A phase I open label dose-escalation study to evaluate the tolerability, safety and immunological efficacy of sub-urothelial durvalumab injection in adults with muscle-invasive or high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (SUBDUE-1, SUB-urothelial DUrvalumab injection-1 study): clinical trial protocol

An evaluation of durvalumab across the spectrum of urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy affecting the urinary system, with the spectrum of disease encompassing non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic disease. On a background of almost half a century of immunogenic management with BCG, various immune checkpoint inhibitors, including durvalumab, have now demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the available literature on durvalumab in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma for all stages of the disease including mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and covers a broad portfolio of reported and ongoing trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of UC is rapidly evolving, which is reflected in the diverse range of upcoming pivotal trials incorporating durvalumab with additional immunomodulatory agents and therapeutics targeting key oncogenic pathways, each with the potential to change the standard of care. As the complexity of UC management increases, future efforts should be directed at identifying better predictive biomarkers and selecting rational synergistic combinations from the novel treatments available. This will allow the addressing of existing gaps, facilitate the exploitation of new techniques of treatment delivery and ultimately deliver more personalized and efficacious care to the individual patient.

The SUB-urothelial DUrvalumab InjEction-1 (SUBDUE-1) trial: first-in-human trial in patients with bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab and examine the impact on tissue and circulating immune cell populations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients were chemotherapy and immunotherapy naïve (bacille Calmette-Guérin allowed) with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer or non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer planned for radical cystectomy (RC). The study was a Phase Ib 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab at three pre-determined doses (25, 75, 150 mg) diluted in 25 mL normal saline, injected at 25 locations (25 × 1 mL injections), at least 2 weeks before RC.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients were recruited (10 male, one female). No significant changes were reported on American Urological Association Symptom Score or O'Leary Interstitial Cystitis Scale. In all, 14 adverse events (AEs) were reported (10 Grade 1, three Grade 2, one Grade 3), none considered immune-related. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were recorded. All the patients underwent RC. Tissue immune populations changed following durvalumab injection (P = 0.012), with a statistically significant increase in M2-macrophage (CD163) when comparing the 25-150 mg dose (P = 0.021). Basal/mixed cancers showed a larger CD163 increase than luminal cancers (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab is feasible and safe without immune-related AEs and shows local immunological effects.

U-PRO-CRM: designing patient-centred dose-finding trials with patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) remains the primary objective for the majority of dose-finding oncology trials. Whilst MTD determination often relies upon clinicians to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) experienced by patients during the trial, research suggests that clinicians may underreport patient's adverse events. Therefore, contemporary practice may be exposed to recommending intolerable doses to patients for further investigation in subsequent trials. There is increasing interest in patients self-assessing their own symptoms using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in dose-finding trials.

DESIGN

We present Utility-PRO-Continual Reassessment Method (U-PRO-CRM), a novel trial design which simultaneously uses clinician-rated and patient-rated DLTs (Clinician-DLTs and Patient-DLTs, respectively) to make dose (de-)escalation decisions and to recommend an MTD. U-PRO-CRM contains the published PRO-CRM as a special case and provides greater flexibility to trade-off the rate of Patient-DLTs and Clinician-DLTs to find an optimal dose. We present simulation results for U-PRO-CRM.

RESULTS

For specified trade-offs between Clinician-DLT and Patient-DLT rate, U-PRO-CRM outperforms the PRO-CRM design by identifying the true MTD more often. In the special case where U-PRO-CRM generalises to PRO-CRM, U-PRO-CRM performs as well as its published counterpart. U-PRO-CRM minimises the number of patients overdosed whilst maintaining a similar proportion of patients allocated to the true MTD.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a utility-based dose selection approach, U-PRO-CRM offers the flexibility to define a trade-off between the risk of patient-rated and clinician-rated DLTs for an optimal dose. Patient-centric dose-finding strategies, which integrate PROs, are poised to assume an ever more pivotal role in significantly advancing our understanding of treatment tolerability. This bears significant implications in shaping the future landscape of early-phase trials.

Amplifying the Patient's Voice in Oncology Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Solutions to Burdens and Barriers

Dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) provide early access to novel compounds of potential therapeutic benefit in addition to providing critical safety and dosing information. While access to trials for which a patient is eligible remains the largest barrier to enrollment on clinical trials, additional direct and indirect barriers unique to enrollment on DFOTs are often overlooked but worthy of consideration. Direct barriers including financial costs of care, travel and time investments, and logical challenges including correlative study designs are important to bear in mind when developing strategies to facilitate the patient experience on DFOTs. Indirect barriers such as strict eligibility criteria, washout periods, and concomitant medication restrictions should be accounted for during DFOT design to maintain the fidelity of the trial without being overly exclusionary. Involving patients and advocates and incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) throughout the process, from initial DFOT design, through patient recruitment and participation, is critical to informing strategies to minimize identified barriers to offer the benefit of DFOTs to all patients.

Experimental and New Approaches for Bladder Preservation in Intermediate and High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

About 75% of bladder cancers are detected as non-muscle invasive. High-risk patients have high progression risk. Although the standard is transurethral resection of bladder tumor plus full dose intravesical BCG for one to 3 years, due to the high risk of progression, radical cystectomy may be considered in specific cases. Although radical cystectomy is still the best approach for high-grade NMIBC from an oncological perspective, its high morbidity and impact on quality of life motivate studies of new strategies that may reduce the need for cystectomy. We carried out a mini-review whose objectives were: 1 - to identify bladder-sparing alternatives that are being studied as possible treatment for patients with intermediate and high-risk NMIBC; 2 - understand the evidence that exists regarding success rate, follow-up, and side effects of different strategies. Several studies have sought alternatives for bladder preservation, including immunotherapy, intravesical chemotherapy, chemo-hyperthermia, antibody-drug conjugates, viral genetic therapy, and others with promising results. The selection of an optimal therapy for high-risk NMIBC that can reduce the need for cystectomy, with low toxicity and high efficacy, is of paramount importance and remains an issue, however, several known medications are being tested as bladder-preserving alternatives in this scenario and have shown promise in studies.

Intratumoral Treatment of Melanoma Tumors with Large Surface Area Microparticle Paclitaxel and Synergy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

The effects of intratumoral (IT) large surface area microparticle paclitaxel (LSAM-PTX) alone and in combination with systemic administration of the programmed cell death protein antibody (anti-mPD-1) were evaluated in a syngeneic murine model of melanoma. Groups of mice with subcutaneously implanted Clone M3 (Cloudman S91) tumors were treated with single and combination therapies. Tumor volume (TV) measurements, body weights, and clinical observations were followed in-life. At end of study, tumor-site tissues were collected, measured, and processed for flow cytometry along with blood and lymph nodes. The combination of LSAM-PTX + anti-mPD-1 resulted in an antitumoral response, which produced a significant decrease in TV compared to control animals. TV decreases also occurred in the LSAM-PTX and anti-mPD-1 groups. Flow cytometry analysis found increases in granulocytes and M2 macrophages and decreases in dendritic cells (DC) and monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC) in tumor-site tissues. Increases in granulocytes and decreases in CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and M1 macrophages were found in the blood of animals administered the combination treatment. Increases in natural killer (NK) cells were found in lymph node tissue in the combination treatment group. These findings suggest that IT LSAM-PTX may provide benefit in the local treatment of melanomas and may synergize with systemic anti-PD-1 therapy, leading to additional tumoricidal outcomes without added systemic toxicity.

Statistical methods and data visualisation of patient-reported outcomes in early phase dose-finding oncology trials: a methodological review

Background

Traditionally, within dose-finding clinical trials, treatment toxicity and tolerability are assessed by clinicians. Research has shown that clinician reporting may have inadequate inter-rater reliability, poor correlation with patient reported outcomes, and under capture the true toxicity burden. The introduction of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), where the patient can assess their own symptomatic adverse events or quality of life, has potential to complement current practice to aid dose optimisation. There are no international recommendations offering guidance for the inclusion of PROs in dose-finding trial design and analysis. Our review aimed to identify and describe current statistical methods and data visualisation techniques employed to analyse and visualise PRO data in published early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs).

Methods

DFOTs published from June 2016-December 2022, which presented PRO analysis methods, were included in this methodological review. We extracted 35 eligible papers indexed in PubMed. Study characteristics extracted included: PRO objectives, PRO measures, statistical analysis and visualisation techniques, and whether the PRO was involved in interim and final dose selection decisions.

Findings

Most papers (30, 85.7%) did not include clear PRO objectives. 20 (57.1%) papers used inferential statistical techniques to analyse PROs, including survival analysis and mixed-effect models. One trial used PROs to classify a clinicians' assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Three (8.6%) trials used PROs to confirm the tolerability of the recommended dose. 25 trial reports visually presented PRO data within a figure or table within their publication, of which 12 papers presented PRO score longitudinally.

Interpretation

This review highlighted that the statistical methods and reporting of PRO analysis in DFOTs are often poorly described and inconsistent. Many trials had PRO objectives which were not clearly described, making it challenging to evaluate the appropriateness of the statistical techniques used. Drawing conclusions based on DFOTs which are not powered for PROs may be misleading. With no guidance and standardisation of analysis methods for PROs in early phase DFOTs, it is challenging to compare study findings across trials. Therefore, there is a crucial need to establish international guidance to enhance statistical methods and graphical presentation for PRO analysis in the dose-finding setting.

Funding

EA has been supported to undertake this work as part of a PhD studentship from the Institute of Cancer Research within the MRC/NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership. AM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, the Institute of Cancer Research and Imperial College.

Novel Delivery Mechanisms for Existing Systemic Agents and Emerging Therapies in Bladder Cancer

Systemic agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and targeted therapies play a critical role in the management of bladder cancer. Novel localized delivery mechanisms for existing systemic agents explore solutions to improve treatment response without compromising safety. Herein, we review the contemporary innovations in modern intravesical agents, hyperthermic drug delivery, reverse-thermal gels, nanocarriers, gene therapy, and subcutaneous therapies.

Local administration of large surface area microparticle docetaxel to solid carcinomas induces direct cytotoxicity and immune-mediated tumoricidal effects: preclinical and clinical studies

This report describes local administration of large surface area microparticle docetaxel (LSAM-DTX: ~ 3.5- to 7.5-µm-sized particles with high relative surface area) in preclinical oncology models and in a clinical trial in urothelial carcinoma. Reductions in tumor volumes were found following intratumoral (IT) injection of LSAM-DTX into human urologic carcinoma cell lines and syngeneic murine renal and breast cancer cell lines. Compared to IT injections of docetaxel solution typically administered intravenously, IT LSAM-DTX results in 40-fold more docetaxel retained within the tumor. The long residence time of LSAM-DTX within the tumor acts as a drug depot, allowing for continuous release of docetaxel, exposing tumor cells to high, therapeutic levels of chemotherapeutic for several weeks. Local LSAM-DTX results in tumoricidal effects at the site of deposition as well as in distant tumors, and IT LSAM-DTX in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy reduces or eliminates metastatic spread. Tumoricidal effects of local LSAM-DTX are accompanied by immunomodulation including increases in innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood. Encouraging clinical results indicate that local administration of LSAM-DTX may provide therapeutic benefits for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and muscle invasive bladder cancer patients; treatments were well-tolerated with few local and systemic adverse events and negligible systemic docetaxel exposure. Results of preclinical and clinical investigations summarized here indicate that local administration of LSAM-DTX may augment tumor response to systemically administered chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy without contributing to systemic toxicity.

Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer: Latest Advances and Ongoing Clinical Trials

For nearly 50 years, immunotherapy has been used in patients with bladder cancer in the form of Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), which is still the first-line therapy for non-muscle invasive disease. However, the remarkable results obtained with checkpoint inhibitor drugs, including Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab, have fueled the quest to optimize these and other forms of immunotherapy for both non-muscle invasive as well as advanced bladder cancer. In this review we summarize the current state of the rapidly evolving field of immunotherapy in bladder cancer highlighting novel approaches and ongoing trials in this exciting area of research.