Staged venous thromboemolic events prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin followed by aspirin is safe and effective after arthroplasty

Chinese Survey on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Thromboprophylaxis Following Arthroplasty

Objective

To examine the current perspectives of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and the clinical practice applications of important ERAS principles among Chinese orthopaedic surgeons.

Methods

This was a cross‐sectional study using an online survey that was completed between November and December 2018. A 16‐item online questionnaire regarding the experiences of ERAS, perceptions of methods, and durations and concerns of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis was sent to 2000 orthopaedic surgeons nationwide, and 1720 (86%) surgeons responded. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess all respondents' results and to compare differences among subgroups that were stratified according to city and hospital level, as well as their professional title.

Results

According to the results of the survey, ERAS awareness was high (65.1%) and most surgeons recognized the importance of thromboprophylaxis. However, the timing of ERAS was not consistent, with 22.8%, 31.9%, and 37.7% of surgeons choosing to initiate pharmaceutical prophylaxis within <6 h, 6–12 h, and 12–24 h after surgery, respectively. Low‐molecular‐weight heparin was mainly selected during hospitalization, and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were the first choice after discharge. Regarding postoperative antithrombotic therapy, particularly when combined with analgesics, the potential bleeding risk was mostly considered (80.0%)Tranexamic acid was believed to have no effect on the timing of NOAC therapy initiation (56.2%). Most of the above outcomes were influenced by the hospital level and professional title of the surgeon. Surgeons who had higher awareness on ERAS and better adhered to the guidelines were from higher‐level hospitals as well as had more advanced professional titles. City level partly might influence their practice but not impact surgeons' awareness.

Conclusions

The awareness and perception of the concept of ERAS and prophylactic antithrombotic regimens remain different among Chinese orthopaedic surgeons in different level cities and with various professional titles. Continuing medical educations (CME) on VTE prophylaxis is needed for improving the quality of health care in China.

Changes in Markers of Thrombin Generation and Interleukin-6 During Unicondylar Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with a risk of thromboembolism requiring routine thromboprophylaxis, but there is debate about the risk with unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) as it is a more minor procedure. We sought to investigate the relative risk of thromboembolism with UKA compared to TKA and one-staged bilateral TKA (BTKA) by measuring the increase in circulating biochemical markers of thrombin generation during the procedures. Degree of surgical trauma was also assessed by measuring interleukin-6, a marker of metabolic injury.

METHODS

We prospectively studied a total of 75 patients: 25 patients undergoing UKA, unilateral TKA, and BTKA, respectively. All patients had surgery performed with tourniquet and received no tranexamic acid. Blood samples were taken during surgery and assayed for circulating markers of thrombin generation: prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) and thrombin-antithrombin complexes plus interleukin-6.

RESULTS

Thrombin-antithrombin complexes, increased during all time points (P < .001) but was not significantly different between surgical treatment groups. F1+2 also rose significantly during surgery, with no significant difference between UKA and TKA. There was, however, a significant difference in F1+2 between BTKA and UKA or TKA (P < .02). Interleukin-6 rose minimally with UKA but rose significantly with TKA and BTKA (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on these data of circulating biochemical markers, patients undergoing UKA are at similar risk of thromboembolism with respect to TKA despite a lower index of metabolic injury. We believe that UKA patients should receive thromboprophylaxis comparable to TKA patients.

A Systematic Review on the Use of Aspirin in the Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Major Elective Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery: An Update from the Past 3 Years

Introduction  Currently there are no consensuses in the national guidance on thromboprophylaxis following major elective lower limb surgery. Emerging clinical evidence suggests that aspirin could be just as effective as anticoagulants with a lower cost. The aim of this study was to provide an update based on literature of the past 3 years for the use of aspirin as thromboprophylaxis after knee and hip arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods  MEDLINE/EMBASE search was performed with appropriate terms for original articles from 2014 to 2017.

Results  Eight articles were found. Five articles concluded that aspirin was an effective prophylactic. The collation of results on the deep vein thrombosis rate involved 43,012 patients who were prescribed aspirin, of which 283 (0.66%) suffered from symptomatic deep vein thromboses. Aspirin was noted for its good side effect profile and cost effectiveness. It was noted that anticoagulants had a higher rate of complications, including bleeding and wound-oozing.

Conclusion  Aspirin is an effective and safe prophylactic against deep vein thrombosis following major elective lower limb arthroplasty surgery.