1
|
Ziemann M, Lindemann M, Hallensleben M, Altermann W, Althaus K, Budde K, Einecke G, Eisenberger U, Ender A, Feldkamp T, Grahammer F, Guthoff M, Holzmann-Littig C, Hugo C, Kauke T, Kemmner S, Koch M, Lachmann N, Marget M, Morath C, Nitschke M, Renders L, Scherer S, Stumpf J, Schwenger V, Sommer F, Spriewald B, Süsal C, Zecher D, Heinemann FM, Verboom M. Risk Stratification Before Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Preformed Donor-specific Antibodies by Different Crossmatch Methods. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1680. [PMID: 39131238 PMCID: PMC11315586 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are a well-known risk factor in kidney transplantation. There is still considerable debate, however, about the optimal risk stratification among patients with preformed DSA. Additionally, data on the prognostic value of different crossmatch assays in DSA-positive patients are scarce. Methods DSA-positive living kidney transplant recipients were selected from a multicenter study examining 4233 consecutive renal transplants. An additional 7 patients from 2 further centers were included. Flow cytometric crossmatches (FXM), Luminex-based crossmatches, and virtual crossmatches based on C1q- and C3d-binding antibodies (C1qXM and C3dXM) were performed retrospectively using pretransplant sera and lymphocytes isolated from fresh samples. These samples were obtained from 44 donor and recipient pairs from 12 centers. Clinical outcome data and the control group without DSA were compiled from the previous study and were supplemented by data on 10-y death-censored graft survival (10yGS). Results Between 19% (C3dXM) and 46% (FXM) of crossmatches were positive. Crossmatch-positive patients showed high incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) within 6 mo (up to 60% in B-cell FXM+ patients). The incidence of AMR in crossmatch-negative patients ranged between 5% (FXM-) and 13% (C1qXM-). 10yGS was significantly impaired in patients with positive T-cell FXM and total FXM compared with both patients without DSA and those with DSA with negative FXM. Conclusions Especially FXM are useful for risk stratification, as the outcome of DSA-positive, FXM-negative patients is similar to that of DSA-negative patients, whereas FXM-positive patients have both more AMR and decreased 10yGS. Because of their lower sensitivity, the significance of Luminex-based crossmatches, C1qXM, and C3dXM would have to be examined in patients with stronger DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Ziemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Monika Lindemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Hallensleben
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Altermann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Karina Althaus
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Clinical Transfusion Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Medizinische Klinik m. S. Nephrologie, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gunilla Einecke
- Klinik für Nieren- und Hochdruckerkrankungen, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ute Eisenberger
- Klinik für Nephrologie, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrea Ender
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Thorsten Feldkamp
- Transplant Center, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florian Grahammer
- III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik für Nephrologie, Rheumatologie und Endokrinologie, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Hamburg Center for Kidney Health, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Guthoff
- Medizinische Klinik IV, Sektion Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Hugo
- Medizinische Klinik III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Teresa Kauke
- Abteilung für Transfusionsmedizin, Zelltherapeutika und Hämostaseologie, Labor für Immungenetik, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
- Abteilung Thoraxchirurgie, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
- Transplant Center, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Stephan Kemmner
- Transplant Center, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Martina Koch
- Hepatobiliäre Chirurgie und Transplantationschirurgie, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- HLA-Labor, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Marget
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Nephrologie, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Nitschke
- Transplant Center, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- Nephrologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Sabine Scherer
- Institut für Immunologie, Transplantationsimmunologie, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian Stumpf
- Medizinische Klinik III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Klinik für Nieren-, Hochdruck- und Autoimmunerkrankungen, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Florian Sommer
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Spriewald
- Medizinische Klinik 5–Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Institut für Immunologie, Transplantationsimmunologie, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zecher
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Falko M. Heinemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Murielle Verboom
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wellekens K, Coemans M, Callemeyn J, Cleenders E, Debyser T, De Pelsmaeker S, Emonds MP, Koshy P, Kuypers D, Pagliazzi A, Roufosse C, Senev A, Van Loon E, Vaulet T, Naesens M. Probable antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation is a rare and challenging phenotype to define: Findings from a single-center study. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00437-4. [PMID: 39029874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
The Banff 2022 consensus introduced probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), characterized by mild AMR histologic features and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibody (DSA) positivity. In a single-center observational cohort study of 1891 kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2004 and 2021, 566 kidney biopsies were performed in 178 individual HLA-DSA-positive transplants. Evaluated at time of the first HLA-DSA-positive biopsy of each transplant (N = 178), 84 of the 178 (47.2%) of first biopsies were scored as no AMR, 22 of the 178 (12.4%) as probable AMR, and 72 of the 178 (40.4%) as AMR. The majority (77.3%) of probable AMR cases were first diagnosed in indication biopsies. Probable AMR was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2) than no AMR (20.2 [8.3-32.3] vs 40.1 [25.4-53.3]; P = .001). The one-year risk of (repeat) AMR was similar for probable AMR and AMR (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR), 0.99; 0.42-2.31; P = .97) and higher than after no AMR (sHR, 3.05; 1.07-8.73; P = .04). Probable AMR had a higher five-year risk of transplant glomerulopathy vs no AMR (sHR, 4.29; 0.92-19.98; P = 06), similar to AMR (sHR, 1.74; 0.43-7.04; P = .44). No significant differences in five-year risk of graft failure emerged between probable AMR and AMR (sHR, 1.14; 0.36-3.58; P = .82) or no AMR (sHR, 2.46; 0.78-7.74; P = .12). Probable AMR is a rare phenotype, however, sharing significant similarities with AMR in this single-center study. Future studies are needed to validate reproducible diagnostic criteria and associated clinical outcomes to allow for defining best management of this potentially relevant phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolien Wellekens
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evert Cleenders
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tim Debyser
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steffi De Pelsmaeker
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Priyanka Koshy
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Angelica Pagliazzi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Elisabet Van Loon
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thibaut Vaulet
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hidalgo LG. Novel Tools for the Study of HLA Class II Cross-isotype Pairings. Transplantation 2024; 108:1058-1059. [PMID: 38659116 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
|
4
|
Chauhan R, Tiwari AK, Aggarwal G, Gowri Suresh L, Kumar M, Bansal SB. Low-MFI (median fluorescence intensity) pre-transplant DSA (donor specific antibodies) leading to anamnestic antibody mediated rejection in live-related donor kidney transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2023; 81:101931. [PMID: 37730185 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
"In solid organ transplantation, the compatibility between recipient and donor relies on testing prior to transplantation as a major determinant for the successful transplant outcomes. This compatibility testing depends on the detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) present in the recipient. Indeed, sensitized transplant candidates are at higher risk of allograft rejection and graft loss compared to non-sensitized individuals. Most of the laboratories in India have adopted test algorithms for the appropriate risk stratification of transplants, namely: 1) donor cell-based flow-cytometric cross-match (FCXM) assay with patient's serum to detect DSAs; 2) HLA-coated beads to detect anti-HLA antibodies; and 3) complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) with donor cells to detect cytotoxic antibodies. In the risk stratification strategy, laboratories generally accept a DSA median fluorescence index (MFI) of 1000 MFI or lower MFI (low-MFI) as a negative value and clear the patient for the transplant. We present two cases of live-related donor kidney transplants (LDKTs) with low-MFI pre-transplant DSA values who experienced an early acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) as a result of an anamnestic antibody response by DSA against HLA class II antibodies. These results were confirmed by retesting of both pre-transplant and post-transplant archived sera from patients and freshly obtained donor cells. Our examples indicate a possible ABMR in patients with low MFI pre-transplant DSA. Reclassification of low vs. high-risk may be appropriate for sensitized patients with low-MFI DSA."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajni Chauhan
- Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-Gurugram, India
| | - Aseem Kumar Tiwari
- Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-Gurugram, India.
| | - Geet Aggarwal
- Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-Gurugram, India
| | - L Gowri Suresh
- Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-Gurugram, India
| | - Mohit Kumar
- Molecular and Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta-Gurugram, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liwski RS, Tafulo S, Carroll R, Lan JH, Greenshields AL. Cutting through the weeds: Evaluation of a novel adsorption with crossmatch cells and elution protocol to sharpen HLA antibody identification by the single antigen bead assay. Front Genet 2022; 13:1059650. [PMID: 36531234 PMCID: PMC9748275 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1059650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The single antigen bead (SAB) assay is the most used test for the identification of HLA specific antibodies pre- and post-transplant. Nevertheless, detection of spurious reactivities remains a recognized assay limitation. In addition, the presence of weak reactivity patterns can complicate unacceptable antigen assignment. This work presents the evaluation of the adsorption with crossmatch cells and elution (AXE) technique, which was designed to help differentiate weak HLA specific antibodies targeting native antigens from spurious and background SAB assay reactivity. The AXE protocol uses selected donor cells to adsorb HLA specific antibodies from sera of interest. Bound antibodies are then eluted off washed cells and identified using the SAB assay. Only antibodies targeting native HLA are adsorbed. Assay evaluation was performed using five cell donors and pooled positive control serum. AXE efficiency was determined by comparing SAB reactivity of adsorbed/eluted antibody to that of the antibodies in unadsorbed sera. A robust efficiency was seen across a wide range of original MFI for donor specific antibodies (DSA). A higher absorption/elution recovery was observed for HLA class I antigens vs. class II. Locus-specific variation was also observed, with high-expression HLA loci (HLA-A/B/DR) providing the best recovery. Importantly, negligible reactivity was detected in the last wash control, confirming that AXE eluates were not contaminated with HLA antibody carry-over. Donor cells incubated with autologous and DSA-containing allogeneic sera showed that AXE selectively adsorbed HLA antibodies in a donor antigen-specific manner. Importantly, antibodies targeting denatured epitopes or other non-HLA antigens were not detected by AXE. AXE was particularly effective at distinguishing weak HLA antibodies from background reactivity. When combined with epitope analysis, AXE enhanced precise identification of antibody-targeted eplets and even facilitated the characterization of a potential novel eplet. Comparison of AXE to flow cytometric crossmatching further revealed that AXE was a more sensitive technique in the detection of weak DSA. Spurious reactivities on the current SAB assay have a deleterious impact on the assignment of clinically relevant HLA specificities. The AXE protocol is a novel test that enables users to interrogate reactive patterns of interest and discriminate HLA specific antibodies from spurious reactivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S. Liwski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Sandra Tafulo
- Blood and Transplantation Center of Porto, Portuguese Institute for Blood and Transplantation, Porto, Portugal
| | - Robert Carroll
- Health and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Transplantation and Immunogenetics Service, Australian Red Cross Blood Services, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - James H. Lan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna L. Greenshields
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leal R, Pardinhas C, Martinho A, Sá HO, Figueiredo A, Alves R. Strategies to Overcome HLA Sensitization and Improve Access to Retransplantation after Kidney Graft Loss. J Clin Med 2022; 11:5753. [PMID: 36233621 PMCID: PMC9572793 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation have a previously failed graft. Retransplantation provides a significant improvement in morbidity, mortality, and quality of life when compared to dialysis. However, HLA sensitization is a major barrier to kidney retransplantation and the majority of the highly sensitized patients are waiting for a subsequent kidney transplant. A multidisciplinary team that includes immunogeneticists, transplant nephrologists and surgeons, and adequate allocation policies is fundamental to increase access to a kidney retransplant. A review of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was performed on the challenges of kidney retransplantation after graft loss, focusing on the HLA barrier and new strategies to overcome sensitization. Conclusion: Technical advances in immunogenetics, new desensitization protocols, and complex allocation programs have emerged in recent years to provide a new hope to kidney recipients with a previously failed graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Leal
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Clara Pardinhas
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - António Martinho
- Coimbra Histocompatibility Center, Portuguese Institute of Blood and Transplantation, 3041-861 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Helena Oliveira Sá
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Arnaldo Figueiredo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
- Urology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Alves
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mamode N, Bestard O, Claas F, Furian L, Griffin S, Legendre C, Pengel L, Naesens M. European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10511. [PMID: 36033645 PMCID: PMC9399356 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Nizam Mamode,
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Gastroenterological and Oncological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Siân Griffin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Adult Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Morel A, Hoisnard L, Dudreuilh C, Moktefi A, Kheav D, Pimentel A, Sakhi H, Mokrani D, Attias P, El Sakhawi K, Champy CM, Remy P, Sbidian E, Grimbert P, Matignon M. Three-Year Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Switched From Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Regimens to Belatacept as a Rescue Therapy. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10228. [PMID: 35497889 PMCID: PMC9043102 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: The long-term benefits of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to belatacept in kidney transplant recipients (KTr) are poorly documented. Methods: A single-center retrospective work to study first-time CNI to belatacept conversion as a rescue therapy [eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, chronic histological lesions, or CNI-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)]. Patient and kidney allograft survivals, eGFR, severe adverse events, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and histological data were recorded over 36 months after conversion. Results: We included N = 115 KTr. The leading cause for switching was chronic histological lesions with non-optimal eGFR (56.5%). Three years after conversion, patient, and death-censored kidney allograft survivals were 88% and 92%, respectively, eGFR increased significantly from 31.5 ± 17.5 to 36.7 ± 15.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.01), the rejection rate was 10.4%, OI incidence was 5.2 (2.9–7.6) per 100 person-years. Older age was associated with death, eGFR was not associated with death nor allograft loss. No patient developed dnDSA at M36 after conversion. CNI-induced TMA disappeared in all cases without eculizumab use. Microvascular inflammation and chronic lesions remained stable. Conclusion: Post-KT conversion from CNIs to belatacept, as rescue therapy, is safe and beneficial irrespective of the switch timing and could represent a good compromise facing organ shortage. Age and eGFR at conversion should be considered in the decision whether to switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Morel
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Léa Hoisnard
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Centre d'Investigation Clinique and Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE (InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), EpiDermE (Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of therapeutics), Créteil, France
| | - Caroline Dudreuilh
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Anissa Moktefi
- Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Pathology Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Créteil, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - David Kheav
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Laboratoire Régional d'histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Vellefaux, Paris
| | - Ana Pimentel
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Hamza Sakhi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - David Mokrani
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Attias
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Karim El Sakhawi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Cécile Maud Champy
- Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert Chenevier, Urology department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Remy
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Emilie Sbidian
- AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Centre d'Investigation Clinique and Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE (InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), EpiDermE (Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of therapeutics), Créteil, France.,Department of Dermatology, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.,INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1430, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.,AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Centre d'Investigation Clinique and Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TRUE (InnovaTive theRapy for immUne disordErs), Créteil, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.,AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, CIC biotherapy, Créteil, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
11
|
Ziemann M, Suwelack B, Banas B, Budde K, Einecke G, Hauser I, Heinemann FM, Kauke T, Kelsch R, Koch M, Lachmann N, Reuter S, Seidl C, Sester U, Zecher D. Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients. HLA 2021; 100:3-17. [PMID: 34951119 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
With the introduction of the virtual allocation crossmatch in the Eurotransplant (ET) region in 2023, the determination of unacceptable antigen mismatches (UAM) in kidney transplant recipients is of utmost importance for histocompatibility laboratories and transplant centers. Therefore, a joined working group of members from the German Society for Immunogenetics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Immungenetik, DGI) and the German Transplantation Society (Deutsche Transplantationsgesellschaft, DTG) revised and updated the previous recommendations from 2015 in light of recently published evidence. Like in the previous version, a wide range of topics is covered from technical issues to clinical risk factors. This review summarizes the evidence about the prognostic value of contemporary methods for HLA antibody detection and identification, as well as the impact of UAM on waiting time, on which these recommendations are based. As no clear criteria could be determined to differentiate potentially harmful from harmless HLA antibodies, the general recommendation is to assign all HLA against which plausible antibodies are found as UAM. There is, however, a need for individualized solutions for highly immunized patients. These revised recommendations provide a list of aspects that need to be considered when assigning UAM to enable a fair and comprehensible procedure and to harmonize risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation between transplant centers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Ziemann
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Medizinische Klinik D, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Medizinische Klinik m. S. Nephrologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gunilla Einecke
- Clinic for Renal and Hypertensive Disorders, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Falko Markus Heinemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Teresa Kauke
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, München, Germany and Transplantation Center, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, München, Germany
| | - Reinhard Kelsch
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Martina Koch
- General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Medizinische Klinik D, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Christian Seidl
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, German Red Cross Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Urban Sester
- Transplant center, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Daniel Zecher
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ravindranath MH, Filippone EJ, Amato-Menker CJ, Arosa FA, Das B, Ou Y, Norin AJ. Antibodies to cryptic epitopes on HLA class I and class II heavy chains bound to single antigen beads: Clinically relevant? Transpl Immunol 2021; 69:101482. [PMID: 34656784 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Cell surface HLA class I consists of trimers, i.e., alpha - heavy chain, beta - 2 - microglobulin, and a peptide, termed closed conformers (CC) on non-activated lymphocytes. HLA class I and class II may also exist, respectively, as alpha-chain only or alpha and beta - chain only on activated cells termed open conformers (OC). We extend previous studies using an OC-specific monoclonal antibody that demonstrate LABScreen HLA class I and II single antigen beads (SABs) contain a mixture of open and closed conformers. LIFECODES SABs have bound CC only. More HLA class I and class II LABScreen SABs were reactive than LIFECODES SABs due to the presence of OC on LABScreen SABs. We hypothesized that antibody against OC on HLA B antigens would not be detected in cell based cross matches (XMs) with typical lymphocyte targets since anti-HLA OC antibodies would not react with native HLA CC on the cell surface. To test this hypothesis, we performed flow cytometry XM (FCXM) assays with sera of sufficient strength that most laboratories would likely predict positive FCXMs. Sera that reacted strongly with LABScreen SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly or not at all with LIFECODES SABs (<1000 MFI) gave negative T and B cell FCXMs. In contrast, sera that reacted with LIFECODES SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly with LABScreen SABs (<2100 MFI) exhibited positive FCXMs. Detection of antibodies directed against OC in SAB assays, may lead to inappropriate listing of unacceptable antigens, a decision not to XM or pre-or post - transplant desensitization procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mepur H Ravindranath
- Department. of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90027, United States of America
| | - Edward J Filippone
- Division of Nephrology, Dept. of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19145, United States of America
| | - Carly J Amato-Menker
- Department of Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis, West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States of America
| | - Fernando A Arosa
- Health Sciences Research Center (CICS-UBI) & Department of Medical Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã 6200-506, Portugal.
| | - Ballabh Das
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, United States of America.
| | - Yijun Ou
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, United States of America.
| | - Allen J Norin
- Department of Medicine and Cell Biology, Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rosser C, Sage D. Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients. Int J Immunogenet 2021; 48:385-402. [PMID: 34346180 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Rosser
- NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting), Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, London, UK
| | - Deborah Sage
- NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting), Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shimabukuro S, Iwasaki K, Kawai S, Shirouzu T, Miwa Y, Iida Y, Nakajima F, Horimi K, Matsuoka Y, Ashimine S, Ishiyama K, Kobayashi T. Improved detection of donor-specific HLA-class II antibody in kidney transplant recipients by modified immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis. Transpl Immunol 2021; 67:101418. [PMID: 34052300 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) which basic principle is same as Luminex crossmatch (LXM), could detect donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). The advantages of ICFA are (i) detection of DSA and (ii) no requirement of viable cells over the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). However, FCXM has been widely used because of its higher sensitivity than ICFA, in particular HLA-class II antibody detection. In this study the accuracy of DSA detection against HLA-class II was investigated by modifying the original method of ICFA. Increment of the sensitivity was found when purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used instead of whole blood. An ICFA-PBMC in addition to FCXM-T/B was conducted for 118 patients before kidney transplantation and 13 patients with de novo DSA against HLA-class II after transplantation. Significantly positive correlation was observed between the values of ICFA-PBMC and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) targeting class II (p < 0.0001). When the cutoff level of 1.4 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the average DSA MFI was found to be significantly higher in the ICFA-PBMC (class II) positive group comparing to that in the negative group (12,217 vs 3885, p = 0.0027). ICFA-PBMC and optimized cutoff level could provide valid information in cases of suspected DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuichi Shimabukuro
- Department of Urology, Okinawa Chubu Hospital, 281, Miyazato, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan; Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Kenta Iwasaki
- Department of Kidney Disease and Transplant Immunology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
| | - Shintaro Kawai
- Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Molecular Diagnostics Division, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Shirouzu
- Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Molecular Diagnostics Division, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuko Miwa
- Department of Kidney Disease and Transplant Immunology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iida
- Department of Kidney Disease and Transplant Immunology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Nakajima
- Blood Service Headquarters, Japanese Red Cross Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosei Horimi
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Yutaka Matsuoka
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ashimine
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Kohei Ishiyama
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Takaaki Kobayashi
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim B, Kim S, Park Y, Kim HS. False-positive reactivity of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies detected using the single-antigen bead assay. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:409-413. [PMID: 33875298 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The single-antigen bead assay (SABA) demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detecting anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. However, SABA may produce false-positive results for anti-HLA antibodies. Herein, we analyzed the data of patients with complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch-/flow cytometric crossmatch-/SABA+/- results to determine false-positive results for anti-HLA antibodies. We also determined the prevalence of false-positive results by comparing false-positive data from our laboratory and national allele frequency data obtained with high-resolution HLA typing. For HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DR, a ratio of positive frequency to allele frequency of ≥3 in our laboratory was considered a false-positive result. For HLA-DQA1/DQB1 and HLA-DPA1/DPB1, we considered the positive frequency of ≥3 as a false positive result due to lack of haplotype frequency data. SABA results from 284 patients (78.0%) demonstrated false reactivity. The antibody against HLA-C*17:01 displayed the highest frequency ratio (298.3). If false-positive reactivity is suspected, results should be confirmed using different methods. If confirmation tests are unfeasible, comparing the allele frequency with the positive rate of detected anti-HLA antibodies and using a ratio ≥3 may facilitate the interpretation of SABA results. The positive rate of anti-HLA antibodies can be validated using the HLA allele frequency of the population to determine false-positive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boyeon Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
| | - Sinyoung Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Younhee Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hyon-Suk Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Launhardt K, Lefevre V, Souplet V, Prantl L, Marget M, Hovoricova B, Wenda S, Olivier C. Concordance with established tests and reproducibility of results obtained with a new single antigen chip array for HLA antibody detection (HISTO SPOT® HLA AB). J Immunol Methods 2021; 491:112971. [PMID: 33549571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2021.112971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze performance of a new single antigen chip array system (HISTO SPOT® HLA AB) developed for HLA antibody detection and compare with results obtained using single antigen Luminex-based systems and serum samples from the Eurotransplant external proficiency testing scheme. Results were analysed from 11 independent Eurotransplant laboratories using HISTO SPOT® HLA AB utilising the Eurotransplant external proficiency testing (EPT) sera and these were compared to published results from 67 labs using the Luminex-based technologies. In addition, QC results from different batches of the test were analysed. Generally, concordance of results with the results from the Luminex technique was good. With the Luminex tests more consensus results and more questionable results were found than with the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test. Within the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB testing group we found a discrepancy rate from the consensus of 2.9% for the EPT sera which is far below the 25% allowed to pass the quality test and only slightly higher than for the Luminex single antigen tests with 1.2%. The average global coefficient of variation (CV) of the mean signal (raw data) for the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test was 13% which is lower than the values reported for Luminex tests in the literature. The average global CV for the signal/background ratio was higher with 28%. In the present study, the mean signal is the best parameter to compare results between labs and the new HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test is at least as good in terms of signal reproducibility as the Luminex tests. In conclusion, the HISTO SPOT® HLA AB test is a good alternative to be used in addition or instead of the Luminex tests in clinical labs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vianney Souplet
- Innobiochips, 70, rue du Docteur Yersin, 59 120 Loos, France
| | - Livia Prantl
- Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, University Hospital, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Matthias Marget
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Blanka Hovoricova
- University Hospital F. D. Roosevelta Banska Bystrica, Department of Laboratory Hematology - HLA Laboratory, Namestie L. Svobodu 1, 975 17, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
| | - Sabine Wenda
- Medical University Vienna, University Hospital for Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Währinger Gürtel 18-20 / Ebene 4i, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eplet-based virtual PRA increases transplant probability in highly-sensitized patients. Transpl Immunol 2021; 65:101362. [PMID: 33434652 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reduced access of highly-sensitized (HS) patients to kidney transplantation (KTx) is one of the major challenges for transplant community. Therefore, the aim of our study was to estimate the impact of three different vPRA calculations, assessed traditionally and using eplet-based analysis, in donor offers. METHODS At 01-01-2020, 157 HS patients are waitlisted for deceased donor KTx and were included in this study. Total vPRA (vPRAt) was calculated considering all patient allosensitization history, using 1 k MFI cut-off. Current vPRA (vPRAc) refers only to the last year SAB assays, using 1 k MFI cut-off. For eplet vPRA (vPRAe) every SAB assay was analyzed by HLAMatchmaker and HLAfusion software. Matching runs have been performed taking vPRA calculation as unacceptable antigens (UAs). RESULTS All patients had at least one previous sensitizing event and patients with 100% vPRA were predominantly candidates for retransplantation (P < 0.001), had higher PRA-CDC (P < 0.001), and longer dialysis vintage waiting time (P < 0.001). Inter-group movement analysis between vPRA measures showed that 70 (45%), 124 (79%) and 80 (51%) patients were reclassified to a lower group when considering vPRAt to vPRAc, vPRAt to vPRAe and vPRAc to vPRAe, respectively. The median percentage of change in estimated number of match runs needed for 95% probability of finding an acceptable donor was significantly more pronounced by increasing vPRAt intervals, when considering the reclassification from vPRAt to vPRAe (P < 0.001) or vPRAc to vPRAe (P = 0.045), while from vPRAt to vPRAc it was not (P = 0.899). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that the use of total or current vPRA calculations are impairing HS patients, by decreasing transplant probability, leading to dramatically longer waiting times, when compared to eplet based vPRA.
Collapse
|
18
|
Savulescu DM, Groome M, Malfeld SCK, Madhi S, Koen A, Jones S, Duxbury V, Scheuermaier K, De Assis Rosa D, Suchard M. HLA antibody repertoire in infants suggests selectivity in transplacental crossing. Am J Reprod Immunol 2020; 84:e13264. [PMID: 32395838 PMCID: PMC7507134 DOI: 10.1111/aji.13264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PROBLEM Late in pregnancy, women produce and transfer high amounts of antibodies to the foetus. During gestation, women produce antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA), including antibodies directed at foetal HLA. There is paucity of data on transplacental crossing, specificity and role of HLA antibodies in pregnancy and new-borns. METHOD OF STUDY Using highly sensitive Luminex technology, we measured prevalence of IgG HLA antibodies in 30 mother-infant pairs six weeks post-partum. Additionally, in six pregnant women, we measured HLA antibodies longitudinally and HLA-typed infant DNA to assess whether maternal HLA antibodies were directed at infant specificities. RESULTS Overall, 68% of mothers and 44% of infants expressed HLA-I antibodies and 56% of mothers and 52% of infants expressed HLA-II antibodies. Infants shared up to 78% of antibodies with their mothers, suggesting that the remaining antibodies were self-made. Less than 25% of maternal HLA antibodies were detected in infants, possibly due to selection in transplacental crossing. We detected complement-fixing HLA antibodies in mothers and at low levels in infants. In a third of our pregnant subjects, we detected infant-directed HLA antibodies. CONCLUSION Our findings raise the possibility of selection in transplacental crossing of HLA antibodies. As HLA antibodies may act as autoantibodies in the neonate, the mechanism of a selective transfer may give important insights into immune tolerance. Findings also suggest that infants start producing their own HLA antibodies in the first weeks of life, which, together with maternally derived antibodies may impact the infant's immune reaction to HLA proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M. Savulescu
- Centre for Vaccines and Immunology (CVI)National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD)A Division of the National Health Laboratory ServiceJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Michelle Groome
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research UnitFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable DiseasesFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Susan C. K. Malfeld
- Centre for Vaccines and Immunology (CVI)National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD)A Division of the National Health Laboratory ServiceJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Shabir Madhi
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research UnitFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable DiseasesFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Anthonet Koen
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research UnitFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable DiseasesFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Stephanie Jones
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research UnitFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable DiseasesFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Vania Duxbury
- Brain Function Research GroupSchool of PhysiologyFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Karine Scheuermaier
- Brain Function Research GroupSchool of PhysiologyFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Debbie De Assis Rosa
- School of Molecular and Cell BiologyFaculty of ScienceUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| | - Melinda Suchard
- Centre for Vaccines and Immunology (CVI)National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD)A Division of the National Health Laboratory ServiceJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
- Department of Chemical PathologyFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgGautengSouth Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Snanoudj R, Siemowski J, Amankwa E, Kheav VD, Arzouk N, Galichon P, Matignon M, Legendre C, Delahousse M, Caillat-Zucman S, Taupin JL. Predictive value of mixed antigen screen beads in pre-transplant assessment of HLA immunization in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14002. [PMID: 32510715 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Pre-transplant serum screening of anti-HLA antibodies is recommended for solid organ transplantations. Many laboratories use the less expensive bead-based screening assay as the main technique and, if positive, turn to single-antigen beads (SAB). We studied the correlations between these two immunoassays. We re-analyzed the raw data of the two assays in 3030 first organ transplant recipients, explored with the two tests. We performed a ROC curve analysis of the screening ratio to predict a positive SAB assay. The AUC were 0.72 and 0.64 for class I and class II. The optimal thresholds of screening ratios were 3.28 (class I) and 2.11 (class II). Whatever the class, the negative predictive value was low, around 40%, with 36% of discordant sera, as defined by negative screening and positive SAB. Testing class I discordant sera on acid-treated SAB showed that 54% of antibodies reacted against denatured HLA molecules. However, these screening-negative sera may contain donor-specific antibodies in 13.9% and 28.7% of cases for class I and class II, respectively, involved in antibody-mediated rejection with the same frequency as non-discordant sera. Given the low predictive value of screening, both assays should be performed at least once on the same serum before transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud Snanoudj
- Transplantation and Nephrology Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Jérémy Siemowski
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth Amankwa
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Vissal-David Kheav
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Nadia Arzouk
- Transplantation and Nephrology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Galichon
- Transplantation and Nephrology Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Transplantation and Nephrology Department, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
| | | | - Michel Delahousse
- Transplantation and Nephrology Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Sophie Caillat-Zucman
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS 976, Institut Universitaire d'Hématologie, University Paris Diderot, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Luminex screening first vs. direct single antigen bead assays: Different strategies for HLA antibody monitoring after kidney transplantation. Hum Immunol 2020; 81:293-299. [PMID: 32279925 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
MAIN PROBLEM Luminex panel and single antigen beads (SAB) are used for screening and DSA specificity determination respectively. The cost of SAB may limit its general use, so some labs perform SAB tests only after positive screening. METHODS We compared both strategies: 1) SAB only if positive screening with kits from manufacturer A, and 2) direct SAB from manufacturer B, and correlate their sensitivity with histological findings. RESULTS We selected 118 kidney transplant recipients with a normal biopsy (n = 19), histological antibody-mediated damage (ABMR, n = 52) or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA, n = 47) following Banff 2015 and 2017 classification. Direct SAB detected DSA in 13 patients missed by screening. Strategy 1 detected DSA in 0% normal, 61.5% ABMR and 8.5% IFTA patients; percentages with strategy 2 were 5.2%, 78.8% and 14.8% (p=0.004). Strategy 2 identified DSA allowing full ABMR diagnosis in 17% cases missed by strategy 1. Thereafter, direct SAB from manufacturer A confirmed DSA in 46% DSA-positive cases with strategy 2 (55.5% ABMR cases). CONCLUSIONS Luminex screening failed to identify clinically relevant HLA antibodies, hampering DSA detection in patients with possible ABMR. Direct SAB testing should be the chosen strategy for post-transplantation monitoring, albeit direct SAB from the two existing manufacturers may diverge in as much as 50% of cases.
Collapse
|
21
|
Wehmeier C, Hönger G, Schaub S. Caveats of HLA antibody detection by solid‐phase assays. Transpl Int 2019; 33:18-29. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
| | - Gideon Hönger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
- Transplantation Immunology Department of Biomedicine University of Basel Basel Switzerland
- HLA‐Diagnostic and Immunogenetics Department of Laboratory Medicine University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
- Transplantation Immunology Department of Biomedicine University of Basel Basel Switzerland
- HLA‐Diagnostic and Immunogenetics Department of Laboratory Medicine University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brook CE, Ranaivoson HC, Broder CC, Cunningham AA, Héraud J, Peel AJ, Gibson L, Wood JLN, Metcalf CJ, Dobson AP. Disentangling serology to elucidate henipa- and filovirus transmission in Madagascar fruit bats. J Anim Ecol 2019; 88:1001-1016. [PMID: 30908623 PMCID: PMC7122791 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Bats are reservoirs for emerging human pathogens, including Hendra and Nipah henipaviruses and Ebola and Marburg filoviruses. These viruses demonstrate predictable patterns in seasonality and age structure across multiple systems; previous work suggests that they may circulate in Madagascar's endemic fruit bats, which are widely consumed as human food. We aimed to (a) document the extent of henipa- and filovirus exposure among Malagasy fruit bats, (b) explore seasonality in seroprevalence and serostatus in these bat populations and (c) compare mechanistic hypotheses for possible transmission dynamics underlying these data. To this end, we amassed and analysed a unique dataset documenting longitudinal serological henipa- and filovirus dynamics in three Madagascar fruit bat species. We uncovered serological evidence of exposure to Hendra-/Nipah-related henipaviruses in Eidolon dupreanum, Pteropus rufus and Rousettus madagascariensis, to Cedar-related henipaviruses in E. dupreanum and R. madagascariensis and to Ebola-related filoviruses in P. rufus and R. madagascariensis. We demonstrated significant seasonality in population-level seroprevalence and individual serostatus for multiple viruses across these species, linked to the female reproductive calendar. An age-structured subset of the data highlighted evidence of waning maternal antibodies in neonates, increasing seroprevalence in young and decreasing seroprevalence late in life. Comparison of mechanistic epidemiological models fit to these data offered support for transmission hypotheses permitting waning antibodies but retained immunity in adult-age bats. Our findings suggest that bats may seasonally modulate mechanisms of pathogen control, with consequences for population-level transmission. Additionally, we narrow the field of candidate transmission hypotheses by which bats are presumed to host and transmit potentially zoonotic viruses globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara E. Brook
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonNew Jersey
- Present address:
Department of Integrative BiologyUC BerkeleyBerkeleyCalifornia.
| | - Hafaliana C. Ranaivoson
- Virology UnitInstitut Pasteur de MadagascarAntananarivoMadagascar
- Department of Animal BiologyUniversity of AntananarivoAntananarivoMadagascar
| | - Christopher C. Broder
- Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyUniformed Services UniversityBethesdaMaryland
| | | | | | - Alison J. Peel
- Environmental Futures Research InstituteGriffith UniversityNathanQueenslandAustralia
| | - Louise Gibson
- Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
| | - James L. N. Wood
- Department of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - C. Jessica Metcalf
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonNew Jersey
| | - Andrew P. Dobson
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonNew Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lima BA, Alves H. Portuguese calculated panel reactive antibodies online estimator. HLA 2019; 93:445-450. [PMID: 30838808 DOI: 10.1111/tan.13516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRA) is a sensitization measure used to classify and prioritize transplant candidates in different kidney transplant allocation systems. CPRA is based on identification of HLA unacceptable on potential organ donors making a transplant candidate ineligible for transplantation. Here, we present a CPRA online estimator based on HLA allelic and haplotypic frequencies from Portuguese donors. We also compare the values we obtained from our CPRA estimator (Portuguese [PT]-CPRA) against CPRA values obtained from: Eurotransplant virtual PRA calculator (ET-CPRA); Canadian CPRA calculator (Canadian [CN]-CPRA) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network CPRA calculator (United States [US]-CPRA). When we analyzed correlations between CPRA values obtained from pairs of calculators, we observed that they are significantly and highly correlated. Bland-Altman plots for the comparison between PT-CPRA calculator against the other calculators, show higher differences between PT and CN than between PT and ET and PT and US. Also, the lowest value for Lin's concordance coefficient was obtained for the comparison between PT and CN calculators. CPRA values reliability depend on donors' pool from which it is calculated and it is crucial for classify correctly highly sensitized patients. A CPRA calculator must use donors' HLA frequencies similar from those who would be actual organ donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno A Lima
- Data Science Department, Oficina de Bioestatistica, Vilar Formoso, Portugal
| | - Helena Alves
- Departamento de Promoção da Saúde e Prevenção de Doenças Não Transmissíveis, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Vilar Formoso, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Comparison of Two Luminex Single-antigen Bead Flow Cytometry Assays for Detection of Donor-specific Antibodies After Renal Transplantation. Transplantation 2019; 103:597-603. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
25
|
Al Attas R, Alzahrani M, Al-Otaibi AS, Lopez R, Liacini A, Alzahrani S, Ajlan K, Abduladheem D, Kebasi S, Harbi H. Discrepant Antibody Testing Results: Which One to Believe? Transplant Proc 2019; 51:497-503. [PMID: 30879576 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The impact of solid-phase immunoassay for HLA antibody detection on the field of transplantation has been extremely significant by providing the most sensitive and precise method for characterization of HLA antibodies. However, despite all the benefits, technical limitations and inherent artifacts represent significant challenges, particularly with Luminex-based single-antigen bead (SAB) assay. Discordant results between antibody detection (screening assay) and identification (SAB) is not uncommon. Positive SAB assay in the context of negative screening testing is well documented and attributed to altered tertiary structure of HLA molecules exposing new epitopes or detection of naturally occurring antibodies. However, there are few reports that addressed the opposite scenario when negative SAB appeared in the context of positive screening assay. In such discrepant results, unmissed HLA antibody has to be excluded with certainty by other tests; however, with the availability of variable assays it may be difficult to choose the best combinations that clarify discrepancy without adding more confusion. Here we describe the results of correlation between 2 antibody screening solid-phase immunoassays (LABScreen Mixed using Luminex and FlowPRA Screen) on conventional flow cytometry and compare their outcomes with SAB and crossmatch results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabab Al Attas
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mariam Alzahrani
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed S Al-Otaibi
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ricardo Lopez
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdelhamid Liacini
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saber Alzahrani
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kenana Ajlan
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dalal Abduladheem
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shaima Kebasi
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan Harbi
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Koefoed-Nielsen P, Møller BK. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies by solid phase immunoassays: advantages and technical concerns. Int Rev Immunol 2018; 38:95-105. [DOI: 10.1080/08830185.2018.1525367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bjarne Kuno Møller
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Halloran PF, Reeve J, Aliabadi AZ, Cadeiras M, Crespo-Leiro MG, Deng M, Depasquale EC, Goekler J, Jouven X, Kim DH, Kobashigawa J, Loupy A, Macdonald P, Potena L, Zuckermann A, Parkes MD. Exploring the cardiac response to injury in heart transplant biopsies. JCI Insight 2018; 3:123674. [PMID: 30333303 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.123674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because injury is universal in organ transplantation, heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies present an opportunity to explore response to injury in heart parenchyma. Histology has limited ability to assess injury, potentially confusing it with rejection, whereas molecular changes have potential to distinguish injury from rejection. Building on previous studies of transcripts associated with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), we explored transcripts reflecting injury. METHODS Microarray data from 889 prospectively collected endomyocardial biopsies from 454 transplant recipients at 14 centers were subjected to unsupervised principal component analysis and archetypal analysis to detect variation not explained by rejection. The resulting principal component and archetype scores were then examined for their transcript, transcript set, and pathway associations and compared to the histology diagnoses and left ventricular function. RESULTS Rejection was reflected by principal components PC1 and PC2, and by archetype scores S2TCMR, and S3ABMR, with S1normal indicating normalness. PC3 and a new archetype score, S4injury, identified unexplained variation correlating with expression of transcripts inducible in injury models, many expressed in macrophages and associated with inflammation in pathway analysis. S4injury scores were high in recent transplants, reflecting donation-implantation injury, and both S4injury and S2TCMR were associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION Assessment of injury is necessary for accurate estimates of rejection and for understanding heart transplant phenotypes. Biopsies with molecular injury but no molecular rejection were often misdiagnosed rejection by histology.TRAIL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02670408FUNDING. Roche Organ Transplant Research Foundation, the University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, and Alberta Health Services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jeff Reeve
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Martin Cadeiras
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Mario Deng
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | - Daniel H Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Peter Macdonald
- The Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luciano Potena
- Cardiovascular Department, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Michael D Parkes
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
McCaughan JA, Tinckam KJ. Donor specific HLA antibodies & allograft injury: mechanisms, methods of detection, manifestations and management. Transpl Int 2018; 31:1059-1070. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A. McCaughan
- HLA Laboratory; Laboratory Medicine Program; University Health Network; Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation; Belfast City Hospital; Belfast UK
| | - Kathryn J. Tinckam
- HLA Laboratory; Laboratory Medicine Program; University Health Network; Toronto ON Canada
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Medicine; University Health Network; Toronto ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Alelign T, Ahmed MM, Bobosha K, Tadesse Y, Howe R, Petros B. Kidney Transplantation: The Challenge of Human Leukocyte Antigen and Its Therapeutic Strategies. J Immunol Res 2018; 2018:5986740. [PMID: 29693023 PMCID: PMC5859822 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5986740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage renal failure. When the immune system of the recipient recognizes the transplanted kidney as a foreign object, graft rejection occurs. As part of the host immune defense mechanism, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major challenge for graft rejection in transplantation therapy. The impact of HLA mismatches between the donor and the potential recipient prolongs the time for renal transplantation therapy, tethered to dialysis, latter reduces graft survival, and increases mortality. The formation of pretransplant alloantibodies against HLA class I and II molecules can be sensitized through exposures to blood transfusions, prior transplants, and pregnancy. These preformed HLA antibodies are associated with rejection in kidney transplantation. On the other hand, the development of de novo antibodies may increase the risk for acute and chronic rejections. Allograft rejection results from a complex interplay involving both the innate and the adaptive immune systems. Thus, further insights into the mechanisms of tissue rejection and the risk of HLA sensitization is crucial in developing new therapies that may blunt the immune system against transplanted organs. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to highlight facts about HLA and its sensitization, various mechanisms of allograft rejection, the current immunosuppressive approaches, and the directions for future therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilahun Alelign
- College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Department of Biology, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Momina M. Ahmed
- St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College and Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Kidist Bobosha
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Yewondwossen Tadesse
- School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Rawleigh Howe
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Beyene Petros
- College of Natural Sciences, Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Katalinić N, Starčević A, Mavrinac M, Balen S. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity and Luminex technology for human leucocyte antigen antibody detection in kidney transplant candidates exposed to different sensitizing events. Clin Kidney J 2017; 10:852-858. [PMID: 29225816 PMCID: PMC5716092 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfx050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of exposure to different sensitizing events (SEs) and to assess their effects on human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alloimmunization in transplant candidates using two different HLA antibody screening techniques: complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and Luminex. Methods This retrospective study included HLA antibody screening results for 163 patients on the kidney transplant waiting list (WL) tested from March 2012 until the end of December 2015 at the Tissue Typing Laboratory, Rijeka, Croatia. All sera samples were tested using the CDC and Luminex techniques in parallel. Results Two-thirds of the patients [114 (70%)] on the WL were exposed to transfusions, pregnancies and/or kidney transplant. The pre-transplant sera of 104 (63.80%) patients were negative for antibodies. In the sera of 23 (14.11%) patients, HLA antibodies were detected by CDC and Luminex and in the sera of 36 (22.09%) patients by Luminex only. Conclusion In patients on kidney WL, previous organ transplantation represents the strongest immunogenic stimulus, followed by blood transfusions (the most frequent SE) and pregnancies. Although Luminex is more sensitive than CDC in HLA antibody detection, the decision on unacceptable HLA antigens in WL patients has to be based on the results of both assays and the patient's immunization history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataša Katalinić
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia
| | - Alma Starčević
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Martina Mavrinac
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Sanja Balen
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia.,Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cao S, Courtwright AM, Lamattina AM, Guleria I, Burkett P, El-Chemaly S, Goldberg HJ. The impact of screening method on HLA antibody detection before and after lung transplantation: A prospective pilot study. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 37:531-533. [PMID: 29229269 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Severine Cao
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Lung Transplant Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew M Courtwright
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anthony M Lamattina
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Lung Transplant Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Indira Guleria
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Burkett
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Lung Transplant Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Souheil El-Chemaly
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Lung Transplant Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hilary J Goldberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Lung Transplant Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Accurate and timely detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are critical for pre-transplant and post-transplant immunological risk assessment. Solid phase immunoassays have provided increased sensitivity and specificity, but test interpretation is not always straightforward. This review will discuss the result interpretation considering technical limitations; assessment of relative antibody strength; and the integration of data for risk stratification from complementary testing and the patient's immunological history. Recent findings Laboratory and clinical studies have provided insight into causes of test failures – false positive reactions because of antibodies to denatured HLA antigens and false negative reactions resulting from test interference and/or loss of native epitopes. Test modifications permit detection of complement-binding antibodies and determination of the IgG subclasses. The high degree of specificity of single antigen solid phase immunoassays has revealed the complexity and clinical relevance of antibodies to HLA-C, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP antigens. Determination of antibody specificity for HLA epitopes enables identification of incompatible antigens not included in test kits. Summary Detection and characterization of HLA antibodies with solid phase immunoassays has led to increased understanding of the role of those antibodies in graft rejection, improved treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and increased opportunities for transplantation. However, realization of these benefits requires careful and accurate interpretation of test results.
Collapse
|
34
|
Halloran PF, Potena L, Van Huyen JPD, Bruneval P, Leone O, Kim DH, Jouven X, Reeve J, Loupy A. Building a tissue-based molecular diagnostic system in heart transplant rejection: The heart Molecular Microscope Diagnostic (MMDx) System. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36:1192-1200. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
|
35
|
Daniel V, Süsal C, Scherer S, Tran H, Gombos P, Trojan K, Sadeghi M, Morath C, Opelz G. Endothelial precursor cell cross-match using Tie-2-enriched spleen cells. Clin Transplant 2017; 31. [PMID: 28925558 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-HLA antibodies against human endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in pre-transplant recipient serum can have a deleterious influence on the graft. EPC enriched from peripheral blood have been commonly used for EPC cross-matching. In the present study, we describe cross-matches using EPC enriched from fresh or frozen-thawed spleen cell preparations, thereby widening the sample source for deceased-donor cross-matching and retrospective studies. METHODS EPC cross-matches were performed retrospectively using spleen cells and the flow cytometric XM-ONE cross-match test kit. RESULTS Healthy controls (n = 28) showed no IgG antibodies against EPC. When sera of 11 random dialysis patients were studied, 2 patients (18%) exhibited IgG EPC antibodies. When pre-transplant sera of 20 kidney graft recipients with good long-term graft outcome (serum creatinine 1.0 ± 0.2 mg/dL measured 2463 ± 324 days post-transplant) were investigated using frozen-thawed and then separated Tie-2-enriched spleen cells of the original transplant donor, 3 patients (15%) had pre-transplant IgG EPC antibodies. When pre-transplant sera of 5 patients with intra-operative graft loss were studied employing the original donor spleen cells, 4 (80%) patients showed IgG EPC antibodies. CONCLUSIONS Cross-matches with spleen cell-derived EPC using the XM-ONE assay are technically possible. Our very preliminary experience suggests clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Daniel
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Scherer
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hien Tran
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Gombos
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karina Trojan
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Sadeghi
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, Center for Internal Medicine, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Opelz
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University-Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Technical Limitations of the C1q Single-Antigen Bead Assay to Detect Complement Binding HLA-Specific Antibodies. Transplantation 2017; 101:1206-1214. [PMID: 27306532 PMCID: PMC5457814 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid-phase assays to distinguish complement binding from noncomplement binding HLA-specific antibodies have been introduced, but technical limitations may compromise their interpretation. We have examined the extent to which C1q-binding to HLA-class I single-antigen beads (SAB) is influenced by denatured HLA on SAB, antibody titre, and complement interference that causes a misleading low assessment of HLA-specific antibody levels. METHODS Sera from 25 highly sensitized patients were tested using Luminex IgG-SAB and C1q-SAB assays. Sera were tested undiluted, at 1:20 dilution to detect high-level IgG, and after ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid treatment to obviate complement interference. Conformational HLA and denatured HLA protein levels on SAB were determined using W6/32 and HC-10 monoclonal antibodies, respectively. Denatured HLA was expressed as HC-10 binding to untreated SAB as a percentage of maximal binding to acid-treated SAB. RESULTS For undiluted sera, Luminex mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values for IgG-SAB and C1q-SAB correlated poorly (r = 0.42). ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid and serum dilution improved the correlation (r = 0.57 and 0.77, respectively). Increasing levels of denatured HLA interfered with the detection of C1q binding. Consequently, the correlation between IgG-SAB MFI and C1q-SAB MFI was lowest using undiluted sera and SAB with greater than 30% denatured HLA (r = 0.40) and highest using diluted sera and SAB with 30% or less denatured HLA (r = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS Antibody level, complement interference, and denatured HLA class I on SAB may all affect the clinical interpretation of the C1q-SAB assay. The C1q-SAB assay represents a substantial additional cost for routine clinical use, and we question its justification given the potential uncertainty about its interpretation.
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Clinical Relevance of HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: Recent Data from the Heidelberg Transplant Center and the Collaborative Transplant Study. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:5619402. [PMID: 28660215 PMCID: PMC5474267 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5619402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Herein, we summarize our recent findings from the international Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) and Heidelberg Transplant Center regarding the role of HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation and their application into the clinical routine. Based on the antibody findings from the CTS serum study, an algorithm was developed in 2006 for the transplantation of high-risk sensitized patients at the Heidelberg Transplant Center which includes seven different pre- and posttransplant measures. Using this algorithm, the number of transplantations could be increased in high-risk presensitized patients and the previously existing impact of antibodies on graft survival could greatly be diminished but not totally eliminated. More recent findings led to the hypothesis that T cell help from a preactivated immune system supports the harmful effects of pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies that otherwise disappear in many cases after transplantation without any consequence.
Collapse
|
39
|
Conformational Variants of the Individual HLA-I Antigens on Luminex Single Antigen Beads Used in Monitoring HLA Antibodies: Problems and Solutions. Transplantation 2017; 101:764-777. [PMID: 27495776 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single antigen beads (SAB) are used for monitoring HLA antibodies in pretransplant and posttransplant patients despite the discrepancy between virtual and actual crossmatch results and transplant outcomes. This discrepancy can be attributed to the presence of conformational variants of HLA-I on SAB, assessment of which would increase the concordance between SAB and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) results, thus enabling improved organ accessibility for the waiting list patients and a better prediction of antibody-mediated rejection. METHODS The conformational variants were examined on HLA-I beads, iBeads, acid-/alkali-treated beads, and T cells using HLA-I monoclonal antibodies (W6/32, TFL-006, and heavy chain (HC)-10). RESULTS The affinity of the monoclonal antibodies against HLA-I beads confirmed the presence and heterogeneous density of peptide-associated β2-microglobulin-associated HLA HC (pepA-β2aHC), peptide-free-β2aHC (pepF-β2aHC), and β2-free HC (β2fHC) on every single antigen-coated bead. In contrast, iBeads harbor a high density of pepA-β2aHC, low density of pepF-β2aHC, and are lacking β2fHC. The FCXM analyses confirmed the prevalence of pepA-β2aHC, but not pepF-β2aHC or β2fHC on resting T cells. CONCLUSIONS The strength of a donor-specific antibody should be assessed with a bead-specific mean fluorescence intensity cutoff based on TFL-006 reactivity against HLA-I beads, and HC-10 against iBeads, where the β2fHC or pepF-β2aHC normalized donor-specific antibody level would reveal the true anti-pepA-β2aHC reactivity associated with positive FCXM.
Collapse
|
40
|
Halloran PF, Famulski KS, Chang J. A Probabilistic Approach to Histologic Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Biopsies. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:129-139. [PMID: 27340822 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Histologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplant biopsies uses lesion score cutoffs such as 0 versus >0 rather than actual scores and requires donor-specific antibody (DSA); however, cutoffs lose information, and DSA is not always reliable. Using microarray-derived molecular ABMR scores as a histology-independent estimate of ABMR in 703 biopsies, we reassessed criteria for ABMR to determine relative importance of various lesions, the utility of equations using actual scores rather than cutoffs, and the potential for diagnosing ABMR when DSA is unknown or negative. We confirmed that the important features for ABMR diagnosis were peritubular capillaritis (ptc), glomerulitis (g), glomerular double contours, DSA and C4d staining, but we questioned some features: arterial fibrosis, vasculitis, acute tubular injury, and sum of ptc+g scores. Regression equations using lesion scores predicted molecular ABMR more accurately than score cutoffs (area under the curve 0.85-0.86 vs. 0.75). DSA positivity improved accuracy, but regression equations predicted ABMR with moderate accuracy when DSA was unknown. Some biopsies without detectable DSA had high probability of ABMR by regression, although most had HLA antibody. We concluded that regression equations using lesion scores plus DSA maximized diagnostic accuracy and can estimate probable ABMR when DSA is unknown or undetectable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - K S Famulski
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J Chang
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Katalinić N, Fućak M, Crnić T, Ćurković M, Starčević A, Balen S. Pretransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies by complement dependent cytotoxicity and Luminex-based assays. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016; 129:33-37. [PMID: 27743177 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-1094-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of more sensitive techniques, such as Luminex® for HLA antibody screening of patients awaiting organ transplantation has resulted in a better understanding of transplantation immunology and improvements in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The interpretation of the results obtained only by Luminex® can lead to inaccurate evaluation of a patient's antibody status and unjustified rejection of a potential organ donor. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the benefits of performing HLA antibody screening in the sera of patients on the waiting list for organ transplantation by two different assays, complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and Luminex®. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 563 pretransplant serum samples from 141 patients on the kidney transplantation waiting list in Rijeka, tested from March 2012 until March 2015. All samples were tested in parallel by the CDC assay and the Luminex®-based assay. RESULTS Out of the 563 samples tested 302 (53.7%) tested negative for HLA antibodies and 88 (15.6%) positive by both assays. From 173 (30.7%) samples with discordant results 149 (26.5%) were CDC negative and Luminex® positive, while 24 (4.3%) were CDC positive and Luminex® negative. Among the Luminex positive patients seven did not experience any immunizing events. CONCLUSION Evaluation of the HLA antibody status in patients on a waiting list for organ transplantation should be based on the results of the both CDC and Luminex® (or other sensitive) assays in accordance to information about patient's clinical status and exposure to immunizing events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataša Katalinić
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Tome Strižića 3, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia.
| | - Marina Fućak
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Tome Strižića 3, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Tajana Crnić
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Tome Strižića 3, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Milena Ćurković
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Tome Strižića 3, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Alma Starčević
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Tome Strižića 3, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Sanja Balen
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Clinical Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Tome Strižića 3, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tafulo S, Malheiro J, Dias L, Mendes C, Osório E, Martins LS, Santos J, Pedroso S, Almeida M, Castro-Henriques A. Low transplantability of 0 blood group and highly sensitized candidates in the Portuguese kidney allocation algorithm: quantifying an old problem in search of new solutions. HLA 2016; 88:232-238. [DOI: 10.1111/tan.12895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tafulo
- Oporto Blood and Transplantation Center; Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantacão; Porto Portugal
| | - J. Malheiro
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - L. Dias
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - C. Mendes
- Oporto Blood and Transplantation Center; Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantacão; Porto Portugal
| | - E. Osório
- Oporto Blood and Transplantation Center; Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantacão; Porto Portugal
| | - L. S. Martins
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - J. Santos
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - S. Pedroso
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - M. Almeida
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| | - A. Castro-Henriques
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department; Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António; Porto Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhao J, Fu YX, Yang T, Shen ZY, Wu CL. Prediction of Complement-Binding Capacity of HLA Antibodies Based on Mean Fluorescence Intensity. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:2235-40. [PMID: 27569975 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies estimated by Luminex single-antigen beads, especially those that fix complement, are associated with antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure. However, the relationship between HLA antibody strength and complement-binding ability is controversial. METHODS Serum samples of 31 sensitized renal patients waiting for renal transplantation were retrospectively analyzed by IgG-Luminex to identify HLA antibodies and in parallel by C1q-Luminex to determine the complement binding of HLA antibodies. RESULTS The percentage of HLA class I antibodies binding with C1q was lower than that of HLA class II antibodies (43.2% vs. 51.3%, P = .006). The mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of IgG-Luminex correlated with the MFI of C1q-Luminex for the same antibodies (Spearman correlation; class I, r = 0.665, P < .01; class II, r = 0.761, P < .01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the MFIs of HLA antibodies by IgG-Luminex predicted their C1q-binding abilities (area under the curve [AUC] class I = 0.917; AUC class II = 0.927). Using MFI cutoff values of 8238 and 6754 in IgG-Luminex for HLA class I and class II antibodies, respectively, the sensitivity and specificity for C1q binding were 82.4% and 87.4% for class I antibodies and 90.9% and 82% for class II antibodies. CONCLUSIONS The MFI of HLA antibodies by IgG-Luminex predicts the complement-binding capability to a certain extent before transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Zhao
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Y X Fu
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - T Yang
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Z Y Shen
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - C L Wu
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Halloran PF, Famulski KS, Reeve J. Molecular assessment of disease states in kidney transplant biopsy samples. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016; 12:534-48. [DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
45
|
Evidence to Support a Contribution of Polyreactive Antibodies to HLA Serum Reactivity. Transplantation 2016; 100:217-26. [PMID: 26285015 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing the serum reactivity to HLA is essential for the evaluation of transplant candidates and the follow-up of allograft recipients. In this study, we look for evidence at the clonal level that polyreactive antibodies cross-reactive to apoptotic cells and multiple autoantigens can also react to HLA and contribute to the overall serum reactivity. METHODS We immortalized B cell clones from the blood of 2 kidney transplant recipients and characterized their reactivity to self-antigens, apoptotic cells as well as native, denatured, and cryptic HLA determinants using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescence, flow cytometry and Luminex assays. We also assessed the reactivity of 300 pretransplant serum specimens to HLA and apoptotic cells. RESULTS We report here 4 distinct B cell clones cross-reactive to self and HLA class I. All 4 clones reacted to numerous HLA class I alleles but did not appear to target canonical "shared" epitopes. In parallel experiments, we observed a strong correlation between IgG reactivity to HLA and apoptotic cells in pretransplant serum samples collected from 300 kidney transplant recipients. Further analysis revealed that samples with higher reactivity to apoptotic cells displayed significantly higher class I percent panel-reactive antibodies compared to samples with low reactivity to apoptotic cells. CONCLUSIONS We provide here (1) proof of principle at the clonal level that human polyreactive antibodies can cross-react to HLA, multiple self-antigens and apoptotic cells and (2) supportive evidence that polyreactive antibodies contribute to overall HLA reactivity in the serum of patients awaiting kidney transplant.
Collapse
|
46
|
Michel K, Santella R, Steers J, Sahajpal A, Downey FX, Thohan V, Oaks M. Many de novo donor-specific antibodies recognize β2 -microglobulin-free, but not intact HLA heterodimers. HLA 2016; 87:356-66. [PMID: 27060279 PMCID: PMC5071754 DOI: 10.1111/tan.12775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Solid‐phase single antigen bead (SAB) assays are standard of care for detection and identification of donor‐specific antibody (DSA) in patients who receive solid organ transplantation (SOT). While several studies have documented the reproducibility and sensitivity of SAB testing for DSA, there are little data available concerning its specificity. This study describes the identification of antibodies to β2‐microglobulin‐free human leukocyte antigen (β2‐m‐fHLA) heavy chains on SAB arrays and provides a reassessment of the clinical relevance of DSA testing by this platform. Post‐transplant sera from 55 patients who were positive for de novo donor‐specific antibodies on a SAB solid‐phase immunoassay were tested under denaturing conditions in order to identify antibodies reactive with β2‐m‐fHLA or native HLA (nHLA). Antibodies to β2‐m‐fHLA were present in nearly half of patients being monitored in the post‐transplant period. The frequency of antibodies to β2‐m‐fHLA was similar among DSA and HLA antigens that were irrelevant to the transplant (non‐DSA). Among the seven patients with clinical or pathologic antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), none had antibodies to β2‐m‐fHLA exclusively; thus, the clinical relevance of β2‐m‐fHLA is unclear. Our data suggests that SAB testing produces false positive reactions due to the presence of β2‐m‐fHLA and these can lead to inappropriate assignment of unacceptable antigens during transplant listing and possibly inaccurate identification of DSA in the post‐transplant period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Michel
- Transplant Program, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - R Santella
- Transplant Institute, Avera McKennan Hospital and University System, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - J Steers
- Transplant Institute, Avera McKennan Hospital and University System, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - A Sahajpal
- Transplant Program, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - F X Downey
- Transplant Program, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - V Thohan
- Transplant Program, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - M Oaks
- Transplant Program, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
In organ transplantation, HLA compatibility between a donor and a recipient is currently assessed through the comparison of their HLA antigens and the sole count of incompatible HLA antigens. Similarly, antibodies were originally described as antigenic-specific. With solid phase assays detection of anti-HLA antibodies and crystallographic studies, it is now recognized that anti-HLA antibodies are not specific for antigens, but for epitopes, i.e. short polymorphic sequences of amino acids that are more often in positions accessible to allo-antibodies. These epitopes, due to the distribution of HLA molecules polymorphism, may be shared by different HLA antigens. This explains why an immunization towards a given HLA antigen can lead to synthesis of antibodies reactive towards other antigens sharing one or more epitopes. Similarly, structural comparison of the HLA molecules of a recipient and his donor defines the epitope load, i.e. the number of incompatible epitopes. This epitope load is correlated with the risk of developing antibodies specific for the donor after transplantation. New tools, such as the HLAMatchmaker software, allow to determine the epitopic load and to analyze the epitopic specificity of alloantibodies. These tools will possibly lead to rethink the method of graft allocation, or at least to take differently into account HLA compatibility in allocation algorythms.
Collapse
|
48
|
Halloran PF, Merino Lopez M, Barreto Pereira A. Identifying Subphenotypes of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplants. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:908-20. [PMID: 26743766 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2015] [Revised: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The key lesions in antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection (ABMR) are microcirculation inflammation (peritubular capillaritis and/or glomerulitis lesions, abbreviated "pg") and glomerular double contours (cg lesions). We used these features to explore subphenotypes in 164 indication biopsies with ABMR-related diagnoses: 137 ABMR (109 pure and 28 mixed with T cell-mediated rejection [TCMR]) and 27 transplant glomerulopathy (TG), identified from prospective multicenter studies. The lesions indicated three ABMR subphenotypes: pgABMR, cgABMR, and pgcgABMR. Principal component analysis confirmed these subphenotypes and showed that TG can be reclassified as pgcgABMR (n = 17) or cgABMR (n = 10). ABMR-related biopsies included 45 pgABMR, 90 pgcgABMR, and 25 cgABMR, with four unclassifiable. Dominating all time intervals was the subphenotype pgcgABMR. The pgABMR subphenotype presented earliest (median <2 years), frequently mixed with TCMR, and was most associated with nonadherence. The cgABMR subphenotype presented late (median 9 years). Subphenotypes differed in their molecular changes, with pgABMR having the most histologic-molecular discrepancies (i.e. potential errors). Donor-specific antibody (DSA) was not identified in 29% of pgcgABMR and 46% of cgABMR, but failure rates and molecular findings were similar to cases where DSA was known to be positive. Thus, ABMR presents distinct subphenotypes, early pg-dominant, late cg-dominant, and combined pgcg phenotype, differing in time, molecular features, accompanying TCMR, HLA antibody, and probability of nonadherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - M Merino Lopez
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - A Barreto Pereira
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Hospital Santa Julia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Daniel V, Sadeghi M, Suesal C, Scherer S, Tran H, Gombos P, Trojan K, Morath C, Opelz G. Clinical relevance of preformed IgG and IgM antibodies against donor endothelial progenitor cells in recipients of living donor kidney grafts. Clin Transplant 2015; 30:124-30. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Daniel
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Mahmoud Sadeghi
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Caner Suesal
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Sabine Scherer
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Hien Tran
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Petra Gombos
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Karina Trojan
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Gerhard Opelz
- Department of Transplantation-Immunology; University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yee MEM, Shah A, Anderson AR, Boudreaux J, Bray RA, Gebel HM, Josephson CD. Class I and II HLA antibodies in pediatric patients with thalassemia major. Transfusion 2015; 56:878-84. [PMID: 26666394 DOI: 10.1111/trf.13440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2015] [Revised: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HLA alloimmunization is a potential complication of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion with detrimental consequences for future organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS The study aimed to determine the prevalence and specificity of HLA antibodies among pediatric patients with thalassemia major (TM) and antibody changes over time while on leukoreduced chronic transfusion therapy. HLA antibodies were measured at two or more time points in children and young adults ages 3 to 21 years with TM. HLA Class I and II antibodies were measured by FlowPRA screening. Positive screening assays were confirmed with LabScreen single-antigen bead assays for antibody specificity. RESULTS HLA antibodies were detected in 10 of 19 (53%) subjects: seven of 19 (37%) with HLA Class I and II antibodies, two of 19 (11%) with only HLA Class I antibodies, and one of 19 (5%) with only HLA Class II antibodies. Subjects with HLA antibodies were older (14.6 years vs. 7.1 years, p = 0.05), predominantly male (80%), and more likely to have a remote history of nonleukoreduced transfusions (p = 0.057). Median time between testing was 3.7 years. De novo HLA antibodies were detected in two of 11 patients who initially had negative panel-reactive antibody screens, while one subject lost detection of Class II antibody. Two of seven patients with HLA antibodies had antibodies to self-HLA. CONCLUSION HLA antibodies have a high prevalence in TM patients and may be associated with nonleukoreduced transfusions and older age. For such patients, antibody identification will be useful if subsequent organ or stem cell transplantation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne E McPherson Yee
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta.,Department of Pediatrics and Hematology/Oncology
| | - Ankoor Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Alan R Anderson
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, BI-LO Charities Children's Cancer Center, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Jeanne Boudreaux
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta.,Department of Pediatrics and Hematology/Oncology
| | - Robert A Bray
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Cassandra D Josephson
- Department of Pediatrics and Hematology/Oncology.,Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|