Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: Predicting the time to replan

Predicting the need for a replan in oropharyngeal cancer: A radiomic, clinical, and dosimetric model

BACKGROUND

Patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) treated with chemoradiation can experience weight loss and tumor shrinkage, altering the prescribed treatment. Treatment replanning ensures patients do not receive excessive doses to normal tissue. However, it is a time- and resource-intensive process, as it takes 1 to 2 weeks to acquire a new treatment plan, and during this time, overtreatment of normal tissues could lead to increased toxicities. Currently, there are limited prognostic factors to determine which patients will require a replan. There remains an unmet need for predictive models to assist in identifying patients who could benefit from the knowledge of a replan prior to treatment.

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop and evaluate a CT-based radiomic model, integrating clinical and dosimetric information, to predict the need for a replan prior to treatment.

METHODS

A dataset of patients (n = 315) with OPC treated with chemoradiation was used for this study. The dataset was split into independent training (n = 220) and testing (n = 95) datasets. Tumor volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured on planning CT images. PyRadiomics was used to compute radiomic image features (n = 1218) on the original and filtered images from each of the primary tumor, nodal volumes, and ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands. Nine clinical features and nine dose features extracted from the OARs were collected and those significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the need for a replan in the training dataset were used in a baseline model. Random forest feature selection was applied to select the optimal radiomic features to predict replanning. Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and random forest classifiers were built using the non-correlated selected radiomic, clinical, and dose features on the training dataset and performance was assessed in the testing dataset. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the prognostic value.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients (25%) required a replan. Smoking status, nodal stage, base of tongue subsite, and larynx mean dose were found to be significantly associated with the need for a replan in the training dataset and incorporated into the baseline model, as well as into the combined models. Five predictive radiomic features were selected (one nodal volume, one primary tumor, two ipsilateral and one contralateral parotid gland). The baseline model comprised of clinical and dose features alone achieved an AUC of 0.66 [95% CI: 0.51-0.79] in the testing dataset. The random forest classifier was the top-performing radiomics model and achieved an AUC of 0.82 [0.75-0.89] in the training dataset and an AUC of 0.78 [0.68-0.87] in the testing dataset, which significantly outperformed the baseline model (p = 0.023, testing dataset).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to use radiomics from the primary tumor, nodal volumes, and parotid glands for the prediction of replanning for patients with OPC. Radiomic features augmented clinical and dose features for predicting the need for a replan in our testing dataset. Once validated, this model has the potential to assist physicians in identifying patients that may benefit from a replan, allowing for better resource allocation and reduced toxicities.

Optimal timing of re-planning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) relies on re-planning to correct treatment variations, but the optimal timing of re-planning to account for dose changes in head and neck organs at risk (OARs) is still under investigation. We aimed to find out the optimal timing of re-planning in head and neck ART.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 110 head and neck cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled. A semi auto-segmentation method was applied to obtain the weekly mean dose (Dmean) to OARs. The K-nearest-neighbour method was used for missing data imputation of weekly Dmean. A dose deviation map was built using the planning Dmean and weekly Dmean values and then used to simulate different ART scenarios consisting of 1 to 6 re-plannings. The difference between accumulated Dmean and planning Dmean before re-planning (ΔDmean_acc_noART) and after re-planning (ΔDmean_acc_ART) were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Among all the OARs, supraglottic showed the largest ΔDmean_acc_noART (1.23 ± 3.13 Gy) and most cases of ΔDmean_acc_noART > 3 Gy (26 patients). The 3rd week is suggested in the optimal timing of re-planning for 10 OARs. For all the organs except arytenoid, 2 re-plannings were able to guarantee the ΔDmean_acc_ART below 3 Gy while the average |ΔDmean_acc_ART| was below 1 Gy. ART scenarios of 2_4, 3_4, 3_5 (week of re-planning separated with "_") were able to guarantee ΔDmean_acc_ART of 99 % of patients below 3 Gy simultaneously for 19 OARs.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal timing of re-planning was suggested for different organs at risk in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy. Generic scenarios of timing and frequency for re-planning can be applied to guarantee the increase of accumulated mean dose within 3 Gy simultaneously for multiple organs.

Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Pitfalls and possibilities from the radiation oncologist's point of view

BACKGROUND

Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may experience substantial anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy treatment. The implementation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) proves effective in managing the consequent impact on the planned dose distribution.

METHODS

This narrative literature review comprehensively discusses the diverse strategies of ART in HNC and the documented dosimetric and clinical advantages associated with these approaches, while also addressing the current challenges for integration of ART into clinical practice.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Although based on mainly non-randomized and retrospective trials, there is accumulating evidence that ART has the potential to reduce toxicity and improve quality of life and tumor control in HNC patients treated with RT. However, several questions remain regarding accurate patient selection, the ideal frequency and timing of replanning, and the appropriate way for image registration and dose calculation. Well-designed randomized prospective trials, with a predetermined protocol for both image registration and dose summation, are urgently needed to further investigate the dosimetric and clinical benefits of ART.

Anatomical changes and dosimetric analysis of the neck region based on FBCT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients during radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate anatomical changes in the neck region and evaluate their impact on dose distribution in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Additionally, the study sought to determine the optimal time for replanning during the course of treatment.

METHODS

Twenty patients diagnosed with NPC underwent IMRT, with weekly pretreatment kV fan beam computed tomography (FBCT) scans in the treatment room. Metastasized lymph nodes in the neck region and organs at risk (OARs) were redelineation using the images from the FBCT scans. Subsequently, the original treatment plan (PLAN0) was replicated to each FBCT scan to generate new plans labeled as PLAN 1-6. The dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the new plans and the original plan were compared. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was utilized to establish threshold(s) at various time points. The presence of such threshold(s) would signify significant change(s), suggesting the need for replanning.

RESULTS

Progressive volume reductions were observed over time in the neck region, the gross target volume for metastatic lymph nodes (GTVnd), as well as the submandibular glands and parotids. Compared to PLAN0, the mean dose (Dmean) of GTVnd-L significantly increased in PLAN5, while the minimum dose covering 95% of the volume (D95%) of PGTVnd-L showed a significant decrease from PLAN3 to PLAN6. Similarly, the Dmean of GTVnd-R significantly increased from PLAN4 to PLAN6, whereas the D95% of PGTVnd-R exhibited a significant decrease during the same period. Furthermore, the dose of bilateral parotid glands, bilateral submandibular glands, brainstem and spinal cord was gradually increased in the middle and late period of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Significant anatomical and dosimetric changes were noted in both the target volumes and OARs. Considering the thresholds identified, it is imperative to undertake replanning at approximately 20 fractions. This measure ensures the delivery of adequate doses to target volumes while mitigating the risk of overdosing on OARs.

Analysis of dose distribution reproducibility based on a fluence map of in vivo transit dose using an electronic portal imaging device

Morphological changes can affect distribution of dose in patients. Determination of the dose distribution changes for each fraction radiotherapy can be done by relativein vivodosimetry (IVD). This study analysed the distribution of doses per fraction based on the fluence map recorded by the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) of the patient's transit dose. This research examined cases involving the cervix, breast, and nasopharynx. Transit dose analysis was performed by calculating the gamma index (GI) with composite and field-by-field methods. The gamma passing rate (GPR) value was assessed for its correlation with the subject's body weight. In the case of the nasopharynx, breast, and cervix, the GPR value decreased as the fraction increased. In the case of the nasopharynx, the correlation between the GPR and fraction radiotherapy showed no difference when using either composite or field-by-field methods. However, in cases involving the cervix and breast, there was a difference in the correlation values between the composite and field-by-field methods, where the subject had a significant correlation (p< 0.05) when it was done using a field-by-field method. In addition, the nasopharynx had the highest number of subjects with significant correlation (p< 0.05) between GPR and body weight, followed by the cervix and breast. In the nasopharynx, breast, and cervix, the reproducibility of the dose distribution decreased. This decreased reproducibility was associated with changes in body weight.

A multi-center survey on adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer in Malaysia

The survey is to assess the current state of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck (H&N) cases among radiotherapy centers in Malaysia and to identify any implementation limitations. An online questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centers in Malaysia. The 24-question questionnaire consists of general information about the center, ART practices, and limitations faced in implementing ART. 28 out of 36 radiotherapy centers responded, resulting in an overall response rate of 78%. About 52% of the responding centers rescanned and replanned less than 5% of their H&N patients. The majority (88.9%) of the respondents reported the use Cone Beam Computed Tomography alone or in combination with other modalities to trigger the ART process. The main reasons cited for adopting ART were weight loss, changes in the immobilization fitting, and anatomical variation. The adaptation process typically occurred during week 3 or week 4 of treatment. More than half of the respondents require three days or more from re-simulation to starting a new treatment plan. Both target and organ at risk delineation on new planning CT relied heavily on manual delineation by physicians and physicists, respectively. All centers perform patient-specific quality assurance for their new adaptive plans. Two main limitations in implementing ART are "limited financial resources or equipment" and "limitation on technical knowledge". There is a need for a common consensus to standardize the practice of ART and address these limitations to improve the implementation of ART in Malaysia.

Improving workflow for adaptive proton therapy with predictive anatomical modelling: A proof of concept

PURPOSE

To demonstrate predictive anatomical modelling for improving the clinical workflow of adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

10 radiotherapy patients with nasopharyngeal cancer were included in this retrospective study. Each patient had a planning CT, weekly verification CTs during radiotherapy and predicted weekly CTs from our anatomical model. Predicted CTs were used to create predicted adaptive plans in advance with the aim of maintaining clinically acceptable dosimetry. Adaption was triggered when the increase in mean dose (Dmean) to the parotid glands exceeded 3 Gy(RBE). We compared the accumulated dose of two adaptive IMPT strategies: 1) Predicted plan adaption: One adaptive plan per patient was optimised on a predicted CT triggered by replan criteria. 2) Standard replan: One adaptive plan was created reactively in response to the triggering weekly CT.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis demonstrates that the accumulated dose differences between two adaptive strategies are not significant (p > 0.05) for CTVs and OARs. We observed no meaningful differences in D95 between the accumulated dose and the planned dose for the CTVs, with mean differences to the high-risk CTV of -1.20 %, -1.23 % and -1.25 % for no adaption, standard and predicted plan adaption, respectively. The accumulated parotid Dmean using predicted plan adaption is within 3 Gy(RBE) of the planned dose and 0.31 Gy(RBE) lower than the standard replan approach on average.

CONCLUSION

Prediction-based replanning could potentially enable adaptive therapy to be delivered without treatment gaps or sub-optimal fractions, as can occur during a standard replanning strategy, though the benefit of using predicted plan adaption over the standard replan was not shown to be statistically significant with respect to accumulated dose in this study. Nonetheless, a predictive replan approach can offer advantages in improving clinical workflow efficiency.

FMISO-Based Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy represents one of the most used strategies in the curative treatment of patients with head and neck (HNC) cancer. Locoregional failure is the predominant recurrence pattern. Tumor hypoxia belongs to the main cause of treatment failure. Positron emission tomography (PET) using hypoxia radiotracers has been studied extensively and has proven its feasibility and reproducibility to detect tumor hypoxia. A number of studies confirmed that the uptake of FMISO in the recurrent region is significantly higher than that in the non-recurrent region. The escalation of dose to hypoxic tumors may improve outcomes. The technical feasibility of optimizing radiotherapeutic plans has been well documented. To define the hypoxic tumour volume, there are two main approaches: dose painting by contour (DPBC) or by number (DPBN) based on PET images. Despite amazing technological advances, precision in target coverage, and surrounding tissue sparring, radiation oncology is still not considered a targeted treatment if the “one dose fits all” approach is used. Using FMISO and other hypoxia tracers may be an important step for individualizing radiation treatment and together with future radiomic principles and a possible genome-based adjusting dose, will move radiation oncology into the precise and personalized era.

Evaluation and risk factors of volume and dose differences of selected structures in patients with head and neck cancer treated on Helical TomoTherapy by using Deformable Image Registration tool

Introduction: The aim of this study was the evaluation of volume and dose differences in selected structures in patients with head and neck cancer during treatment on Helical TomoTherapy (HT) using a commercially available deformable image registration (DIR) tool. We attempted to identify anatomical and clinical predictive factors for significant volume changes probability.

Material and methods: According to our institutional protocol, we retrospectively evaluated the group of 20 H&N cancer patients treated with HT who received Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) due to soft tissue alterations spotted on daily MVCT. We compared volumes on initial computed tomography (iCT) and replanning computed tomography (rCT) for clinical target volumes (CTV) – CTV1 (the primary tumor) and CTV2 (metastatic lymph nodes), parotid glands (PG) and body contour (B-body). To estimate the planned and delivered dose discrepancy, the dose from the original plan was registered and deformed to create a simulation of dose distribution on rCT (DIR-rCT).

Results: The decision to replan was made at the 4th week of RT (N = 6; 30%). The average volume reduction in parotid right PG[R] and left PG[L] was 4.37 cc (18.9%) (p < 0.001) and 3.77 cc (16.8%) (p = 0.004), respectively. In N = 13/20 cases, the delivered dose was greater than the planned dose for PG[R] of mean 3 Gy (p < 0.001), and in N = 6/20 patients for PG[L] the mean of 3.6 Gy (p = 0.031). Multivariate regression analysis showed a very strong predictor explaining 88% (R2 = 0.88) and 83% (R2 = 0.83) of the variance based on the mean dose of iPG[R] and iPG[L] (p < 0.001), respectively. No statistically significant correlation between volume changes and risk factors was found.

Conclusions: Dosimetric changes to the target demonstrated the validity of replanning. A DIR tool can be successfully used for dose deformation and ART qualification, significantly reducing the workload of radiotherapy centers. In addition, the mean dose for PG was a significant predictor that may indicate the need for a replan.

Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol "Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy" in Head and Neck Cancer

No clear criteria have yet been established to guide decision-making for patient selection and the optimal timing of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) based on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). We have developed a novel protocol—the Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy (B-ART) protocol—to guide patient selection for ART. The aim of the present study is to describe this protocol, to evaluate its validity in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, and to identify the anatomical and clinical predictors of the need for replanning. We retrospectively evaluated 82 patients with HN cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy (HT) and subsequently required replanning due to soft tissue changes upon daily MVCT. Under the proposed criteria, patients with anatomical changes >3 mm on three to four consecutive scans are candidates for ART. We compared the volumes on the initial CT scan (iCT) and the replanning CT (rCT) scan for the clinical target volumes (CTV1, referring to primary tumor or tumor bed and CTV2, metastatic lymph nodes) and for the parotid glands (PG) and body contour (B-body). The patients were stratified by primary tumor localization, clinical stage, and treatment scheme. The main reasons for replanning were: (1) a planning target volume (PTV) outside the body contour (n = 70; 85.4%), (2) PG shrinkage (n = 69; 84.1%), (3) B-body deviations (n = 69; 84.1%), and (4) setup deviations (n = 40; 48.8%). The replanning decision was made, on average, during the fourth week of treatment (n = 47; 57.3%). The mean reductions in the size of the right and left PG volumes were 6.31 cc (20.9%) and 5.98 cc (20.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). The reduction in PG volume was ≥30% in 30 patients (36.6%). The volume reduction in all of the anatomical structures was statistically significant. Four variables—advanced stage disease (T3−T4), chemoradiation, increased weight loss, and oropharyngeal localization—were significantly associated with the need for ART. The B-ART protocol provides clear criteria to eliminate random errors, and to allow for an early response to relevant changes in target volumes.

Multi-Organ Omics-Based Prediction for Adaptive Radiation Therapy Eligibility in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

To investigate the role of different multi-organ omics-based prediction models for pre-treatment prediction of Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) eligibility in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods and Materials

Pre-treatment contrast-enhanced computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images, radiotherapy dose and contour data of 135 NPC patients treated at Hong Kong Queen Elizabeth Hospital were retrospectively analyzed for extraction of multi-omics features, namely Radiomics (R), Morphology (M), Dosiomics (D), and Contouromics (C), from a total of eight organ structures. During model development, patient cohort was divided into a training set and a hold-out test set in a ratio of 7 to 3 via 20 iterations. Four single-omics models (R, M, D, C) and four multi-omics models (RD, RC, RM, RMDC) were developed on the training data using Ridge and Multi-Kernel Learning (MKL) algorithm, respectively, under 10-fold cross validation, and evaluated on hold-out test data using average area under the receiver-operator-characteristics curve (AUC). The best-performing single-omics model was first determined by comparing the AUC distribution across the 20 iterations among the four single-omics models using two-sided student t-test, which was then retrained using MKL algorithm for a fair comparison with the four multi-omics models.

Results

The R model significantly outperformed all other three single-omics models (all p-value<0.0001), achieving an average AUC of 0.942 (95%CI: 0.938-0.946) and 0.918 (95%CI: 0.903-0.933) in training and hold-out test set, respectively. When trained with MKL, the R model (R_MKL) yielded an increased AUC of 0.984 (95%CI: 0.981-0.988) and 0.927 (95%CI: 0.905-0.948) in training and hold-out test set respectively, while demonstrating no significant difference as compared to all studied multi-omics models in the hold-out test sets. Intriguingly, Radiomic features accounted for the majority of the final selected features, ranging from 64% to 94%, in all the studied multi-omics models.

Conclusions

Among all the studied models, the Radiomic model was found to play a dominant role for ART eligibility in NPC patients, and Radiomic features accounted for the largest proportion of features in all the multi-omics models.

What information can we gain from performing adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients from the past 10 years?

The aim of the review was to present the current literature status about replanning regarding anatomical and dosimetric changes in the target and OARs in the head and neck region during radiotherapy, to discuss and to analyze factors influencing the decision for adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients. Significant progress has been made in head and neck patients' evaluation and qualification for adapted radiotherapy over the past ten years. Many factors leading to anatomical and dosimetric changes during treatment have been identified. Based on the literature, the most common factors triggering re-plan are weight loss, tumor and nodal changes, and parotid glands shrinkage. The fluctuations in dose distribution in the clinical area are significant predictive factors for patients' quality of life and the possibility of recovery. It has been shown that re-planning influence clinical outcomes: local control, disease free survival and overall survival. Regarding literature studies, it seems that adaptive radiotherapy would be the most beneficial for tumors of immense volume or those in the nearest proximity of the OARs. All researchers agree that the timing of re-planning is a crucial challenge, and there are still no clear consensus guidelines for time or criteria of re-planning. Nowadays, thanks to significant technological progress, the decision is mostly made based on observation and supported with IGRT verification. Although further research is still needed, adaptive strategies are evolving and now became the state of the art of modern radiotherapy.

Adaptive radiation therapy: When, how and what are the benefits that literature provides?

PURPOSE

To identify from the current literature when is the right time to replan and to assign thresholds for the optimum process of replanning. Nowadays, adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for head and neck cancer plays an exceptional role consisting of an evaluation procedure of the prominent anatomical and dosimetric variations. By performing complex radiotherapy methods, the credibility of the therapeutic result is crucial. Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) was developed to ensure locoregional control and thus changes that might occur during radiotherapy be dealt with.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic research of articles published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Science Direct databases from January 2004 to October 2020 was performed. Among a total of 127 studies assessed for eligibility, 85 articles were ultimately retained for the review.

RESULTS

The most noticeable changes have been reported in the middle fraction of the treatment. Therefore, the suggested optimal time to replan is between the third and the fourth week. Anatomical deviations>1cm in the external contour, average weight loss>10%, violation in the dose coverage of the targets>5%, and violation in the dose of the peripherals were some of the thresholds that are currently used, and which lead to replanning.

CONCLUSION

ART may decrease toxicity and improve local-control. Whether it is beneficial or not, depends ultimately on each patient. However, more investigation of the changes should be performed in future prospective studies to obtain more accurate results.

Early Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Combination in Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone in Oropharynx Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is expected to reduce toxicity more effectively than intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Because of long waiting before starting IMPT, authors began IMRT first and then determined whether to continue IMRT or to switch into IMPT at time of adaptive re-plan, based on the rival plan comparison in 148 OPC patients. Early clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between IMRT alone and IMRT/IMPT combination groups through propensity score matching method. We found that, with comparable oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles (mucositis and need for analgesic use) were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.

Abstract

Purpose: To report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 148 OPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center, were retrospectively reviewed. During the 5.5 weeks’ RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses. Results: With the median follow-up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, the IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (p < 0.001); and analgesic quantification algorithm (AQA) in 37.0% and 19.4% (p = 0.019), respectively. The same trends were observed after PSM: mucositis in 39.5% and 15.8% (p = 0.021); and AQA in 47.4% and 21.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, grade ≥ 3 mucositis was significantly less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.027 and 0.024, respectively). AQA score ≥ 3 was also less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.085 and 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: In treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.

Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Evaluation of Triggered Adaptive Replanning in Routine Practice

Purpose and Objective

A proportion of patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) require ad hoc treatment re-planning. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the patients who required ad hoc re-planning and to identify factors, which may predict need for re-planning.

Materials and Methods

A single center evaluation of all patients receiving radical or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (CRT) for HNSCC between January and December 2016 was undertaken. Patients who underwent ad hoc re-planning during the treatment were identified in electronic records. Reasons for re-planning were categorized as: weight loss, tumor shrinkage, changes in patient position and immobilization-related factors. Potential trigger factors for adaptive radiotherapy such as patient characteristics, primary tumor site, stage, concomitant chemotherapy, weight loss ratios, radical/adjuvant treatment, and nutritional interventions were investigated.

Results

31/290 (10.6%) HNSCC patients who underwent radical/adjuvant radiotherapy required re-planning. The adaptive radiotherapy (ART) was performed at a mean fraction of 15. The most common documented reasons for re-planning were tumor shrinkage (35.5%) and weight loss (35.5%). Among the patient/tumor/treatment factors, nasopharyngeal primary site (p = 0.013) and use of concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (p = 0.034) were found to be significantly correlated with the need for re-planning.

Conclusion

Effective on-treatment verification schedules and close follow up of patients especially with NPC primary and/or treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy are crucial to identify patients requiring ART. We suggest an individualized triggered approach to ART rather than scheduled strategies as it is likely to be more feasible in terms of utilization of workload and resources.

Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer reduces the requirement for rescans during treatment due to spinal cord dose

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck (H&N) cancer often experience anatomical changes. The potential compromises to Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage or Organ at Risk (OAR) sparing has prompted the use of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for these patients. However, implementation of ART is time and resource intensive. This study seeks to define a clinical trigger for H&N re-plans based on spinal cord safety using kV Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) verification imaging, in order to best balance clinical benefit with additional workload.

METHODS

Thirty-one H&N patients treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) who had a rescan CT (rCT) during treatment were included in this study. Contour volume changes between the planning CT (pCT) and rCT were determined. The original treatment plan was calculated on the pCT, CBCT prior to the rCT, pCT deformed to the anatomy of the CBCT (dCT), and rCT (considered the gold standard). The dose to 0.1 cc (D0.1cc) spinal cord was evaluated from the Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs).

RESULTS

The median dose increase to D0.1cc between the pCT and rCT was 0.7 Gy (inter-quartile range 0.2-1.9 Gy, p < 0.05). No correlation was found between contour volume changes and the spinal cord dose increase. Three patients exhibited an increase of 7.0-7.2 Gy to D0.1cc, resulting in a re-plan; these patients were correctly identified using calculations on the CBCT/dCT.

CONCLUSIONS

An adaptive re-plan can be triggered using spinal cord doses calculated on the CBCT/dCT. Implementing this trigger can reduce patient appointments and radiation dose by eliminating up to 90% of additional un-necessary CT scans, reducing the workload for radiographers, physicists, dosimetrists, and clinicians.

Future of Radiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignancy with unique clinical biological profiles such as associated Epstein-Barr virus infection and high radiosensitivity. Radiotherapy has long been recognized as the mainstay for the treatment of NPC. However, the further efficacy brought by radical radiotherapy has reached the bottleneck in advanced patients, who are prone to develop recurrence and distant metastasis after treatment. The application of photon therapy makes it possible for radiation dose escalation in refractory cases and may provide second chance for recurrent patients with less unrecoverable tissue damage. The concept of adaptive radiotherapy is put forward in consideration of target volume shrinkage during treatment. The replanning procedure offers better protection for the organ at risk. However, the best timing and candidates for adaptive radiotherapy is still under debate. The current tendency of artificial intelligence in NPC mainly focuses on image recognition, auto-segmentation and dose prediction. Although artificial intelligence is still in developmental stage, the future of it is promising.To further improve the efficacy of NPC, multimodality treatment is encouraged. In-depth studies on genetic and epigenetic variations help to explain the great heterogeneity among patients, and could further be applied to precise screening and prediction, personalized radiotherapy and the evolution of targeted drugs. Given the clinical benefit of immunotherapy in other cancers, the application of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitor, in NPC is also of great potential. Results from ongoing clinical trials combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy in NPC are expected.

Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician

For nearly 2 decades, adaptive radiation therapy (ART) has been proposed as a method to account for changes in head and neck tumor and normal tissue to enhance therapeutic ratios. While technical advances in imaging, planning and delivery have allowed greater capacity for ART delivery, and a series of dosimetric explorations have consistently shown capacity for improvement, there remains a paucity of clinical trials demonstrating the utility of ART. Furthermore, while ad hoc implementation of head and neck ART is reported, systematic full-scale head and neck ART remains an as yet unreached reality. To some degree, this lack of scalability may be related to not only the complexity of ART, but also variability in the nomenclature and descriptions of what is encompassed by ART. Consequently, we present an overview of the history, current status, and recommendations for the future of ART, with an eye toward improving the clarity and description of head and neck ART for interested clinicians, noting practical considerations for implementation of an ART program or clinical trial. Process level considerations for ART are noted, reminding the reader that, paraphrasing the writer Elbert Hubbard, "Art is not a thing, it is a way."

Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography scans

Background and Purpose

Head-Neck (HN) patients may experience severe acute skin complications that can cause treatment interruption and increase the risk of late fibrosis. This study assessed a method for accurately monitoring skin dose changes during helical tomotherapy for HN cancer based on deformable image registration of planning computed tomography (CT) and mega-voltage CT (MVCT).

Materials and Methods

Planning CTs of nine patients were deformably registered to mid-treatment MVCT (MV15) images resulting in CTdef images. The original plans were recalculated on both CTdef and mid-treatment kilo-voltage CT (CT15) taken as ground truth. Superficial layers (SL) of the body with thicknesses of 2, 3 and 5 mm (SL2, SL3, SL5) were considered as derma surrogates. SL V95%, V97%, V98%, V100%, V102%, V105% and V107% of the prescribed PTV dose were extracted for CT15/CTdef and compared (considering patients with skin dose > 95%). For comparison, doses were calculated directly on the calibrated MVCT and analyzed in the same way.

Results

Differences between SL2/SL3/SL5 V95%-V107% in CT15/CTdef were very small: for eight of nine patients the difference between the considered SL2 Vd% computed on CTdef and CT15 was less than 1.4 cm³ for all d%. A larger value was found when using MVCT for skin dose calculation (4.8 cm³ for SL2), although CTdef body contour matched CT15 body with accuracy similar to that of MV15.

Conclusions

Deforming the planning CT-to-MVCT was shown to be accurate considering external body contours and skin DVHs. The method was able to accurately identify superficial overdosing.

Online daily assessment of dose change in head and neck radiotherapy without dose-recalculation

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancers are commonly treated with radiation therapy, but due to possible volume changes, plan adaptation may be required during the course of treatment. Currently, plan adaptations consume significant clinical resources. Existing methods to evaluate the need for plan adaptation requires deformable image registration (DIR) to a new CT simulation or daily cone beam CT (CBCT) images and the recalculation of the dose distribution. In this study, we explore a tool to assist the decision for plan adaptation using a CBCT without re-computation of dose, allowing for rapid online assessment.

METHODS

This study involved 18 head and neck cancer patients treated with CBCT image guidance who had their treatment plan modified based on a new CT simulation (ReCT). Dose changes were estimated using different methods and compared to the current gold standard of using DIR between the planning CT scan (PCT) and ReCT with recomputed dose. The first and second methods used DIR between the PCT and daily CBCT with the planned dose or recalculated dose from the ReCT respectively, with the dose transferred to the CBCT using rigid registration. The necessity of plan adaptation was assessed by the change in dose to 95% of the planning target volume (D95) and mean dose to the parotids.

RESULTS

The treatment plans were adapted clinically for all 18 patients but only 7 actually needed an adaptation yielding 11 unnecessary adaptations. Applying a method using the daily CBCT with the planned dose distribution would have yielded only four unnecessary adaptations and no missed adaptations: a significant improvement from that done clinically.

CONCLUSION

Using the DIR between the planning CT and daily CBCT can flag cases for plan adaptation before every fraction while not requiring a new re-planning CT scan and dose recalculation.

Establishing action threshold for change in patient anatomy using EPID gamma analysis and PTV coverage for head and neck radiotherapy treatment

PURPOSE

To present a new adaptive radiotherapy (ART) method based on relative gamma analysis and patient classification for the identification of anatomical changes that induce a sufficient dosimetric impact to affect the treatment delivery and require complete replanning.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes 55 patients treated for a head and neck cancer with IMRT, VMAT, or 3D conformal RT. Electronic Portal Imaging Device images for all treatment fields were acquired daily at every fraction. CBCTs were collected at least once a week. Gamma analysis was performed using the first fraction of the treatment as a reference once validated that it was delivered without error. Gamma analysis parameters (<γ>, standard deviation and the Top 1% γ) were used to define categories using statistic from a k-means clustering analysis. From these categories an action threshold was defined and correlated with dosimetric changes. For 23 of 55 patients, the V100% for PTV was computed for both, the planning CT and original contours deformed onto CBCT acquired at the last fraction. These values were then compared with 2D image relative γ-analysis of EPID images. Sensitivity and specificity of the method for the detection of dosimetric changes were computed.

RESULTS

Three categories indicating an increasing level of change with the planned treatment were identified. A threshold was established for which patients were at risk of deviation at <γ> = 0.42. From 23 recomputing plans, it has been confirmed that patients with a strong dosimetric impact were above this threshold, with a specificity of 0.80 and a sensitivity of 0.84.

CONCLUSIONS

The specificity and the sensitivity value confirmed the performance of the method to detect anatomical changes. The γ-analysis threshold correlated well with morphological changes that have a relevant dosimetric impact. Analysis of daily EPID images provides a method to identify patients at risk of deviation from their planned treatment and can support an early replanning decision.

Dosimetric comparison and observation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and the incidence of complications. Between May 2010 and June 2012, 141 patients diagnosed with local recurrence of NPC due to cranial base lesions or cranial nerve symptoms, confirmed by pathology biopsy and/or by CT/MRI, were included in the present study. In accordance with the principle of randomized control, the patients were divided into three groups and treated with three different doses of 3D-CRT. The planned radiotherapy doses of 3D-CRT were 58/1.8–2 Gy, 62/1.8–2 Gy and 68/1.8–2 Gy, respectively. The survival rate, disease-free survival (DFS) rate and local control rate of the three groups of patients were compared as well as the adverse reactions observed after radiotherapy. The prognoses of NPC patients were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. The follow-up rate of the study was 100%. The 5-year overall survival, DFS, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were: 43.2 vs. 64.53 vs. 75%, 29.13 vs. 42.82 vs. 39.7% and 30.76 vs. 44.19 vs. 45.4%, respectively. In addition, 62/1.8–2 Gy was similar in treatment effects to 68/1.8–2 Gy, but 68/1.8–2 Gy showed more adverse reactions than 62/1.8–2 Gy. Thus, 62/1.8–2 Gy can be used as a safe and effective dose for 3D-CRT treatment of NPC. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age may be the main prognostic factor of patients with NPC. In conclusion, 3D-CRT with a dose of 62/1.8–2 Gy is a safe, effective and tolerable treatment for NPC patients with good clinical value.