1
|
Cigrovski Berkovic M, Šeša V, Balen I, Lai Q, Silovski H, Mrzljak A. Key challenges of post-liver transplant weight management. World J Transplant 2024; 14:95033. [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.95033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation serves as a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease, yet long-term survival remains a challenge. Post-liver transplant obesity seems to have a significant contribution to this challenge and it emerges as a significant risk factor for graft steatosis, metabolic syndrome and de-novo malignancy development. This review synthesizes current literature on prevalence, risk factors and management strategies for post-liver transplant obesity, emphasizing its impact on graft and patient survival. Literature review consultation was conducted in Medline/PubMed, SciELO and EMBASE, with the combination of the following keywords: Weight management, liver transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, lifestyle interventions, bariatric surgery. Immunosuppressive therapy has a significant influence on long-term survival of liver transplant patients, yet it seems to have lesser effect on post-transplant obesity development than previously thought. However, it significantly contributes to the development of other components of metabolic syndrome. Key predisposing factors for post-transplant obesity development encompass elevated recipient and donor body mass index, a history of alcoholic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, male gender, the absence of cellular rejection and the marital status of the recipient. Tailored immunosuppressive regimens, pharmacotherapy, lifestyle interventions and bariatric surgery represent key components in mitigating post-transplant obesity and improving long-term survival and quality of life in this group of patients. Timely identification and intervention thus hold paramount importance. Further research is warranted to refine optimal management strategies and enhance outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Cigrovski Berkovic
- Department for Sport and Exercise Medicine, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Vibor Šeša
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Ivan Balen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, General Hospital “Dr. Josip Bencevic”, Slavonski Brod 35000, Croatia
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00018, Italy
| | - Hrvoje Silovski
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Anna Mrzljak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Department of Medicine, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berg T, Aehling NF, Bruns T, Welker MW, Weismüller T, Trebicka J, Tacke F, Strnad P, Sterneck M, Settmacher U, Seehofer D, Schott E, Schnitzbauer AA, Schmidt HH, Schlitt HJ, Pratschke J, Pascher A, Neumann U, Manekeller S, Lammert F, Klein I, Kirchner G, Guba M, Glanemann M, Engelmann C, Canbay AE, Braun F, Berg CP, Bechstein WO, Becker T, Trautwein C. S2k-Leitlinie Lebertransplantation der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:1397-1573. [PMID: 39250961 DOI: 10.1055/a-2255-7246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Berg
- Bereich Hepatologie, Medizinischen Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Niklas F Aehling
- Bereich Hepatologie, Medizinischen Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Tony Bruns
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Martin-Walter Welker
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroent., Hepat., Pneum., Endokrin. Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Tobias Weismüller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jonel Trebicka
- Medizinische Klinik B für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Frank Tacke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m. S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK) und Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Pavel Strnad
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Martina Sterneck
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Eckart Schott
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II - Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Diabetolgie, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Hartmut H Schmidt
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Ulf Neumann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Steffen Manekeller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Frank Lammert
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Ingo Klein
- Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Gabriele Kirchner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg und Innere Medizin I, Caritaskrankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Markus Guba
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Glanemann
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland
| | - Cornelius Engelmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m. S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK) und Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Ali E Canbay
- Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Felix Braun
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schlewswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Christoph P Berg
- Innere Medizin I Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Becker
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schlewswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Olayinka OT, Orelus J, Nisar MR, Kotha R, Saad-Omer SI, Singh S, Yu AK. Comparative Mortality Rates of Vasoconstrictor Agents in the Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e67034. [PMID: 39286706 PMCID: PMC11402629 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is an acute complication of advanced liver disease, which manifests with a rapidly progressive decline in kidney function. Though pharmacological treatment has been recently advanced, there are still high mortality rates. The study compares the mortality rate in patients using different vasoconstrictor agents in the management of HRS. A complete literature search was done in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PubMed Central (PMC), and Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Studies were included according to previously established criteria, in which all studies reporting on adult patients with HRS treated with vasoconstrictor agents were eligible. The data extracted were analyzed with a random-effects model to express variability between studies, and the principal measure was the risk ratio (RR) for mortality. Of the 8,137 studies identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analysis, vasoconstrictors, mainly terlipressin, significantly improved renal function and decreased the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) versus placebo. However, a significant impact on mortality was lacking (0.94 (0.84-1.06), p = 0.31). The subgroup analysis found that mortality rates were not significantly different between vasoconstrictors, whether used in combination with or without albumin (0.97 (0.77-1.23), p = 0.79, and 0.98 (0.79-1.21), p = 0.86). Global heterogeneity was low, indicating consistent results in the studies. Vasoconstrictors are helpful in managing HRS, with improvement in renal function and reduction in RRT requirements. However, the effect on mortality was small and nonsignificant. Such findings support the use of terlipressin in HRS management; concomitantly, they emphasize the need for personalized treatment strategies and future research to find alternative therapies that may be more effective for improved survival results with fewer side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwatoba T Olayinka
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Jaslin Orelus
- Emergency Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Mah Rukh Nisar
- Neurology and Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Rudrani Kotha
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Sabaa I Saad-Omer
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Shivani Singh
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Ann Kashmer Yu
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Simone P, Bronzoni J, Martinelli C, Ducci J, Campani D, Gitto S, Marchetti P, Biancofiore G. Aging with a Liver Graft: Analysis of Very Long-Term Survivors after Liver Transplantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1087. [PMID: 38398400 PMCID: PMC10889074 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Italy, data on long-term survivors after liver transplantation are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a hybrid design study on a cohort of 359 adult recipients who received transplants between 1996 and 2002 to identify predictors of survival and the prevalence of co-morbidities among long-term survivors. RESULTS The actuarial (95% CI) patient survival was 96% (94.6-98.3%), 69% (64.2-73.6%), 55% (49.8-59.9%), 42.8% (37.6-47.8%), and 34% (29.2-38.9%) at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. The leading causes of death were hepatitis C virus recurrence (24.6%), extrahepatic malignancies (16.9%), infection (14.4%), and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (14.4%). The factors associated with the survival probability were younger donor and recipient ages (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), female recipient sex (p < 0.001), absence of HCV (p < 0.01), absence of HCC (p = 0.001), and absence of diabetes mellitus at one year (p < 0.01). At the latest follow-up, the leading comorbidities were hypertension (53.6%), obesity (18.7%), diabetes mellitus (17.1%), hyperlipidemia (14.7%), chronic kidney dysfunction (14.7%), and extrahepatic malignancies (13.8%), with 73.9% of patients having more than one complication. CONCLUSIONS Aging with a liver graft is associated with an increased risk of complications and requires ongoing care to reduce the long-term attrition rate resulting from chronic immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo De Simone
- Liver Transplant Program, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Biochemical Pathology and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Via Savi 20, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Jessica Bronzoni
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Caterina Martinelli
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Juri Ducci
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniela Campani
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Biochemical Pathology and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Via Savi 20, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Pathology, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Gitto
- Internal Medicine and Liver Unit, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Piazza San Marco 4, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Piero Marchetti
- Diabetology Unit, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Biancofiore
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Biochemical Pathology and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Via Savi 20, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Savi 20, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Intensive Care Unit, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palaniyappan N, Peach E, Pearce F, Dhaliwal A, Campos-Varela I, Cant MR, Dopazo C, Trotter J, Divani-Patel S, Hatta AAZ, Hopkins L, Testa G, Bilbao A, Kasmani Z, Faloon S, Mirza DF, Klintmalm GB, Bilbao I, Asrani SK, Rajoriya N, Aravinthan AD. Long-term outcomes (beyond 5 years) of liver transplant recipients-A transatlantic multicenter study. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:170-181. [PMID: 37589505 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
The long-term (>5 y) outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) have not been extensively reported. The aim was to evaluate outcomes of LT recipients who have survived the first 5 years. A multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 3 high volume LT centers (Dallas-USA, Birmingham-UK, and Barcelona-Spain) was undertaken. All adult patients, who underwent LT since the inception of the program to December 31, 2010, and survived at least 5 years since their LT were included. Patient survival was the primary outcome. A total of 3682 patients who survived at least 5 years following LT (long-term survivors) were included. Overall, median age at LT was 52 years (IQR 44-58); 53.1% were males; and 84.6% were Caucasians. A total of 49.4% (n=1820) died during a follow-up period of 36,828 person-years (mean follow-up 10 y). A total of 80.2% (n=1460) of all deaths were premature deaths. Age-standardized all-cause mortality as compared to general population was 3 times higher for males and 5 times higher for females. On adjusted analysis, besides older recipients and older donors, predictors of long-term mortality were malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and dialysis. Implementation of strategies such as noninvasive cancer screening, minimizing immunosuppression, and intensive primary/secondary cardiovascular prevention could further improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naaventhan Palaniyappan
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Emily Peach
- Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Pearce
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, UK
- Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Isabel Campos-Varela
- Liver Unit, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Matthew R Cant
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Cristina Dopazo
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James Trotter
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Laurence Hopkins
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Angela Bilbao
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zain Kasmani
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Faloon
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius F Mirza
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Itxarone Bilbao
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Neil Rajoriya
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Aloysious D Aravinthan
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen L, Zhang N, Huang Y, Zhang Q, Fang Y, Fu J, Yuan Y, Chen L, Chen X, Xu Z, Li Y, Izawa H, Xiang C. Multiple Dimensions of using Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treating Liver Diseases: From Bench to Beside. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2023; 19:2192-2224. [PMID: 37498509 DOI: 10.1007/s12015-023-10583-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Liver diseases impose a huge burden worldwide. Although hepatocyte transplantation has long been considered as a potential strategy for treating liver diseases, its clinical implementation has created some obvious limitations. As an alternative strategy, cell therapy, particularly mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation, is widely used in treating different liver diseases, including acute liver disease, acute-on-chronic liver failure, hepatitis B/C virus, autoimmune hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we summarize the status of MSC transplantation in treating liver diseases, focusing on the therapeutic mechanisms, including differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells, immunomodulating function with a variety of immune cells, paracrine effects via the secretion of various cytokines and extracellular vesicles, and facilitation of homing and engraftment. Some improved perspectives and current challenges are also addressed. In summary, MSCs have great potential in the treatment of liver diseases based on their multi-faceted characteristics, and more accurate mechanisms and novel therapeutic strategies stemming from MSCs will facilitate clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Chen
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuqi Huang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Yangxin Fang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiamin Fu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Yin Yuan
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Chen
- Innovative Precision Medicine (IPM) Group, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311215, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310027, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenyu Xu
- Innovative Precision Medicine (IPM) Group, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311215, People's Republic of China
| | - Yifei Li
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China
| | - Hiromi Izawa
- Jingugaien Woman Life Clinic, Jingu-Gaien 3-39-5 2F, Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Charlie Xiang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China.
- Research Units of Infectious Disease and Microecology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fu C, Li X, Chen Y, Long X, Liu K. Lung cancer incidences after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:16119-16128. [PMID: 37351559 PMCID: PMC10469810 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation has made significant progress in recent decades. Lung cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers after liver transplantation. However, the risk of lung cancer among liver transplant patients compared with the general population is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the risk of developing lung cancer after liver transplantation. METHODS All eligible studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from database inception to April 2022 were included. Standardized incidence ratio was used to describe the increased risk of lung cancer in liver transplant recipients as compared with the general population. The random-effects model was used for the calculations. A funnel plot and Egger test were performed to assess the potential publication bias. RESULTS Our meta-analysis included 15 studies, which involved 76,897 liver transplantation patients. Studies included in this review showed significant heterogeneity (I2 = 65.3%; p < 0.001), which required a random-effects model for effect pooling. The results indicated a significant higher risk of developing lung cancer in liver transplant patients than the general population with a pooled SIR of 2.06 (95% CI: 1.73, 2.46, p < 0.001). When stratified by region, no significant regional difference was observed. It showed a similarly doubled risk of lung cancer in Europe and North America, but an insignificantly increased risk in Asian populations. The sensitivity analysis by removal and substitution of each literature did not change the results. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis suggests that liver transplant patients are twice as likely as the general population to develop lung cancer. Further research on risk factors for the development of lung cancer after liver transplantation should be conducted and appropriate surveillance protocols should be developed to reduce the risk of its occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Fu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery CenterFirst Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
| | - Xiaocong Li
- Medical Research and Biometrics Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yongjin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery CenterFirst Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
| | - Xiaoyin Long
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery CenterFirst Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
| | - Kai Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery CenterFirst Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu M, Li C, Liu J, Wan Q. Risk factors of early bacterial infection and analysis of bacterial composition, distribution and drug susceptibility after cadaveric liver transplantation. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2023; 22:63. [PMID: 37525234 PMCID: PMC10391978 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-023-00616-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study provided a theoretical basis for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of bacterial infection after liver transplantation through analyzing the pathogenic distribution, drug sensitivity and risk factors of bacterial infection after liver transplantation. METHODS We collected clinical data from 207 recipients undergoing liver transplantation of graft from donation after citizens' death donors in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to December 2021 and analyzed the composition and distribution of bacterial pathogens, drug resistance and risk factors of infection. RESULTS A total of 90 bacterial infections occurred in 55 recipients within two months after liver transplantation, and the incidence of bacterial infection was 26.6% (55/207). The gram-negative bacteria (46/90, 51.1%) were more prevalent than gram-positive bacteria (44/90, 48.9%). Common sites of infection were the abdominal/biliary tract (26/90, 28.9%), lung (22/90, 22.4%) and urinary tract (22/90, 22.4%). Fourteen cases (6.8%) died after liver transplantation. Klebsiella pneumoniae (17/90, 18.9%) was the most frequent gram-negative bacteria causing infection in liver transplant recipients and 58.7%, 50%, 80.4% and 89.1% of gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to amikacin, minocycline, tigecycline and polymyxin B, respectively. The most common gram-positive bacteria was Enterococcus faecium (30/90, 33.3%) and 97.7%, 100%, 86.4%, 100% and 100% of gram-positive bacteria were sensitive to vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, tigecycline and linezolid, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that bacterial infection was associated with female, age (≥ 50 years old), preoperative albumin (≤ 30 g/L), operation duration (≥ 400 min), intraoperative blood loss (≥ 3000 ml) and postoperative ventilator support. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that female (OR = 3.149, 95% CI: 1.418-6.993, P = 0.005), operation duration (≥ 400 min) (OR = 2.393, 95% CI: 1.202-4.765, P = 0.013) and intraoperative blood loss (≥ 3000 ml) (OR = 2.052, 95% CI: 1.007-4.183, P = 0.048) were independent risk factors for bacterial infection after liver transplantation. CONCLUSION The incidence of early bacterial infection after liver transplantation was high, and the infection sites were mainly abdominal/biliary tract, respiratory tract and urinary tract. The most common pathogenic bacterium was gram-negative bacterium. Our study also identified several independent risk factors for bacterial infection after liver transplantation, including female gender, operation duration of 400 min or more, and intraoperative blood loss of 3000 ml or more. By addressing these risk factors, such as implementing strategies to optimize surgical procedures and minimize blood loss, healthcare professionals can work towards reducing the incidence of bacterial infections following liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Liu
- Department of Transplant Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China
- Engineering and Technology Research Center for Transplantation Medicine of National Health Commission, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China
| | - Cuiying Li
- Department of Transplant Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China
- Engineering and Technology Research Center for Transplantation Medicine of National Health Commission, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Transplant Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China
- Engineering and Technology Research Center for Transplantation Medicine of National Health Commission, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China
| | - Qiquan Wan
- Department of Transplant Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China.
- Engineering and Technology Research Center for Transplantation Medicine of National Health Commission, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410013, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fuochi E, Anastasio L, Lynch EN, Campani C, Dragoni G, Milani S, Galli A, Innocenti T. Main factors influencing long-term outcomes of liver transplantation in 2022. World J Hepatol 2023; 15:321-352. [PMID: 37034235 PMCID: PMC10075010 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i3.321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplant (LT) outcomes have markedly improved in the recent decades, even if long-term morbidity and mortality are still considerable. Most of late deaths are independent from graft function and different comorbidities, including complications of metabolic syndrome and de novo neoplasms, seem to play a key role in determining long-term outcomes in LT recipients. This review discusses the main factors associated with late mortality and suggests possible strategies to improve long-term management and follow-up after liver transplantation. In particular, the reduction of drug toxicity, the use of tools to identify high-risk patients, and setting up a multidisciplinary team also for long-term management of LT recipients may further improve survival after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Fuochi
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Anastasio
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Erica Nicola Lynch
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Claudia Campani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Gabriele Dragoni
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena 53100, Italy
| | - Stefano Milani
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Andrea Galli
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Tommaso Innocenti
- Gastroenterology Research Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gabbay U, Issachar A, Cohen-Naftaly M, Brown M, Nesher E. Gender specific survival rates after deceased donor liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 79:103933. [PMID: 35860137 PMCID: PMC9289308 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background According to the literature, there are sex allocation inequalities in liver transplantation (LT). Sex disparities in outcomes after LT have been debated. This study aimed to evaluate sex-specific outcomes after LT, specifically short-term mortality and long-term survival rates. Methods A retrospective cohort of the entire LT series from to 2010–2019 in a single center in which the inclusion criteria were adults ≥18 YO age who underwent primary deceased donor LT. Mortality rate was evaluated within 30 days and 6 months. Survival rate was evaluated at 1,3 and 5 years of age. Results A total of 240 primary and deceased donor LTs (153 men and 87 women) were included. Mean age 55.2Y men and 51.6Y women (p = 0.02). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the direct indication in 32.7% of the men and only 17.4% of the women. The leading primary liver morbidities were viral hepatitis (B, C, and D) in 38.3% (N = 92) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 20.8% (N = 50) of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 14%, which was significantly higher in men (18%) than in women (8%). Survival rates after 5 years were 64.9% and 78.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis through logistic regression that included age, direct indication, MELD, and primary liver morbidity revealed statistically significant female to male Odds-Ratio of 0.4 in 30 days, 6 m mortality and a statistically significant higher long-term survival. Conclusions Our observations revealed better female outcomes, namely, lower short-term mortality and higher long-term survival. Given the consistency after stratification and given the multivariate analysis, this is unlikely to be attributable to confounders. Such findings suggesting consistently better female outcomes have not been previously reported; hence, multi center study is encouraged. Gender outcome disparities after liver transplantation (LT) is debated. We present retrospective cohort of 240 consecutive LT in a single center. We found significant lower short-term mortality rates and better long-term survival in women. The outcome disparity was consistent in most underlying liver diseases. We had not identified factors that may confound sex outcome disparity.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chauhan M, Zhang T, Thuluvath PJ. Gender Differences in Liver Transplantation Outcomes in Polycystic Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:3445-3454. [PMID: 34191186 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07125-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, our objective was to determine gender differences in the outcomes of patients with PLD undergoing liver (LT) or liver/kidney transplantation (SLK). METHODS We analyzed the UNOS datasets of all adults who had transplanted for PLD between 1988 and 2018. RESULTS During the study period, 663 LT/SLK (51% LT only and 49% SLK) were done for PLD patients and of these 500 (75%) were in women. Women were younger (52.8 vs. 56.7 years, p < 0.001), had lower MELD at transplant (16.6 vs. 19.4, p < 0.001), had higher serum albumin (3.7 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001), and had a lower CTP class (p < 0.008). During the follow-up, 18% (n = 89) women and 29% (n = 47) men died (p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates showed similar survival rate for patients who had LT and SLK (p = 0.459), but survival rate was significantly higher for women compared to men (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that female gender (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.90) was associated with a lower mortality. Moreover, Karnofsky Performance Status was excellent for 70% of women and 55% of men (p = 0.03) after LT. Women had better survival whether they received liver or SLK. The era of transplant, whether they were transplanted with MELD exception points or whether they were on dialysis at the time of transplant, did not have an effect on the gender differences in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Women had 46% lower risk of mortality after adjusting for other covariates compared to men after LT/SLK for PLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahak Chauhan
- Institute of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Talan Zhang
- Institute of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul J Thuluvath
- Institute of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alcohol-associated Liver Disease Is Now the Most Common Indication for Liver Transplant Waitlisting Among Young American Adults. Transplantation 2022; 106:2000-2005. [PMID: 35642977 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality from cirrhosis is increasing and is the highest among young adults with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). The aim of this study was to describe rates of liver transplant (LT) waitlisting stratified by age, sex, and cirrhosis etiology. METHODS Retrospective population-based study from 2003 to 2018 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Adults newly registered on the LT waitlist were included, and age at listing was dichotomized to ±40 y. Annual standardized incidence proportions of LT waitlisting by age group, sex, and etiology were calculated using census data. Changes in annual rates were described with Poisson regression. RESULTS A total of 209 399 unique individuals were included, 10 326 (5%) <40 y at listing. In those <40 y of age, listing increased most for ALD (4-fold increase) followed by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD; 2-fold increase). Compared to young adult males, young females were more likely to be listed for ALD and less likely to be listed for NAFLD. In those ≥40 y of age, listings increased most for ALD (2-fold increase) and NAFLD (2-fold increase). Hepatitis C virus increased from 2003 to 2013 and declined post-2014 in the ≥40-y age group. CONCLUSIONS LT waitlisting is increasing substantially in young Americans, driven primarily by ALD. These data support ongoing efforts to identify adolescents and young adults with early stages of ALD where interventions can be implemented to prevent the development of cirrhosis and liver-related complications.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ayvazoğlu Soy EH, Akdur A, Karakaya E, Moray G, Haberal M. Liver Transplant Recipients Who Survive for More Than 10 Years: A Long-Term Survey. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:20-23. [PMID: 35384803 DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2021.o8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Liver transplant is the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver failure. Short-term and midterm surveys have been published, but there are few long-term surveys. Here, we report the outcomes of our long-term liver transplant survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 1988, we have performed 694 liver transplants (366 adult, 328 pediatric), including the first deceased donor transplant in Turkey (December 8, 1988); the first pediatric segmental living related transplant in Turkey, the Middle and Near East, and Europe; the world's first adult segmental living related transplant (April 24, 1990); and the world's first living related donor combined liver-kidney transplant (May 16, 1992). We retrospectively evaluated data from recipients who survived >10 years with normal graft function. RESULTS Of 215 recipients, survival ranges were ≥20 years (n = 13), 15 to 19 years (n = 86), and 10 to 14 years (n = 116); 211 remain alive today with normal liver function. There were 5 retransplants to treat chronic graft rejection, of which 4 recipients are alive with normal graft function after a second liver transplant (15, 20, 22, and 31 years after first transplant). One patient died soon after the second liver transplant (15 years after first transplant). Acute rejection episodes were seen in 72 (34%), and 7 were steroid resistant. There were 48 (22.7%) drug-induced complications. Ten patients had de novo malignancy: 5 lymphoma, 2 squamous cell carcinoma, 1 gastrointestinal stromal tumor, 1 thyroid papillary carcinoma, and 1 multiple myeloma. There were also 31 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplant: 13 were beyond Milan criteria, 6 had incidental HCC, and 12 were within Milan. CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival after liver transplant is possible with expert care. Few reports have mentioned long-term surveys; our long-term liver transplant survey is among the largest series in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebru H Ayvazoğlu Soy
- From the General Surgery Department, Division of Transplantation, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dooghaie Moghadam A, Eslami P, Dowlati Beirami A, Iravani S, Farokhi E, Mansour-Ghanaei A, Hashemi MR, Aghajanpoor Pasha M, Mehrvar A, Nassiri-Toosi M. An Overview of the Current Hepatitis B Treatment Strategies after Liver Transplantation. Middle East J Dig Dis 2021; 13:5-14. [PMID: 34712432 PMCID: PMC8531931 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, liver transplantation (LT) is considered as the only option for the treatment of patients with various causes of liver failure, including patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. Overall, patients with HBV who undergo LT are at increased risk of hepatitis B infection recurrence. Although the current knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of this infection has been dramatically increased over the past few decades, it is still considered a complex disease process with varying degrees of clinical characteristics and changing patterns over time. There are various treatment strategies for preventing HBV recurrence in the LT setting. Generally, these regimens include oral nucleoside/ nucleotide analogues (NAs), hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), and vaccines or the combination of these drugs. The treatment strategy of choice should be based on cost-effectiveness, along with other patients underlying conditions. In this case, studies indicate that potent NAs are more cost-effective than HBIG in most case scenarios. In this article, we aimed to review the general medications used in the prophylaxis of the recurrence of HBV infection after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Dooghaie Moghadam
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pegah Eslami
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirreza Dowlati Beirami
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahrokh Iravani
- Research Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ermia Farokhi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Mansour-Ghanaei
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center (GLDRC), Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran
| | - Mahmood Reza Hashemi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Aghajanpoor Pasha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azim Mehrvar
- Research Center for Cancer Screening and Epidemiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohssen Nassiri-Toosi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ibach M, Eurich D, Dobrindt E, Lurje G, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Pratschke J, Globke B. Orthotopic Liver Transplantation for Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Observations from a 30-Year Liver Transplant Program. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA 2021; 57:medicina57080821. [PMID: 34441027 PMCID: PMC8401475 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57080821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) refers to a complete thrombotic obstruction of the venous hepatic outflow tract due to various etiologies and constitutes a rare indication for ortothopic liver transplantation (LT). Few studies investigated long-term outcomes after LT for BCS. The aim of this study was to examine potential risk factors for late mortality and to evaluate long-term outcomes after LT for BCS. Materials and methods: 46 patients received an LT for BCS between 1989 and 2019 at the transplant center of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. We analyzed potential effects of disease etiology, vascular events, rejection, and immunosuppression on long-term survival after transplantation using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox logistic regression. Results: Of the 46 patients, 70% were female and 30% were male. Median age at the time of transplantation was 36 years. A total of 41 vascular events, including 26 thrombotic and 17 hemorrhagic incidents, occurred. The 1 year, the 5 year, the 10 year, and the 20 year survival rates were 87%, 83%, 76%, and 60%, respectively. By comparison, survival rates of the liver transplant cohort across all other indications at our center were slightly inferior with 85%, 75%, 65%, and 46%, respectively. In the study population, patients with myeloproliferative disorders showed worse outcomes compared to patients with other causes of BCS. Conclusion: Liver transplantation for BCS showed excellent results, even superior to those for other indications. Vascular events (i.e., thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications) did not have any prognostic value for overall mortality. Patients with myeloproliferative disorders seem to have a disadvantage in survival.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ivanics T, Shwaartz C, Claasen MPAW, Patel MS, Yoon P, Raschzok N, Wallace D, Muaddi H, Murillo Perez CF, Hansen BE, Selzner N, Sapisochin G. Trends in indications and outcomes of liver transplantation in Canada: A multicenter retrospective study. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1444-1454. [PMID: 33977568 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The liver transplantation (LT) landscape is continuously evolving. We sought to evaluate trends in indications for LT in Canada and the impact of primary liver disease on post-LT outcomes using a national transplant registry. Adult patients who underwent a primary LT between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively identified in the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry. Outcomes included post-LT patient and graft survival. A total of 5,722 LTs were identified. The number of LT per year increased from 251 in 2000 to 349 in 2018. The proportion of patients transplanted for HCV decreased from 31.5% in 2000 to 3.4% in 2018. In contrast, the percentage of transplants for HCC increased from 2.3% in 2000 to 32.4% in 2018, and those performed for NASH increased from 0.4% in 2005 to 12.6% in 2018. Year of transplant (per 1 year) was protective for both patient (HR:0.96,95%CI:0.94-0.97; P < 0.001) and graft survival (HR:0.97, 95%CI: 0.96-0.99; P = 0.001). Post-LT outcomes have improved over time in this nationwide analysis spanning 18 years. Moreover, trends in the indications for LT have changed, with HCC becoming the leading etiology. The decrease in the proportion of HCV patients and increase in those with NASH has implications on the evolving management of LT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Yoon
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nathanael Raschzok
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Wallace
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hala Muaddi
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carla Fiorella Murillo Perez
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Romano DN, Mokuolu DC, Katz DJ, DeMaria S. Orthotopic liver transplant in the pregnant recipient: A systematic review of preoperative management and maternal and fetal outcomes. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14269. [PMID: 33615548 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Severe liver dysfunction requiring transplantation is a major event at any stage of life, but for those requiring liver transplantation while pregnant, two lives hang in the balance. Available evidence on this relatively rare event consists solely of case reports and have yet to be reviewed or synthesized. We performed a systematic literature review and analyzed reports of 22 patients who underwent liver transplantation during pregnancy. This review describes the reported etiologies of hepatic failure in pregnant patients requiring transplantation, perioperative anesthetic management techniques, and the maternal and fetal clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana N Romano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Liver Transplant Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Debbie C Mokuolu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J Katz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel DeMaria
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Liver Transplant Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nephew LD, Zia Z, Ghabril M, Orman E, Lammert C, Kubal C, Chalasani N. Sex disparities in waitlisting and liver transplant for acute liver failure. JHEP Rep 2021; 3:100200. [PMID: 33511336 PMCID: PMC7817503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Sex disparities in liver transplantation (LT) for chronic liver disease have been described. It is unclear if similar disparities exist for acute liver failure (ALF). METHODS Adults waitlisted for LT from 2002 to 2016 with ALF were investigated using the United Network of Organ Sharing database. Clinical characteristics and causative aetiologies were compared between men and women who were waitlisted Status-1. Differences in LT, waitlist removal, and 1-year post-transplant survival were explored. RESULTS Of 8,408 patients waitlisted for LT with ALF, 41.3% of men and 63.9% of women were waitlisted Status-1 (p <0.001). Women had significantly higher international normalised ratio, higher frequency of grade 3-4 hepatic encephalopathy, and different aetiologies of ALF than men. On univariable analysis, women were less likely to undergo LT (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.84-0.97) and were more likely to die or be removed from the waitlist as a result of clinical deterioration (SHR 1.14; 95% CI 1.002-1.30) than men. The disparities in LT (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.03) and death/clinical deterioration (SHR 1.13; 95% CI 0.99-1.29) were no longer significant on multivariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in 1-year post-transplant survival between men and women. CONCLUSIONS Women with ALF are more likely to be waitlisted Status-1 than men. There were no clear disparities in LT or waitlist removal. Sex differences in LT and waitlist removal were attenuated on fully adjusted models, suggesting that these disparities may in part be mitigated by Status-1 listing. LAY SUMMARY Women with acute liver failure appear to be sicker than men and more often require urgent Status-1 waitlisting. There were no sex disparities in waitlist removal because of clinical deterioration or liver transplantation. This is in contrast to chronic liver disease, where sex disparities exist. The Status-1 waitlisting that women with acute liver failure receive may in part mitigate sex disparities in liver transplantation.
Collapse
Key Words
- AIH, autoimmune hepatitis
- ALF, acute liver failure
- APAP, acetaminophen
- Allocation
- Fulminant
- Gender
- HE, hepatic encephalopathy
- HR, hazard ratio
- INR, international normalised ratio
- LT, liver transplantation
- MELD, model for end-stage liver disease
- SHR, subdistribution hazard ratio
- SRTR, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients
- Status-1
- UNOS, United Network of Organ Sharing
- Women
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D. Nephew
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zahra Zia
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Marwan Ghabril
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Eric Orman
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Craig Lammert
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Chandrashekhar Kubal
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Naga Chalasani
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Psychosocial Burden of HCV Infection and the Impact of Antiviral Therapy on the Quality of Life in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2020:8754247. [PMID: 33204255 PMCID: PMC7655256 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8754247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for HCV is safe and effective in the liver (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients; however, data on the quality of life (QoL) of patients are scanty. This pilot study is aimed at prospectively evaluating the QoL in LT and KT recipients before and after DAA treatment. Methods We prospectively enrolled 17 LT and 11 KT recipients with HCV infection starting a sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy for 12 weeks. All participants before (T0), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) weeks after the end of the therapy completed the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire, the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI—Y1–Y2). Results At T0, LT and KT patients were similar for gender, age, BMI, smoking habits, marital status, mean liver stiffness values at Fibroscan, and HCV genotype distribution (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in STAI-Y1, STAI-Y2, Zung, and SF-36 scores (p > 0.05). At T12, all the participants showed a sustained virological response (SVR). All items of the SF-36 questionnaire improved from the pretreatment to posttreatment period within the LT group, and the 4 domains role-physical, bodily pain, social function, role-emotional, and mental health reached statistical significance (p < 0.05 in all cases). On the contrary, in KT patients, there was no significant improvement in SF-36 mean scores compared to at baseline at T12 and T24. Conclusions This pilot study suggested that DAA therapy is associated with a significant improvement of the QoL only in LT recipients. Probably, KT recipients did not consider HCV a “central player” in the course of their disease, and HCV eradication did not significantly impact on their QoL.
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Maira T, Little EC, Berenguer M. Immunosuppression in liver transplant. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 46-47:101681. [PMID: 33158467 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The increasing potency of immunosuppression (IS) agents resulted in significantly decreased rates of steroid resistant rejection and rejection related graft loss in liver transplantation (LT). Currently, more than two thirds of late mortality after LT is unrelated to graft function. However, the increased benefit of more potent IS drugs, coupled with the prolonged survival of transplant recipients led to longer patients exposure to these drugs and their unwanted adverse effects, creating a double-edged sword. In this article the authors describe the mechanism of action and the adverse effects of the most commonly used immunosuppressed drugs, and the most commonly used IS regimens for both induction and maintenance regimens. The balance between the ideal IS regimen to prevent rejection and the need to minimize the dose of IS drugs in order to prevent the adverse effects related to its use requires the knowledge of the science and the experience with the art of medicine. The different protocols aimed at protecting renal function and preventing the development of de novo cancer and metabolic syndrome are discussed here. The main causes of mortality late after liver transplant are associated with prolonged use of IS medications, and clear evidence exists about over-immunosuppression of recipients of liver transplant. The current status of strategies of IS minimization and withdrawal are reviewed in this article, with evaluation of its benefits and pitfalls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Di Maira
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Avda Fernando Abril Martorell, 106 (Torre F5), Valencia, 46026, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, 28029, Spain; ISS La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain.
| | - Ester Coelho Little
- University of Arizona, College of Medicine, 3110 East Minnesona Avenue, Phoenix, AZ, 85016, USA.
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Avda Fernando Abril Martorell, 106 (Torre F5), Valencia, 46026, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, 28029, Spain; ISS La Fe, Valencia, 46026, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Facultad de Medicina, Valencia, 46010, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Koch C, Bette T, Waidmann O, Filmann N, Schrecker C, Trojan J, Weiler N, Vermehren J, Schnitzbauer AA, Bechstein WO, Zeuzem S, Herrmann E, Welker MW. AFP ratio predicts HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235576. [PMID: 32614912 PMCID: PMC7332004 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Early identification of patients at risk for HCC recurrence is of paramount importance since early treatment of recurrent HCC after LT may be associated with increased survival. We evaluated incidence of and predictors for HCC recurrence, with a focus on the course of AFP levels. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-center study of 99 HCC patients who underwent LT between January 28th, 1997 and May 11th, 2016. A multi-stage proportional hazards model with three stages was used to evaluate potential predictive markers, both by univariate and multivariable analysis, for influences on 1) recurrence after transplantation, 2) mortality without HCC recurrence, and 3) mortality after recurrence. Results 19/99 HCC patients showed recurrence after LT. Waiting time was not associated with overall HCC recurrence (HR = 1, p = 0.979). Similarly, waiting time did not affect mortality in LT recipients both with (HR = 0.97, p = 0.282) or without (HR = 0.99, p = 0.685) HCC recurrence. Log10-transformed AFP values at the time of LT (HR 1.75, p = 0.023) as well as after LT (HR 2.07, p = 0.037) were significantly associated with recurrence. Median survival in patients with a ratio (AFP at recurrence divided by AFP 3 months before recurrence) of 0.5 was greater than 70 months, as compared to a median of only 8 months in patients with a ratio of 5. Conclusion A rise in AFP levels rather than an absolute threshold could help to identify patients at short-term risk for HCC recurrence post LT, which may allow intensification of the surveillance strategy on an individualized basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Koch
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Theresa Bette
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Oliver Waidmann
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Natalie Filmann
- Institut für Biostatistik und Mathematische Modellierung, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nina Weiler
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Johannes Vermehren
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas A. Schnitzbauer
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Wolf Otto Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Stefan Zeuzem
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eva Herrmann
- Institut für Biostatistik und Mathematische Modellierung, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krenzien F, Katou S, Papa A, Sinn B, Benzing C, Feldbrügge L, Kamali C, Brunnbauer P, Splith K, Lorenz RR, Ritschl P, Wiering L, Öllinger R, Schöning W, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M. Increased Cell-Free DNA Plasma Concentration Following Liver Transplantation Is Linked to Portal Hepatitis and Inferior Survival. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051543. [PMID: 32443763 PMCID: PMC7291032 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor organ quality is crucial for transplant survival and long-term survival of patients after liver transplantation. Besides bacterial and viral infections, endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) can stimulate immune responses. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is one such DAMP that exhibits highly proinflammatory effects via DNA sensors. Herein, we measured cfDNA after liver transplantation and found elevated levels when organs from resuscitated donors were transplanted. High levels of cfDNA were associated with high C-reactive protein, leukocytosis as well as granulocytosis in the recipient. In addition to increased systemic immune responses, portal hepatitis was observed, which was associated with increased interface activity and a higher numbers of infiltrating neutrophils and eosinophils in the graft. In fact, the cfDNA was an independent significant factor in multivariate analysis and increased concentration of cfDNA was associated with inferior 1-year survival. Moreover, cfDNA levels were found to be decreased significantly during the postoperative course when patients underwent continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. In conclusion, patients receiving livers from resuscitated donors were characterised by high postoperative cfDNA levels. Those patients showed pronounced portal hepatitis and systemic inflammatory responses in the short term leading to a high mortality. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of cfDNA clearance by haemoadsorption and haemofiltration in vitro and in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Shadi Katou
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany;
| | - Alba Papa
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Bruno Sinn
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
- Institute of Pathology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Linda Feldbrügge
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Can Kamali
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Philipp Brunnbauer
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Katrin Splith
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Ralf Roland Lorenz
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Paul Ritschl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Leke Wiering
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.K.); (A.P.); (C.B.); (L.F.); (C.K.); (P.B.); (K.S.); (R.R.L.); (P.R.); (L.W.); (R.Ö.); (W.S.); (J.P.)
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), 10178 Berlin, Germany;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Madreseh E, Mahmoudi M, Nassiri-Toosi M, Baghfalaki T, Zeraati H. Post Liver Transplantation Survival and Related Prognostic Factors among Adult Recipients in Tehran Liver Transplant Center; 2002-2019. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE 2020; 23:326-334. [PMID: 32383617 DOI: 10.34172/aim.2020.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is a standard treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). However, with increasing demand for this treatment and limited resources, it is available only to patients who are more likely to survive. The primary aim was to determine prognostic factors for survival. METHODS We collected data from 597 adult patients with ESLD, who received a single organ and initial orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in our center between 20 March 2008 and 20 March 2018. In this historical cohort study, univariate and multiple Cox model were used to determine prognostic factors of survival after transplantation. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 825 (0-3889) days, 111 (19%) patients died. Survival rates were 88%, 85%, 82% and 79% at 90 days, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. Older patients (HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.01-1.59), presence of pre-OLT ascites (HR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.16-3.57), pre-OLT hospitalization (HR = 1.88; 95% CI:1.02-3.46), longer operative time (HR = 1.006; 95% CI: 1.004-1.008), post-OLT dialysis (HR = 3.51; 95% CI: 2.07-5.94), cancer (HR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.23-5.89) and AID (HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.17-3.56) as underlying disease versus hepatitis, and higher pre-OLT creatinine (HR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.10-2.52) were associated with decreased survival. CONCLUSION In this center, not only are survival outcomes excellent, but also younger patients, cases with better pre-operative health conditions, and those without complications after OLT have superior survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Madreseh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmood Mahmoudi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohssen Nassiri-Toosi
- Liver Transplantation Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Taban Baghfalaki
- Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hojjat Zeraati
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Son J, Stam SP, Gomes-Neto AW, Osté MCJ, Blokzijl H, van den Berg AP, Porte RJ, Bakker SJL, de Meijer VE. Post-transplant obesity impacts long-term survival after liver transplantation. Metabolism 2020; 106:154204. [PMID: 32173406 DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short-term survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has improved over the past decades, but long-term survival remains impaired. The effects of obesity on long-term survival after OLT are controversial. Because pre-transplant body mass index (BMI) can be confounded by ascites, we hypothesized that post-transplant BMI at 1 year could predict long-term survival. METHODS A post-hoc analysis was performed of an observational cohort study consisting of adult recipients of a first OLT between 1993 and 2010. Baseline BMI was measured at 1-year post-transplantation to represent a stable condition. Recipients were stratified into normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed with log-rank testing, followed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS Out of 370 included recipients, 184 had normal weight, 136 were overweight, and 50 were obese at 1-year post-transplantation. After median follow-up for 12.3 years, 107 recipients had died, of whom 46 (25%) had normal weight, 39 (29%) were overweight, and 22 (44%) were obese (log-rank P = 0.020). Obese recipients had a significantly increased mortality risk compared to normal weight recipients (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08-3.68, P = 0.027). BMI was inversely associated with 15 years patient survival (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, P = 0.001 per kg/m2), independent of age, gender, muscle mass, transplant characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, kidney- and liver function. CONCLUSION Obesity at 1-year post-transplantation conveys a 2-fold increased mortality risk, which may offer potential for interventional strategies (i.e. dietary advice, lifestyle modification, or bariatric surgery) to improve long-term survival after OLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey van Son
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne P Stam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Antonio W Gomes-Neto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maryse C J Osté
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Blokzijl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Aad P van den Berg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Porte
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stephan J L Bakker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Improvement in Liver Transplant Outcomes From Older Donors: A US National Analysis. Ann Surg 2020; 270:333-339. [PMID: 29958229 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate trends in long-term graft and patient outcomes following liver transplantation using grafts from donors ≥60 years old. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The scarcity of donor livers has led to increased utilization of organs from donors ≥60 years old. However, few studies have examined how long-term transplant outcomes from older donors have evolved over time. METHODS The OPTN/UNOS database was queried for all first-time isolated adult liver transplants. We identified 14,796 adult liver transplant using donors ≧60-year-old suitable for analysis from 1990 to 2014. Cohorts were then developed based on 5-year intervals of transplant date. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare graft and patient survival for recipients from older donor across each 5-year era. RESULTS Utilization of donor grafts ≥60 years old increased steadily for the first 15 years of the study, but has leveled off over the last 10 years. Comparison of the earliest and latest eras in the study was notable for an increase in median recipient age (51 vs. 59, P < 0.001) and reduction in median cold ischemic time (10 vs. 6 h, P = 0.001). Unadjusted 5-year graft and patient survival has improved significantly over time (P < 0.0001). More importantly, the discrepancy in survival between older and younger grafts has narrowed substantially over time (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates significant improvement in transplant outcomes with donor grafts ≥60-years old and supports increased but judicious use of extended criteria donors liver grafts. Improved patient selection and reduction in cold ischemia time appear to be contributing factors.
Collapse
|
26
|
Best LMJ, Leung J, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Milne EJ, Cowlin M, Payne A, Walshaw D, Thorburn D, Pavlov CS, Davidson BR, Tsochatzis E, Williams NR, Gurusamy KS. Induction immunosuppression in adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 1:CD013203. [PMID: 31978255 PMCID: PMC6984652 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013203.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is considered the definitive treatment for people with liver failure. As part of post-liver transplantation management, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections. Immunosuppressive drugs can be classified into those that are used for a short period during the beginning phase of immunosuppression (induction immunosuppression) and those that are used over the entire lifetime of the individual (maintenance immunosuppression), because it is widely believed that graft rejections are more common during the first few months after liver transplantation. Some drugs such as glucocorticosteroids may be used for both induction and maintenance immunosuppression because of their multiple modalities of action. There is considerable uncertainty as to whether induction immunosuppression is necessary and if so, the relative efficacy of different immunosuppressive agents. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different induction immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different induction immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until July 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in adults undergoing liver transplantation. SELECTION CRITERIA We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults undergoing liver transplantation. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had multivisceral transplantation and those who already had graft rejections. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio (OR), rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) based on an available case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 25 trials (3271 participants; 8 treatments) in the review. Twenty-three trials (3017 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The trials that provided the information included people undergoing primary liver transplantation for various indications and excluded those with HIV and those with renal impairment. The follow-up in the trials ranged from three to 76 months, with a median follow-up of 12 months among trials. All except one trial were at high risk of bias, and the overall certainty of evidence was very low. Overall, approximately 7.4% of people who received the standard regimen of glucocorticosteroid induction died and 12.2% developed graft failure. All-cause mortality and graft failure was lower with basiliximab compared with glucocorticosteroid induction: all-cause mortality (HR 0.53, 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.93; network estimate, based on 2 direct comparison trials (131 participants; low-certainty evidence)); and graft failure (HR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.28 to 0.70; direct estimate, based on 1 trial (47 participants; low-certainty evidence)). There was no evidence of differences in all-cause mortality and graft failure between other induction immunosuppressants and glucocorticosteroids in either the direct comparison or the network meta-analysis (very low-certainty evidence). There was also no evidence of differences in serious adverse events (proportion), serious adverse events (number), renal failure, any adverse events (proportion), any adverse events (number), liver retransplantation, graft rejections (any), or graft rejections (requiring treatment) between other induction immunosuppressants and glucocorticosteroids in either the direct comparison or the network meta-analysis (very low-certainty evidence). However, because of the wide CrIs, clinically important differences in these outcomes cannot be ruled out. None of the studies reported health-related quality of life. FUNDING the source of funding for 14 trials was drug companies who would benefit from the results of the study; two trials were funded by neutral organisations who have no vested interests in the results of the study; and the source of funding for the remaining nine trials was unclear. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on low-certainty evidence, basiliximab induction may decrease mortality and graft failure compared to glucocorticosteroids induction in people undergoing liver transplantation. However, there is considerable uncertainty about this finding because this information is based on small trials at high risk of bias. The evidence is uncertain about the effects of different induction immunosuppressants on other clinical outcomes, including graft rejections. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered, employ blinding, avoid post-randomisation dropouts (or perform intention-to-treat analysis), and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft failure, and health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence MJ Best
- University College LondonDivision of Surgery and Interventional ScienceRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW32PF
| | - Jeffrey Leung
- University College LondonMedical SchoolGower StreetLondonUKWC1H6BT
| | - Suzanne C Freeman
- University of LeicesterDepartment of Health SciencesUniversity RoadLeicesterUKLE1 7RH
| | - Alex J Sutton
- University of LeicesterDepartment of Health SciencesUniversity RoadLeicesterUKLE1 7RH
| | - Nicola J Cooper
- University of LeicesterDepartment of Health SciencesUniversity RoadLeicesterUKLE1 7RH
| | | | | | - Anna Payne
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation TrustHPB and Liver Transplant SurgeryPond StreetLondonGreater LondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Dana Walshaw
- Barts and The London NHS TrustAcute MedicineLondonUK
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentrePond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Chavdar S Pavlov
- 'Sechenov' First Moscow State Medical UniversityCenter for Evidence‐Based MedicinePogodinskja st. 1\1MoscowRussian Federation119881
| | - Brian R Davidson
- University College LondonDivision of Surgery and Interventional ScienceRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW32PF
| | - Emmanuel Tsochatzis
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentrePond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Norman R Williams
- UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional ScienceSurgical & Interventional Trials Unit (SITU)3rd Floor, Charles Bell House 43 – 45Foley StreetLondonUKW1W 7TY
| | - Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- University College LondonDivision of Surgery and Interventional ScienceRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW32PF
- 'Sechenov' First Moscow State Medical UniversityCenter for Evidence‐Based MedicinePogodinskja st. 1\1MoscowRussian Federation119881
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Neuberger J. Follow-up of liver transplant recipients. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 46-47:101682. [PMID: 33158465 PMCID: PMC7485448 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The number of surviving liver allograft recipients is increasing almost exponentially. The quality and length of life is increasing but most recipients have reduced survival and quality of life compared with healthy matched individuals. Causes of premature death include cardio and cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, graft failure, de novo malignancy and recurrent disease. Follow-up is needed lifelong to ensure graft and patient health and ensure that complications are recognised and treated early. Immunosuppression is kept to the appropriate minimum and prophylactic interventions are given early, such as use of statins and tight control of blood pressure and blood sugar. Recipients will require life-long follow-up, and this is placing an increasing burden on transplant units. Follow-up is best done by close collaboration between the Liver Transplant Unit, the local hospital and primary care team. Involvement of other health care practitioners, such as recipient coordinators, pharmacists, dermatologists and addiction specialists may improve outcomes. Key to successful follow-up are agreed protocols and good communication between the recipients and all relevant health care providers. Use of IT allows for better communication and will support use of video and telephone consultations in selected instances. The most appropriate follow-up will depend on many factors, including logistic and geographic issues, local experience. The provision of well-funded and supported registries at local, national and international levels will allow for improvements in management.
Collapse
|
28
|
Posttransplant Calcineurin Inhibitors Levels and Intrapatient Variability Are Not Associated With Long-term Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2019; 104:1201-1209. [PMID: 31609904 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an interest in understanding the association between early calcineurin inhibitors exposure post-liver transplantation (LT) and long-term outcomes. We aimed to analyze this association exploring median calcineurin inhibitor levels and intrapatient variability (IPV) in a multicenter, retrospective cohort. METHODS Tacrolimus (Tac) and Cyclosporine (CsA) levels obtained during the first 15 days post-LT were collected. High immunosuppression (IS) was considered as a median of Tac, CsA blood trough levels 12 hours after drug administration, or blood levels 2 hours after drug administration higher than 10, 250, or 1200 ng/mL, respectively, or a peak of Tac >20 ng/mL. Optimal IS was defined as a median of Tac, CsA blood trough levels 12 hours after drug administration, or blood levels 2 hours after drug administration levels between 7 and 10, 150 and 250, or 800 and 1200 ng/mL. Low IS was defined as below the thresholds of optimal IS. IPV was estimated during the first 15 days post-LT. RESULTS The study included 432 patients with a median follow-up of 8.65 years. IS regimen was based on either Tac or CsA in 243 (56.3%) and 189 (43.8%), respectively. There were no differences in terms of graft loss among low versus optimal and high IS groups (P = 0.812 and P = 0.451) nor in high versus low IPV (P = 0.835). Only viral hepatitis and arterial hypertension were independently associated with higher graft loss (hazard ratio = 1.729, P = 0.029 and hazard ratio = 1.570, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS In contrast to what has previously been reported, no association was found between very early postoperative over IS or high IPV and long-term outcome measures following LT. Strategies aimed at reducing these long-term events should likely focus on other factors or on a different IS time window.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lu HF, Ren ZG, Li A, Zhang H, Xu SY, Jiang JW, Zhou L, Ling Q, Wang BH, Cui GY, Chen XH, Zheng SS, Li LJ. Fecal Microbiome Data Distinguish Liver Recipients With Normal and Abnormal Liver Function From Healthy Controls. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1518. [PMID: 31333622 PMCID: PMC6619441 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that altered intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the pathogenesis of many liver diseases, mainly by promoting inflammation via the “intestinal microbiota-immunity-liver” axis. We aimed to investigate the fecal microbiome of liver recipients with abnormal/normal liver function using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Fecal samples were collected from 90 liver recipients [42 with abnormal liver function (Group LT_A) and 48 with normal liver function (Group LT_N)] and 61 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs). Fecal microbiomes were analyzed for comparative composition, diversity, and richness of microbial communities. Principal coordinates analysis successfully distinguished the fecal microbiomes of recipients in Group LT_A from healthy subjects, with the significant decrease of fecal microbiome diversity in recipients in Group LT_A. Other than a higher relative abundance of opportunistic pathogens such as Klebsiella and Escherichia/Shigella in all liver recipients, the main difference in gut microbiome composition between liver recipients and HC was the lower relative abundance of beneficial butyrate-producing bacteria in the recipients. Importantly, we established a fecal microbiome index (specific alterations in Staphylococcus and Prevotella) that could be used to distinguish Group LT_A from Group LT_N, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.801 and sensitivity and specificity values of 0.771 and 0.786, respectively. These findings revealed unique gut microbial characteristics of liver recipients with abnormal and normal liver functions, and identified fecal microbial risk indicators of abnormal liver function in liver recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Feng Lu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Gang Ren
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Precision Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ang Li
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Precision Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shao-Yan Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Wen Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.,Health Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qi Ling
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bao-Hong Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guang-Ying Cui
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Precision Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xin-Hua Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lan-Juan Li
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Last Year Before Graft Failure Negatively Impacts Economic Outcomes and is Associated With Greater Healthcare Resource Utilization Compared With Previous Years in the United Kingdom: Results of a Retrospective Observational Study. Transplant Direct 2019; 5:e443. [PMID: 31165078 PMCID: PMC6511438 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Kidney and liver transplantation is the standard of care for end-stage renal or liver disease. However, long-term survival of kidney and liver grafts remain suboptimal. Our study aimed to understand the healthcare resources utilized and their associated costs in the years before graft failure. Methods. Two noninterventional, retrospective, observational studies were conducted in cohorts of kidney or liver transplant patients. Once identified, patients were followed using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics databases from the date of transplantation to the date of the first graft failure. Total healthcare costs in the year before graft failure (primary endpoint) and during years 2–5 before graft failure (secondary endpoint) were collected. Results. A total of 269 kidney and 81 liver transplant patients were analyzed. The mean total costs were highest for all resource components in the last year before graft failure, except for mean costs of immunosuppressive therapy per patient, which decreased slightly by index date (ie, graft failure). The mean total healthcare costs in the last year before graft failure were £8115 for kidney and £9988 for liver transplant patients and were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than years 2–5 before graft failure. Mean healthcare costs for years 2, 3, 4, and 5 before graft failure were £5925, £5575, £5469, and £5468, respectively, for kidney, and £6763, £7042, £6020, and £5651, respectively, for liver transplant patients. Conclusions. Total healthcare costs in the last year before graft failure are substantial and statistically significantly higher than years 2–5 before graft failure, in both kidney and liver transplant patients. Our findings show the economic burden placed on healthcare services in the years before graft failure.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Liver diseases during pregnancy pose a unique clinical challenge because they can affect the lives of both the mother and unborn child. Although severe liver disease is rare, pregnancy-related liver disease affects approximately 3% of pregnancies and can be fatal. Timely recognition and diagnosis are essential in order to institute appropriate management strategies. This article provides an overview of liver diseases during pregnancy and is divided into 2 sections: (1) liver diseases specific to pregnancy, and (2) preexisting or coincident liver diseases during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Ma
- Section of Gastroenterology, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 207, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Daniel Berger
- Section of Gastroenterology, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 207, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Nancy Reau
- Section of Hepatology, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 319, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stam SP, Osté MCJ, Eisenga MF, Blokzijl H, van den Berg AP, Bakker SJL, de Meijer VE. Posttransplant muscle mass measured by urinary creatinine excretion rate predicts long-term outcomes after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:540-550. [PMID: 29745020 PMCID: PMC6585633 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Long-term survival in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients remains impaired because of many contributing factors, including a low pretransplant muscle mass (or sarcopenia). However, influence of posttransplant muscle mass on survival is currently unknown. We hypothesized that posttransplant urinary creatinine excretion rate (CER), an established noninvasive marker of total body muscle mass, is associated with long-term survival after OLT. In a single-center cohort study of 382 adult OLT recipients, mean ± standard deviation CER at 1 year posttransplantation was 13.3 ± 3.7 mmol/24 h in men and 9.4 ± 2.6 mmol/24 h in women. During median follow-up for 9.8 y (interquartile range 6.4-15.0 y), 104 (27.2%) OLT recipients died and 44 (11.5%) developed graft failure. In Cox regression analyses, as continuous variable, low CER was associated with increased risk for mortality (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.71, P = .001) and graft failure (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90, P = .03), independent of age, sex, and body surface area. Similarly, OLT recipients in the lowest tertile had an increased risk for mortality (HR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.47-4.91, P = .001) and graft failure (HR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.04-7.39, P = .04), compared to OLT recipients in the highest tertile. We conclude that 1 year posttransplant low total body muscle mass is associated with long-term risk of mortality and graft failure in OLT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne P. Stam
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Maryse C. J. Osté
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Michele F. Eisenga
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Hans Blokzijl
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Aad P. van den Berg
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Stephan J. L. Bakker
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of Internal MedicineUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Vincent E. de Meijer
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gurusamy KS, Tsochatzis E. Induction immunosuppression in adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- University College London; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital Rowland Hill Street London UK NW3 2PF
| | - Emmanuel Tsochatzis
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive Health; Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre; Pond Street London UK NW3 2QG
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
[Frontiers in liver transplantation in indication and techniques]. Chirurg 2018; 90:102-109. [PMID: 30413847 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-018-0761-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The frontiers in liver transplantation are intrinsically expansions of indications, e.g. hepatocellular carcinoma and (perihilar) cholangiocarcinoma, recipients with more severe concomitant diagnoses or "soft" contraindications and technically demanding reconstruction procedures of vascular structures (for portal vein thrombosis or aorto-hepatic conduits). In addition, an extension of the donor pool with suboptimal donor organs (old donors and steatotic livers) is of interest. METHODS This article presents the current situation based on personal experiences in daily practice and an appropriate literature review. RESULTS A significant reduction of 1‑year patient survival has been reported in Germany. The percentage of so-called marginal donor organs is inversely proportional to the very low donation rate and parallel to the waiting list mortality. Simultaneously, the proportion of inpatients with multiple organ failure is rising. CONCLUSION Results-oriented and controlled liver transplantation currently prohibits making inroads into the previously intrinsic frontiers. As long as the current circumstances do not change, a shift in the intrinsic frontiers of that which is surgically feasible will not be possible. The current situation forces the transplant surgeon to apply a more restrictive indications and organ acceptance policy. With this approach we can try to regain the previously excellent short- and long-term results of a 1‑year survival of 90% and a 20-year survival of 50%.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kwak BJ, Kim DG, Han JH, Choi HJ, Bae SH, You YK, Choi JY, Yoon SK. Clinical outcome of 1,000 consecutive cases of liver transplantation: a single center experience. Ann Surg Treat Res 2018; 95:267-277. [PMID: 30402445 PMCID: PMC6204322 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.5.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze survival outcomes in 1,000 consecutive liver transplantations (LTs) performed at a single institution from 1993 to April 2017. Methods The study population was divided into 2 groups based on donor type: deceased donor LT (DDLT; n = 181, 18.1%) and living donor LT (LDLT; n = 819; 81.9%), and into 3 periods based on the number of cases (first 300 cases, middle 300 cases, last 400 cases). Results Infection was the most common cause of death, accounting for 34.8% (95 of 273). Mortality due to hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence occurred most frequently between 1 and 5 years after transplantation. Mortality rate by graft rejection was highest between 5 and 10 years after transplantation. And mortality by de novo malignancy occurred most frequently after 10 years after transplantation. The patient survival rates for the entire population at 5 and 10 years were 74.7%, and 68.6%, respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the LDLT and DDLT groups (P = 0.188). Cause of disease, disease severity, case period, and retransplantation had a significant association with patient survival (P = 0.002, P = 0.031, P = 0.003, and P = 0.024, respectively). Conclusion Surgical techniques and perioperative management for transplant patients have improved and undergone standardization. Controlling perioperative infection and managing patients with HCC as LT candidates will result in better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bong Jun Kwak
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Goo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Joong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Kyoung You
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Young Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Kew Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Advancing Transplantation: New Questions, New Possibilities in Kidney and Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2018; 101 Suppl 2S:S1-S41. [PMID: 28125449 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
37
|
Vesco NDL, Fragoso LVC, Beserra FDM, Aguiar MIFD, Alves NP, Bonates LAM. INFECÇÕES RELACIONADAS À ASSISTÊNCIA À SAÚDE E FATORES ASSOCIADOS NO PÓS-OPERATÓRIO DE TRANSPLANTE HEPÁTICO. TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM 2018. [DOI: 10.1590/0104-070720180002150017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Objetivo: identificar a incidência das infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde e seus fatores associados, durante o primeiro mês do pós-operatório de pacientes adultos submetidos ao transplante hepático em um hospital público de Fortaleza. Método: estudo retrospectivo, descritivo com abordagem quantitativa, realizado com 53 receptores de fígado no primeiro semestre do ano de 2015. Os dados foram coletados através dos prontuários, fichas ambulatoriais e de notificação de infecções. Resultados: dos pacientes avaliados, 15 (28,3%) apresentaram infecção durante o primeiro mês, em que o mais prevalente foi a sepse clínica (n=6; 37,4%), seguida de infecção do trato respiratório (n=3; 18,8%), trato urinário (n=3;18,8%), sítio cirúrgico (n=3; 18,8%) e por último, infecção de corrente sanguínea (n=1; 6,2%). Os que apresentaram associação estatística em relação a não ocorrência de infecções foram o grupo dos pacientes casados e a indicação de cirrose por hepatite C. A média dos dias de internação no pós-operatório, o uso do imunossupressor micofenolato de mofetil e a média do uso de alguns dispositivos invasivos, foram identificados como os fatores associados à ocorrência de infecções, sendo estatisticamente significativos para p=<0,05. Conclusão: a identificação da incidência das infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde e seus fatores associados em pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático, poderá subsidiar o direcionamento das ações de saúde, com a finalidade de diminuir a morbimortalidade associada às infecções e otimizando a recuperação desses pacientes.
Collapse
|
38
|
Martinelli J, Habes D, Majed L, Guettier C, Gonzalès E, Linglart A, Larue C, Furlan V, Pariente D, Baujard C, Branchereau S, Gauthier F, Jacquemin E, Bernard O. Long-term outcome of liver transplantation in childhood: A study of 20-year survivors. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1680-1689. [PMID: 29247469 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We report the results of a study of survival, liver and kidney functions, and growth with a median follow-up of 24 years following liver transplantation in childhood. From 1988 to 1993, 128 children underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (median age: 2.5 years). Twenty-year patient and graft survival rates were 79% and 64%, respectively. Raised serum aminotransferase and/or γ-glutamyl transferase activities were present in 42% of survivors after a single transplantation. Graft histology (35 patients) showed signs of chronic rejection in 11 and biliary obstruction in 5. Mean total fibrosis scores were 4.5/9 and 3/9 in patients with abnormal and normal serum liver tests, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate was <90 mL·min-1 in 35 survivors, including 4 in end-stage renal disease who were undergoing dialysis or had undergone renal transplantation. Median final heights were 159 cm for women and 172 cm for men; final height was below the target height in 37 patients. Twenty-year survival after childhood liver transplantation may be close to 80%, and final height is within the normal range for most patients. However, chronic kidney disease or altered liver biochemistries are present in over one third of patients, which is a matter of concern for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Martinelli
- Hépatologie pédiatrique and centre de référence national de l'atrésie des voies biliaires, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - D Habes
- Hépatologie pédiatrique and centre de référence national de l'atrésie des voies biliaires, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - L Majed
- Biostatistique et épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Guettier
- Anatomie pathologique, Hopital Paul Brousse-Bicetre, AP-HP, Inserm U 1193, Hopital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - E Gonzalès
- Hépatologie pédiatrique and centre de référence national de l'atrésie des voies biliaires, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,Inserm U 1174, Hepatinov, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
| | - A Linglart
- Department of pediatric endocrinology, APHP, Reference center for rare disorders of the mineral metabolism, and Plateforme d'Expertise Maladies Rares Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,INSERM U1169, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - C Larue
- Biostatistique et épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - V Furlan
- Toxicologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - D Pariente
- Radiologie pédiatrique, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - C Baujard
- Anesthésie réanimation chirurgicale, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - S Branchereau
- Chirurgie pédiatrique, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - F Gauthier
- Chirurgie pédiatrique, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - E Jacquemin
- Hépatologie pédiatrique and centre de référence national de l'atrésie des voies biliaires, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,Inserm U 1174, Hepatinov, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
| | - O Bernard
- Hépatologie pédiatrique and centre de référence national de l'atrésie des voies biliaires, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP and Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Darstein F, Hoppe-Lotichius M, Vollmar J, Weyer-Elberich V, Zimmermann A, Mittler J, Otto G, Lang H, Galle PR, Zimmermann T. Pretransplant coronary artery disease is a predictor for myocardial infarction and cardiac death after liver transplantation. Eur J Intern Med 2018; 51:41-45. [PMID: 29229303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is a serious problem of liver transplant (LT) recipients because of increased cardiovascular risk due to immunosuppressive therapy, higher age, intraoperative risk and comorbidities (such as diabetes and nicotine abuse). Reported frequency of cardiovascular events after LT shows a high variability between different LT cohorts. Our aim was to analyze a cohort of LT recipients from a single center in Germany to evaluate frequency of the cardiovascular endpoints (CVE) myocardial infarction and/or cardiac death after LT and to investigate correlations of CVE post LT with pretransplant patient characteristics. PATIENTS In total, data from 352 LT patients were analyzed. Patients were identified from an administrative transplant database, and all data were retrieved from patients' charts and reports. RESULTS During the median follow-up of 4.0 (0-13) years, 10 cases of CVE were documented (six myocardial infarctions and four coronary deaths). The frequency of CVE did not differ according to classic cardiovascular risk factors such as body mass index (p=0.071), total cholesterol (p=0.533), hypertension (p=0.747), smoking (p=1.000) and pretransplant diabetes mellitus (p=0.146). In patients with pretransplant coronary heart disease (n=24; 6.8%) CVE were found more frequently (p=0.024). CONCLUSION In summary, we found a rate of 2.8% CVE after LT in a German transplant cohort. Pretransplant CHD was the only risk factor for CVE, but showed no significant impact on overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Darstein
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - M Hoppe-Lotichius
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Vollmar
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - V Weyer-Elberich
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - A Zimmermann
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Mittler
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - G Otto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Lang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - P R Galle
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Zimmermann
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lim TY, Gonsalkorala E, Cannon MD, Gabeta S, Penna L, Heaton ND, Heneghan MA. Successful pregnancy outcomes following liver transplantation is predicted by renal function. Liver Transpl 2018. [PMID: 29537127 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a successful treatment for both acute liver failure and end-stage liver disease. The number of women of reproductive age undergoing LT is increasing. Pregnancy outcomes are favorable, but there is still a lack of prognostic markers. We aimed to identify factors predictive of adverse pregnancy outcomes in LT recipients. An analysis of all pregnancies occurring in LT recipients from 1989 to 2016 at King's College Hospital was performed. Clinical data of 162 conceptions in 93 women were reviewed. Descriptive and regression analyses were done to examine associations between laboratory markers and hepatological scores with pregnancy outcomes of live birth and preterm birth. Median age at LT was 23 years (range, 1-41 years), with a median age at conception of 30 years (range, 18-47 years). The live birth rate was 75% (n = 121). Of live births, 35% (n = 39/110 available) were delivered preterm. Preconception creatinine levels were higher in patients who had a preterm birth (85 versus 74 μmol/L; P = 0.008), with a preconception estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <90 mL/minute significantly associated with preterm delivery (P = 0.04). Progressive decline in eGFR predicted outcome, with gestational length declining with increasing chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage: CKD 0-1 = 39 weeks (median), CKD 2 = 37 weeks, and CKD 3 = 35 weeks. The risk of preterm birth was greatest in women with an eGFR <60 mL/minute (P = 0.004). Moreover, hypertension-related complications during pregnancy, such as gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia, were also associated with prematurity (P = 0.01). Women taking steroid-based immunosuppression had an increased risk of infection during pregnancy or postpartum (15% versus 4%; P = 0.02). In conclusion, although the majority of women have a successful pregnancy outcome after LT, preconception renal function predicts pregnancy outcome and steroids increase risk of infection during pregnancy or postpartum. Liver Transplantation 24 606-615 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiong Y Lim
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,King's Liver Pregnancy Research Group, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Enoka Gonsalkorala
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,King's Liver Pregnancy Research Group, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary D Cannon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,King's Liver Pregnancy Research Group, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stella Gabeta
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,King's Liver Pregnancy Research Group, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Leonie Penna
- Department of Obstetrics, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Heneghan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,King's Liver Pregnancy Research Group, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Busch CJ, Siegler BH, Werle H, Lichtenstern C, Bruckner T, Heininger A, Mehrabi A, Weiss KH, Weigand MA, Hochreiter M. Risk factors for early viral infections after liver transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018; 403:509-519. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1672-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
42
|
Nordin A, Åberg F, Pukkala E, Pedersen CR, Storm HH, Rasmussen A, Bennet W, Olausson M, Wilczek H, Ericzon BG, Tretli S, Line PD, Karlsen TH, Boberg KM, Isoniemi H. Decreasing incidence of cancer after liver transplantation-A Nordic population-based study over 3 decades. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:952-963. [PMID: 28925583 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cancer remains one of the most serious long-term complications after liver transplantation (LT). Data for all adult LT patients between 1982 and 2013 were extracted from the Nordic Liver Transplant Registry. Through linkage with respective national cancer-registry data, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) based on country, sex, calendar time, and age-specific incidence rates. Altogether 461 cancers were observed in 424 individuals of the 4246 LT patients during a mean 6.6-year follow-up. The overall SIR was 2.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-2.43). SIRs were especially increased for colorectal cancer in recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (4.04) and for lung cancer in recipients with alcoholic liver disease (4.96). A decrease in the SIR for cancers occurring within 10 years post-LT was observed from the 1980s: 4.53 (95%CI, 2.47-7.60), the 1990s: 3.17 (95%CI, 2.70-3.71), to the 2000s: 1.76 (95%CI, 1.51-2.05). This was observed across age- and indication-groups. The sequential decrease for the SIR of non-Hodgkin lymphoma was 25.0-12.9-7.53, and for nonmelanoma skin cancer 80.0-29.7-10.4. Cancer risk after LT was found to be decreasing over time, especially for those cancers that are strongly associated with immunosuppression. Whether immunosuppression minimization contributed to this decrease merits further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nordin
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - F Åberg
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Pukkala
- Finnish Cancer Registry - Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland.,Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - C R Pedersen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - H H Storm
- Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Rasmussen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - W Bennet
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Olausson
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - H Wilczek
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B-G Ericzon
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Tretli
- The Norwegian Cancer Registry, Oslo, Norway
| | - P-D Line
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - T H Karlsen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - K M Boberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - H Isoniemi
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Peláez-Jaramillo MJ, Cárdenas-Mojica AA, Gaete PV, Mendivil CO. Post-Liver Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Relevance and Approach to Treatment. Diabetes Ther 2018; 9:521-543. [PMID: 29411291 PMCID: PMC6104273 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0374-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-liver transplantation diabetes mellitus (PLTDM) develops in up to 30% of liver transplant recipients and is associated with increased risk of mortality and multiple morbid outcomes. PLTDM is a multicausal disorder, but the main risk factor is the use of immunosuppressive agents of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) family (tacrolimus and cyclosporine). Additional factors, such as pre-transplant overweight, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C virus infection, may further increase risk of developing PLTDM. A diagnosis of PLTDM should be established only after doses of CNI and steroids are stable and the post-operative stress has been overcome. The predominant defect induced by CNI is insulin secretory dysfunction. Plasma glucose control must start immediately after the transplant procedure in order to improve long-term results for both patient and transplant. Among the better known antidiabetics, metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors have a particularly benign profile in the PLTDM context and are the preferred oral agents for long-term management. Insulin therapy is also an effective approach that addresses the prevailing pathophysiological defect of the disorder. There is still insufficient evidence about the impact of newer families of antidiabetics (GLP-1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors) on PLTDM. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, course of disease and medical management of PLTDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paula V Gaete
- Universidad de los Andes School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Carlos O Mendivil
- Universidad de los Andes School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia.
- Endocrinology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rubín Suárez A, Bilbao Aguirre I, Fernández-Castroagudin J, Pons Miñano JA, Salcedo Plaza M, Varo Pérez E, Prieto Castillo M. Recommendations of everolimus use in liver transplant. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2017; 40:629-640. [PMID: 28743539 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus are immunosuppressive agents with a minor nephrotoxic effect, limited to the development of proteinuria in some cases. The combination of EVL and low-dose tacrolimus has proven to be as safe and effective as standard therapy with tacrolimus for the prevention of acute cellular rejection. Early initiation of EVL-based immunosuppressive regimens with reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to significantly improve renal function of LT recipients during induction and maintenance phases, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. In patients with established kidney failure, initiating EVL may enable clinicians to reduce calcineurin inhibitors exposure, thereby contributing to the improved renal function of these patients. Although there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use to prevent the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of de novo tumours, they are used in this context in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Rubín Suárez
- Unidad de Hepatología, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Área de Enfermedades Digestivas, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, CIBERehd, Valencia, España.
| | - Itxarone Bilbao Aguirre
- Servicio de Cirugía HBP y Trasplantes Digestivos, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón. Grupos de investigación VHIR y CIBERehd, Barcelona, España
| | - Javier Fernández-Castroagudin
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
| | - José Antonio Pons Miñano
- Unidad de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, IMIB. Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España
| | - Magdalena Salcedo Plaza
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón IISGM. CIBERehd, Madrid, España
| | - Evaristo Varo Pérez
- Unidad de Trasplante Abdominal, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
| | - Martín Prieto Castillo
- Unidad de Hepatología, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Área de Enfermedades Digestivas, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, CIBERehd, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Komaki Y, Komaki F, Micic D, Ido A, Sakuraba A. Risk of colorectal cancer in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:93-104.e5. [PMID: 28011280 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in various chronic liver diseases compared with the general population remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of CRC in patients with chronic liver diseases before and after liver transplantation. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the risk of CRC in patients with chronic liver diseases. The primary outcome was the pooled risk of CRC among studies that reported the risk as standardized incidence rate (SIR). RESULTS Fifty studies that included 55,991 patients were identified. Among studies that included hepatitis and cirrhotic patients, the pooled SIR was 2.06 (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-2.90) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 49.2%), which appeared to be because of the difference between subgroup of diseases and the power of studies. Three studies reported an increased risk of CRC in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients (pooled SIR 6.70; P < .0001; 95% CI, 3.48-12.91) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 36.3%), which appeared to be because of the difference between the power of studies. Among studies that included post-transplant patients, the pooled SIR was 2.16 (P < .0001; 95% CI, 1.59-2.94) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 56.4%). Meta-regression showed a correlation between the proportion of autoimmune-related liver diseases and the risk of CRC. CONCLUSIONS Patients with chronic liver diseases had an increased risk of CRC compared with the general population, which persisted after liver transplantation. A more intensive surveillance for CRC is warranted in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuga Komaki
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Fukiko Komaki
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dejan Micic
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Akio Ido
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sakuraba
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Aguiar D, Martínez-Urbistondo D, Baroja-Mazo A, de la Mata M, Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Rubín A, Puchades L, Serrano T, Montero J, Cuadrado A, Casafont F, Salcedo M, Rincón D, Pons JA, Herrero JI. Real-World Multicenter Experience of Immunosuppression Minimization Among 661 Liver Transplant Recipients. Ann Transplant 2017; 22:265-275. [PMID: 28461684 PMCID: PMC6248177 DOI: 10.12659/aot.902523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients is frequently secondary to immunosuppression toxicity. However, data are scarce regarding immunosuppression minimization in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this cross-sectional, multicenter study, we reviewed the indications of immunosuppression minimization (defined as tacrolimus levels below 5 ng/mL or cyclosporine levels below 50 ng/mL) among 661 liver transplant recipients, as well as associated factors and the effect on renal function. RESULTS Fifty-three percent of the patients received minimized immunosuppression. The median time from transplantation to minimization was 32 months. The most frequent indications were renal insufficiency (49%), cardiovascular risk (19%), de novo malignancy (8%), and cardiovascular disease (7%). The factors associated with minimization were older age at transplantation, longer post-transplant follow-up, pre-transplant diabetes mellitus and renal dysfunction, and the hospital where the patients were being followed. The patients who were minimized because of renal insufficiency had a significant improvement in renal function (decrease of the median serum creatinine level, from 1.50 to 1.34 mg/dL; P=0.004). Renal function significantly improved in patients minimized for other indications, too. In the long term, glomerular filtration rate significantly decreased in non-minimized patients and remained stable in minimized patients. CONCLUSIONS Immunosuppression minimization is frequently undertaken in long-term liver transplant recipients, mainly for renal insufficiency. Substantial variability exists regarding the use of IS minimization among centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Aguiar
- Liver Unit, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Alberto Baroja-Mazo
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Murcia Institute for Biomedical Research (IMIB-Arrixaca), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Manuel de la Mata
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimónides Institute of Biomedical Research (IMBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain
- Maimónides Institute of Biomedical Research (IMBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Angel Rubín
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Liver Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Trinidad Serrano
- Gastroenterology Service, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Jessica Montero
- Gastroenterology Service, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antonio Cuadrado
- Gastroenterology Service, Marques de Vadecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Fernando Casafont
- Gastroenterology Service, Marques de Vadecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Magdalena Salcedo
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Service, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Rincón
- Gastroenterology Service, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose A. Pons
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Murcia Institute for Biomedical Research (IMIB-Arrixaca), Pamplona, Spain
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division and Liver Transplantation Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jose I. Herrero
- Liver Unit, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Network for Biomedical Research for Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Pamplona, Spain
- Institute for Health Investigation of Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Buzzetti E, Kalafateli M, Thorburn D, Davidson BR, Thiele M, Gluud LL, Del Giovane C, Askgaard G, Krag A, Tsochatzis E, Gurusamy KS. Pharmacological interventions for alcoholic liver disease (alcohol-related liver disease): an attempted network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD011646. [PMID: 28368093 PMCID: PMC6464309 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011646.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol-related liver disease is due to excessive alcohol consumption. It includes a spectrum of liver diseases such as alcohol-related fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis, and alcoholic cirrhosis. Mortality associated with alcoholic hepatitis is high. The optimal pharmacological treatment of alcoholic hepatitis and other alcohol-related liver disease remains controversial. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different pharmacological interventions in the management of alcohol-related liver disease through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the available pharmacological interventions according to their safety and efficacy in order to identify potential treatments. However, even in the subgroup of participants when the potential effect modifiers appeared reasonably similar across comparisons, there was evidence of inconsistency by one or more methods of assessment of inconsistency. Therefore, we did not report the results of the network meta-analysis and reported the comparative benefits and harms of different interventions using standard Cochrane methodology. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and randomised controlled trials registers until February 2017 to identify randomised clinical trials on pharmacological treatments for alcohol-related liver diseases. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) including participants with alcohol-related liver disease. We excluded trials that included participants who had previously undergone liver transplantation and those with co-existing chronic viral diseases. We considered any of the various pharmacological interventions compared with each other or with placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently identified trials and independently extracted data. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and rate ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models based on available-participant analysis with Review Manager. We assessed risk of bias according to Cochrane, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We identified a total of 81 randomised clinical trials. All the trials were at high risk of bias, and the overall quality of the evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Alcoholic hepatitisFifty randomised clinical trials included 4484 participants with alcoholic hepatitis. The period of follow-up ranged from one to 12 months. Because of concerns about transitivity assumption, we did not perform the network meta-analysis. None of the active interventions showed any improvement in any of the clinical outcomes reported in the trials, which includes mortality (at various time points), cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplantation. None of the trials reported health-related quality of life or incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Severe alcoholic hepatitisOf the trials on alcoholic hepatitis, 19 trials (2545 participants) included exclusively participants with severe alcoholic hepatitis (Maddrey Discriminat Function > 32). The period of follow-up ranged from one to 12 months. There was no alteration in the conclusions when only people with severe alcoholic hepatitis were included in the analysis. SOURCE OF FUNDING Eleven trials were funded by parties with vested interest in the results. Sixteen trials were funded by parties without vested interest in the results. The source of funding was not reported in 23 trials. Other alcohol-related liver diseasesThirty-one randomised clinical trials included 3695 participants with other alcohol-related liver diseases (with a wide spectrum of alcohol-related liver diseases). The period of follow-up ranged from one to 48 months. The mortality at maximal follow-up was lower in the propylthiouracil group versus the no intervention group (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.78; 423 participants; 2 trials; low-quality evidence). However, this result is based on two small trials at high risk of bias and further confirmation in larger trials of low risk of bias is necessary to recommend propylthiouracil routinely in people with other alcohol-related liver diseases. The mortality at maximal follow-up was higher in the ursodeoxycholic acid group versus the no intervention group (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.90; 226 participants; 1 trial; low-quality evidence). SOURCE OF FUNDING Twelve trials were funded by parties with vested interest in the results. Three trials were funded by parties without vested interest in the results. The source of funding was not reported in 16 trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Because of very low-quality evidence, there is uncertainty in the effectiveness of any pharmacological intervention versus no intervention in people with alcoholic hepatitis or severe alcoholic hepatitis. Based on low-quality evidence, propylthiouracil may decrease mortality in people with other alcohol-related liver diseases. However, these results must be confirmed by adequately powered trials with low risk of bias before propylthiouracil can be considered effective.Future randomised clinical trials should be conducted with approximately 200 participants in each group and follow-up of one to two years in order to compare the benefits and harms of different treatments in people with alcoholic hepatitis. Randomised clinical trials should include health-related quality of life and report serious adverse events separately from adverse events. Future randomised clinical trials should have a low risk of bias and low risk of random errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Buzzetti
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentreLondonUK
| | - Maria Kalafateli
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentreLondonUK
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentreLondonUK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryPond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Maja Thiele
- Odense University HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologySdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 126OdenseDenmark5000
| | - Lise Lotte Gluud
- Copenhagen University Hospital HvidovreGastrounit, Medical DivisionKettegaards AlleHvidovreDenmark2650
| | - Cinzia Del Giovane
- University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaCochrane Italy, Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health MedicineVia del Pozzo 71ModenaItaly41124
| | - Gro Askgaard
- RigshospitaletDepartment of HepatologyBlegdamsvej 9København ØDenmark2100
| | - Aleksander Krag
- Odense University HospitalDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologySdr. Boulevard 29, indgang 126Odense CDenmark5000
| | - Emmanuel Tsochatzis
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentreLondonUK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rodríguez‐Perálvarez M, Guerrero‐Misas M, Thorburn D, Davidson BR, Tsochatzis E, Gurusamy KS. Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD011639. [PMID: 28362060 PMCID: PMC6464256 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011639.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of liver transplantation, immunosuppression (suppressing the host immunity) is given to prevent graft rejections resulting from the immune response of the body against transplanted organ or tissues from a different person whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. The optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative benefits and harms of different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in adults undergoing liver transplantation through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until October 2016 to identify randomised clinical trials on immunosuppression for liver transplantation. SELECTION CRITERIA We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adult participants undergoing liver transplantation (or liver retransplantation) for any reason. We excluded trials in which participants had undergone multivisceral transplantation or participants with established graft rejections. We considered any of the various maintenance immunosuppressive regimens compared with each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio, rate ratio, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 26 trials (3842 participants) in the review, and 23 trials (3693 participants) were included in one or more outcomes in the review. The vast majority of the participants underwent primary liver transplantation. All of the trials were at high risk of bias, and all of the evidence was of low or very low quality. In addition, because of sparse data involving trials at high risk of bias, it is not possible to entirely rely on the results of the network meta-analysis. The trials included mainly participants undergoing primary liver transplantation of varied aetiologies. The follow-up in the trials ranged from 3 to 144 months. The most common maintenance immunosuppression used as a control was tacrolimus. There was no evidence of difference in mortality (21 trials; 3492 participants) or graft loss (15 trials; 2961 participants) at maximal follow-up between the different maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based on the network meta-analysis. In the direct comparison, based on a single trial including 222 participants, tacrolimus plus sirolimus had increased mortality (HR 2.76, 95% CrI 1.30 to 6.69) and graft loss (HR 2.34, 95% CrI 1.28 to 4.61) at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with serious adverse events (1 trial; 719 participants), proportion of people with any adverse events (2 trials; 940 participants), renal impairment (8 trials; 2233 participants), chronic kidney disease (1 trial; 100 participants), graft rejections (any) (16 trials; 2726 participants), and graft rejections requiring treatment (5 trials; 1025 participants) between the different immunosuppressive regimens. The network meta-analysis showed that the number of adverse events was lower with cyclosporine A than with many other immunosuppressive regimens (12 trials; 1748 participants), and the risk of retransplantation (13 trials; 1994 participants) was higher with cyclosporine A than with tacrolimus (HR 3.08, 95% CrI 1.13 to 9.90). None of the trials reported number of serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, or costs. FUNDING 14 trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies who would benefit from the results of the trial; two trials were funded by parties who had no vested interest in the results of the trial; and 10 trials did not report the source of funding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on low-quality evidence from a single small trial from direct comparison, tacrolimus plus sirolimus increases mortality and graft loss at maximal follow-up compared with tacrolimus. Based on very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis, we found no evidence of difference between different immunosuppressive regimens. We found very low-quality evidence from network meta-analysis and low-quality evidence from direct comparison that cyclosporine A causes more retransplantation compared with tacrolimus. Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered; performed in people who are generally seen in the clinic rather than in highly selected participants; employ blinding; avoid postrandomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs; and use clinically important outcomes such as mortality, graft loss, renal impairment, chronic kidney disease, and retransplantation. Such trials should use tacrolimus as one of the control groups. Moreover, such trials ought to be designed in such a way as to ensure low risk of bias and low risks of random errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Rodríguez‐Perálvarez
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehdHepatology and Liver TransplantationAvenida Menéndez Pidal s/nCórdobaSpain14004
| | - Marta Guerrero‐Misas
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehdHepatology and Liver TransplantationAvenida Menéndez Pidal s/nCórdobaSpain14004
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentrePond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryPond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | - Emmanuel Tsochatzis
- Royal Free Hospital and the UCL Institute of Liver and Digestive HealthSheila Sherlock Liver CentrePond StreetLondonUKNW3 2QG
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pischke S, Lege MC, von Wulffen M, Galante A, Otto B, Wehmeyer MH, Herden U, Fischer L, Nashan B, Lohse AW, Sterneck M. Factors associated with long-term survival after liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. World J Hepatol 2017; 9:427-435. [PMID: 28357030 PMCID: PMC5355765 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i8.427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To identify predictive factors associated with long-term patient and graft survival (> 15 years) in liver transplant recipients.
METHODS Medical charts of all de novo adult liver transplant recipients (n = 140) who were transplanted in Hamburg between 1997 and 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 155 transplantations were identified in this time period (15 re-transplantations). Twenty-six orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients were early lost to follow-up due to moving to other places within 1 year after transplantation. All remaining 114 patients were included in the analysis. The following recipient factors were analysed: Age, sex, underlying liver disease, pre-OLT body mass index (BMI), and levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin, creatinine and gamma-glutamyltransferase (gamma-GT), as well as warm and cold ischemia times. Furthermore, the following donor factors were assessed: Age, BMI, cold ischemia time and warm ischemia time. All surviving patients were followed until December 2014. We divided patients into groups according to their underlying diagnosis: (1) hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5, 4%); (2) alcohol toxic liver disease (n = 25, 22.0%); (3) primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 6, 5%); (4) autoimmune liver diseases (n = 7, 6%); (5) hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (n = 15, 13%); (6) hepatitis B virus cirrhosis (n = 21, 19%); and (7) other (n = 35, 31%). The group “other” included rare diagnoses, such as acute liver failure, unknown liver failure, stenosis and thrombosis of the arteria hepatica, polycystic liver disease, Morbus Osler and Caroli disease.
RESULTS The majority of patients were male (n = 70, 61%). Age and BMI at the time point of transplantation ranged from 16 years to 69 years (median: 53 years) and from 15 kg/m2 to 33 kg/m2 (median: 24), respectively. Sixty-six OLT recipients (58%) experienced a follow-up of 15 years after transplantation. Recipient’s age (P = 0.009) and BMI (P = 0.029) were identified as risk factors for death by χ2-test. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed BMI or age above the median as predictors of decreased long-term survival (P = 0.008 and P = 0.020). Hepatitis B as underlying disease showed a trend for improved long-term survival (P = 0.049, χ2-test, P = 0.055; Kaplan-Meier analysis, Log rank). Pre-transplant bilirubin, creatinine, ALT and gamma-GT levels were not associated with survival in these patients of the pre-era of the model of end stage liver disease.
CONCLUSION The recipients’ age and BMI were predictors of long-term survival after OLT, as well as hepatitis B as underlying disease. In contrast, donors’ age and BMI were not associated with decreased survival. These findings indicate that recipient factors especially have a high impact on long-term outcome after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
50
|
Buescher N, Seehofer D, Helbig M, Andreou A, Bahra M, Pascher A, Pratschke J, Schoening W. Evaluating twenty-years of follow-up after orthotopic liver transplantation, best practice for donor-recipient matching: What can we learn from the past era? World J Transplant 2016; 6:599-607. [PMID: 27683639 PMCID: PMC5036130 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To characterize major determinants of 20-year survival after liver transplantation (LT).
METHODS This longitudinal single-institution study includes 313 consecutive patients who received a LT between 1988 and 1992. Pretransplant clinical characteristics and laboratory values were assessed and compared between 20-year survivors and non-survivors. Particular attention was paid to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (labMELD)-score and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index (ET-DRI) to unravel their impact on 20-year survival after LT.
RESULTS Twenty-year survivors were significantly younger (44 vs 50 years, P = 0.001), more likely to be female (49% vs 36%, P = 0.03) and less likely to be obese at the time of LT (19% vs 32%, P = 0.011). Mean labMELD-score (P = 0.156), rate of high-urgency LT (P = 0.210), cold-ischemia time (P = 0.994), rate of retransplantation (P = 0.12) and average donor age (28 vs 33 years, P = 0.099) were not statistically different. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was higher among survivors (P = 0.007). ET-DRI > 1.4 (P = 0.020) and donor age ≥ 30 years (P < 0.022) had significant influence on 20-year survival. The overall survival was not significantly impacted by labMELD-score categories (P = 0.263).
CONCLUSION LT offers excellent long-term results in case of optimal donor and recipient conditions. However, mainly due to the current organ shortage, these ideal circumstances are rarely given; thus algorithms for donor-recipient matching need to be refined, in order to enable a maximum benefit for the recipients of high quality as well as marginal organs.
Collapse
|