Treatment strategy for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common condition. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of HH.

METHODS

Systematic reviews were conducted for four key questions regarding the treatment of HH in adults: surgical treatment of asymptomatic HH versus surveillance; use of mesh versus no mesh; performing a fundoplication versus no fundoplication; and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus redo fundoplication for recurrent HH. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology by subject experts. When the evidence was insufficient to base recommendations on, expert opinion was utilized instead. Recommendations for future research were also proposed.

RESULTS

The panel provided one conditional recommendation and two expert opinions for adults with HH. The panel suggested routinely performing a fundoplication in the repair of HH, though this was based on low certainty evidence. There was insufficient evidence to make evidence-based recommendations regarding surgical repair of asymptomatic HH or conversion to RYGB in recurrent HH, and therefore, only expert opinions were offered. The panel suggested that select asymptomatic patients may be offered surgical repair, with criteria outlined. Similarly, it suggested that conversion to RYGB for management of recurrent HH may be appropriate in certain patients and again described criteria. The evidence for the routine use of mesh in HH repair was equivocal and the panel deferred making a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should provide guidance regarding surgical decision-making in the treatment of HH and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and consideration of patient values to optimize outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs will improve the evidence base and may allow for stronger recommendations in future evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of HH.

The role of anterior gastropexy in elderly Japanese hiatal hernia patients

PURPOSE

As Japanese society ages, the number of surgeries performed in elderly patients with hiatal hernia (HH) is increasing. In this study, we examined the feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of the addition of anterior gastropexy to hiatoplasty with or without mesh repair and/or fundoplication in elderly Japanese HH patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent laparoscopic HH repair between 2010 and 2021. We divided them into 2 groups according to age: the "younger" group (< 75 years old, n = 21), and the "older" group (≥ 75 years old, n = 18). The patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results were collected.

RESULTS

The median ages were 68 and 82 years old in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the female ratio was similar between the groups (younger vs. older: 67% vs. 78%, p = 0.44). The older group had more type III/IV HH cases than the younger group (19% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The operation time was longer in the older group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss, perioperative complications, or postoperative length of stay between the groups. The older group had significantly more cases of anterior gastropexy (0% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and less fundoplication (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.004) than the younger group. There was no significant difference in HH recurrence between the groups (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of anterior gastropexy to other procedures is feasible, safe, and potentially effective in elderly Japanese patients with HH.

Reducing recurrence rates in hiatal hernia repair: Results of a quality improvement study

BACKGROUND

Patient and procedure factors are considered in the decision-making process for surgical repair of hiatal hernias. Recurrence is multi-factorial and has been shown to be related to size, type, BMI and age.

AIMS

This study examined recurrence rates in a single institution, identified areas for improved surgical technique, and re-assessed recurrence following implantation of a quality improvement initiative.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair surgery between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Demographics, pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative procedures and recurrence rates were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients from 2018 to 2020 and 34 patients from 2021 to 2022 were identified. The recurrence rate was 21% in 2018-2020, with 14% requiring a revisional procedure. Recurrence and re-operation were subsequently reduced to 6% in 2021 and 2022, which was statistically significant (p = 0.043). There was an increase in gastropexy from 21% to 41% following the review (p = 0.032), which was mainly reserved for large and giant hernias. Procedural and literature review, alongside gastropexy, can be attributed to recurrence rate reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to educate patients on the likelihood and risk factors of recurrence. A comprehensive review of procedures and a quality improvement program in our facility for hiatal hernia repair is shown to reduce recurrence.

Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I2 = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; I2 = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89; I2 = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.

Is it meaningful to add mesh reinforcement to laparoscopic fundoplication for esophageal hiatal hernias in the patients with high risk of hiatal hernia recurrence?

BACKGROUND

While laparoscopic fundoplication is a standard surgical procedure for patients with esophageal hiatal hernias, the postoperative recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias is a problem for patients with giant hernias, elderly patients, or obese patients. Although there are some reports indicating that reinforcement with mesh is effective, there are differing opinions regarding the use thereof. The aim of this study is to investigate whether mesh reinforcement is effective for laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with esophageal hiatus hernias.

METHODS

The subjects included 280 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication as the initial surgery for giant esophageal hiatal hernias, elderly patients aged 75 years or older, and obese patients with a BMI of 28 or higher, who were considered at risk of recurrent hiatal hernias based on the previous reports. Of the subject patients, 91 cases without mesh and 86 cases following the stabilization of mesh use were extracted to compare the postoperative course including the pathology, symptom scores, surgical outcome, and recurrence of esophageal hiatus hernias.

RESULTS

The preoperative conditions indicated that the degree of esophageal hiatal hernias was high in the mesh group (p = 0.0001), while the preoperative symptoms indicated that the score of heartburn was high in the non-mesh group (p = 0.0287). Although the surgical results indicated that the mesh group underwent a longer operation time (p < 0.0001) and a higher frequency of intraoperative complications (p = 0.037), the rate of recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernia was significantly low (p = 0.049), with the rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis also tending to be low (p = 0.083).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh reinforcement in laparoscopic fundoplication for esophageal hiatal hernias contributes to preventing the recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias when it comes to patient options based on these criteria.

A case of conservatively managed gastric perforation at a recurrent hiatal hernia site after laparoscopic paraesophageal repair

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Gastric perforation due to a hiatal hernia is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain that often requires surgical intervention. Conservative management for this condition is an effective option in certain cases, although fewer reports of this exist. Herein, we report a unique case of gastric perforation caused by a recurrent hiatal hernia that was successfully treated with conservative management.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 74-year-old man developed a high fever and an elevated inflammatory response on the third day after a laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair using a mesh. Computed tomography confirmed the recurrence of the hiatal hernia, with gastric fundal prolapse into the mediastinum and surgical emphysema in the gastric wall. This was followed by a gastric perforation within the mediastinum. The patient was treated using an ileus tube through the perforation site.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

In similar cases, if the clinical symptoms are mild, there are no signs of serious infection, and the perforation remains in the mediastinum and can be appropriately drained, conservative treatment is considered an option.

CONCLUSION

Under favorable conditions, conservative management can be an option for gastric perforation in patients with recurrent hiatal hernias, which is a serious potential postoperative complication.

The pathological conditions and surgical outcomes depending on the degree of hernia in the intra-thoracic stomach

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of patients requiring surgery for intra-thoracic stomach (ITS) has been increasing due to the effects of obesity and gibbus due to aging. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of the degree of hernia on the pathological conditions and surgical outcomes in ITS patients.

METHODS

ITS was defined as cases in which over 50% of the stomach had deviated into the mediastinum by esophagogastric fluoroscopy and/or computed tomography, with 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery as the initial surgery included. We compared the pathological conditions and surgical outcomes by dividing the subjects into 3 groups: Group A: 50%- < 75%; Group B: 75%- < 100%; and Group C: 100% (upside-down stomach), depending on the degree of deviation into the mediastinum of the stomach.

RESULTS

The breakdown of patients was 33 in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 11 in Group C. Regarding the preoperative pathological conditions, Group C had a high body mass index (BMI) and a low score for factor V according to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (p = 0.0109, p = 0.0062, respectively). While the surgical results indicated that the operation time was extended depending on the degree of hernia (p = 0.0051), there was no marked difference in other surgical outcomes or the postoperative course among the three groups, with a high degree of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of ITS, although the operation time was extended depending on the degree of the hernia, the surgical outcomes were the same, and overall good results were obtained.

A protocol for developing core outcome sets for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Background

Hiatal hernias negatively damage patients’ health and life quality. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is currently the gold standard for the treatment of hiatal hernia (LHHR). Numerous clinical trials on laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair have been done, but the published findings are highly variable due to the lack of unique outcome sets. Basic outcome sets have ever been established over the previous decade for a few procedures, but not for hiatal hernia repair yet. This protocol outlines the procedure to develop a core outcome set for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair COS-LHHR). COS-LHHR will provide a unique criteria for clinical investigations.

Methods

This study will be conducted in four phases: (1) scoping reviews of existing qualitative studies and outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials to develop a list of potential outcome domains; (2) qualitative interviews with patients to explore the impact of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and the outcomes that they care most; (3) a multi-round e-Delphi study to achieve preliminary consensus on the core outcome set; and (4) an evidence-based consensus on a core outcome set will be achieved through a structured group consensus meeting, recommending best assessment outcome sets.

Discussion

The development the COS-LHHR will guide clinical research of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with unique outcome assessment. This would improve comparative analyses among studies.

Therapeutic effect of laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD-related disease in the elderly

BACKGROUND

It is anticipated that surgical treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the elderly will increase. This time, using propensity score matching, we examined the results of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for GERD-related diseases in the elderly.

METHODS

Of 302 cases which underwent initial LF for GERD-related diseases during the period from June 2008 to February 2019, we classified them into elderly (65 years of age or older) and non-elderly groups (64 years of age or younger). 57 cases each were extracted upon performing propensity score matching regarding five factors including: gender; body mass index; esophageal hiatal hernia; extent of reflux esophagitis; and the use of mesh.

RESULTS

With regard to the preoperative disease status, the pH < 4 holding time was indicated as 2.8% (0.5-10.7%) in the elderly group and 3.4% (0.6-8.0%) in the non-elderly group, with no difference in terms of the illness period as well (p = 0.889 and p = 0.263, respectively). Although there was no difference in terms of the operative time (155 vs. 139 min, p = 0.092) and estimated blood loss (both ≒ 0 ml, p = 0.298), postoperative hospital stay was prolonged in the elderly group [7 (7-9) vs. 7 (7-7), p = 0.007]. On the other hand, esophageal hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and acid reflux time in the esophagus were all improved following surgery in both groups (p < 0.001 in both groups).

CONCLUSION

The treatment results of LF for GERD-related diseases in the elderly were as good as those in the non-elderly, indicating possible safe implementation.