schultheis AM, Schwartz RP, Lee JD, Marsch LA, Waddell EN. The impact of COVID-19 on the treatment of opioid use disorder in carceral facilities: a cross-sectional study. HEALTH & JUSTICE 2022; 10:35. [PMID: 36529829 PMCID: PMC9760540 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-022-00199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
While the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery everywhere, persons with carceral system involvement and opioid use disorder (OUD) were disproportionately impacted and vulnerable to severe COVID-associated illness. Carceral settings and community treatment programs (CTPs) rapidly developed protocols to sustain healthcare delivery while reducing risk of COVID-19 transmission. This survey study assessed changes to OUD treatment, telemedicine use, and re-entry support services among carceral and CTPs participating in the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-funded study, Long-Acting Buprenorphine vs. Naltrexone Opioid Treatments in Criminal Justice System-Involved Adults (EXIT-CJS) study. In December 2020, carceral sites (n = 6; median pre-COVID 2020 monthly census = 3468 people) and CTPs (n = 7; median pre-COVID 2020 monthly census = 550 patients) participating in EXIT-CJS completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. The survey assessed changes pre- (January-March 2020) and post- (April-September 2020) COVID-19 in OUD treatment, telemedicine use, re-entry supports and referral practices. Compared to January-March 2020, half of carceral sites (n = 3) increased the total number of persons initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) from April-September 2020, while a third (n = 2) decreased the number of persons initiated. Most CTPs (n = 4) reported a decrease in the number of new admissions from April-September 2020, with two programs stopping or pausing MOUD programs due to COVID-19. All carceral sites with pre-COVID telemedicine use (n = 5) increased or maintained telemedicine use, and all CTPs providing MOUD (n = 6) increased telemedicine use. While expansion of telemedicine services supported MOUD service delivery, the majority of sites experienced challenges providing community support post-release, including referrals to housing, employment, and transportation services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this small sample of carceral and CTP sites innovated to continue delivery of treatment for OUD. Expansion of telemedicine services was critical to support MOUD service delivery. Despite these innovations, sites experienced challenges providing reintegration supports for persons in the community. Pre-COVID strategies for identifying and engaging individuals while incarcerated may be less effective since the pandemic. In addition to expanding research on the most effective telemedicine practices for carceral settings, research exploring strategies to expand housing and employment support during reintegration are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Saunders
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
| | - Milan F Satcher
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Ryan D McDonald
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sandra A Springer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David Farabee
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Amesika Nyaku
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Donald Reeves
- Rutgers University Correctional Health Care, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | - Lynn E Kunkel
- Oregon Health and Science University -Portland State University School of Public Health and Addiction Medicine Section, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alysse M Schultheis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Lee
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa A Marsch
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA
| | - Elizabeth Needham Waddell
- Oregon Health and Science University -Portland State University School of Public Health and Addiction Medicine Section, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McIlveen JW, Hoffman KA, McCarty D. State policy uptake does not require formal action: A comment on Nesoff et al. Addiction 2022; 117:2359-2360. [PMID: 35352422 DOI: 10.1111/add.15886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John W McIlveen
- State Opioid Treatment Authority, Oregon Health Authority, Salem, OR, USA
| | - Kim A Hoffman
- Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Dennis McCarty
- Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shi L, Zhang D, Martin E, Chen Z, Li H, Han X, Wen M, Chen L, Li Y, Li J, Chen B, Ramos AK, King KM, Michaud T, Su D. Racial Discrimination, Mental Health and Behavioral Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a National Survey in the United States. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:2496-2504. [PMID: 35411530 PMCID: PMC8999987 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07540-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While hate crimes rose during the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies examined whether this pandemic-time racial discrimination has led to negative health consequences at the population level. OBJECTIVE We examined whether experienced and perceived racial discrimination were associated with mental or behavioral health outcomes during the pandemic. DESIGN In October 2020, we conducted a national survey with minorities oversampled that covered respondents' sociodemographic background and health-related information. PARTICIPANTS A total of 2709 participants responded to the survey (response rate: 4.2%). MAIN MEASURES The exposure variables included (1) experienced and encountered racial discrimination, (2) experienced racial and ethnic cyberbullying, and (3) perceived racial bias. Mental health outcomes were measured by psychological distress and self-rated happiness. Measures for behavioral health included sleep quality, change in cigarette smoking, and change in alcohol consumption. Weighted logistic regressions were performed to estimate the associations between the exposure variables and the outcomes, controlling for age, gender, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, household income, eligibility to vote, political party, COVID-19 infection, and geographic region. Separate regressions were performed in the six racial and ethnic subgroups: non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, East Asian, South Asian, and Southeast Asian respondents. KEY RESULTS Experienced racial discrimination was associated with higher likelihood of psychological distress (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.34-3.55). Experienced racial discrimination (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.34-3.99) and perceived racial bias (AOR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09) were both associated with increased cigarette smoking. The associations between racial discrimination and mental distress and substance use were most salient among Black, East Asian, South Asian, and Hispanic respondents. CONCLUSIONS Racial discrimination may be associated with higher likelihood of distress, and cigarette smoking among racial and ethnic minorities. Addressing racial discrimination is important for mitigating negative mental and behavioral health ramifications of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Shi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Donglan Zhang
- New York University Long Island School of Medicine, 101 Mineola Blvd, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
| | - Emily Martin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Zhuo Chen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
- School of Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China
| | - Hongmei Li
- Department of Media, Journalism and Film, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ming Wen
- Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Liwei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Baojiang Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health in Austin, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Athena K Ramos
- Center for Reducing Health Disparities, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Keyonna M King
- Center for Reducing Health Disparities, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Tzeyu Michaud
- Center for Reducing Health Disparities, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Dejun Su
- Center for Reducing Health Disparities, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nesoff ED, Marziali ME, Martins SS. Response to McIlveen et al.: Collaboration and transparency are necessary to effectively estimate substance use disorder treatment need. Addiction 2022; 117:2361-2362. [PMID: 35491735 PMCID: PMC9872911 DOI: 10.1111/add.15909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth D. Nesoff
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Megan E. Marziali
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Silvia S. Martins
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moran KM, Mullachery PH, Lankenau S, Bilal U. Changes in Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Opioid-Related Outcomes in Urban Areas during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Review of the Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159283. [PMID: 35954640 PMCID: PMC9368442 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Opioid use disorders (OUDs) are increasingly common among minoritized populations, who have historically experienced limited access to healthcare, a situation that may have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a structured keyword search in Pubmed, we reviewed the literature to synthesize the evidence on changes in racial/ethnic disparities in OUD-related outcomes in urban areas during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Nine articles were included in the final analysis. Six found increases in OUD-related outcomes during the pandemic, with four showing a widening of disparities. Results also point to the worsening of opioid outcomes among Black and Latinx individuals related to shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders. Studies examining the use of telehealth and access to OUD treatment showed that minoritized groups have benefited from telehealth programs. The limited number of studies in a small number of jurisdictions indicate a gap in research examining the intersection between COVID-19 and OUD-related outcomes with a focus on disparities. More research is needed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related policies on OUD outcomes among racial/ethnic minoritized groups, including examining the impact of service disruptions on vulnerable groups with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara M. Moran
- College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 1601 Cherry Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA;
| | - Pricila H. Mullachery
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3600 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Stephen Lankenau
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| | - Usama Bilal
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3600 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kang AW, DeBritz AA, Hoadley A, DelaCuesta C, Walton M, Hurley L, Martin R. Barriers and poor telephone counseling experiences among patients receiving medication for opioid use disorders. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2607-2610. [PMID: 35279358 PMCID: PMC9203915 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the relaxation of regulations surrounding Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUD) treatment, including a shift from in-person to telehealth counseling services adjunct to MOUD treatment. We examine how patient-level barriers impact their counseling experiences. METHODS We examine data from n = 264 participants who completed a cross-sectional survey regarding their experiences with telephone counseling adjunct to MOUD between July to November 2020. Variables examined include: convenience and satisfaction with telephone counseling, comfort and change in relationship with counselor, and how telephone counseling helped with anxiety, depression, anger, substance use, and recovery. Participants also listed the barriers they faced when using telephone counseling. RESULTS Thirty-one percent of the sample (n = 81) reported experiencing one or more barriers to telephone counseling. Satisfaction with counseling, perceived convenience, comfort, and beneficial effects of counseling on substance use were associated with increased odds of reporting no barriers (range of p.038 to <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Many participants reported barriers to telehealth counseling, and these barriers were in turn associated with poorer counseling experiences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Many treatment providers plan to integrate telehealth service provision in their healthcare delivery model, but more research on patient-level barriers and its impact on treatment is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augustine W Kang
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
| | - Audrey A DeBritz
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ariel Hoadley
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Courtney DelaCuesta
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Mary Walton
- CODAC Behavioral Healthcare, Inc., Cranston, RI, United States
| | - Linda Hurley
- CODAC Behavioral Healthcare, Inc., Cranston, RI, United States
| | - Rosemarie Martin
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yeager S, Abramovitz D, Harvey-Vera AY, Vera CF, Algarin AB, Smith LR, Rangel G, Artamonova I, Patterson TL, Bazzi AR, Brugman EL, Strathdee SA. A cross-sectional study of factors associated with COVID-19 testing among people who inject drugs: missed opportunities for reaching those most at risk. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:842. [PMID: 35473678 PMCID: PMC9042668 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13273-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) are vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We examined correlates of COVID-19 testing among PWID in the U.S.-Mexico border region and described encounters with services representing potential opportunities (i.e., 'touchpoints') where COVID-19 testing could have been offered. METHODS Between October, 2020 and September, 2021, participants aged ≥18 years from San Diego, California, USA and Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico who injected drugs within the last month completed surveys and SARS-CoV-2, HIV, and HCV serologic testing. Logistic regression identified factors associated with COVID-19 testing including potential touchpoints, comorbidities and COVID-19 related misinformation and disinformation. RESULTS Of 583 PWID, 30.5% previously had a COVID-19 test. Of 172 PWID who tested SARS-CoV-2 seropositive (30.1%), 50.3% encountered at least one touchpoint where COVID-19 testing could have been offered within the prior six months. Factors independently associated with at least two fold higher odds of COVID-19 testing were living in San Diego, recent incarceration, receiving substance use treatment, and experiencing ≥1 chronic health condition. Homelessness, having received ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine, and having a HIV or HCV test since the COVID-19 epidemic began were also independently associated with having had a prior COVID-19 test. CONCLUSION We identified several factors independently associated with COVID-19 testing and multiple touchpoints where COVID-19 testing could be scaled up for PWID, such as SUD treatment programs and syringe service programs. Integrated health services are needed to improve access to rapid, free COVID-19 testing in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Yeager
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Daniela Abramovitz
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Alicia Yolanda Harvey-Vera
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
- Universidad Xochicalco, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Tijuana, Rampa Yumalinda 4850, Chapultepec Alamar, 22110, Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
- United States-Mexico Border Health Commission, Centenario 10851, Obrera, 22320, Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
| | - Carlos F Vera
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Angel Blake Algarin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Laramie Rae Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Gudelia Rangel
- United States-Mexico Border Health Commission, Centenario 10851, Obrera, 22320, Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
- Departmento de Estudios de Población, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 22560, Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
| | - Irina Artamonova
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Thomas Leroy Patterson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0960, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0960, USA
| | - Angela Robertson Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive Mail Code 0725, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0725, USA
| | - Emma L Brugman
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA
| | - Steffanie Ann Strathdee
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yeager S, Abramovitz D, Harvey-Vera A, Vera CF, Algarin AB, Smith LR, Rangel G, Artamonova I, Patterson TL, Bazzi AR, Brugman EL, Strathdee SA. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Testing among People who Inject Drugs: Missed Opportunities for Reaching those Most at Risk. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.01.04.22268749. [PMID: 35018388 PMCID: PMC8750714 DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.04.22268749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
People who inject drugs (PWID) are vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We examined correlates of COVID-19 testing among PWID in the U.S.-Mexico border region and described encounters with services or venues representing potential opportunities (i.e., 'touchpoints') where COVID-19 testing could have been offered. Between October, 2020 and September, 2021, participants aged ≥18 years from San Diego, California, USA and Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico who injected drugs within the last month completed surveys and SARS-CoV-2, HIV, and HCV serologic testing. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with COVID-19 testing prior to enrollment. Of 583 PWID, 30.5% previously had a COVID-19 test. Of 172 PWID who tested SARS-CoV-2 seropositive in our study (30.1%), 50.3% encountered at least one touchpoint within the prior six months where COVID-19 testing could have been offered. Factors independently associated with at least two fold higher odds of COVID-19 testing were living in San Diego (versus Tijuana), having recently been incarcerated or attending substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and having at least one chronic health condition. In addition, recent homelessness, having had at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose and having been tested for HIV or HCV since the pandemic began were independently associated with COVID-19 testing. We identified several factors independently associated with COVID-19 testing and multiple touchpoints where COVID-19 testing could be scaled up for PWID, such as SUD treatment programs and syringe service programs. Integrated health services are needed to improve access to rapid, free COVID-19 testing in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Yeager
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| | - Daniela Abramovitz
- Universidad Xochicalco, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Tijuana, Rampa Yumalinda 4850, Chapultepec Alamar, 22110 Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
| | - Alicia Harvey-Vera
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
- Universidad Xochicalco, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Tijuana, Rampa Yumalinda 4850, Chapultepec Alamar, 22110 Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
- United States-Mexico Border Health Commission, Centenario 10851, Obrera, 22320 Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
| | - Carlos F Vera
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| | - Angel B Algarin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| | - Laramie R Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| | - Gudelia Rangel
- United States-Mexico Border Health Commission, Centenario 10851, Obrera, 22320 Tijuana, B.C., Mexico
- Departmento de Estudios de Población, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 22560 Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
| | - Irina Artamonova
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| | - Thomas L Patterson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0960, La Jolla, CA 92093-0960, US
| | - Angela R Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive Mail Code 0725, La Jolla, CA 92093-0725 US
| | - Emma L Brugman
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| | - Steffanie A Strathdee
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0507, La Jolla, CA 92093-0507, United States
| |
Collapse
|