1
|
Chen X, Arun B, Nino-Meza OJ, Sarhan MO, Singh M, Jeon B, Mane K, Shah M, Tucker EW, Carroll LS, Freundlich JS, Peloquin CA, Ivaturi VD, Jain SK. Dynamic PET reveals compartmentalized brain and lung tissue antibiotic exposures of tuberculosis drugs. Nat Commun 2024; 15:6657. [PMID: 39143055 PMCID: PMC11324906 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50989-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death, but antibiotic treatments for tuberculous meningitis, the deadliest form of TB, are based on those developed for pulmonary TB and not optimized for brain penetration. Here, we perform first-in-human dynamic 18F-pretomanid positron emission tomography (PET) in eight human subjects to visualize 18F-pretomanid biodistribution as concentration-time exposures in multiple compartments (NCT05609552), demonstrating preferential brain versus lung tissue partitioning. Preferential, antibiotic-specific partitioning into brain or lung tissues of several antibiotics, active against multidrug resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, are confirmed in experimentally-infected mice and rabbits, using dynamic PET with chemically identical antibiotic radioanalogs, and postmortem mass spectrometry measurements. PET-facilitated pharmacokinetic modeling predicts human dosing necessary to attain therapeutic brain exposures. These data are used to design optimized, pretomanid-based regimens which are evaluated at human equipotent dosing in a mouse model of TB meningitis, demonstrating excellent bactericidal activity without an increase in intracerebral inflammation or brain injury. Importantly, several antibiotic regimens demonstrate discordant activities in brain and lung tissues in the same animal, correlating with tissue antibiotic exposures. These data provide a mechanistic basis for the compartmentalized activities of antibiotic regimens, with important implications for developing treatments for meningitis and other infections in compartments with unique antibiotic penetration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueyi Chen
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bhavatharini Arun
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Oscar J Nino-Meza
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mona O Sarhan
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Medha Singh
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Byeonghoon Jeon
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kishor Mane
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Maunank Shah
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth W Tucker
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laurence S Carroll
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joel S Freundlich
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Charles A Peloquin
- Infectious Disease Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Vijay D Ivaturi
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Centre for Pharmacometrics, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Sanjay K Jain
- Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mori G, Scarpellini P, Masera F, Torri S, Castagna A, Guffanti M. Management of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus early-onset prosthetic joint infection: Case report and literature review. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis 2024; 35:100440. [PMID: 38694253 PMCID: PMC11061329 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Nontuberculous mycobacteria are a rare but still emerging cause of difficult-to-treat prosthetic joint infection. To our knowledge only 17 cases of M. abscessus complex prosthetic joint infection are reported in literature, of which only 1 is by M. abscessus subps. abscessus. No guidelines are available for this clinical scenario. We describe a 68-years-old female patient with an early-onset M. abscessus subsp. abscessus prosthetic joint infection, successfully treated with a tailored medical-surgical strategy, and present an overview of cases currently available in the literature to assist physicians in the management of these uncommon infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Mori
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy
| | - Paolo Scarpellini
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Masera
- Traumatology and Orthopedic Clinic, Istituto Clinico Città Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Torri
- Unit of Microbiology and Virology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Castagna
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Guffanti
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdelgawad N, Wasserman S, Abdelwahab MT, Davis A, Stek C, Wiesner L, Black J, Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Denti P. Linezolid Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Patients With Tuberculosis Meningitis. J Infect Dis 2024; 229:1200-1208. [PMID: 37740554 PMCID: PMC11011161 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiad413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linezolid is evaluated in novel treatment regimens for tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Linezolid pharmacokinetics have not been characterized in this population, particularly in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as, following its co-administration with high-dose rifampicin. We aimed to characterize linezolid plasma and CSF pharmacokinetics in adults with TBM. METHODS In the LASER-TBM pharmacokinetic substudy, the intervention groups received high-dose rifampicin (35 mg/kg) plus 1200 mg/day of linezolid for 28 days, which was then reduced to 600 mg/day. Plasma sampling was done on day 3 (intensive) and day 28 (sparse). A lumbar CSF sample was obtained on both visits. RESULTS Thirty participants contributed 247 plasma and 28 CSF observations. Their median age and weight were 40 years (range, 27-56) and 58 kg (range, 30-96). Plasma pharmacokinetics was described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and saturable elimination. Maximal clearance was 7.25 L/h, and the Michaelis-Menten constant was 27.2 mg/L. Rifampicin cotreatment duration did not affect linezolid pharmacokinetics. CSF-plasma partitioning correlated with CSF total protein up to 1.2 g/L, where the partition coefficient reached a maximal value of 37%. The plasma-CSF equilibration half-life was ∼3.5 hours. CONCLUSIONS Linezolid was readily detected in CSF despite high-dose rifampicin coadministration. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of linezolid plus high-dose rifampicin for the treatment of TBM in adults. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03927313).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noha Abdelgawad
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sean Wasserman
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, United Kingdom
| | - Mahmoud Tareq Abdelwahab
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Angharad Davis
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Life Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Cari Stek
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lubbe Wiesner
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - John Black
- Department of Medicine, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
| | - Graeme Meintjes
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Robert J Wilkinson
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Denti
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdelgawad N, Wasserman S, Abdelwahab MT, Davis A, Stek C, Wiesner L, Black J, Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Denti P. Linezolid population pharmacokinetic model in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid among patients with tuberculosis meningitis. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.04.06.23288230. [PMID: 37066148 PMCID: PMC10104225 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.06.23288230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Background Linezolid is being evaluated in novel treatment regimens for tuberculous meningitis (TBM). The pharmacokinetics of linezolid have not been characterized in this population, particularly in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) where exposures may be affected by changes in protein concentration and rifampicin co-administration. Methods This was a sub-study of a phase 2 clinical trial of intensified antibiotic therapy for adults with HIV-associated TBM. Participants in the intervention groups received high-dose rifampicin (35 mg/kg) plus linezolid 1200 mg daily for 28 days followed by 600 mg daily until day 56. Plasma was intensively sampled, and lumbar CSF was collected at a single timepoint in a randomly allocated sampling window, within 3 days after enrolment. Sparse plasma and CSF samples were also obtained on day 28. Linezolid concentrations were analyzed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. Results 30 participants contributed 247 plasma and 28 CSF linezolid observations. Plasma PK was best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and saturable elimination. The typical value of maximal clearance was 7.25 L/h. Duration of rifampicin co-treatment (compared on day 3 versus day 28) did not affect linezolid pharmacokinetics. Partitioning between plasma and CSF correlated with CSF total protein concentration up to 1.2 g/L where the partition coefficient reached a maximal value of 37%. The equilibration half-life between plasma and CSF was estimated at ∼3.5 hours. Conclusion Linezolid was readily detected in CSF despite co-administration of the potent inducer rifampicin at high doses. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of linezolid plus high-dose rifampicin for the treatment of TBM in adults.
Collapse
|
5
|
Heidari S, Khalili H. Linezolid pharmacokinetics: a systematic review for the best clinical practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 79:195-206. [PMID: 36565357 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03446-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarize the pharmacokinetics of linezolid to optimize the dosing regimen in special populations. METHODS A literature search was performed in three largest medical databases, including Embase, Scopus, and PubMed. The main applied keywords were linezolid and pharmacokinetics. Of 3663 retrieved publications in the English language, 35 original research articles, clinical studies, and case reports about linezolid pharmacokinetics in different populations such as pregnant women, pediatrics, elderly subjects, obese people, individuals with organ dysfunction, and critically ill patients were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Dose adjustment is not currently recommended for linezolid in patients with mild to moderate renal or hepatic impairment, older adults, and pregnant women. Although dose adjustment is not recommended in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment, it should be considered that these patients are more vulnerable to linezolid adverse effects and drug interactions. In pediatrics, reducing the linezolid dosing interval to 8 h is suggested. Despite the lack of sufficient information in obese individuals, dosing based on body weight or use of higher dose seems to be justifiable to prevent sub-therapeutic concentrations. Although dose adjustment of linezolid is not recommended in critically ill patients, administration of linezolid as continuous intravenous infusion is suggested in this population. Blood level monitoring should be considered in populations that are vulnerable to linezolid underexposure (such as critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance, pediatrics, overweight, and obese patients) or overexposure (such as elderly, patients with hepatic and renal impairment). To assess the efficacy and safety of linezolid, the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24 h/MIC) equal to 80-120, percentage of time above the MIC ≥ 85%, and serum trough concentration between 2 and 7 mg/L are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shima Heidari
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Khalili
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Research Center for Antibiotic Stewardship and Antimicrobial Resistance, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Resendiz-Galvan JE, Arora PR, Abdelwahab MT, Udwadia ZF, Rodrigues C, Gupta A, Denti P, Ashavaid TF, Tornheim JA. Pharmacokinetic analysis of linezolid for multidrug resistant tuberculosis at a tertiary care centre in Mumbai, India. Front Pharmacol 2023; 13:1081123. [PMID: 36686664 PMCID: PMC9846493 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1081123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Linezolid is an oxazolidinone used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), including in the recently-endorsed shorter 6-month treatment regimens. Due to its narrow therapeutic index, linezolid is often either dose-adjusted or discontinued due to intolerance or toxicity during treatment, and the optimal balance between linezolid efficacy and toxicity remains unclear. India carries a significant burden of MDR-TB cases in the world, but limited information on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution is available from Indian MDR-TB patients. We enrolled participants from a tertiary care centre in Mumbai, India, treated for MDR-TB and receiving linezolid daily doses of 600 or 300 mg. Pharmacokinetic visits were scheduled between 1 and 15 months after treatment initiation to undergo intensive or sparse blood sampling. Linezolid concentration versus time data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling, with simulations to evaluate doses for different scenarios. We enrolled 183 participants (121 females), with a median age of 26 years (interquartile range [IQR] 21-35), weight 55.0 kg (IQR 45.6-65.8), and fat-free mass 38.7 kg (IQR 32.7-46.0). Linezolid pharmacokinetics was best described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination allometrically scaled by fat-free mass and transit compartment absorption. The typical clearance value was 3.81 L/h. Simulations predicted that treatment with 300 mg daily achieves a high probability of target attainment (PTA) when linezolid MIC was ≤0.25 mg/L (61.5% of participant samples tested), while 600 mg daily would be required if MIC were 0.5 mg/L (29% of samples). While linezolid 300 mg daily is predicted to achieve effective targets for the majority of adults with MDR-TB, it failed to achieve the therapeutic target for 21% participants. A dose of 600 mg had a PTA >90% for all susceptible samples, but with a higher likelihood of exceeding toxicity thresholds (31% vs 9.6%). These data suggest potential benefit to individualized dosing taking host and microbial characteristics into account to improve the likelihood of treatment efficacy while minimizing risk of toxicity from linezolid for the treatment of MDR-TB. Further prospective evaluation in different clinical settings is urgently needed to inform safety and efficacy of these lower doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Prerna R Arora
- Research Laboratories, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahmoud Tareq Abdelwahab
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Zarir F Udwadia
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Camilla Rodrigues
- Research Laboratories, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Amita Gupta
- Center for Infectious Diseases in India, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Center for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Paolo Denti
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tester F Ashavaid
- Research Laboratories, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Jeffrey A Tornheim
- Center for Infectious Diseases in India, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Center for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alffenaar JWC, de Steenwinkel JEM, Diacon AH, Simonsson USH, Srivastava S, Wicha SG. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-tuberculosis drugs: An evaluation of in vitro, in vivo methodologies and human studies. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1063453. [PMID: 36569287 PMCID: PMC9780293 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1063453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an increased interest in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) of anti-tuberculosis drugs. A better understanding of the relationship between drug exposure, antimicrobial kill and acquired drug resistance is essential not only to optimize current treatment regimens but also to design appropriately dosed regimens with new anti-tuberculosis drugs. Although the interest in PKPD has resulted in an increased number of studies, the actual bench-to-bedside translation is somewhat limited. One of the reasons could be differences in methodologies and outcome assessments that makes it difficult to compare the studies. In this paper we summarize most relevant in vitro, in vivo, in silico and human PKPD studies performed to optimize the drug dose and regimens for treatment of tuberculosis. The in vitro assessment focuses on MIC determination, static time-kill kinetics, and dynamic hollow fibre infection models to investigate acquisition of resistance and killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis populations in various metabolic states. The in vivo assessment focuses on the various animal models, routes of infection, PK at the site of infection, PD read-outs, biomarkers and differences in treatment outcome evaluation (relapse and death). For human PKPD we focus on early bactericidal activity studies and inclusion of PK and therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical trials. Modelling and simulation approaches that are used to evaluate and link the different data types will be discussed. We also describe the concept of different studies, study design, importance of uniform reporting including microbiological and clinical outcome assessments, and modelling approaches. We aim to encourage researchers to consider methods of assessing and reporting PKPD of anti-tuberculosis drugs when designing studies. This will improve appropriate comparison between studies and accelerate the progress in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia,School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia,*Correspondence: Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar,
| | | | | | | | - Shashikant Srivastava
- Department of Pulmonary Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Sebastian G. Wicha
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
In recent years, many studies on population pharmacokinetics of linezolid have been conducted. This comprehensive review aimed to summarize population pharmacokinetic models of linezolid, by focusing on dosage optimization to maximize the probability of attaining a certain pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter in special populations. We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for population pharmacokinetic analyses of linezolid using a parametric non-linear mixed-effect approach, including both observational and prospective trials. Of the 32 studies, 26 were performed in adults, four in children, and one in both adults and children. High between-subject variability was determined in the majority of the models, which was in line with the variability of linezolid concentrations previously detected in observational studies. Some studies found that patients with renal impairment, hepatic failure, advanced age, or low body weight had higher exposure and adverse reactions rates. In contrast, lower concentrations and therapeutic failure were associated with obese patients, young patients, and patients who had undergone renal replacement techniques. In critically ill patients, the inter-individual and intra-individual variability was even greater, suggesting that this population is at an even higher risk of underexposure and overexposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be warranted in a large proportion of patients given that the Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that the one-size-fits-all labeled dosing of 600 mg every 12 h could lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure for high values of the minimum inhibitory concentration of the target pathogen. Further research on covariates, including renal function, hepatic function, and drug–drug interactions related to P-glycoprotein could help to explain variability and improve linezolid dosing regimens.
Collapse
|
9
|
Alffenaar JWC, Stocker SL, Forsman LD, Garcia-Prats A, Heysell SK, Aarnoutse RE, Akkerman OW, Aleksa A, van Altena R, de Oñata WA, Bhavani PK, Van't Boveneind-Vrubleuskaya N, Carvalho ACC, Centis R, Chakaya JM, Cirillo DM, Cho JG, D Ambrosio L, Dalcolmo MP, Denti P, Dheda K, Fox GJ, Hesseling AC, Kim HY, Köser CU, Marais BJ, Margineanu I, Märtson AG, Torrico MM, Nataprawira HM, Ong CWM, Otto-Knapp R, Peloquin CA, Silva DR, Ruslami R, Santoso P, Savic RM, Singla R, Svensson EM, Skrahina A, van Soolingen D, Srivastava S, Tadolini M, Tiberi S, Thomas TA, Udwadia ZF, Vu DH, Zhang W, Mpagama SG, Schön T, Migliori GB. Clinical standards for the dosing and management of TB drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2022; 26:483-499. [PMID: 35650702 PMCID: PMC9165737 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal drug dosing is important to ensure adequate response to treatment, prevent development of drug resistance and reduce drug toxicity. The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on 'best practice´ for dosing and management of TB drugs.METHODS: A panel of 57 global experts in the fields of microbiology, pharmacology and TB care were identified; 51 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score draft standards. The final document represents the broad consensus and was approved by all participants.RESULTS: Six clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, defining the most appropriate initial dose for TB treatment; Standard 2, identifying patients who may be at risk of sub-optimal drug exposure; Standard 3, identifying patients at risk of developing drug-related toxicity and how best to manage this risk; Standard 4, identifying patients who can benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM); Standard 5, highlighting education and counselling that should be provided to people initiating TB treatment; and Standard 6, providing essential education for healthcare professionals. In addition, consensus research priorities were identified.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based Clinical Standards for the dosing and management of TB drugs to guide clinicians and programme managers in planning and implementation of locally appropriate measures for optimal person-centred treatment to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W C Alffenaar
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S L Stocker
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St Vincent´s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, St Vincent´s Clinical Campus, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - L Davies Forsman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden, Department of Infectious Diseases Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - A Garcia-Prats
- Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - S K Heysell
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - R E Aarnoutse
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences & Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - O W Akkerman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Groningen, The Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Tuberculosis Center Beatrixoord, Haren, The Netherlands
| | - A Aleksa
- Educational Institution "Grodno State Medical University", Grodno, Belarus
| | - R van Altena
- Asian Harm Reduction Network (AHRN) and Medical Action Myanmar (MAM) in Yangon, Myanmar
| | - W Arrazola de Oñata
- Belgian Scientific Institute for Public Health (Belgian Lung and Tuberculosis Association), Brussels, Belgium
| | - P K Bhavani
- Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis-International Center for Excellence in Research, Chennai, India
| | - N Van't Boveneind-Vrubleuskaya
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, Department of Public Health TB Control, Metropolitan Public Health Services, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - A C C Carvalho
- Laboratório de Inovações em Terapias, Ensino e Bioprodutos (LITEB), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - R Centis
- Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Respiratorie, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Tradate, Italy
| | - J M Chakaya
- Department of Medicine, Therapeutics and Dermatology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - D M Cirillo
- Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - J G Cho
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Parramatta Chest Clinic, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
| | - L D Ambrosio
- Public Health Consulting Group, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - M P Dalcolmo
- Reference Center Hélio Fraga, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - P Denti
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - K Dheda
- Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonology and UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, University of Cape Town Lung Institute & South African MRC Centre for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance, Cape Town, South Africa, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - G J Fox
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | - A C Hesseling
- Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa
| | - H Y Kim
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C U Köser
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - B J Marais
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, The Children´s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - I Margineanu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A G Märtson
- Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Munoz Torrico
- Clínica de Tuberculosis, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - H M Nataprawira
- Division of Paediatric Respirology, Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - C W M Ong
- Infectious Disease Translational Research Programme, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Institute for Health Innovation & Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - R Otto-Knapp
- German Central Committee against Tuberculosis (DZK), Berlin, Germany
| | - C A Peloquin
- Infectious Disease Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - D R Silva
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - R Ruslami
- TB/HIV Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - P Santoso
- Division of Respirology and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - R M Savic
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - R Singla
- Department of TB & Respiratory Diseases, National Institute of TB & Respiratory Diseases, New Delhi, India
| | - E M Svensson
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences & Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Skrahina
- The Republican Research and Practical Centre for Pulmonology and TB, Minsk, Belarus
| | - D van Soolingen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, TB Reference Laboratory (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Srivastava
- Department of Pulmonary Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| | - M Tadolini
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Tiberi
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - T A Thomas
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Z F Udwadia
- P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - D H Vu
- National Drug Information and Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centre, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - W Zhang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People´s Republic of China
| | - S G Mpagama
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania, Kibong´oto Infectious Diseases Hospital, Sanya Juu, Siha, Kilimanjaro, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - T Schön
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden, Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection and Inflammation, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, Department of Infectious Diseases, Kalmar County Hospital, Kalmar, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - G B Migliori
- Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica delle Malattie Respiratorie, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Tradate, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Linezolid in Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14040753. [PMID: 35456587 PMCID: PMC9032906 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Linezolid is an efficacious medication for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis but has been associated with serious safety issues that can result in treatment interruption. The objectives of this study were thus to build a population pharmacokinetic model and to use the developed model to establish a model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) algorithm enabling safe and efficacious dosing in patients with multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Routine hospital therapeutic drug monitoring data, collected from 70 tuberculosis patients receiving linezolid, was used for model development. Efficacy and safety targets for MIPD were the ratio of unbound area under the concentration versus time curve between 0 and 24 h over minimal inhibitory concentration (fAUC0–24h/MIC) above 119 and unbound plasma trough concentration (fCmin) below 1.38 mg/L, respectively. Model building was performed in NONMEM 7.4.3. The final population pharmacokinetic model consisted of a one-compartment model with transit absorption and concentration- and time-dependent auto-inhibition of elimination. A flat dose of 600 mg once daily was appropriate in 67.2% of the simulated patients from an efficacy and safety perspective. Using the here developed MIPD algorithm, the proportion of patients reaching the efficacy and safety target increased to 81.5% and 88.2% using information from two and three pharmacokinetic sampling occasions, respectively. This work proposes an MIPD approach for linezolid and suggests using three sampling occasions to derive an individualized dose that results in adequate efficacy and fewer safety concerns compared to flat dosing.
Collapse
|