Microvascular inflammation: Gene expression changes do not necessarily reflect pathogenesis

Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis

Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.

Systematic Biopsy-Based Transcriptomics and Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection in Clinical Practice

Key Points

Background

To diagnose kidney transplant antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), biopsy-based transcriptomics can substitute for some histological criteria according to the Banff classification. However, clinical accessibility of these assays is still limited. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of integrating a routine-compatible molecular assay for the diagnosis of AMR in clinical practice.

Methods

All biopsies performed in our center between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively included. These biopsies were classified into three groups: AMR biopsies which displayed the full Banff criteria of AMR independently of biopsy-based transcriptomics; undetermined for AMR biopsies which did not meet AMR histological criteria, but would have been considered as AMR if biopsy-based transcriptomics had been positive; and control biopsies which showed no features of rejection.

Results

Within the inclusion period, 342 biopsies had a complete Banff scoring. Thirty-six of the biopsies already met AMR criteria, and 43 of 306 (14%) were considered as undetermined for AMR. Among these biopsies, 24 of 43 (56%) had a molecular signature of AMR, reclassifying them into the AMR category. Five-year death-censored survival of these biopsies was unfavorable and statistically equivalent to that of the AMR category (P = 0.22), with 15 of 24 (63%) graft loss.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of biopsies could benefit from a biopsy-based transcriptomics for AMR diagnosis according to the Banff classification. Using a routine-compatible molecular tool, more than the half of these biopsies were reclassified as AMR and associated with poor allograft survival.

Banff 2022 Kidney Commentary: Reflections and Future Directions

In September 2022, in Banff, Alberta, Canada, the XVIth Banff meeting, corresponding to the 30th anniversary of the Banff classification, was held, leading to 2 recent publications. Discussions at the Banff meeting focused on proposing improvements to the Banff process as a whole. In line with this, a unique opportunity was offered to a selected group of 16 representatives from the pathology and transplant nephrology community, experts in the field of kidney transplantation, to review these 2 Banff manuscripts. The aim was to provide an insightful commentary, to gauge any prospective influence the proposed changes may have, and to identify any potential areas for future enhancement within the Banff classification. The group expressed its satisfaction with the incorporation of 2 new entities, namely "microvascular inflammation/injury donor-specific antibodies-negative and C4d negative" and "probable antibody-mediated rejection," into category 2. These changes expand the classification, facilitating the capture of more biopsies and providing an opportunity to explore the clinical implications of these lesions further. However, we found that the Banff classification remains complex, potentially hindering its widespread utilization, even if a degree of complexity may be unavoidable given the intricate pathophysiology of kidney allograft pathology. Addressing the histomorphologic diagnosis of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA TCMR), potentially reconsidering a diagnostic-agnostic approach, as for category 2, to inflammation in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and chronic active T cell-mediated rejection was also an important objective. Furthermore, we felt a need for more evidence before molecular diagnostics could be routinely integrated and emphasized the need for clinical and histologic context determination and the substantiation of its clinical impact through rigorous clinical trials. Finally, our discussions stressed the ongoing necessity for multidisciplinary decision-making regarding patient care.

Absence of IL-6 Receptor Blockade Effect on the Outcomes of Transplant Glomerulopathy in the Absence of Anti-HLA Donor-specific Antibodies

Background

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is the hallmark of chronic antibody-mediated rejection but often occurs without anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the assumption that other DSAs may be the effectors of the tissue injury. Recently, we reported a positive effect of interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor blocker tocilizumab (TCZ) in TG/DSA+. In the present study, we investigate the effect of TCZ in a cohort of TG cases without detectable anti-HLA DSAs.

Methods

Single-center retrospective analysis of TG cases without anti-HLA DSAs (TG/DSA) treated with TCZ for chronic antibody-mediated rejection as first-line therapy evaluated through clinical, protocol biopsies, and gene expression analyses was included.

Results

Differently from TG/DSA+, TG/DSA- showed a progressive reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 mo and after that with no significant modification in microvascular inflammation or C4d+. No upregulation in tight junction protein-1, aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3, and calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase, documented in TG/DSA+, was noted in post-TCZ biopsies. The reduction of microvascular inflammation was associated with natural killer-cell reduction in TG/DSA+, whereas TG/DSA- tends to maintain or increase periglomerular/interstitial infiltration.

Conclusions

In the absence of anti-HLA DSAs, TG behavior seems not to be modified by IL-6 receptor blockade. These results are at variance with observational studies and previous trials with IL-6 inhibitors in TG associated with anti-HLA DSAs. These data may fuel the hypothesis of different mechanisms underlying TGs (including the potentially different roles of natural killer cells) and suggest carefully selecting patients with TG for clinical trials or off-label treatment based on their antidonor serologic status.

The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics

The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.