1
|
Totten AM, Womack DM, Griffin JC, McDonagh MS, Davis-O'Reilly C, Blazina I, Grusing S, Elder N. Telehealth-guided provider-to-provider communication to improve rural health: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2024; 30:1209-1229. [PMID: 36567431 PMCID: PMC11389081 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x221139892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Telehealth may address healthcare disparities for rural populations. This systematic review assesses the use, effectiveness, and implementation of telehealth-supported provider-to-provider collaboration to improve rural healthcare. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 1 January 2010 to 12 October 2021 for trials and observational studies of rural provider-to-provider telehealth. Abstracts and full text were dual-reviewed. We assessed the risk of bias for individual studies and strength of evidence for studies with similar outcomes. RESULTS Seven studies of rural uptake of provider-to-provider telehealth documented increases over time but variability across geographic regions. In 97 effectiveness studies, outcomes were similar with rural provider-to-provider telehealth versus without for inpatient consultations, neonatal care, outpatient depression and diabetes, and emergency care. Better or similar results were reported for changes in rural clinician behavior, knowledge, confidence, and self-efficacy. Evidence was insufficient for other clinical uses and outcomes. Sixty-seven (67) evaluation and qualitative studies identified barriers and facilitators to implementing rural provider-to-provider telehealth. Success was linked to well-functioning technology, sufficient resources, and adequate payment. Barriers included lack of understanding of rural context and resources. Methodologic weaknesses of studies included less rigorous study designs and small samples. DISCUSSION Rural provider-to-provider telehealth produces similar or better results versus care without telehealth. Barriers to rural provider-to-provider telehealth implementation are common to practice change but include some specific to rural adaptation and adoption. Evidence gaps are partially due to studies that do not address differences in the groups compared or do not include sufficient sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dana M Womack
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ian Blazina
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sara Grusing
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nancy Elder
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dean K, Chang C, McKenna E, Nott S, Hunter A, Tall JA, Setterfield M, Addis B, Webster E. A retrospective observational study of vCare: a virtual emergency clinical advisory and transfer service in rural and remote Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:100. [PMID: 38238698 PMCID: PMC10797963 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10425-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Provision of critical care in rural areas is challenging due to geographic distance, smaller facilities, generalist skill mix and population characteristics. Internationally, the amalgamation telemedicine and retrieval medicine services are developing to overcome these challenges. Virtual emergency clinical advisory and transfer service (vCare) is one of these novel services based in New South Wales, Australia. We aim to describe patient encounters with vCare from call initiation at the referring site to definitive care at the accepting site. METHODS This retrospective observational study reviewed all patients using vCare in rural and remote Australia for clinical advice and/or inter-hospital transfer for higher level of care between February and March 2021. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and included remoteness of sites, presenting complaint, triage category, camera use, patient characteristics, transfer information, escalation of therapeutic intervention and outcomes. Data were summarised using cross tabulation. RESULTS 1,678 critical care patients were supported by vCare, with children (12.5%), adults (50.6%) and older people (36.9%) evenly split between sexes. Clinicians mainly referred to vCare for trauma (15.1%), cardiac (16.1%) and gastroenterological (14.8%) presentations. A referral to vCare led to an escalation of invasive intervention, skill, and resources for patient care. vCare cameras were used in 19.8% of cases. Overall, 70.5% (n = 1,139) of patients required transfer. Of those, 95.1% were transferred to major regional hospitals and 11.7% required secondary transfer to higher acuity hospitals. Of high-urgency referrals, 42.6% did not receive high priority transport. Imaging most requested included CT and MRI scans (37.2%). Admissions were for physician (33.1%) and surgical care (23.3%). The survival rate was 98.6%. CONCLUSION vCare was used by staff in rural and remote facilities to support decision making and care of patients in a critical condition. Issues were identified including low utilisation of equipment, heavy reliance on regional sites and high rates of secondary transfer. However, these models are addressing a key gap in the health workforce and supporting rural and remote communities to receive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley Dean
- Orange Health Service, Western NSW Local Health District, 1530 Forest Road, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia
| | - Cynthia Chang
- Maitland Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, 51 Metford Rd, Metford, NSW, 2323, Australia
| | - Erin McKenna
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 4 Moran Drive, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia
| | - Shannon Nott
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 4 Moran Drive, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia
- Western NSW Local Health District, 7 Commercial Ave, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia
| | - Amanda Hunter
- vCare Western NSW Local Health District, PO Box 739, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia
| | - Julie A Tall
- Health Intelligence Unit, Western NSW Local Health District, Ward 22, Bloomfield Campus, Locked Bag 6008, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia
| | - Madeline Setterfield
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 4 Moran Drive, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia
| | - Bridget Addis
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 4 Moran Drive, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia
| | - Emma Webster
- School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, 4 Moran Drive, Dubbo, NSW, 2830, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|