Tests for latent tuberculosis in candidates for solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Characteristics, management, and outcome of tuberculosis after liver transplant: A case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant recipients are at risk of tuberculosis, which is particularly difficult-to diagnose and to treat in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all cases of tuberculosis diagnosed from 2007 to 2022 in the French network of liver transplant sites.

RESULTS

Twenty-three liver transplant recipients were diagnosed with tuberculosis (six females, median age 59 years [interquartile range, 54-62]), with a median time lapse of 10 months [5-40.5] after transplant, and 38 days [26-60] after symptoms onset. Primary modes of pathogenesis were latent tuberculosis reactivation (n = 15) and transplant-related transmission (n = 3). Even though most patients with pre-transplant data had risk factors for tuberculosis (11/20), IFN-gamma release assay was performed in only three. Most cases involved extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (20/23, 87 %). With median follow-up of 63 months [24-108], five patients died (22 %), including four tuberculosis-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis is a severe disease in liver transplant recipients. Systematic pre-transplant screening of latent tuberculosis may prevent most of them.

Mycobacteria in Organ Transplant Recipients

This review describes the epidemiology and risk factors of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant recipients. We discuss the pre-transplant screening for risk of TB and management of latent TB in this population. We also discuss the challenges of management of TB and other difficult to treat mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium complex. The drugs for the management of these infections include rifamycins which have significant drug interactions with immunosuppressants and must be monitored closely.

Diagnostic Value of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Tuberculosis in the Immunocompromised Population

Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are widely used in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection by detecting interferon-γ released by previously sensitized T-cells in-vitro. Currently, there are two assays based on either enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) technology, with several generations of products available. The diagnostic value of IGRAs in the immunocompromised population is significantly different from that in the immunocompetent population because their results are strongly affected by the host immune function. Both physiological and pathological factors can lead to an immunocompromised situation. We summarized the diagnostic value and clinical recommendations of IGRAs for different immunocompromised populations, including peoplewith physiological factors (pregnant and puerperal women, children, and older people), as well as people with pathological factors (solid organ transplantation recipients, combination with human immunodeficiency virus infection, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, and chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases). Though the performance of IGRAs is not perfect and often requires a combination with other diagnostic strategies, it still has some value in the immunocompromised population. Hopefully, the newly developed IGRAs could better target this population.

Risk Groups of Developing Active Tuberculosis in Liver Transplant Recipients in a Tuberculosis Endemic Area: Risk Stratification by Chest Image and Interferon Gamma Release Assay

OBJECTIVES

We implemented a stratified risk analysis to predict the development of active tuberculosis (TB) in liver transplantation (LT) recipients based on IGRA and chest images in a TB-endemic area.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, LT recipients who tested for IGRA between May 2008 and December 2017 were included. Chest images compatible with old TB lesions were considered as positive images. LT recipients were divided into six groups: LT recipients with history of treated TB, image (+)/IGRA (+), image (+)/IGRA (-), image (-)/IGRA (+), image (-)/IGRA (-) and LTBI treated. The Cox regression model was used to analyze risk groups.

RESULTS

Among the 717 eligible LT recipients included in this study, 21 patients developed active TB. Incidence rates of TB were 2,261, 724, and 119 cases/100,000 person-years in the 1st, 2nd, and ≥ 3rd year after transplantation, respectively. History of treated TB (HR 18.92; 95% CI 4.10-87.25) and image (+)/IGRA (+) (HR 10.86; 95% CI 2.75-42.89) were independent risk factors for developing active TB. IGRA (+) with a negative image was not a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that both IGRA and chest images should be considered to identify risk groups for LTBI treatment.