1
|
Tentes AA, Kyziridis D, Kalakonas A, Iliadis A, Fotiadou A. Pancreatic cancer with synchronous peritoneal and hepatic metastases: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2024; 118:109588. [PMID: 38581939 PMCID: PMC11015438 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction and importance: There is evidence that patients with limited peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic cancer or those with low burden of hepatic metastases are amenable to surgical resection. A case report of a patient with cancer of the pancreatic tail and synchronous peritoneal and hepatic metastases is presented. CASE PRESENTATION A male patient, 66 years old, underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and radio-frequency ablation (RFA) for synchronous hepatic metastases simultaneously to distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Adjuvant chemotherapy followed the R0 surgery. The patient remained disease free for 18 months, developed liver recurrence and died 28 months after the initial operation. DISCUSSION CRS plus HIPEC with synchronous ablation or resection of hepatic metastases may be used for the treatment of pancreatic cancer with synchronous peritoneal and hepatic metastases in highly selected patients. CONCLUSION Further studies are needed to confirm whether patients with synchronous peritoneal and hepatic metastases are offered survival benefit from complex surgical intervention (CRS plus HIPEC combined with hepatic resection or RFA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alexandros Iliadis
- Laboratory of Diagnostic Histopathology, Mitropoleos 115, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
| | - Anastasia Fotiadou
- Laboratory of Diagnostic Histopathology, Mitropoleos 115, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grange R, Rousset P, Williet N, Guesnon M, Milot L, Passot G, Phelip JM, Le Roy B, Glehen O, Kepenekian V. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2378-2390. [PMID: 38170409 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14840-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selection of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant peritoneal (PM) and liver metastases (LM) for radical treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), including liver resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), needs improvement. This retrospective, monocentric study was designed to evaluate the predictive factors for early recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in such patients treated in a referral center. METHODS Consecutive colorectal cancer patients with concomitant LM and PM treated with curative intent with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, simultaneous complete CRS, liver resection, and HIPEC in 2011-2022 were included. Clinical, radiological (before and after preoperative chemotherapy), surgical, and pathological data were investigated, along with long-term oncologic outcomes. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence (diagnosed <6 months after surgery), DFS, and OS. RESULTS Of more than 61 patients included, 31 (47.1%) had pT4 and 27 (40.9%) had pN2 primary tumors. Before preoperative chemotherapy, the median number of LM was 2 (1-4). The median surgical PCI (peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was 3 (5-8.5). The median DFS and OS were 8.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-10.1) and 34.1 months (95% CI 28.1-53.5), respectively. In multivariate analysis, pT4 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.14 [1.2-16.78], p = 0.032]) and pN2 (OR = 3.7 [1.08-13.86], p = 0.042) status were independently associated with an early recurrence, whereas retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 39 [8.67-175.44], p < 0.001) was independently associated with poor OS. CONCLUSIONS In colorectal cancer patients with concomitant PM and LM, an advanced primary tumor (pT4 and/or pN2) was associated with a higher risk of early recurrence following a radical multimodal treatment, whereas RLN metastases was strongly detrimental for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Grange
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CICLY EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Mathias Guesnon
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Vahan Kepenekian
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France.
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balachandran R, Sørensen MM, Funder JA, Knudsen AR, Iversen LH. Outcomes after curatively intended treatment of limited peritoneal metastases and thermal ablation for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:167-174. [PMID: 38144219 PMCID: PMC10739284 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Peritoneal metastases (PM) and liver metastases (LM) are present simultaneously in up to 2 % of patients at the time of their colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis. Curatively intended treatment includes cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with LM resection. A less invasive treatment for LM is ablation. We aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and postoperative data in patients managed simultaneously with CRS, HIPEC and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as first choice. Methods This was a retrospective national cohort study. All patients were treated at Aarhus University Hospital; the only CRS+HIPEC centre in Denmark. We included CRC patients managed with curative intent for simultaneously diagnosed PM and LM in the period January 2016 - December 2021. LM was treated with RFA as first choice, if possible. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 25 patients were included, the median age was 60 years (range 43-75 years) and 15 (60 %) were females. The median peritoneal cancer index was 7 (range 0-12), the median number of LM was 1 (range 1-3). Ablation was performed as the only treatment for LM in 18 (72 %) patients. After a median follow-up time of 17.1 months (range 4-36 months), the median OS was 28.6 months (95 % confidence interval (Cl) 15.8;36.1), 1-year OS was 84.0 % (95 % Cl 62.8;93.7). Median DFS was 6.1 months (95 % Cl 4.0;10.3). Median LOS was ten days (range 5-26 days). Both 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0 %. Conclusions The selected treatment modality (RFA) for CRC patients with both LM and PM was safe. However, DFS was low. Further research is warranted to investigate if RFA is as effective as LM resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogini Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lene Hjerrild Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gong YQ, Lu TL, Chen CW. Long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic, pulmonary, peritoneal and rare colon metastasis: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:1819-1824. [PMID: 37701683 PMCID: PMC10494599 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant cancer that often metastasizes and has a poor prognosis. Gastrointestinal tract metastases are rare, and colon metastases are even rarer. The long-term survival of patients with multiple intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases, especially to the colon, has not been previously reported. CASE SUMMARY We present an atypical clinical case of a patient with liver, right lung, peritoneal, and colon metastases diagnosed successively following hepatic resection for primary HCC. Comprehensive treatment, including partial liver, lung and colon resection, palliative management such as systemic chemotherapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, targeted therapy with sorafenib, and cryotherapy were attempted. Despite his early metastases, the patient remained relatively healthy for 8 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSION This case indicates that comprehensive treatment is beneficial for certain patients with metastatic HCC. Clinicians should be alert as to the possibility of rare site metastatic tumors that may be easily misdiagnosed as primary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Qiang Gong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China
| | - Tai-Liang Lu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China
| | - Chao-Wu Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morales-Soriano R, Pineño-Flores C, Morón-Canis JM, Molina-Romero FJ, Rodriguez-Pino JC, Loyola-Miró J, Gonzalez-Argente FX, Palma-Zamora E, Guillot-Morales M, Giménez S, Alvarez-Mon M, Ortega MA, Segura-Sampedro JJ. Simultaneous Surgical Approach with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Patients with Concurrent Peritoneal and Liver Metastases of Colon Cancer Origin. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113860. [PMID: 37298054 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Simultaneous liver resection and peritoneal cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial today. The aim of the study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes and survival of patients with advanced metastatic colon cancer (peritoneal and/or liver metastases). Methods: Retrospective observational study from a prospective maintained data base. Patients who underwent a simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and liver resection plus HIPEC were studied. Postoperative outcomes and overall and disease free survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: From January 2010 to October 2022, 22 patients operated with peritoneal and liver metastasis (LR+) were compared with 87 patients operated with peritoneal metastasis alone (LR-). LR+ group presented higher serious morbidity (36.4 vs. 14.9%; p: 0.034). Postoperative mortality did not reach statistical difference. Median overall and disease free survival was similar. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index was the only predictive factor of survival. Conclusions: Simultaneous peritoneal and liver resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and hospital stay, but with similar postoperative mortality and OS and disease free survival. These results reflect the evolution of these patients, considered inoperable until recently, and justify the trend to incorporate this surgical strategy within a multimodal therapeutic plan in highly selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales-Soriano
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Royal Academy of Medicine of the Balearic Islands, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Cristina Pineño-Flores
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - José Miguel Morón-Canis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Molina-Romero
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Julia Loyola-Miró
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Francisco Xavier Gonzalez-Argente
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Elías Palma-Zamora
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Mónica Guillot-Morales
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Sandra Giménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Melchor Alvarez-Mon
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (IRYCIS), University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Miguel A Ortega
- Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (IRYCIS), University of Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | - Juan José Segura-Sampedro
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IDISBA), 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Carlo S, Cavallaro G, La Rovere F, Usai V, Siragusa L, Izzo P, Izzo L, Fassari A, Izzo S, Franceschilli M, Rossi P, Dhimolea S, Fiori E, Sibio S. Synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: Is cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with liver resection a feasible option? Front Surg 2022; 9:1006591. [PMID: 36589624 PMCID: PMC9797824 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1006591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, synchronous liver resection (LR), cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have been contraindicated. Nowadays, clinical practice has promoted this aggressive treatment in selected cases. This study aimed to review surgical and survival results of an extensive surgical approach including CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and LR. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were matched to find the available literature on this topic. The search period was limited to 10 years (January 2010-January 2021). A threshold of case series of 10 patients or more was applied. Results In the search period, out of 114 studies found about liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, we found 18 papers matching the inclusion criteria. Higher morbidity and mortality were reported for patients who underwent such an extensive surgical approach when compared with patients who underwent only cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Also, survival rates seem worse in the former than in the latter. Conclusion The role of combined surgical strategy in patients with synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer remains controversial. Survival rates and morbidity and mortality seem not in favor of this option. A more accurate selection of patients and more restrictive surgical indications could perhaps help improve results in this subgroup of patients with limited curative options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cavallaro
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca La Rovere
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Usai
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luciano Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Fassari
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Franceschilli
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Piero Rossi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Sirvjo Dhimolea
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Fiori
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Sibio
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy,Correspondence: Simone Sibio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beal EW, Chen JC, Kim A, Johnston FM, Abbott DE, Raoof M, Grotz TE, Fournier K, Dineen S, Veerapong J, Clarke C, Staley C, Patel SH, Lambert L, Cloyd JM. Is CRS-HIPEC Still Indicated in Patients With Extraperitoneal Disease? J Surg Res 2022; 277:269-278. [PMID: 35525209 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with extraperitoneal disease (EPD) is controversial. METHODS Among patients with peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer (AC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent CRS-HIPEC, those with EPD (liver, lung, or retroperitoneal lymph nodes [RP LN]) were retrospectively compared to those without EPD. Overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) analyses were performed before/after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS Among 1341 patients with AC (64%) or CRC (36%) who underwent CRS ± HIPEC, 134 (10%) had EPD whereas 1207 (90%) did not. EPD was located in the lungs (47%), RP LN (28%), liver (18%), or multiple (6%). Patients with EPD experienced worse median OS (34 versus 63 mo; P = 0.002) and RFS (12 versus 19 mo; P < 0.001). On a multivariable analysis, EPD was associated with worse RFS (P = 0.003), but not OS (P = 0.071). After PSM, the association of EPD with OS (P = 0.204) and RFS (P = 0.056) was no longer significant. In the multivariable analysis of the PSM cohort, EPD was not associated with OS (P = 0.157) or RFS (P = 0.110). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this large retrospective multi-institutional study suggest that EPD alone, while a negative prognostic indicator, should not be considered an absolute contraindication to CRS ± HIPEC for otherwise well-selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. Further research is needed to delineate whether location of EPD influences OS and RFS following CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza W Beal
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - J C Chen
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Alex Kim
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jula Veerapong
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | | | | | - Laura Lambert
- University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Polderdijk MCE, Brouwer M, Haverkamp L, Ziesemer KA, Tenhagen M, Boerma D, Kok NFM, Versteeg KS, Sommeijer DW, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Outcomes of Combined Peritoneal and Local Treatment for Patients with Peritoneal and Limited Liver Metastases of Colorectal Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1952-1962. [PMID: 34686925 PMCID: PMC8810452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10925-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Almost half of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will experience metastases at some point, and in the majority of cases, multiple organs will be involved. If the peritoneum is involved in addition to the liver, the current guideline-driven treatment options are limited. The reported overall survival ranges from 6 to 13 months for the current standard of care (systemic treatment). This study aimed to evaluate morbidity and clinical long-term outcomes from a combined local treatment of hepatic metastases with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) used to treat peritoneal metastases. Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase.com, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Studies evaluating the clinicopathologic data of patients who had both peritoneal and hepatic metastases treated with CRS-HIPEC were included provided sufficient data on the primary outcomes (overall and disease-free survival) were presented. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Results Patients treated for peritoneal and liver metastases (PMLM group) had a pooled mean survival of 26.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.4–30.4 months), with a 3-year survival rate of 34% (95% CI 26.7–42.0%) and a 5-year survival rate of 25% (95% CI 17.3–33.8%). Surgical complications occurred more frequently for these patients than for those with peritoneal metastasis only (40% vs 22%; p = 0.0014), but the mortality and reoperation rates did not differ significantly. Conclusion This systematic review showed that CRS and HIPEC combined with local treatment of limited liver metastasis for selected patients is feasible, although with increased morbidity and an association with a long-term survival rate of 25%, which is unlikely to be achievable with systemic treatment only.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10925-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot C E Polderdijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max Brouwer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Haverkamp
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark Tenhagen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bacalbasa N, Balescu I, Cretoiu D, Halmaciu I, Dimitriu M, Socea B, Diaconu C, Iliescu L, Savu C, Savu C, Filipescu A, Stoica C, Stiru O. Determination of whether HIPEC is beneficial in patients with synchronous peritoneal and liver metastases from colorectal cancer (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021; 22:1267. [PMID: 34594404 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis, as well as the presence of liver metastases from colorectal cancer, has been long considered as the sign of a systemic disease, transforming the patient into a candidate for palliation and best supportive care. However, in recent decades, progress in the field of medical and surgical oncology has allowed scientists worldwide to produce curative therapeutic strategies for these cases such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or extended liver resection. In addition, the association of these two therapies has also been performed with encouraging results. The aim of the current study was to review articles published thus far in regard to the association of these two therapeutic strategies, in order to identify which cases can benefit the most, which is the most efficient agent or combination of agents, and whether these types of therapy should be performed as monotherapy or as a two-stage procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolae Bacalbasa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'I. Cantacuzino' Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Balescu
- Department of Visceral Surgery, 'Ponderas' Academic Hospital, 021188 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dragos Cretoiu
- Department of Cellular, Molecular and Histology Biology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Histology Scientific Researcher, 'Alessandrescu-Rusescu' National Institute of Mother and Child Health, Fetal Medicine Excellence Research Center, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Halmaciu
- Department of Anatomy, 'George Emil Palade' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dimitriu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Sf. Pantelimon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan Socea
- Department of Surgery, 'Sf. Pantelimon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Camelia Diaconu
- Department of Internal Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 105402 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laura Iliescu
- Department of Internal Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Internal Medicine, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cornel Savu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, 'Marius Nasta' Institute of Pneumonology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carmen Savu
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Fundeni' Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Filipescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Elias' Emergency Hospital, 125100 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Claudia Stoica
- Department of Visceral Surgery, County Emergency Hospital Ilfov, 022104 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ovidiu Stiru
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 'Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu' Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Synchronous Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver and Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:754-764. [PMID: 33742615 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have traditionally been contraindicated. More recent clinical practice has begun to promote this aggressive treatment in select patients. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, with and without liver resection, in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to July 2020. STUDY SELECTION Cohort studies comparing outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with and without liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer were reviewed. No randomized controlled trials were available. INTERVENTION Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without synchronous liver resection were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were perioperative mortality and major morbidity. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 5-year overall survival and 1- and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS Fourteen studies fitted the inclusion criteria, with 8 studies included in the meta-analysis. On pooled analysis, there was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. Patients that underwent concomitant liver resection had worse 1- and 3-year disease-free survival and 3- and 5-year overall survival. LIMITATIONS Only a limited number of studies were available, with a moderate degree of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS The addition of synchronous liver resection to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable metastatic colorectal cancer was not associated with increased perioperative major morbidity and mortality in comparison with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone. However, the presence of liver metastases was associated with inferior disease-free and overall survival. These data support the continued practice of liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of select patients with such stage IV disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Outcomes following synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study. Surg Oncol 2021; 37:101553. [PMID: 33839444 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres. METHOD This bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV). RESULTS Twenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0-22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4-54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months. CONCLUSION Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee RM, Gamboa AC, Turgeon MK, Zaidi MY, Kimbrough C, Leiting J, Grotz T, Lee AJ, Fournier K, Powers B, Dineen S, Baumgartner JM, Veerapong J, Mogal H, Clarke C, Wilson G, Patel S, Hendrix R, Lambert L, Pokrzywa C, Abbott DE, LaRocca CJ, Raoof M, Greer J, Johnston FM, Staley CA, Cloyd JM, Maithel SK, Russell MC. A novel preoperative risk score to optimize patient selection for performing concomitant liver resection with cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC. J Surg Oncol 2020; 123:187-195. [PMID: 33002202 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC. METHODS Patients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000-2017) with invasive appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary, curative intent CRS/HIPEC with CC0-1 resection were included. LR was defined as a formal parenchymal resection. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 658 patients were included. About 83 (15%) underwent LR of colorectal (58%) or invasive appendiceal (42%) metastases. LR patients had more complications (81% vs. 60%; p = .001), greater number of complications (2.3 vs. 1.5; p < .001) per patient and required more reoperations (22% vs. 11%; p = .007) and readmissions (39% vs. 25%; p = .014) than non-LR patients. LR patients had decreased OS (2-year OS 62% vs. 79%, p < .001), even when accounting for peritoneal carcinomatosis index and histology type. Preoperative factors associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis in LR patients included age < 60 years (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.10-11.81), colorectal histology (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.69-12.65), and multiple liver tumors (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.21-9.85) (all p < .05). When assigning one point for each factor, there was an incremental decrease in 2-year survival as the risk score increased from 0 to 3 (0: 100%; 1: 91%; 2: 58%; 3: 0%). CONCLUSIONS As CRS/HIPEC + LR has become more common, we created a simple risk score to stratify patients considered for CRS/HIPEC + LR. These data aid in striking the balance between an increased perioperative complication profile with the potential for improvement in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Adriana C Gamboa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael K Turgeon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Charles Kimbrough
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Benjamin Powers
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Gregory Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Sameer Patel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Ryan Hendrix
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Christopher J LaRocca
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria C Russell
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang Y, Zhou YM, Zhang ZJ, Li X. miR-210 is a Serological Biomarker for Predicting Recurrence and Prognosis of Colon Carcinoma Patients with Liver Metastases After Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:9077-9085. [PMID: 33061602 PMCID: PMC7524199 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s267731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hepatic metastasis of colon carcinoma seriously affects the prognosis of patients, and miRNA has attracted much attention in predicting hepatic metastasis of colon carcinoma (CC). This research aimed to explore the predictive role of miR-210 in serum for recurrence and prognosis of CC patients with hepatic metastasis. Methods Altogether, 150 patients with liver metastases of CC (research group, RG) and 130 patients with non-metastatic of CC (control group, CG) admitted to People’s Hospital of Deyang City from March 2012 to March 2015 were obtained and their serum was collected. miR-210 in the RG and the CG, and miR-210 in the RG after radiofrequency ablation treatment were detected, the relationship between miR-210 and pathological parameters of CC patients with hepatic metastasis was analyzed, and patients in the RG were followed up for 5 years to analyze the recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was applied to test the predictive value of miR-210. Cox regression was applied to analyze the independent prognostic factors of patients. Results miR-210 in the RG was evidently higher than that in the CG, and AUC for distinguishing hepatic metastasis of CC was 0.907. miR-210 had a close correlation with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and pathological differentiation. After treatment, miR-210 in the RG was evidently reduced, and the serum was higher in patients with recurrence and with poor prognosis. AUC for predicting recurrence was 0.858, and AUC for predicting poor prognosis was 0.843. High miR-210 was closely related to lower 5-year OS and DFS and is also an independent prognostic factor affecting patients’ 5-year OS. Conclusion miR-210 is enhanced in hepatic metastasis of CC, which is a serological biomarker for predicting recurrence and prognosis of patients with hepatic metastasis of CC after radiofrequency ablation, and has great clinical application value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhang
- Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan Province 618000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Mei Zhou
- Outpatient Department, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan Province, 618000, People's Republic of China
| | - Zu-Jian Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan Province 618000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan Province 618000, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Adileh M, Mor E, Assaf D, Benvenisti H, Laks S, Ben-Yaacov A, Schtrechman G, Hazzan D, Shacham-Shmueli E, Margalit O, Halpern N, Aderka D, Perelson D, Ariche A, Nissan A. Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Combined Hepatectomy with Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3320-3329. [PMID: 32968959 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09165-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous peritoneal and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer is a relative contraindication for curative surgery. We aimed to evaluate the safety and oncological outcomes of combined treatment of peritoneal and liver metastasis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients from two prospective databases: peritoneal surface malignancy (n = 536) and hepatobiliary (n = 286). We compared 60 patients treated with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and hepatectomy; 80 patients treated with cytoreduction and HIPEC only; and 63 patients treated with hepatectomy alone. RESULTS No differences in demographics were observed between the groups. Median hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay was shorter in group C (7 and 1 days, respectively) versus groups A and B (13 and 1 days, and 12 and 1 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were not significantly different. Median follow-up was 18.6, 23.1, and 30.6 months for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 48.8% (group A), 55.4% (group B), and 60.2% (group C) [p = 0.043 for group A vs. group C], and estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 14.2% (group A), 23.0% (group B), and 18.6% (group C). Five-year OS was superior in group C compared with group A (p = 0.043), and DFS was superior in group C compared with groups A and B (p = 0.043 and 0.03, respectively). The peritoneum was the site of first recurrence in groups A and B (23.3% and 32.5%, respectively), and the liver was the site of first recurrence in group C (44.4%). CONCLUSIONS We report favorable perioperative and oncological outcomes in combined cytoreduction/HIPEC and hepatectomy for patients with peritoneal and liver metastasis. Surgical intervention after multidisciplinary discussion should be considered in patients with both peritoneal and hepatic lesions when complete cytoreduction is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Adileh
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Eyal Mor
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Dan Assaf
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Haggai Benvenisti
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shachar Laks
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Almog Ben-Yaacov
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Gal Schtrechman
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - David Hazzan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ofer Margalit
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Naama Halpern
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Dan Aderka
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Daria Perelson
- The Department of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Arie Ariche
- The Department of Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Aviram Nissan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zou Y, Chen X, Zhang X, Shen Z, Cai J, Tan Y, Weng J, Rong Y, Lin X. Clinical outcomes of curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases combined with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 37:944-954. [PMID: 32787474 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1803424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and liver metastases (LM) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM who had undergone curative surgery, including resections at both metastatic sites and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies. Studies focusing on the clinical effects of curative surgery and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM were included. Meta-analysis results were recorded as hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences. RESULTS We included 9 of 998 identified studies in the meta-analysis, involving 746 patients (221 patients with PC + LM, 525 patients with PC). Overall survival (pooled HR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.13, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (pooled HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.51-2.20, p < 0.01) were both lower in patients with PC + LM. A higher recurrence rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, p = 0.02) and major postoperative morbidity (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.82, p < 0.01) were also observed in patients with PC + LM. CONCLUSION Liver resection in combination with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases may be associated with worse survival and higher morbidity compared with patients with isolated PC. More restricted patient inclusion criteria should be established to facilitate an optimal prognosis for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Zou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinzhi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihong Shen
- Department of General surgery, Jieyang City Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jieyang, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiawei Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yingxin Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - JingRong Weng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuming Rong
- Department of VIP Region, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xutao Lin
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang P, Shi L, Song L, Long Y, Yuan K, Ding W, Deng L. LncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 are Promising Biomarkers for Prognosis in Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis Following Hepatectomy. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:1681-1692. [PMID: 32210611 PMCID: PMC7069563 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s233147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCLM) had limited availability of tools to predict survival and tumor recurrence. LncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 have been proven to be closely related to cancer progression. However, the predictive value of lncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 in cancer prognosis is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether lncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 could be used as promising biomarkers for prognosis prediction of SCLM patients who underwent hepatectomy. Methods The expression profile of lncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 in serum of SCLM patients was examined by qRT-PCR. The relationship between lncRNA expression and clinicopathological characteristics was analyzed. The Cox proportional-hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed to analyze the association between lncRNA expression and overall survival (OS) and tumor recurrence of SCLM patients. Results Levels of lncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 in patients who underwent recurrence or death were significantly higher than that of patients with recurrence-free or survival (P<0.01). Both lncRNA CRNDE high level and lncRNA SNHG7 high level showed a significant correlation with differentiation of primary tumor, invasion depth of primary focus, lymph node metastases, number of liver metastases, and liver metastasis grade. High levels of lncRNA CRNDE or lncRNA SNHG7 predicted shorter recurrence time, shorter OS time, higher recurrence rate and lower OS rate. Furthermore, lncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 were independent risk factors for high recurrence and poor OS in SCLM underwent hepatectomy. Conclusion Taken together, lncRNA CRNDE and lncRNA SNHG7 could be promising biomarkers for prediction of OS and tumor recurrence in SCLM underwent hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peixian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Lan Shi
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Linjing Song
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Long
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Kehua Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Wanbao Ding
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Oncology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City & Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jeon Y, Park EJ, Lim JH, Baik SH. Clinical outcomes of complete cytoreduction with concurrent liver resection followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for synchronous peritoneal and liver metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:214. [PMID: 31829188 PMCID: PMC6907264 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1746-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of concurrent liver resection with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases. Methods Patients with colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis who underwent complete cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with concurrent liver surgery between September 2014 and July 2018 were included. Perioperative outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival were analyzed retrospectively. Results In total, 22 patients were included. The median peritoneal cancer index was 13 (range, 0–26), and the median number of liver metastases was 3 (range, 1–13). The mean total operative time was 11.4 ± 2.6 h. Minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I–II) were reported in 10 patients (45.5%), and major postoperative complications (grade III–V) were reported in five patients (22.7%), including one mortality patient. The median overall survival since diagnosis with metastasis was 27.4 months. The median overall survival since surgical intervention and the progression-free survival were 16.7 months and 7.1 months, respectively. Conclusions This short-term follow-up study showed that, in an experienced center, combined resection with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases was feasible and safe with acceptable oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngbae Jeon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 20, Eonju-ro 63-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06229, Korea
| | - Eun Jung Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 20, Eonju-ro 63-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06229, Korea
| | - Jin Hong Lim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Hyuk Baik
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 20, Eonju-ro 63-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06229, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Georgakis GV, Goldberg I, Sasson AR. Current Trends in the Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-019-00440-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
19
|
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) and Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) for Colorectal Cancer: Potential for Individualized Care, Review of Current Treatment Trends, Recent Advancements, and a Look into the Future. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-019-00427-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
20
|
Impact of Synchronous Liver Resection on the Perioperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing CRS-HIPEC. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:1576-1584. [PMID: 29713875 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3784-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While liver resection (LR) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are commonly performed for hepatic and peritoneal metastases, respectively, the safety of synchronous LR and CRS-HIPEC has not been established. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) databases from 2005 to 2016 were used to identify patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative outcomes were compared among patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC with and without synchronous LR. RESULTS Among 1168 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC, 100 (8.6%) underwent synchronous LR and 1068 (91.4%) did not. The most common primary diagnosis was unspecified (65.3%) followed by appendix (16.0%) and colorectal (12.5%). Among patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC plus LR, the majority had a partial hepatectomy (96.0%), while a small subset underwent trisegmentectomy (2.0%) or hemihepatectomy (2.0%). Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC plus LR underwent a greater number of operative procedures (8.3 ± 2.5 vs 6.7 ± 2.5, p < 0.001), had a longer operative time (520.7 ± 155.3 vs 454.6 ± 160.7 min, p = 0.001), had a longer hospital length of stay (16.7 ± 15.6 vs 11.1 ± 11.5 days, p < 0.001), were more likely to require reoperation (13.0 vs 6.9%, p = 0.03), and experienced greater 30-day morbidity (47.0 vs 27.4%, p < 0.001), but not mortality (3.0 vs 1.4%, p = 0.22). On multivariate logistic regression, LR was strongly associated with increased risk of postoperative morbidity even after controlling for potential confounders (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.64). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous LR and CRS-HIPEC was associated with increased operative time, length of hospital stay, reoperation, and postoperative morbidity compared to CRS-HIPEC alone. For patients with synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases, a staged operative approach should be considered.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tonello M, Ortega-Perez G, Alonso-Casado O, Torres-Mesa P, Guiñez G, Gonzalez-Moreno S. Peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from rectal or colonic adenocarcinoma treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): two different diseases. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:1268-1273. [PMID: 29667123 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1857-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) has poor survival. Multi-modal treatment including systemic chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be used in selected patients with curative intent. The majority published works consider PC of CRC origin as a homogenous disease. Aim of this study is to stress the different biological behaviors and survival of PC according to colonic or rectal origin. METHODS Data of CRS and HIPEC procedures for PC of CRC origin performed at MD Anderson Cancer Center-Madrid (Spain) have been collected, dividing patients into two groups according to colonic or rectal PC. Clinical, operatory, and postoperatory variables of the two groups have been analyzed to compare survival-related rates and PC origin. RESULTS In the years 2004-2015, 114 procedures of CRS followed by HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis of different origin have been performed; of these, 36 procedures were for colorectal PC (31 patients in colonic and 5 in rectal group). Two groups are homogenous after analysis of clinical, operatory, and follow-up data. Median survival (OS) is significantly higher in colonic compared to rectal group (47.83 vs. 22.0 months, p 0.008). 3- and 5-year survival rate is 74 and 50% in colonic group vs. 20 and 0% in rectal group. CONCLUSION Rectal origin PC has a more aggressive behavior compared to colonic origin, reflecting in a worst prognosis of patients affected by rectal origin PC. According to our data and literature, indications of multi-modal treatment including CRS and HIPEC should be more restrictive for rectal cancer PC. Authors should differentiate colonic and rectal origin of PC when reporting cases in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tonello
- Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain. .,University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - G Ortega-Perez
- Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Alonso-Casado
- Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Torres-Mesa
- Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.,Gastrolife SAS, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - G Guiñez
- Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.,Clinica Alemana, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - S Gonzalez-Moreno
- Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Behrenbruch C, Hollande F, Thomson B, Michael M, Warrier SK, Lynch C, Heriot A. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87:665-670. [PMID: 28664645 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Revised: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The peritoneum is the second most common site of metastasis after the liver and the only site of metastatic disease in approximately 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In the past, peritoneal carcinomatosis in CRC was thought to be equivalent to distant metastasis; however, the transcoelomic spread of malignant cells is an acknowledged alternative pathway. Metastasectomy with curative intent is well accepted in patients with liver metastasis in CRC despite the paucity of randomized trials. Therefore, there is rationale for local treatment with peritonectomy to eliminate macroscopic disease, followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to destroy any residual free tumour cells within the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence for cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina Behrenbruch
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frédéric Hollande
- Department of Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin Thomson
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Craig Lynch
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Morales Soriano R, Morón Canis JM, Molina Romero X, Pérez Celada J, Tejada Gavela S, Segura Sampedro JJ, Jiménez Morillas P, Díaz Jover P, García Pérez JM, Sena Ruiz F, González Argente X. Influence of simultaneous liver and peritoneal resection on postoperative morbi-mortality and survival in patients with colon cancer treated with surgical cytoreduction and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Cir Esp 2017; 95:214-221. [PMID: 28400138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) has recently been established as the treatment of choice for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin. Until recently, the simultaneous presence of peritoneal and hepatic dissemination has been considered a contraindication for surgery. The aim of this paper is to analyze the morbidity, mortality and survival of patients with simultaneous peritoneal and hepatic resection with HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colon cancer. METHODS Between January 2010 and January 2015, 61 patients were operated on, 16 had simultaneous peritoneal and hepatic dissemination (group RH+), and 45 presented only peritoneal dissemination (group RH-). RESULTS There were no differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, length of surgery and extension of peritoneal disease. Postoperative grade III-V complications were significantly higher in the RH+ group (56.3 vs. 26.6%; P=.032). For the whole group, mortality rate was 3.2% (two patients in group RH-, and none in group RH+). Patients with liver resection had a longer postoperative stay (14.4 vs. 23.1 days) (P=.027). Median overall survival was 33 months for RH-, and 36 for RH+ group. Median disease-free survival was 16 months for RH-, and 24 months for RH+ group. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and hepatic resection resulted in a significantly higher Clavien grade III-V morbidity and a longer hospital stay, although the results are similar to other major abdominal interventions. The application of multimodal oncological and surgical treatment may obtain similar long-term survival results in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Morales Soriano
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España.
| | - José Miguel Morón Canis
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Xavier Molina Romero
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Judit Pérez Celada
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Silvia Tejada Gavela
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Juan José Segura Sampedro
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Patricia Jiménez Morillas
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Paula Díaz Jover
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - José María García Pérez
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Fátima Sena Ruiz
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| | - Xavier González Argente
- Unidad de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), España
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
El-Nakeep S, Rashad N, Oweira H, Schmidt J, Helbling D, Giryes A, Petrausch U, Mehrabi A, Decker M, Abdel-Rahman O. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases coupled with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases: an updated systematic review. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:249-258. [PMID: 28099818 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1284586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases coupled with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed was conducted to screen for eligible records. Studies evaluating colorectal surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with curative treatment of liver metastases were included. We excluded duplicate publications. Sixty-seven full-text papers were assessed and six papers were finally included. The overall survival in the included studies ranged from 6-49 months. Five-year survival ranged from 18%-28%, three-year survival ranged from 22%-42% and two-year survival ranged from 34%-78%. Survival was lower in patients with liver metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) than those with PC alone in the majority of studies. Expert commentary: This review poses questions rather than presenting answers. The heterogeneity of survival data suggests the possible benefit of this aggressive treatment approach in selected patients. Standardization of the technique used for intraperitoneal chemotherapy instillation, agent used as well as the systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy type and duration through prospective controlled trials is required to provide an evidence of a higher strength to support or prohibit this treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah El-Nakeep
- a Internal Medicine Department, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Faculty of Medicine , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt
| | - Noha Rashad
- b Medical Oncology department , Maadi Military hospital , Cairo , Egypt
| | - Hani Oweira
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland.,d Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Jan Schmidt
- d Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Daniel Helbling
- e Department of Surgery , OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ) , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Anwar Giryes
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Ulf Petrausch
- e Department of Surgery , OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ) , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- d Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Michael Decker
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Omar Abdel-Rahman
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland.,f Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Navez J, Remue C, Leonard D, Bachmann R, Kartheuser A, Hubert C, Coubeau L, Komuta M, Van den Eynde M, Zech F, Jabbour N. Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal and Liver Metastases Using Combined Liver and Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Report from a Single-Centre Experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:666-673. [PMID: 27646023 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5543-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapeutic advances have enabled successful cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expansion in treating metastatic colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of combining liver surgery (LS) with HIPEC and CRS (which remains controversial) and its impact on overall survival (OS) rates. METHODS From 2007 to 2015, a total of 77 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer. Twenty-five of these patients underwent concomitant LS for suspicion of liver metastases (LM; group 2), and were compared with patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC only (group 1). Demographic and clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS Among the group 2 patients, two underwent major hepatectomies, six underwent multiple wedge resections, 16 underwent single wedge resections (one with radiofrequency ablation), and one underwent radiofrequency ablation alone. For groups 1 and 2, median peritoneal cancer index was 6 and 10 (range 0-26; p = 0.08), complication rates were 15.4 and 32.0 % (Dindo-Clavien ≥3; p = 0.15), and median follow-up was 34.2 and 25.5 months (range 0-75 and 3-97), respectively. One group 2 patient died of septic shock after 66 days. Pathology confirmed LM in 21 patients in group 2 (four with benign hepatic lesions were excluded from long-term outcome analysis). Two-year OS rates were 89.5 and 70.2 % (p = 0.04), and 2-year recurrence-free survival rates were 38.3 and 13.4 % (p = 0.01) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous surgery for colorectal LM and PC is both feasible and safe, with low postoperative morbidity. Further longer-term studies would help determine its impact on patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Navez
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christophe Remue
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Leonard
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Radu Bachmann
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alex Kartheuser
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Hubert
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurent Coubeau
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mina Komuta
- Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francis Zech
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Jabbour
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lansom J, Alzahrani N, Liauw W, Morris DL. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Appendix Tumours. Indian J Surg Oncol 2015; 7:166-76. [PMID: 27065707 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-015-0478-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is the intra-peritoneal accumulation of mucus due to mucinous neoplasia, most often from a ruptured mucinous appendiceal neoplasm. A similar syndrome is caused by appendix cancer and other gastrointestinal malignancies. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) provides long-term survival in selected patients with these conditions. The management of the appendiceal neoplasm prior to development of peritoneal involvement is initially discussed. This is followed by an overview of the management of peritoneal disease caused by appendiceal neoplasms. The principles and basic techniques of CRS and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (both intraoperative and post operative) are then discussed. Survival outcomes from several large studies are summarised. Prognostic factors are also discussed. We report our basic outcome data for the 345 patients with PMP or appendix cancer treated at our institution. Finally, the promising upcoming treatment of mucolytic therapy is discussed. We conclude that appendiceal neoplasms, although rare can cause significant morbidity and mortality. With optimal management long-term survival is possible in the majority of patients. The key to treatment is complete cytoreduction and use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Lansom
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales ; Department of Surgical Oncology, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Nayef Alzahrani
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales ; Department of Surgical Oncology, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia ; Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales ; Department of Surgical Oncology, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|