Is the assessment of submucosal invasion still useful in the management of early rectal cancer? A study of 91 consecutive patients

Risk Factors for Rectal Cancer Recurrence after Local Excision of T1 Lesions from a Decade-Long Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background: Local surgical excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinoma is a well-established approach. Yet, there are still open questions regarding the recurrence rates and its risk factors. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study including all patients who underwent local excision of early rectal cancer with an open or MIS approach and had a T1 lesion from 2010 to 2020 in six academic centers. Data included demographics, preoperative studies, surgical findings, postoperative outcomes, and local and systemic recurrence. A univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for recurrence. Results: Overall, 274 patients underwent local excision of rectal lesions. Of them, 97 (35.4%) patients with a T1 lesion were included in the cohort. The mean age was 69 ± 10.5 years, and 42 (43.3%) were female. The mean distance of the lesions from the anal verge was 7.8 ± 3.2 cm, and the average tumor size was 2.7 ± 1.6 cm. Eighty-two patients (85%) had a full-thickness resection. Eight patients (8%) had postoperative complications. Kikuchi classification of submucosal (SM) involvement was reported in 29 (30%) patients. Twelve patients had SM1, two SM2, and fifteen SM3. Following pathology, 24 patients (24.7%) returned for additional surgery or treatment. The overall recurrence rate was 14.4% (14 patients), with 11 patients having a local recurrence and 6 having a systemic metastatic recurrence, 3 of which had both. The mean time for recurrence was 2.78 ± 2.8 years and the overall mortality rate was 11%. On univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of recurrence vs. non-recurrence groups, the strongest and most significant association and possible risk factors for recurrence were larger lesions (4.3 vs. 2.5 cm, p < 0.001) with an OR of 6.67 (CI-1.82-24.36), especially for tumors larger than 3.5 cm, mucinous histology (14.3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.004, OR of 14.02, CI-1.13-173.85), and involved margins (41.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.003, OR of 9.59, CI-2.14-43.07). The open transanal excision (TAE) approach was also identified as a possible significant risk factor in univariant analysis, while SM3 level penetration showed only a trend. Conclusion: Surgical local excision of T1 rectal malignancy is a safe and viable option. Still, one in four patients received additional treatment. There is an almost 15% chance for recurrence, especially in large tumors, mucinous histology, or involved margin cases. These high-risk patients might warrant additional intervention and stricter surveillance protocols.

Predictors of early colorectal cancer metastasis to lymph nodes: providing rationale for therapy decisions

With the improvement of national health awareness and the popularization of a series of screening methods, the number of patients with early colorectal cancer is gradually increasing, and accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer is the key to determining the optimal therapeutic solutions. Whether patients with T1 colorectal cancer undergoing endoscopic resection require additional surgery and regional lymph node dissection is inconclusive in current guidelines. However, we can be sure that in early colorectal cancer without lymph node metastasis, endoscopic resection alone does not affect the prognosis, and it greatly improves the quality of life and reduces the incidence of surgical complications while preserving organ integrity. Therefore, it is vital to discriminate patients without lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer, and this requires accurate predictors. This paper briefly explains the significance and shortcomings of traditional pathological factors, then extends and states the new pathological factors, clinical test factors, molecular biomarkers, and the risk assessment models of lymph node metastasis based on artificial intelligence.

Management after local excision of small rectal cancers. Indications for completion total mesorectal excision and possible alternatives

The treatment of superficial rectal cancers (local excision, or proctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) remains controversial. Endoscopy and endorectal ultrasonography are essential for the precise initial definition of these small cancers. During endoscopy, the depth of the lesion can be estimated using virtual chromoendoscopy with magnification, thereby aiding the assessment of the possibilities of local excision. Current international recommendations indicate completion proctectomy after wide local excision for cases where the pathologic examination reveals poorly-differentiated lesions, lymphovascular invasion, grade 2 or 3 tumor budding, and incomplete resection. But debate persists regarding whether the depth of submucosal invasion can accurately predict the risk of lymph node spread. Recent data from the literature suggest that the depth of submucosal invasion should no longer, by itself, be an indication for additional oncological surgery. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy could be an alternative to completion proctectomy in patients with pT1 rectal cancer and unfavorable histopathological criteria. A Dutch randomized controlled trial is underway to validate this strategy.

Differences in Factors Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis Between pT1 Rectal Cancer and pT1 Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding factors that predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in pT1 colorectal cancers. We hypothesized that these discrepancies could be related to different factors predicting LNM between rectal and colon cancer. This study aimed to compare predicting factors for LNM between pT1 rectal and colon cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated a prospectively maintained database that included 380 patients with pT1 colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients were grouped according to whether they had rectal or colon cancer, with or without LNM, and factors predicting LNM were analyzed.

RESULTS

In pT1 rectal cancer, LNM was associated with deeper submucosal (SM) invasion (P = .024) and a higher proportion of poorly differentiated tumors (P = .006). In pT1 colon cancer, LNM was associated with a higher proportion of moderately/poorly differentiated tumors (P = .002) and lymphatic invasion (P = .004). In the multivariate analysis for rectal cancer, depth of SM invasion (≥3000 μm) was an independent predictive factor for LNM (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-27.94; P = .013), whereas for colon cancer, moderately/poorly differentiated tumors (95% CI, 1.38-8.13; P = .008) and lymphatic invasion (95% CI, 1.44-11.78; P = .008) were independent predictive factors for LNM.

DISCUSSION

There were distinct differences in the factors predicting LNM between pT1 rectal cancer and colon cancer. These results suggest the necessity in differentiating between rectal and colon cancer when performing studies on LNM in pT1 colorectal cancer.

Deep Submucosal Invasion Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Deep submucosal invasion (DSI) is considered a key risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and important criterion to recommend surgery in T1 colorectal cancer. However, metastatic risk for DSI is shown to be low in the absence of other histologic risk factors. This meta-analysis determines the independent risk of DSI for LNM.

METHODS

Suitable studies were included to establish LNM risk for DSI in univariable analysis. To assess DSI as independent risk factor, studies were eligible if risk factors (eg, DSI, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade tumor budding) were simultaneously included in multivariable analysis or LNM rate of DSI was described in absence of poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade tumor budding. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies (21,238 patients) were included. Overall LNM rate was 11.2% and significantly higher for DSI-positive cancers (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.10-3.18). Eight studies (3621 patients) were included in multivariable meta-analysis and did not weigh DSI as a significant predictor for LNM (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.96-3.12). As opposed to a significant association between LNM and poor differentiation (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.39-3.28), high-grade tumor budding (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.06-3.88), and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.88-5.33). Eight studies (1146 patients) analyzed DSI as solitary risk factor; absolute risk of LNM was 2.6% and pooled incidence rate was 2.83 (95% CI, 1.66-4.78).

CONCLUSIONS

DSI is not a strong independent predictor for LNM and should be reconsidered as a sole indicator for oncologic surgery. The expanding armamentarium for local excision as first-line treatment prompts serious consideration in amenable cases to tailor T1 colorectal cancer management.

Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery – A Single-Center Experience

Aim

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is widely performed in early rectal cancer. This technique offers greater organ preservation and decreases the risk of subsequent surgery. However, postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis remain challenges for patients with high-risk pathological factors. This single-center study reports the prognosis of early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old after TEM.

Methods

The data of the patients over 60 years old who underwent local anal resection were collected retrospectively. Moreover, the 5-year follow-up data were analyzed to determine the 5-year DFS and OS.

Results

47 early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old underwent TEM. There were 27 patients with high-risk factors and 20 patients without high-risk factors. Two patients underwent radical surgery after TEM and ten patients received adjuvant treatment. Local recurrence occurred in 7 patients, of which 4 underwent salvage surgery. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 75.6%, which was lower in the high-risk patients group (69.6%) than in the non-high-risk patients group (83.3%) (P&gt;0.05). The 5-year OS was 90.2%, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (high-risk patients 87.0%, non-high-risk patients 94.4%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between people over and under 70 years old.

Conclusion

Some high-risk factor patients over 60 years old do not have inferior 5-year DFS and OS to the non-high-risk patients. TEM is an option for old patients with high surgical risks. Even if postoperative pathology revealed high-risk factors, timely surgical treatment after local recurrence would be beneficial to improve the 5-year DFS and OS.

T1 Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a Different Way to Measure Tumoral Invasion Based on the Healthy Residual Submucosa with Its Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of early rectal cancer T1 is either local excision or total mesorectal excision. The choice of surgery is based on the risk of metastatic lymph node involvement. The most important factor to consider is the degree of submucosal invasion. We present a different way to measure tumoral invasion derived from the measurement of the healthy residual submucosa with its prognosis and therapeutic implications METHODS: Observational study of tumor submucosal invasion in patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery was conducted. Parameters evaluated are submucosal invasion, measuring the healthy residual submucosa at the point of maximum invasion; macroscopic morphology of the tumor; presence of muscularis mucosa, muscularis propria, and measurement of submucosa in the tumor area and the healthy area. The classification proposed is compared with the ones previously published.

RESULTS

Eighty consecutive patients diagnosed with T1 rectal cancer underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Seventeen tumors (21.3%) were polypoid. En bloc resection was achieved in 77 (96.3%). The muscularis mucosa was present in 28 (35%), and the muscularis propria in 77 (96.3%) (p < 0.001). The healthy residual submucosa in the tumor area measured 2,343 ± 1,869 μm. Agreement was moderate with the Kikuchi classification (kappa 0.58) and very good with the Kudo classification (kappa 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a method for measuring submucosal invasion in T1 rectal cancer which does not depend on the morphology of the lesion or on the presence of the muscularis mucosa. It can be applied to all T1 classifications of the digestive tract in which the muscularis propria is present.

Classic and Novel Histopathologic Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of endoscopically resected T1 colorectal cancers is based on the risk of lymph node metastasis. Risk is based on histopathologic features, although there is lack of consensus as to what constitutes high-risk features.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathologic risk factors for lymph node metastasis.

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane controlled register of trials for risk factors for lymph node metastasis was performed from inception until August 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Included patients must have had an oncologic resection to confirm lymph node status and reported at least 1 histopathologic risk factor.

INTERVENTION

Rates of lymph node positivity were compared between patients with and without risk factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We report the results of the meta-analysis as ORs.

RESULTS

Of 8592 citations, 60 met inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses found that lymphovascular invasion, vascular invasion, neural invasion, and poorly differentiated histology were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, as were depths of 1000 µm (OR = 2.76), 1500 µm (OR = 4.37), 2000 µm (OR = 2.37), submucosal level 3 depth (OR = 3.08), and submucosal level 2/3 (OR = 3.08) depth. Depth of 3000 µm, Haggitt level 4, and widths of 3000 µm and 4000 µm were not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. Tumor budding (OR = 4.99) and poorly differentiated clusters (OR = 14.61) were also significantly associated with lymph node metastasis.

LIMITATIONS

Included studies reported risk factors independently, making it impossible to examine the additive metastasis risk in patients with numerous risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 1500 μm as the depth most significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. Novel factors tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters were also significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. These findings should help inform guidelines regarding risk stratification of T1 tumors and prompt additional investigation into the exact contribution of poorly differentiated clusters to lymph node metastasis.

The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: new parameters to assess the degree of submucosal invasion

PURPOSE

In T1 colorectal cancer, the depth is the main factor assessing the degree of submucosal invasion (DSI) to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The width (WSI) and the area of submucosal invasion (ASI) have been suggested as additional parameters to assess the risk of LNM. A review of the literature was undertaken on the correlation between WSI and ASI parameters and the incidence of LNM.

METHODS

A Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search was performed to retrieve all studies reporting correlation between WSI/ASI and risk of LNM in T1 colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Eight studies including 1727 patients were identified. All considered the degree of WSI and its influence on LNM: seven assessed different width cut-off of submucosal invasion, and one study the mean width of submucosal invasion in patients having or not involved lymph nodes. The WSI was significantly a prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05) in four studies. Both 2 and 3 mm seem to be the most discriminatory cut-off values of submucosal width invasion in defining the risk difference of LNM above and below the cut-off (2 mm, OR = infinite; 3 mm, OR = 6.9). Patients having a cut-off ≤ 5 mm of WSI showed a low risk (5.6%) of LNM rendering radical surgery unnecessary. Four studies assessed the risk of LNM according to the involved submucosal area (width × depth). In two of these, the ASI was a significant prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The WSI and ASI seem to be reliable prognostic factors for LNM in T1 colorectal cancer. There is no agreement on ideal cut-off value.

Nonsurgical Management Following Local Resection for Early Rectal Cancer in Patients with High-risk Factors: A Single-institute Experience

Objective

Additional surgery is considered for patients at high risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) after local resection for early rectal cancer. Several factors are considered as indications for additional surgery, although there are currently no definitive criteria. This study aimed to clarify the need for additional surgery based on the number of risk factors for LNM and to evaluate the significance of submucosal invasion on recurrence.

Methods

Patients with early rectal cancer harboring risk factors for LNM who underwent local resection between March 2005 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Associations among the number of risk factors, prognosis, and additional treatment after local resection were investigated.

Results

A total of 29 eligible patients were classified into the surgery (n = 10), chemoradiotherapy (n = 7), and no-additional-treatment (NAT, n = 12) groups. Among the 29 patients, 15 patients (52%) with only one risk factor did not relapse. The NAT group harbored fewer risk factors for LNM, and 8 of the 12 patients (67%) had only deep submucosal invasion. Local recurrence occurred in one patient in the chemoradiotherapy group. The estimated 5-year overall survival rates were 88.9%, 75.0%, and 81.5% in the surgery, chemoradiotherapy, and NAT groups, respectively. There were no disease-specific deaths in the overall cohort.

Conclusions

In the present study, no recurrence occurred in patients who did not receive additional surgery with deep submucosal invasion as the only risk factor. A multicenter investigation is necessary to confirm the safety of nonsurgical options.

Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic factors for patients with T1-2 colorectal cancer (CRC) after radical resection and the predictive value of lymph node distribution (LND) system compared with TNM system for these patients have not been well studied.

METHODS

From September 2009 and June 2016, a total of 541 consecutive patients with T1-2 CRC who accepted radical resection in two centers were included in this study. Their clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The predictive value of LND system for these patients were compared with the TNM system.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that patients' gender, tumor size, LNM and lymphovascular or nerve invasion were prognostic factors for the disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed the gender, LNM and lymphovascular or nerve invasion were independent prognostic factors for the DFS (p < 0.05). The LND system had a better predictive value than the TNM system in lymph node-positive T1-2 CRC patients (P = 0.026 vs p = 0.148).

CONCLUSIONS

The gender, LNM and lymphovascular or nerve invasion were independent prognostic factors for the patients with T1-2 CRC after radical resection. The LND system had a better predictive value than the TNM system in T1-2 CRC patients.

Lymphovascular Infiltration, Not Depth of Invasion, is the Critical Risk Factor of Metastases in Early Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Population-based Cohort Study on Prospectively Collected Data, Including Validation

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and histopathological risk factors of LNM in T1 CRC.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The requisite of additional surgery after locally resected T1 CRC is dependent on the risk of LNM. Depth of submucosal invasion is used as a key predictor of lymphatic metastases although data are conflicting on its actual impact.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study on prospectively collected data on all patients with T1 CRC undergoing surgical resection in Sweden, 2009-2017 and Denmark 2016-2018. The Danish cohort was used for validation. Potential risk factors of LNM investigated were; age, sex, tumor location, submucosal invasion, grade of differentiation, mucinous subtype, lymphovascular, and perineural invasion.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty out of the 1439 included patients (10%) had LNM. LVI (P < 0.001), perineural invasion (P < 0.001), mucinous subtype (P = 0.006), and age <60 years (P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors whereas deep submucosal invasion was only a dependent (P = 0.025) risk factor and not significant in multivariate analysis (P = 0.075). The incidence of LNM was 51/882 (6%) in absence of the independent risk factors. The Danish validation cohort, confirmed our findings regarding the role of submucosal invasion, LVI, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a large study on LNM in T1 CRC, including validation, showing that LVI and perineural invasion, mucinous subtype, and low age constitute independent risk factors, whereas depth of submucosal invasion is not an independent risk factor of LNM. Thus, our findings provide a useful basis for management of patients after local excision of early CRC.

Is Additional Surgery Necessary After Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered to be a curative treatment for early colorectal cancer, additional surgery with lymph node dissection is routinely recommended for patients treated in non-curative ESD, owing to the risk of residual cancer and lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, in clinical practice, few patients are found to have either residual cancer or LNM after additional surgery. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the risk factors associated with residual cancer and LNM.

METHODS

Patients with early colorectal cancer after non-curative ESD and additional surgery from January 2015 to May 2019 were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected to determine the predictors of residual cancer and LNM.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were enrolled for analysis in this study. After additional surgery, residual cancer and LNM was detected in 12 patients (19.35%). Clinicopathological comparison of patients with the presence or absence of residual cancer and LNM demonstrated that piecemeal resection (80% vs. 14.04%, P < 0.001), submucosal invasion greater than 2000 μm (26.09% vs. 0%, P = 0.026), lymphovascular infiltration (37.5% vs. 13.04%, P = 0.033), and perineuronal invasion (75% vs. 15.52%, P = 0.004) were more frequent in residual cancer and LNM cases. Multivariate analysis identified lymphovascular infiltration (P = 0.031) as the only significantly independent risk factor associated with residual cancer and LNM.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional surgery with lymphadenectomy should be performed after non-curative ESD owing to the high risk of residual cancer and LNM, especially in cases with lymphovascular infiltration.

Does transanal local resection increase morbidity for subsequent total mesorectal excision for early rectal cancer?

AIM

Local excision is recommended for early rectal cancer (pT1). Complementary total mesorectal excision (cTME) is warranted when bad pathological features are present. The impact of a prior local resection on the outcome remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess if prior local excision increases the morbidity of a subsequent cTME compared with primary TME.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2016 all patients who underwent TME after local excision for rectal adenocarcinoma were studied. All were matched (1:1) with patients who underwent primary TME, without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. The matching factors included age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and type of surgery. Short-term morbidity and pathological examination of the resected specimen were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included (14 women, 34%, mean age 65 ± 11 years), comprising classic transanal excision (66%) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (34%), and were matched to 41 patients who had primary TME. cTME was significantly longer (315 min ± 87 vs 275 min ± 58, P = 0.03). The overall morbidity was 48.8% in the local excision group vs 31.7% in the control group (P = 0.18). Surgical morbidity was 31.7% vs 26.8% (P = 0.8). Anastomotic related morbidity was similar (local excision 17% vs TME 14.6%, P = 0.84) and the mean length of stay was similar (14 days) in both groups. There was a tendency to a worse quality of mesorectal excision in the cTME group (17% vs 5%, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

Local excision prior to TME for early rectal cancer tends to increase overall morbidity and may worsen the quality of the mesorectal plane but should be considered as a surgical approach in select cases.

Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Submucosal Invasive Colorectal Carcinoma: A New Proposal of Depth of Invasion for Radical Surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma (SM cancer) require additional surgical treatment after endoscopic dissection. However, because additional radical resection after endoscopic local resection may be unnecessary for cases without LNM, more specific criteria are required in order to diminish the incidence of further radical resection after endoscopic dissection.

METHODS

A total of 492 patients with biopsy-proven SM cancer who underwent curative surgery between January 2008 and December 2012 were collected and were divided into LNM group and no LNM group. The cutoff value for the depth of submucosal invasion was analyzed by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In this retrospective study, the association between LNM and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The depth of submucosal invasion of 1900 μm was determined as the cutoff value by ROC curve. Significant, independent predictive factors for LNM included the depth of submucosal invasion >1900 μm (odds ratio [OR] 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-18.3; p < 0.001), venous invasion (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.5; p = 0.03), and poorly differentiated/mucinous adenocarcinoma (OR 6.3; 95% CI 1.3-30.8; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the depth of submucosal invasion (>1900 μm), vascular invasion and poorly differentiated/mucinous carcinoma were predictive factors of LNM in patients with SM cancer. These predictors may help to reduce the incidence of unnecessary surgery after endoscopic resection.

Comparison of guidelines for the management of rectal cancer

A comparison between NCCN, ESMO and JSCCR Guidelines is presented, concerning the treatment of rectal cancer, with an analysis and discussion of their discrepancies. Differences indicate areas for research.