Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: updated analysis of 93 randomized patients - control survival is much better than previously assumed

Reoperative Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Outcomes and Indications

Recurrent pulmonary metastasis after initial pulmonary metastasectomy is common and poses a clinical dilemma. Reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy is an option that in select patients has been shown to be safe and technically feasible resulting in encouraging survival results from non-randomized retrospective studies. As with metastasectomy in general, there is ongoing debate if observed benefit of repeat pulmonary resection is a result of surgery or a reflection of selection bias. This review summarizes available evidence regarding reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy, discusses selection bias, and outlines future directions in the context of our evolving understanding of the oligometastatic state.

Impact of Metastasectomy on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life

This article explores the impact of pulmonary metastasectomy on patient health-related quality of life, emphasizing the role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in evaluating surgical outcomes. It provides a detailed analysis of studies reporting PROMs in lung metastasectomy, compares different surgical techniques, and discusses the broader implementation of PROMs in this setting. Limitations and future directions for improving PROMs integration in clinical practice are also addressed, highlighting the importance of these measures in enhancing patient-centered care and shared decision-making.

The Ugly: Metastatic Colon Cancer-Surgical Options

Over 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease. Although systemic therapy remains the backbone of palliative treatment, select patients may be candidates for surgical resection with curative intent. Given increasing evidence of the association between metastasectomy and prolonged survival, surgery has acquired an increasingly central role in the management of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases. This is compounded by accumulating advances in local and systemic treatments that have allowed for expansion of the resectability pool, bringing the potential for curative surgical treatment to increasing numbers of patients with stage IV disease. However, as the boundaries of resectability are pushed, patient selection and consideration of tumor-related and technical factors are imperative to the identification of patients for whom surgery would be of the greatest benefit.

Transcontinental Differences in Management of Pulmonary Metastatic Disease: Europe

Several international registries, including 4 from Europe-Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons-are dedicated to addressing deficiencies in pulmonary metastasectomy research. The randomized PulMiCC and SABR-COMET trials provide contradictory outcomes and new randomized trials have been initiated. Europe's metastasectomy approach transitioned from open thoracotomy to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, with 72% of surgeons favoring minimally invasive methods by 2023. European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend surgery for completely resectable lesions and propose ablative approaches as supplementary or alternative treatments for inoperable cases due to frailty or unfavorable anatomy.

Role of Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer

Pulmonary metastasectomy serves as the most efficacious local therapeutic option for stage IV colorectal cancer that has spread to the lungs. In order to properly select patients who will benefit most from pulmonary metastasectomy over other therapeutic options, a multidisciplinary approach should be utilized. The ideal technique is parenchymal-sparing, especially given that there is a high recurrence rate with the most common location being the remainder of the lung. While benefits of pulmonary metastatsectomy are well-documented, further studies are warranted to continue to refine patient selection, timing of surgery, and interplay with other treatment modalities.

Metastasectomy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases: a systematic review

Metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are both guideline-recommended treatment modalities for patients with oligometastatic colorectal lung metastases (CLM). Few evidence is available comparing different local therapies in an oligometastatic population. This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of metastasectomy with SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on metastasectomy and SBRT for patients with oligometastatic CLM. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 were identified through Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were assessed and compared between both groups. The risk of bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. A total of 141 studies on metastasectomy (n = 29932) and 16 studies on SBRT (n = 1381) were included in the final analysis. The pooled five-year OS was 52.2 % (CI: 49.8-54.5) and 45.0 % (CI: 31.2-58.9) following metastasectomy and SBRT, respectively (p = 0.213). The pooled five-year PFS was 35.1 % (CI: 32.2-38.1) following metastasectomy and 11.7 % (CI: 0-38.2) following SBRT (p < 0.001). The pooled LRR was 10.5 % (CI: 5.5-15.5) following metastasectomy and 28.1 % (CI: 20.8-35.4) following SBRT (p < 0.001). The average GRADE score of the included studies was low. The data suggest that patients with oligometastatic CLM have a comparable OS rate after metastasectomy or SBRT, but PFS and LRR favour a surgical approach. This systematic review supports initiating a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SBRT in operable patients with oligometastatic CLM.

A phase 2 study of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (WJOG5810G)

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer remains unknown. This phase 2 study evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) after lung metastasectomy.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included colorectal adenocarcinoma, first curative resection of ≤4 lung metastases, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, with the expectation of 50% (threshold, 35%) and a planned sample size of 100 (90% power; alpha error, 5%).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled between July 2011 and July 2014; patient enrollment was closed prematurely because of slow accrual. Excluding four ineligible patients, the characteristics of the 48 patients in the efficacy analysis set were a median age of 62 years (range, 43-75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 in 45 patients, prior resection of extrathoracic metastasis in four patients, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen within normal range in 43 patients; the status of lung metastasis was single in 34 patients, unilateral in 40 patients, and metachronous in 41 patients; and a disease-free interval between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of lung metastasis of <2 years in 33 patients. The 5-year OS rate was 85.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4%-92.6%), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 44.9%-72.4%). Forty-one of the 52 patients (78.8%) in the safety analysis set completed 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. Grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (50.0%), fatigue (7.7%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (7.7%), and other (<5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 is feasible, and may be effective after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Preclinical experience with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and doxorubicin in pulmonary suffusion

Background

Because suffusion amplifies lung chemotherapy while limiting systemic toxicity, we tested candidate drugs for treating human lung cancers and pulmonary metastases.

Methods

Immature beagle dogs underwent thoracotomy for unilateral lung suffusion of cisplatin (0.125-2 mg/kg; n = 19), doxorubicin (3.75-7.5 mg/kg; n = 7), gemcitabine (168.75 mg/kg; n = 5), or saline (n = 3). After ipsilateral lung circulation isolation and drainage, pulmonary artery chemotherapy was injected, dwelled for 30 minutes, and then aspirated. Bilateral lung biopsies and serum samples assessed delivery and leak. After lung reperfusion, animals recovered for 30 days with scheduled monitoring of vital signs, weights, and behaviors. At experiment termination, necropsy histopathologic tissue analyses assessed tolerability.

Results

All 32 animals recovered, except 1 with lung torsion and 2 with pulmonary toxicity that required early euthanasia. Serum concentrations during suffusion for cisplatin (135 ng/mL), doxorubicin (undetectable), and gemcitabine (1452 ng/mL) indicated minimal systemic leakage. Cisplatin escalations showed uniform suffusion deliveries (100% fibrosis at a 100% systemic chemotherapy dose), which was then reduced to a nondamaging 25% threshold. When the equivalent dose of doxorubicin was used, toxicity occurred, but 12.5% (2.5-fold amplification of local delivery) was well tolerated. Gemcitabine, like cisplatin, caused minimal toxicity at 25% of the systemic dose (5-fold amplification). Optimized doses caused no hematologic or metabolic derangements and necropsies showed no gross organ injury other than adhesions. Histopathology demonstrated multifocal ipsilateral lung fibrotic changes without contralateral or extrapulmonary pathology.

Conclusions

While suffusion delivery of the vesicant doxorubicin was tolerated less well than cisplatin and gemcitabine, all appear to be safe and feasible for human trials.

Influence of lung metastases on outcomes of curative management of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Traditionally there has been a nihilistic approach towards patients with pulmonary metastases arising from colorectal cancer. However, emerging evidence highlights the benefit of curative intent treatment. Given the established individual roles of pulmonary metastectomy and CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of colorectal pulmonary and peritoneal metastases, respectively, we decided to combine these modalities and determine whether pulmonary metastases really influence the outcomes of curative intent treatment in CRC patients with peritoneal metastases.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database of CRC patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing CRS and HIPEC with curative intent from Jan 1, 2005 to Aug 1, 2018. Patients were divided into two groups of without pulmonary metastases and with pulmonary metastases. Patients were followed up for a median 40.8 months.

RESULTS

Of total 455 patients 19 had pulmonary metastases. The median RFS and OS of all patients was 14.26 months (95 % CI:12.71-16.2) and 56.96 months (95 % CI: 47.73-77.79) respectively. Median RFS and OS of patients with and without pulmonary metastases was 12 & 49.8 months and 14.4 & 57.9 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, PCI, CC-0 rate, CEA, signet ring histology and retroperitoneal lymph node metastases significantly affected the OS. Presence of pulmonary metastases did not significantly affect the RFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

There has always been a skepticism in the management CRC with PM and extraperitoneal disease, especially pulmonary metastases with curative intent. Our study demonstrates that CRS and HIPEC improves OS in such patients and pulmonary metastases per se do not influence the outcomes of disease. Nevertheless, further prospective and multi centric studies are required to validate these findings.

Incidence, treatment, and survival of isolated patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases: A registry-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of surgical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) lung metastases is unclear. The aim was to investigate the incidence, treatment strategy, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in CRC patients with isolated lung metastases.

METHODS

This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients treated with curative resection of CRC within the county of Skåne during the period 2010-2016, who had synchrone or metachrone isolated lung metastases. Exclusion criteria were previous or concurrent metastases at other organ sites. Patients were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) and data were retrieved from SCRCR and medical charts. Patients were divided into groups based on whether they had synchronous or metachronous lung metastases and curative or palliative treatment intent. The primary endpoint was 5-year OS. Multivariable Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Of 8457 curatively resected CRC patients, 93 (1.1%) had isolated lung metastases (53 synchronous/40 metachronous). Of these, 53 were treated with curative intent, 51 (96%) of whom were managed surgically. The remaining 40 patients were treated palliatively and either with chemotherapy or with best supportive care. Five-year OS was 42% (39/93), median 50 months (IQR: 24-60) for the entire cohort, and 68% (36/53), median 60 months (IQR 55-60) and 7.5% (3/40), median 22 months (IQR: 12-33) for curative and palliative patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.04, confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.07), multiple lung metastases (HR: 1.64, CI: 1.08-2.47), and unilateral distribution (HR: 0.41, CI: 0.20-0.84) were predictors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated CRC lung metastases are rare. Curative treatment was associated with considerably better 5-year OS than palliative treatment (68% vs 8%). Age, solitary metastases, and unilateral distribution were predictors of survival.

Long-term survival and undetectable circulating tumor DNA following comprehensive involved site radiotherapy for oligometastases

Distant metastases account for ~ 90% of cancer deaths and major responses with systemic therapy alone for metastatic cancers are so rare that the National Cancer Institute launched the Exceptional Responders Initiative. Comprehensive involved site radiotherapy (ISRT) is a promising treatment for oligometastases but the role of circulating tumor DNA to confirm durable molecular response following treatment remains unexplored. Among 597 consecutive patients with distant metastases treated with radiation therapy from 2014 to 2021, 133 (22%) were oligometastatic and 464 (78%) were polymetastatic. The 5-year overall survival was 38% for oligometastases vs. 3% for polymetastases (p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 71 months for treated oligometastases, 37 (28%) exceptional responders (ER) remain alive and recurrence free at ≥ 2 year follow-up. Among ER, 49% underwent stereotactic radiotherapy (median 27 Gy in 3 fractions, EQD2 43 Gy), 65% underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (median 53 Gy in 24 fractions, EQD2 54 Gy), and 76% received additional systemic therapy. Although ctDNA testing was not possible in most ER due to patient refusal or tumor specimen quality, all 12 ER tested ctDNA-negative. Long-term complete responses, including molecular complete responses, are achievable with comprehensive ISRT in diverse clinical presentations.

Multimodal treatment improves survival in patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis

AIM

The lungs represent the second most common site of colorectal cancer metastases. Although surgery is commonly considered the best treatment, many other invasive and noninvasive procedures and treatments have been adopted to improve patient survival and there is no clear evidence in the literature of which is the more effective. The aim of this work was to identify which treatment confers the best gain in overall survival for patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHOD

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of survival hazard ratio (HR) including 11 studies was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane protocol on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 31 December 2023. Surgery, image-guided thermoablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy, chemotherapy and best standard care, associated or alone, were evaluated. Chemotherapy was adopted as the treatment reference to define survival HRs. Network metaregression was then performed considering patients with pulmonary only or multisite metastases from colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

In patients with pulmonary metastases, the association of surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the best performing (HR 0.22), while the most effective components alone are image-guided thermoablation (HR 0.53) and surgery (HR 0.57), although this was not significant. After metaregression, multimodal treatments still represent the strategy conferring the best survival gain. However, while surgery (incremental HR 0.26) has the most important role in patients with isolated pulmonary metastatic disease, chemotherapy (incremental HR 0.3) leads for patients with multimetastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal treatment confers the best gain in overall survival in patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Combining multiple therapeutic strategies improves survival, with oligometastatic patients benefiting more from surgery and local therapies while multimetastatic patients mainly benefit from chemotherapy, although ablation and surgery can enhance outcomes when feasible.

Reply to Treasure et al. Comment on "Ambrogi et al. Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3106"

We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the thoughtful reflections on our recent study regarding pulmonary metastasectomy, and we greatly appreciate the constructive dialog that our work has sparked [...].

Comments on Ambrogi et al. Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3106

We were interested to read the results from the Italian database [...].

A Retrospective Analysis of Real-Life Management of Colorectal Cancer Lung-Limited Metastases Treated with Surgery: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Background: Unlike liver metastases, the role of surgery in colorectal cancer lung-limited metastases (CCLLM) is not yet established, and data are still poor. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of surgery on the management of CCLLM. Material and Method: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received surgery for CCLLM at our Institution from January 2010 to June 2019. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of clinical and pathological features on the survival (OS and DFS) of patients treated with surgery for CCLLM. Results: One hundred and fifty patients were included in the analysis. Seventy-six patients received preoperative chemotherapy (pCT) and 56 an adjuvant treatment (aCT), while 18 underwent up-front surgery without CT. In the whole population, median OS (mOS) and median DFS (mDFS) were 54.1 months (95%CI 44.0-82.1) and 24.0 months (95%CI 20.0-31.2), respectively. In multivariate analysis, number of metastases was the only factor correlated to DFS (p = 0.0006) and OS (p = 0.0018). Conclusion: Our study, although retrospective and of small size, shows that tumor burden (number of metastases) is the main prognostic factor in patients undergoing lung surgery for CCLLM. Moreover, our results suggest that surgery for lung metastases might prolong survival. These data strengthen the role of multidisciplinary management to allow patients with CCLLM to pursue local treatment whenever possible, even regardless of previous liver surgery or RAS mutated status.

Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.

Do Children With Osteosarcoma Benefit From Pulmonary Metastasectomy?: A Systematic Review of Published Studies and "Real World" Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To critically examine the evidence-base for survival benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for osteosarcoma (OS) in the pediatric population.

BACKGROUND

PM for OS is recommended as the standard of care in both pediatric and adult treatment protocols. Recent results from the "Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer" trial demonstrate no survival benefit from PM in colorectal cancer in adults.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken according to "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis" guidelines. Medline, Embase, and 2 clinical trial registers were searched for all studies detailing pediatric patients with OS (<18 years) undergoing PM with a comparison cohort group that did not receive PM.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met inclusion criteria dating from 1984 to 2017. All studies were retrospective and none directly compared PM versus no PM in pediatric patients as its main objective(s). Three-year survival rates ranged from 0% to 54% for PM and 0% to 16% for no PM. No patients receiving PM were usually those with unresectable disease and/or considered to have a poor prognosis. All studies were at high risk of bias and there was marked heterogeneity in the patient selection.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a weak evidence base (level IV) for a survival benefit of PM for OS in pediatric patients likely due to selection bias of "favorable cases." The included studies many of which detailed outdated treatment protocols were not designed in their reporting to specifically address the questions directly. A randomized controlled trial-while ethically challenging in a pediatric population-incorporating modern OS chemotherapy protocols is needed to crucially address any "survival benefit."

Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Spread to the Lungs

Background/Objectives: Pulmonary metastasis is the most prevalent type of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. International guidelines recommend systemic treatment for patients with HCC having pulmonary metastases. However, the role of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) remains relatively unexplored. Therefore, we assessed the survival outcomes and the factors influencing them in patients who underwent PM for metastatic HCC. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with HCC who underwent PM for metastasis at a single tertiary center between January 2004 and December 2022. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: Overall, 63 patients underwent PM with a median follow-up time of 84.0 months. The cumulative survival rates after the initial PM at 1, 2, and 5 years were 79.1%, 63.9%, and 35.6%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, early intrathoracic recurrence <6 months, number and size of metastases, resection margin status, and PM bilaterality were significantly associated with overall survival. A larger size of the primary HCC, increased number of repeated PM, and frequent lobectomy were more common in patients with early (<6 months) recurrence after PM than in those without early recurrence. Conclusions: PM in patients with metastatic HCC may provide acceptable survival outcomes for those with smaller, unilateral lung metastases that can be resected with generous surgical margins. However, early recurrence with reduced overall survival is likely in patients with a larger-size initial HCC after prior PM and lobectomy.

Local-Regional Therapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United States as well as a leading cause of cancer-related death. Upward of 30% of patients ultimately develop metastatic disease, most commonly to the liver and lung. Untreated, patients have poor survival. Historically, patients with oligometastatic disease were treated with resection leading to long-term survival; however, there are many patients who are not surgical candidates. Innovations in thermal ablation, hepatic artery infusions, chemoembolization and radioembolization, and stereotactic ablative radiation have led to an expansion of patients eligible for local therapy. This review examines the evidence behind each modality for the most common locations of oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions.

RESULTS

Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients' values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Stage IV Colorectal Cancer at Initial Presentation versus Progression during and after Treatment, Differences in Management: Management Differences for Initial Presentation versus Progression of Disease after Initial Treatment

Stage IV colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease and understanding the appropriate treatment options is important. Medical oncologic treatment remains the mainstay of treatment in cases where curative resection is not possible. Surgical intervention is indicated if the primary tumor and associated metastases are amenable to curative resection or if obstructive, bleeding, or perforative complications arise from the tumor. New endoscopic techniques can provide palliation and benefit for patients who cannot undergo surgery and may speed time to chemotherapy initiation. Recently, immunotherapy has shown promise at managing, controlling, and regressing advanced disease, in some cases converting it to curative with resection. For patients that progress while on treatment, continued medical therapy remains the mainstay of treatment. Further research into the benefits of asymptomatic primary tumor resection without curative intent needs to be performed. Colorectal cancer, and more specifically metastatic colorectal cancer, continues to have improved 1- and 5-year survival rates and likely will continue to do so over the coming months and years.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma-Not If, but When

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) commonly metastasizes to the lungs, and pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is utilized due to limited systemic options.

METHODS

All ACC patients with initially only lung metastases (LM) from a single institution constituted this observational case series. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses evaluated the association with potential prognostic factors and outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of the PM or, in those patients who did not undergo surgery, from the development of LM.

RESULTS

A total of 75 ACC patients over a 45-year period met the criteria; 52 underwent PM, and 23 did not. The patients undergoing PM had a median OS of 3.1 years (95% CI: 2.4, 4.7 years) with the 5- and 10-year OS being 35.5% and 32.8%, respectively. The total resected LM did not impact the OS nor the DFS. The patients who developed LM after 11 months from the initial ACC resection had an improved OS (4.2 years; 95% CI: 3.2, NR; p = 0.0096) compared to those developing metastases earlier (2.4 years; 95% CI: 1.6, 2.8). Patients who underwent PM within 11 months of adrenalectomy demonstrated a reduced OS (2.2 years; 95% CI: 1.0, 2.7) compared to those after 11 months (3.6 years, 95% CI: 2.6, NR; p = 0.0045). PM may provide benefit to those patients with LM at presentation (HR: 0.5; p = 0.2827), with the time to first PM as a time-varying covariate.

CONCLUSIONS

PM appears to have a role in ACC patients. The number of nodules should not be an exclusion factor. Patients developing LM within a year of primary tumor resection may benefit from waiting before further surgeries, which may provide additional insight into who may benefit from PM.

Salvage surgery for local recurrences after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of colorectal pulmonary metastases

INTRODUCTION

Local control following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases is reportedly lower than for metastases from other tumors. Such recurrences may still be amenable to salvage therapy. We describe our experience with salvage surgery in 17 patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent salvage metastasectomy for a local recurrence following SABR for colorectal pulmonary metastases were identified from the surgical institutional databases of three Dutch major referral hospitals. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine survival.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent 20 salvage resections for local recurrence of colorectal pulmonary metastases. All patients had a progressive lesion on consecutive CT scans, with local uptake on 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET CT), and were discussed in a thoracic oncology tumor board. Median time to local recurrence following SABR was 20 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 13-29). Fourteen procedures were performed minimally invasively. Extensive adhesions were observed during three procedures. A Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complication occurred after four resections (20%). The 90-day mortality was 0%. The estimated median overall survival and progression-free survival following salvage resection were 71 months (confidence intervals [CI]: 50-92) and 39 months (CI: 19-58), respectively. Salvage resections were significantly more extensive, compared to the potential resection assessed on pre-SABR imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with 20 salvage pulmonary metastasectomy procedures for local recurrences following SABR in colorectal cancer patients demonstrates that salvage resection is a feasible option with acceptable morbidity and good oncological outcome in a highly selected cohort.

Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Definitions and Patient Selection for Local Therapies

PURPOSE

Nearly one-third of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will ultimately develop metastatic disease. While a small percentage of patients can be considered for curative resection, more patients have limited disease that can be considered for local therapy. Challenges remain in defining oligometastatic CRC as well as developing treatment strategies guided by high level evidence.

METHODS

In this review, we present the challenges in defining oligometastatic CRC and summarize the current literature on treatment and outcomes of local therapy in patients with metastatic CRC.

RESULTS

For patients with liver- and/or lung-confined CRC metastases, surgical resection is the standard of care given the potential for long-term progression-free and overall survival. For patients with liver- or lung-confined disease not amenable to surgical resection, non-surgical local therapies, such as thermal ablation, hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP), or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), should be considered. For patients with more advanced disease, such as lymph node or bony metastases, the role of metastasis-directed therapy is controversial. Emerging data suggests that SBRT to ablate all metastases can improve progression-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary management is critical for patients with metastatic CRC due to the complexity of their cases and the nuanced patient, tumor, biological, and anatomical factors that must be weighed when considering local therapy. High-quality prospective randomized data in CRC are needed to further clarify the role of local ablative therapy in patients with unresectable oligometastatic CRC with ongoing studies including the RESOLUTE trial (ACTRN12621001198819) and the upcoming NCTN ERASur trial (NCT05673148).

Less aggressive treatment for less aggressive disease? A retrospective single-center study of pulmonary-limited metastases associated with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the appropriate treatment strategies, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with pulmonary-limited metastases derived from colorectal cancer (CRC), usually manifested as a less aggressive course.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in 331 CRC patients diagnosed with pulmonary-limited metastases at a single institution between January 2011 and November 2017. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS). Further analysis was conducted according to treatment modalities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine potential prognostic factors influencing OS.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 38.6 months, the median OS in all patients was 45.2 months. A total of 163 patients received intensive local treatment with a median OS of 76.4 months, whereas 168 patients received palliative systemic treatment with a median OS of 29.7 months. The median OS was 68.9 months for patients treated with radiotherapy/radiofrequency ablation, with similar efficacy compared to surgery group, whose OS had not reached yet. No survival benefits were observed from the additional targeted therapy in systemic treatment group. The prognostic analysis demonstrated unilateral/bilateral lesions, synchronous/metachronous metastases, intensive local treatment, and resection of primary lesion that were significantly associated with survival of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive local treatment alone for pulmonary lesions was associated with excellent survival in certain patients with CRC presented with metastases confined to lungs. Doublet systemic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment also revealed satisfied efficacy and safety.

Colorectal Pulmonary Metastases: Pulmonary Metastasectomy or Stereotactic Radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are both guideline-recommended treatments for selected patients with oligometastatic colorectal pulmonary metastases. However, there is limited evidence comparing these local treatment modalities in similar patient groups.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive patients treated for colorectal pulmonary metastases with surgical metastasectomy or SABR from 2012 to 2019 at two Dutch referral hospitals that had different approaches toward the local treatment of colorectal pulmonary metastases, one preferring surgery, the other preferring SABR. Two comparable patient groups were identified based on tumor and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

The metastasectomy group comprised 40 patients treated for 69 metastases, and the SABR group had 60 patients who were treated for 90 metastases. Median follow-up was 38 months (IQR: 26-67) in the surgery group and 46 months (IQR: 30-79) in the SABR group. Median OS was 58 months (CI: 20-94) in the metastasectomy group and 70 months (CI: 29-111) in the SABR group (p = 0.23). Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 44% after metastasectomy and 30% after SABR (p = 0.16). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (CI: 3-26) in the metastasectomy group and 10 months (CI: 6-13) in the SABR group (p = 0.049). Local recurrence rate was 12.5/7.2% of patients/metastases respectively after metastasectomy and 38.3/31.1% after SABR (p < 0.001). Lower BED Gy10 was correlated with an increased likelihood of recurrence (p = 0.025). Clavien Dindo grade III-V complication rates were 2.5% after metastasectomy and 0% after SABR (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort study, pulmonary metastasectomy and SABR had comparable overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and complication rates, despite patients in the SABR group having a significantly lower progression-free survival and local control rate. These data would support a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SABR in operable patients with radically resectable colorectal pulmonary metastases.

Clinical score for colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastases undergoing surgical resection: Meta-Lung Score

BACKGROUND

Radical resection of isolated lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. Like Fong's criteria in liver metastases, our study was meant to assign a clinical prognostic score in patients with LM from CRC, aiming for better surgery selection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 260 CRC patients who underwent curative LM resection from December 2002 to January 2022, verifying the impact of different clinicopathological features on the overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

At the univariate analysis: higher baseline CEA levels (p = 0.0001), disease-free survival less than or equal to 12 months (m) (p = 0.0043), LM size larger than 2 cm (p = 0.0187), multiple resectable nodules (p = 0.0083), and positive nodal status of the primary tumor (p = 0.0011) were associated with worse prognosis. In a Cox regression model, these characteristics retained their independent role for OS (p < 0.0001) and were chosen as criteria to be assigned one point each for clinical risk score. The 5-year survival rate in patients with 0 points was 88%, while no patients with a 5-point score survived at 2 years. Based on the 0-1 vs. 2-5 score range, we obtained a significant difference in median OS: not reached vs. 40.8 months (95 %CI 36 to 87.5), respectively (p < 0.0001) stratifying patients into good and poor prognosis. The prognostic role of the score was also confirmed in terms of median RFS: not reached in 0-1 scored patients vs. 30.5 months (95 %CI 19.4 to 42) in patients with 2-5 scores (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

When LM from CRC is resectable, the Meta-Lung Score provides valuable prognostic information. Indeed, while upfront surgery should be considered in patients with scores of 0 to 1, it should be cautiously suggested in patients with scores of 2 to 5, for whom a prognosis comparison between preventive surgery and other treatments should be investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Results of intention-to-treat pulmonary metastasectomies in northern Finland revealing significant number of new lung primary carcinomas: time to move on from wedge resections?

Background

A considerable proportion of intended pulmonary metastasectomies is known to turn out as new incidental primary lung cancers in final pathology. We aimed to analyse the trends and results of pulmonary metastasectomies using the intention-to-treat approach with an emphasis on final histopathological findings.

Methods

All intention-to-treat pulmonary metastasectomies performed in Oulu University Hospital between 2000 and 2020 were included in the study. Long term survival was analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios for incidental primary lung cancer in final histology.

Results

A total of 154 intended pulmonary metastasectomies were performed to 127 individual patients. There was an increasing trend in pulmonary metastasectomies during the study period. Despite the increasing trend in comorbidities of the operated patients, the length of hospital stays decreased, and the postoperative complication rates remained stable. In final pathology reports, 9.7% were new primary lung cancers and 13.0% were benign nodules. A long disease-free interval (≥24 months) and smoking history were associated with incidental primary lung cancer in final histology. The short-term 30- and 90-day mortalities after pulmonary metastasectomy were 0.7%. The 5-year survival after pulmonary metastasectomy from all histologies was 52.8%, and from colorectal cancer metastasectomies (n=34) it was 73.5%.

Conclusions

The significant amount of new primary lung cancer lesions in pulmonary metastasectomy specimens highlight the diagnostic importance of pulmonary metastasectomy. A segmentectomy could be considered as a primary procedure in pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with a long disease-free interval and a heavy smoking history.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict which patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases would benefit from primary tumor resection

PURPOSE

The use of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients has become increasingly controversial. Our goal is to establish a nomogram to screen for the candidates that would benefit from PTR in CRLM patients.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for 8366 patients with colorectal liver cancer metastases (CRLM) from 2010 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier curve. After propensity score matching (PSM), predictors were analyzed by logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was created to predict for survival benefit of PTR using R software.

RESULTS

After PSM, there were 814 patients in both PTR group and non-PTR group, respectively. The median OS time in the PTR group was 26 months (95%CI = 23.33 ~ 28.67) and the median OS time in the non-PTR group was 15 months (95%CI = 13.36 ~ 16.64). The Cox regression analysis found that PTR was an independent predictive factor (HR = 0.46, 0.41 ~ 0.52) for OS. Additionally, logistic regression was used to study the factors impacting PTR benefit, and the results showed that CEA (P = 0.016), chemotherapy (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), histological grade (P < 0.001), and lung metastasis (P = 0.001) are independent predictive factors affecting the therapeutic outcome of PTR in patients with CRLM. The developed nomogram displayed good discriminative ability in predicting the beneficial probability of PTR surgery, with the area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.801 in training set and 0.739 in validation set respectively.

CONCLUSION

We developed a nomogram that predicts the survival benefits of PTR in CRLM patients with relatively high accuracy, and quantifies the predictive factors for PTR-related benefits.

Long-Term Outcomes of TROG 13.01 SAFRON II Randomized Trial of Single- Versus Multifraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In a randomized phase II clinical trial, the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group compared single- versus multifraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in 90 patients with 133 oligometastases to the lung. The study found no differences in safety, efficacy, systemic immunogenicity, or survival between arms, with single-fraction SABR picked as the winner on the basis of cost-effectiveness. In this article, we report the final updated survival outcome analysis. The protocol mandated no concurrent or post-therapy systemic therapy until progression. Modified disease-free survival (mDFS) was defined as any progression not addressable by local therapy, or death. At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the 3- and 5-year estimates for overall survival (OS) were 70% (95% CI, 59 to 78) and 51% (95% CI, 39 to 61). There were no significant differences between the multi- and single-fraction arms for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0]; P = .81). The 3- and 5-year estimates for disease-free survival were 24% (95% CI, 16 to 33) and 20% (95% CI, 13 to 29), with no differences between arms (HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.6]; P = .92). The 3- and 5-year estimates for mDFS were 39% (95% CI, 29 to 49) and 34% (95% CI, 24 to 44), with no differences between arms (HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8]; P = .90). In this patient population, where patients receive SABR in lieu of systemic therapy, one-in-three patients are alive without disease in the long term. There were no differences in outcomes by fractionation schedule.

The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives

Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Liver Metastases

The liver is a common site for metastatic spread for various primary tumor histologies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment technique with broad patient candidacy for the ablation of tumors in the liver and other organs. SBRT involves focused, high-dose radiation therapy delivered in one to several treatments, resulting in high rates of local control. Use of SBRT for ablation of oligometastatic disease has increased in recent years and emerging prospective data have demonstrated improvements in progression free and overall survival in some settings. When delivering SBRT to liver metastases, clinicians must balance the priorities of delivering ablative tumor dosing while respecting dose constraints to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Motion management techniques are crucial for meeting dose constraints, ensuring low rates of toxicity, maintaining quality of life, and can allow for dose escalation. Advanced radiotherapy delivery approaches including proton therapy, robotic radiotherapy, and real-time MR-guided radiotherapy may further improve the accuracy of liver SBRT. In this article, we review the rationale for oligometastases ablation, the clinical outcomes with liver SBRT, tumor dose and OAR considerations, and evolving strategies to improve liver SBRT delivery.

Treatment and survival of patients with metachronous colorectal lung metastases

INTRODUCTION

The lungs are the second most common site for metachronous metastases in colorectal cancer. No treatment algorithm is established, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to map pulmonary recurrences in a modern multimodal treated population, and to evaluate survival depending on management.

METHODS

Retrospective study based on the COLOFOL-trial population of 2442 patients, radically resected for colorectal cancer stage II-III. All recurrences within 5 years were identified and medical records were scrutinized.

RESULTS

Of 165 (6.8%) patients developing lung metastases as first recurrence, 89 (54%) were confined to the lungs. Potentially curative treatment was possible in 62 (37%) cases, of which 33 with surgery only and 29 with surgery and chemotherapy combined. The 5-year overall survival (5-year OS) for all lung recurrences was 28%. In patients treated with chemotherapy only the 5-year OS was 7.5%, compared with 55% in patients treated with surgery, and 72% when surgery was combined with chemotherapy. Hazard ratio for mortality was 2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.40-6.10) for chemotherapy only compared to surgery.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of metachronous lung metastases after colorectal surgery were possible to resect, yielding good survival. The combination of surgery and chemotherapy might be advantageous for survival.

A predictive model of polymetastatic disease from a multicenter large retrospectIve database on colorectal lung metastases treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: The RED LaIT-SABR study

Aim

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) showed increasing survival in oligometastatic patients. Few studies actually depicted oligometastatic disease (OMD) evolution and which patient will remain disease-free and which will rapidly develop a polymetastatic disease (PMD) after SABR. Therefore, apart from the number of active metastases, there are no clues on which proven factor should be considered for prescribing local treatment in OMD. The study aims to identify predictive factors of polymetastatic evolution in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

This international Ethical Committee approved trial (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT) involved 23 Centers and 450 lung oligometastatic patients. Primary end-point was time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC). Additionally, oligometastases number and cumulative gross tumor volume (cumGTV) were used as combined predictive factors of tPMC. Oligometastases number was stratified as 1, 2-3, and 4-5; cumGTV was dichotomized to the value of 10 cc.

Results

The median tPMC in the overall population was 26 months. Population was classified in the following tPMC risk classes: low-risk (1-3 oligometastases and cumGTV ≤ 10 cc) with median tPMC of 35.1 months; intermediate-risk (1-3 oligometastases and cumGTV > 10 cc), with median tPMC of 13.9 months, and high-risk (4-5 oligometastases, any cumGTV) with median tPMC of 9.4 months (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

The present study identified predictive factors of polymetastatic evolution after SABR in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer. The results demonstrated that the sole metastases number is not sufficient to define the OMD since patients defined oligometastatic from a numerical point of view might rapidly progress to PMD when the cumulative tumor volume is high. A tailored approach in SABR prescription should be pursued considering the expected disease evolution after SABR, with the aim to avoid unnecessary treatment and toxicity in those at high risk of polymetastatic spread, and maximize local treatment in those with a favorable disease evolution.