Optimising pre-operative assessment for older people

To Be Frail or Not to Be Frail: This Is the Question-A Critical Narrative Review of Frailty

Many factors have contributed to rendering frailty an emerging, relevant, and very popular concept. First, many pandemics that have affected humanity in history, including COVID-19, most recently, have had more severe effects on frail people compared to non-frail ones. Second, the increase in human life expectancy observed in many developed countries, including Italy has led to a rise in the percentage of the older population that is more likely to be frail, which is why frailty is much a more common concern among geriatricians compared to other the various health-care professionals. Third, the stratification of people according to the occurrence and the degree of frailty allows healthcare decision makers to adequately plan for the allocation of available human professional and economic resources. Since frailty is considered to be fully preventable, there are relevant consequences in terms of potential benefits both in terms of the clinical outcome and healthcare costs. Frailty is becoming a popular, pervasive, and almost omnipresent concept in many different contexts, including clinical medicine, physical health, lifestyle behavior, mental health, health policy, and socio-economic planning sciences. The emergence of the new "science of frailty" has been recently acknowledged. However, there is still debate on the exact definition of frailty, the pathogenic mechanisms involved, the most appropriate method to assess frailty, and consequently, who should be considered frail. This narrative review aims to analyze frailty from many different aspects and points of view, with a special focus on the proposed pathogenic mechanisms, the various factors that have been considered in the assessment of frailty, and the emerging role of biomarkers in the early recognition of frailty, particularly on the role of mitochondria. According to the extensive literature on this topic, it is clear that frailty is a very complex syndrome, involving many different domains and affecting multiple physiological systems. Therefore, its management should be directed towards a comprehensive and multifaceted holistic approach and a personalized intervention strategy to slow down its progression or even to completely reverse the course of this condition.

A Description of Interventions Prompted by Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Optimization in Older Elective Noncardiac Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVES

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), a multicomponent, complex intervention, can be used to improve perioperative outcomes. This study aimed to describe the actions and interventions prompted by preoperative CGA and optimization in elective noncardiac, older, surgical patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Five hundred consecutive patients aged over 65 years attending a preoperative CGA and optimization clinic in a single academic center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of electronic clinical records was undertaken. CGA prompted actions and interventions were categorized a priori and examined according to the perioperative pathway and frailty status.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of nine interventions (IQR 6‒12, range 0‒28). Long-term condition medication changes were made in 375 (75.0%) patients, lifestyle advice provided in 269 (53.8%), therapy interventions delivered in 117 (23.4%), shared decision making documented in 495 (99.0%) with individualized admission plans documented in 410/426 (96.2%). Following CGA, 74/500 (14.8%) patients did not undergo surgery and were more likely to have benign pathology (69% vs 53%, P = .01), higher frailty scores (Edmonton Frail Scale 8 (IQR 5‒10) vs 4 (IQR 2-6), P < .001), lower functional status (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living 33 (IQR 16‒47) vs 57 (IQR 45‒64), P < .001) or cognitive scores (Montreal Cognitive Assessment 19 (IQR 14‒24) vs 24 (IQR 20‒26), P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study provides a description of actions and interventions prompted by preoperative CGA at one center. Such a detailed exploration of the CGA process and the clinical skills necessary to deliver it, should be used to inform future multicenter studies and the development and implementation of perioperative services for older patients.

The Prevalence and Impact of Undiagnosed Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore the prevalence of undiagnosed mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its association with adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large tertiary medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The authors enrolled 170 patients aged 65 years or older who were scheduled for thoracic surgery between November 7, 2018, and April 1, 2019, at the Shanghai Chest Hospital. Patients with a history of schizophrenia or dementia disease, uncorrected vision or hearing impairment, and refusal to participate were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 154 elderly patients completed the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test preoperatively and were included in the final analysis. They were categorized into a normal group (MoCA ≥ 26 scores, group N) and an abnormal group (MoCA < 26 scores, group AN) based on test results. Delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method twice daily during the first 3 postoperative days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), cardiovascular complications, other complications, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the hospital length of stay (LOS). The incidence of MCI before thoracic surgery in elderly patients was 49.4% (76 of 154). Compared with group N, MCI could increase the incidence of POD (14.1% v 30.3%, p = 0.016) and median LOS (4 d v 5 d, p = 0.016). However, the differences in pulmonary complications, cardiovascular and other complications, and ICU stay were not significant. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed preoperative MCI (OR = 2.573, 95% CI =1.092 to 6.060, p = 0.031) as an independent risk factor of POD. Compared with the elderly patients without POD, POD could increase the risk of PPCs (17.5% v 35.3%, p = 0.026) and median LOS (4 d v 5 d, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of MCI before thoracic surgery in elderly patients was higher and associated with a higher rate of adverse postoperative outcomes. The findings may be important for preoperative patient counseling, operative planning, and eventually reducing potential risk exposure and related outcomes.