1
|
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Detection from Saliva Sampling and Oropharyngeal Swab. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0142222. [PMID: 36129278 PMCID: PMC9604035 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01422-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the detection rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) of side-by-side saliva and oropharyngeal swab (OPS) samples from 639 symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, of which 47 subjects were found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the OPS or saliva sample or both. It was found that the detection rate (93.6% for both OPS and saliva) as well as the sensitivity and specificity were comparable between the two sampling methods in this cohort. The sensitivity was 0.932 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.818 to 0.977) and the specificity was 0.995 (95% CI, 0.985 to 0.998), both for saliva when OPS sampling was used as the reference and for OPS when saliva was used as the reference. Furthermore, the Cohen's kappa value was 0.926 (95% CI, 0.868 to 0.985), indicating strong agreement between the two sampling methods. In addition, the viral RNA stability in pure saliva and saliva mixed with preservation buffers was examined following storage at room temperature and at 4°C. It was found that pure saliva kept the viral RNA stable for 9 days at both temperatures and that the type of preservation buffer can either enhance or reduce the stability of the RNA. We conclude that self-administered saliva sampling is an attractive alternative to oropharyngeal swabbing for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and it might be useful in large-scale testing. IMPORTANCE It is not inconceivable that we will witness recurring surges of COVID-19 before the pandemic finally recedes. It is therefore still relevant to look for feasible, simple, and flexible screening methods so that schools, workplaces, and communities in general can avoid lockdowns. In this work, we analyzed two different sampling methods: oropharyngeal swabs and saliva collection. Oropharyngeal swabs must be collected by trained health personnel at clinics, whereas self-assisted saliva collection can be performed at any given location. It was found that the two sampling methods were comparable. Saliva sampling is a simple method that allows easy mass testing using minimal resources from the existing health care system, and this method may therefore prove to be an effective tool for containing the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Upadhyay A, Pillai S, Khayambashi P, Tran SD. Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection: a scoping review. Oral Dis 2022; 28 Suppl 2:2362-2390. [PMID: 35445491 PMCID: PMC9115496 DOI: 10.1111/odi.14216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objectives This scoping review aims to summarize the diagnostic value of saliva assessed from current studies that (1) compare its performance in reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction testing to nasopharyngeal swabs, (2) evaluate its performance in rapid and point‐of‐care COVID‐19 diagnostic tests, and (3) explore its use as a specimen for detecting anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies. Materials and Methods A systematic search was performed on the following databases: Medline and Embase (Ovid), World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Global Health (Ovid) from January 2019 to September 2021. Of the 657 publications identified from the searches, n = 146 articles were included in the final scoping review. Results Our findings showcase that salivary samples exceed nasopharyngeal swabs in detecting SARS‐CoV‐2 using reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction testing in several studies. A select number of rapid antigen and point‐of‐care tests from the literature were also identified capable of high detection rates using saliva. Moreover, anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies have been shown to be detectable in saliva through biochemical assays. Conclusion We highlight the potential of saliva as an all‐rounded specimen in detecting SARS‐CoV‐2. However, future large‐scale clinical studies will be needed to support its widespread use as a non‐invasive clinical specimen for COVID‐19 testing.
Collapse
|
3
|
von Linstow M, Kruse A, Kirkby N, Søes LM, Nygaard U, Poulsen A. Response to letter in response to 'saliva is inferior to nose and throat swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in children'. Acta Paediatr 2021; 110:3388. [PMID: 34529876 PMCID: PMC8653192 DOI: 10.1111/apa.16112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie‐Louise von Linstow
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent MedicineThe Juliane Marie CentreCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Alexandra Kruse
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent MedicineCopenhagen University Hospital HvidovreHvidovreDenmark
| | - Nikolai Kirkby
- Department of Clinical MicrobiologyCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Lillian Marie Søes
- Department of Clinical MicrobiologyCopenhagen University Hospital HvidovreHvidovreDenmark
| | - Ulrikka Nygaard
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent MedicineThe Juliane Marie CentreCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Anja Poulsen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent MedicineThe Juliane Marie CentreCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Savela ES, Winnett A, Romano AE, Porter MK, Shelby N, Akana R, Ji J, Cooper MM, Schlenker NW, Reyes JA, Carter AM, Barlow JT, Tognazzini C, Feaster M, Goh YY, Ismagilov RF. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 viral-load curves in paired saliva and nasal swabs inform appropriate respiratory sampling site and analytical test sensitivity required for earliest viral detection. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2021:2021.04.02.21254771. [PMID: 33851180 PMCID: PMC8043477 DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.02.21254771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical to reduce asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, curb the spread of variants by travelers, and maximize treatment efficacy. Low-sensitivity nasal-swab testing (antigen and some nucleic-acid-amplification tests) is commonly used for surveillance and symptomatic testing, but the ability of low-sensitivity nasal-swab tests to detect the earliest stages of infection has not been established. In this case-ascertained study, initially-SARS-CoV-2-negative household contacts of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 prospectively self-collected paired anterior-nares nasal-swab and saliva samples twice daily for viral-load quantification by high-sensitivity RT-qPCR and digital-RT-PCR assays. We captured viral-load profiles from the incidence of infection for seven individuals and compared diagnostic sensitivities between respiratory sites. Among unvaccinated persons, high-sensitivity saliva testing detected infection up to 4.5 days before viral loads in nasal swabs reached the limit of detection of low-sensitivity nasal-swab tests. For most participants, nasal swabs reached higher peak viral loads than saliva, but were undetectable or at lower loads during the first few days of infection. High-sensitivity saliva testing was most reliable for earliest detection. Our study illustrates the value of acquiring early (within hours after a negative high-sensitivity test) viral-load profiles to guide the appropriate analytical sensitivity and respiratory site for detecting earliest infections. Such data are challenging to acquire but critical to design optimal testing strategies in the current pandemic and will be required for responding to future viral pandemics. As new variants and viruses emerge, up-to-date data on viral kinetics are necessary to adjust testing strategies for reliable early detection of infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S. Savela
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Alexander Winnett
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Anna E. Romano
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Michael K. Porter
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Natasha Shelby
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Reid Akana
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Jenny Ji
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Matthew M. Cooper
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Noah W. Schlenker
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Jessica A. Reyes
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Alyssa M. Carter
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Jacob T. Barlow
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| | - Colten Tognazzini
- City of Pasadena Public Health Department, 1845 N. Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, CA, USA 91103
| | - Matthew Feaster
- City of Pasadena Public Health Department, 1845 N. Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, CA, USA 91103
| | - Ying-Ying Goh
- City of Pasadena Public Health Department, 1845 N. Fair Oaks Ave., Pasadena, CA, USA 91103
| | - Rustem F. Ismagilov
- California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA, USA 91125
| |
Collapse
|