Bariatric surgery and weight loss in the short- and long-term: Evidence from NHANES 2015-2018

Falling short in bariatric surgery: An exploration of key barriers and motivators of attrition

BACKGROUND

In the United States, obesity-related diseases pose significant healthcare challenges, with bariatric surgery offering a potential solution. However, bariatric surgery completion rates, particularly among Black and Hispanic populations, remain low.

OBJECTIVE

This study applied the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore behavioral factors influencing bariatric surgery program attrition among a majority Black participant population to inform interventions for improving attrition.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 surgical and non-surgical participants and conducted deductive content analysis informed by six TDF constructs to explore factors influencing bariatric surgery program attrition.

RESULTS

Participants' decision-making regarding bariatric surgery is influenced by behavioral factors, including knowledge, skills, social roles, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, and beliefs about consequences.

CONCLUSION

Understanding multifaceted factors influencing bariatric surgery attrition will inform the development of tailored interventions that address knowledge gaps, enhance skills, and consider social role conflicts to improve patient engagement and decision-making in managing obesity, especially for Black populations.

Assessing the Prevalence of Male Obesity-Associated Gonadal Dysfunction in Severe Obesity: A Focus on the Impact of Bariatric Surgery and Surgical Approaches

PURPOSE

Obesity is an important risk factor for secondary hypogonadism in men. Several studies evaluated the impact of bariatric surgery on gonadal function in men, proving an improvement in testosterone levels, without yet a global consensus on the impact of different surgical approaches. Objectives of the study are: to estimate the prevalence of obesity-associated gonadal dysfunction among men with severe obesity; to evaluate the response to bariatric surgery in terms of resolution of this condition, distinguishing between restrictive and restrictive-malabsorptive surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 413 males with severe obesity (BMI 44.7 ± 8.3 kg/m2). A subgroup of them (61.7%) underwent bariatric surgery. Anthropometric assessment (weight, BMI, waist and hip circumference), metabolic (glyco-lipidic asset and urate) and hormonal (morning gonadotropin and total testosterone) assessments were carried out at baseline and 3-6 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Using a TT threshold of 2.64 ng/ml, 256 out of 413 (62%) patients were categorized as having biochemical hypogonadism. At multivariate analysis, the only parameter significantly associated with biochemical hypogonadism, was BMI value (p = 0.001). At 3-6 months after surgery, during the acute weight loss phase, only 20.1% of patients still had biochemical hypogonadism. At multivariate analysis, which included age, presurgical BMI, pre-surgical TT, surgical approach and %EWL, presurgical TT levels (p = 0.0004), %EWL (p = 0.04), and mixed restrictive-malabsorptive surgery (p = 0.01), were independently associated with the recovery of gonadal function.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study underscore the potential reversibility of obesity-associated gonadal dysfunction through bariatric surgery, highlighting the importance of considering surgical approach.

Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery in an Inner-City Minority Population: A Pre and Postoperative Comparison Between Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Background Obese patients are at an increased risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Bariatric surgery or weight loss surgery is an important therapeutic measure in obese patients for the management of weight and comorbidities. Data are scarce in inner-city Hispanic and Black patients who undergo bariatric surgery, which eventually leads to health disparity in this minority population. Differences between patients with and without OSA have not been assessed in this population. This study aims to answer these questions. Methodology The study was conducted in a high-volume hospital in the Bronx, New York. Before bariatric surgery, patients underwent a preoperative evaluation that included a variety of blood tests, a sleep study, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and echocardiography. They also underwent basic anthropometric measurements, such as weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), before surgery and 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Additional calculations were made using these anthropometric measures, namely, total weight loss, excess weight loss, and delta BMI. Results Most patients were Hispanic (85.2%), with a mean age of 41.9 ± 10.8 years. We found that of the 108 patients included in the study, 69.4% (70/108) had OSA. Preoperative BMI in the study was 43.9 ± 13 kg/m2. Postoperatively, the mean decrease in BMI was 12.3 ± 14.5 kg/m2. Total weight loss and excess weight loss were 30.2 ± 14.3 and 52.6 ± 16.6, respectively. Conclusions In this study, no significant difference was noted in patients with or without OSA in either the laboratory or anthropometric parameters.

Endoscopic therapies for bariatric surgery complications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to present the current state of the field, highlight recent developments, and describe the clinical outcomes of endoscopic therapies for bariatric surgery complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The field of interventional endoscopy now presents a range of minimally invasive procedures for addressing postbariatric complications. Lumen-opposing metal stents have emerged as a reliable solution for managing gastrojejunal strictures following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, whether with or without associated leaks. Additionally, they serve as a conduit for performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) post-RYGB via EUS-directed ERCP (EDGE). Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy, originally designed for gastroparesis, has demonstrated effectiveness in treating postgastric sleeve stenosis, particularly the challenging helical stenosis cases. Furthermore, innovative endoscopic antireflux techniques are showing encouraging outcomes in addressing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following sleeve gastrectomy. Additionally, several modifications have been proposed to enhance the efficacy of transoral outlet reduction (TORe), originally developed to treat weight regain due to gastrojejunal anastomotic issues post-RYGB.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic management of bariatric surgery complications is continuously evolving. The development of new techniques and devices allows endoscopists to provide novel, minimally invasive alternatives that were not possible in the near past. Many techniques, however, are limited to expert centers because they are technically demanding, and specialized training in bariatric endoscopy is still required.

LSG vs OAGB: 7-Year Follow-up Data of a Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Outcome Based on BAROS Score

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate and compare long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) based on bariatric analysis reporting and outcome system (BAROS) score.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients operated for morbid obesity between 2013 and 2015 were randomised to LSG and OAGB groups. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 201 patients (100 LSG and 101 OAGB) were analysed for changes in total body weight (TBW), body mass index (BMI), percent excess weight loss (%EWL), percent total weight loss (%TWL), QoL (quality of life) scores, comorbidity resolution and outcome based on BAROS at 7 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-six LSG and 64 OAGB patients were followed up at 7 years. Mean pre-operative TBW and BMI were 119 ± 28.2 and 44.87 ± 7.71 for LSG group and 113.25 ± 23.74 and 44.71 ± 8.75 for OAGB group respectively. At 7 years after surgery, there was significant drop in mean TBW and BMI in both groups. Mean %EWL for LSG and OAGB patients was 50.78 ± 28.48 and 59.99 ± 23.32 and mean %TWL for LSG and OAGB patients was 23.22 ± 12.66 and 27.71 ± 12.27 respectively. Mean QoL scores at 7 years were significantly higher than the pre-operative scores and most of the patients in both groups had remission or improvement in their comorbidities. 68.76% OAGB patients had very good or excellent outcome on BAROS score while only 36.37% LSG patients had similar outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG and OAGB are successful bariatric procedures over the long term. OAGB outperforms LSG and has significantly higher %EWL and %TWL over the long term.

The Utilisation of Digital Applications for Measuring Patient Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

In the context of escalating obesity rates, bariatric surgery holds a crucial role in managing severely obese patients. With a demonstrated effectiveness in weight loss and with the advent of ambulatory surgery, bariatric surgery allows for a streamlined care pathway, ideally suited for postoperative surveillance using digital health applications. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of eHealth-delivered health services or support for adults undergoing bariatric surgery. Five studies, encompassing 2210 patients, were analysed. The intervention group showed a 10% increase in total weight reduction and a 22% reduction in excess weight loss. ED visitation rates also trended towards reduction. Despite the absence of clear statistical superiority for DHA, the findings suggest potential benefits of DHA in postoperative monitoring.