1
|
Sacchelli L, Filippi F, Balato A, Balestri R, Bellinato F, Bernardini N, Bianchi L, Burlando M, Campanati A, Chessa MA, Corazza M, Di Cesare A, Di Lernia V, Diotallevi F, Esposito M, Fargnoli MC, Gisondi P, Giunta A, Hansel K, Magnano M, Megna M, Odorici G, Prignano F, Potenza C, Rech G, Rovesti M, Ruggiero A, Satolli F, Stingeni L, Gibertoni D, Bardazzi F. PsoBioVax: A multicentric Italian case-control study of the immunological response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among psoriatic patients under biological therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38:e215-e218. [PMID: 38059550 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L Sacchelli
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - F Filippi
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Balato
- Unit of Dermatology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - R Balestri
- Division of Dermatology, Psoriasis Outpatient Service, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - F Bellinato
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sezione Di Dermatologia Università di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - N Bernardini
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine Sapienza University of Rome - Polo Pontino (ASL Latina), Latina, Italy
| | - L Bianchi
- Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - M Burlando
- Department of Dermatology, DISSAL University of Genoa, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - A Campanati
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - M A Chessa
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Corazza
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - A Di Cesare
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - V Di Lernia
- Dermatology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - F Diotallevi
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - M Esposito
- Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- Dermatology Unit, Ospedale San Salvatore, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - M C Fargnoli
- Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- Dermatology Unit, Ospedale San Salvatore, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - P Gisondi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sezione Di Dermatologia Università di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - A Giunta
- Dermatology, Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - K Hansel
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M Magnano
- Division of Dermatology, Psoriasis Outpatient Service, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - M Megna
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - G Odorici
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - F Prignano
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - C Potenza
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine Sapienza University of Rome - Polo Pontino (ASL Latina), Latina, Italy
| | - G Rech
- Division of Dermatology, Psoriasis Outpatient Service, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - M Rovesti
- Dermatologic Unit, Ospedale "Guglielmo da Saliceto", Piacenza, PC, Italy
| | - A Ruggiero
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - F Satolli
- UOC Dermatologia, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - L Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - D Gibertoni
- Research and Innovation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - F Bardazzi
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shabani M, Shobeiri P, Nouri S, Moradi Z, Amenu RA, Mehrabi Nejad MM, Rezaei N. Risk of flare or relapse in patients with immune-mediated diseases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29:55. [PMID: 38229141 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01639-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases (AI-IMD) are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection; therefore, they should be prioritized in vaccination programs. However, there are concerns regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in terms of disease relapse, flare, or exacerbation. In this study, we aimed to provide a more precise and reliable vision using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for original articles reporting the relapse/flare in adult patients with AI-IMD between June 1, 2020 and September 25, 2022. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. RESULTS A total of 134 observations of various AI-IMDs across 74 studies assessed the rate of relapse, flare, or exacerbation in AI-IMD patients. Accordingly, the crude overall prevalence of relapse, flare, or exacerbation was 6.28% (95% CI [4.78%; 7.95%], I2 = 97.6%), changing from 6.28% (I2 = 97.6%) to 6.24% (I2 = 65.1%) after removing the outliers. AI-IMD patients administering mRNA, vector-based, and inactive vaccines showed 8.13% ([5.6%; 11.03%], I2 = 98.1%), 0.32% ([0.0%; 4.03%], I2 = 93.5%), and 3.07% ([1.09%; 5.9%], I2 = 96.2%) relapse, flare, or exacerbation, respectively (p-value = 0.0086). In terms of disease category, nephrologic (26.66%) and hematologic (14.12%) disorders had the highest and dermatologic (4.81%) and neurologic (2.62%) disorders exhibited to have the lowest crude prevalence of relapse, flare, or exacerbation (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The risk of flare/relapse/exacerbation in AI-IMD patients is found to be minimal, especially with vector-based vaccines. Vaccination against COVID-19 is recommended in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahya Shabani
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parnian Shobeiri
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, 14194, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran
- Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Shadi Nouri
- Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Zahra Moradi
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Robel Assefa Amenu
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabi Nejad
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, 14194, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, 14194, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.
- Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Messas T, Lim RK, Burns L, Yumeen S, Kroumpouzos G. A critical review of COVID-19 course and vaccination in dermatology patients on immunomodulatory/biologic therapy: recommendations should not differ between non-pregnant and pregnant individuals. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1121025. [PMID: 37332768 PMCID: PMC10272467 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1121025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 can have detrimental effects on immunosuppressed patients. Here, we evaluate the evidence regarding continuing immunomodulatory/biologic (IMBI) therapy in pregnant dermatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, we discuss the risks of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant dermatology patients on IMBI therapy. As indicated in this review, regarding continuing IMBI therapy in pregnant dermatology patients during the pandemic, there is no compelling reason for treating them differently than non-pregnant. The body of evidence indicates that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy. Studies on rheumatology patients, a group that overlaps significantly with the dermatology group, provided essential findings. IMBI in a non-pregnant rheumatology patient was not associated with COVID-19 mortality (except for rituximab), and vaccination of the rheumatology patient during pregnancy improved the obstetric outcomes compared to the unvaccinated patient. Based on this data, it can be stated that after weighing the benefit-risk profile of the available COVID-19 vaccines, the recommendation for the pregnant dermatology patient speaks in favor of the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccine recommendations in pregnant dermatology patients on IMBI should not differ from those for their non-pregnant counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tassahil Messas
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Centre, University of Constantine III, Constantine, Algeria
| | - Rachel K. Lim
- Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Laura Burns
- Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Sara Yumeen
- Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - George Kroumpouzos
- Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- GK Dermatology, PC, South Weymouth, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khanahmadi M, Khayatan D, Guest PC, Hashemian S, Abdolghaffari AH, Sahebkar A. The Relationship Between Psoriasis, COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination During Treatment of Patients. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1412:339-355. [PMID: 37378776 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-28012-2_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, scientists worldwide have been looking for a way to control this global threat. One of the most successful and practical solutions has been the development and worldwide distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines. However, in a small percentage of cases, vaccination can lead to de novo development or exacerbation of immune or inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis. Due to the immunomodulatory nature of this disease, people affected by psoriasis and other related skin conditions have been encouraged to receive COVID-19 vaccines, which are immunomodulatory by nature. As such, dermatological reactions are possible in these patients, and cases of onset, exacerbation or change in the type of psoriasis have been observed in patients administered with COVID-19 vaccines. Considering the rarity and minor nature of some of these cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccination, there is a general consensus that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential risks of experiencing such side effects. Nevertheless, healthcare workers who administer vaccines should be made aware of the potential risks and advise recipients accordingly. Furthermore, we suggest careful monitoring for potentially deleterious autoimmune and hyperinflammatory responses using point-of-care biomarker monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Khanahmadi
- Department of Toxicology & Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- GI Pharmacology Interest Group (GPIG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Danial Khayatan
- Department of Toxicology & Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- GI Pharmacology Interest Group (GPIG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Paul C Guest
- Department of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Neuroproteomics, Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Somayyeh Hashemian
- Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Amir Hossein Abdolghaffari
- Department of Toxicology & Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- GI Pharmacology Interest Group (GPIG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
- Medicinal Plants Research Center, Institute of Medicinal Plants, Karaj, Iran
- Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, and Toxicology and Diseases Group, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Potestio L, Martora F, Fabbrocini G, Battista T, Megna M. Safety and Efficacy of Covid-19 Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Biological Treatments for Psoriasis. PSORIASIS (AUCKLAND, N.Z.) 2023; 13:11-18. [PMID: 37077713 PMCID: PMC10106810 DOI: 10.2147/ptt.s398135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis, shifting treatment goals to higher treatment outcomes and less frequent safety issues. The outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a worldwide challenge, strongly affecting lifestyle, global economy, and overall health. Among the strategies adopted to contain the spreading of the infection, vaccination is the main one. In this context, the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines raised several doubts about their effectiveness and safety in patients undergoing therapy with biological for psoriasis. Even if molecular and cellular mechanisms by which COVID-19 vaccines lead to psoriasis development have not yet been fully elucidated, vaccination itself can trigger the release of interleukin (IL)-6, interferon (IFN) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α by T-helper (Th)1/Th17 cells. All these cytokines are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to review current literature on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in psoriasis patients undergoing treatment with biologics, in order to clarify any concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Potestio
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Martora
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: Fabrizio Martora, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, Tel +39 081 7462457, Fax +39 081 7462442, Email
| | - Gabriella Fabbrocini
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Teresa Battista
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Megna
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aryanian Z, Balighi K, Afshar ZM, Zamanian MH, Razavi Z, Hatami P. COVID vaccine recommendations in dermatologic patients on immunosuppressive agents: Lessons learned from pandemic. J Cosmet Dermatol 2022; 21:6568-6573. [PMID: 36214611 PMCID: PMC9874417 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since SARS-CoV2 vaccines were approved without enough long-term monitoring due to emergent situations, some issues have been raised about timing and protocol of receiving them by patients treated by different immunosuppressive agents. AIM AND METHOD Here, we present different aspects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in such patients in the field of dermatology. RESULT In brief, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is recommended in all dermatologic patients, regardless of their disorders and therapeutic regimens. Nevertheless, special considerations should be given to the immunosuppressive therapy and its association with vaccination timing due to the decreased immunogenicity of vaccines in this setting. CONCLUSION Novel biologic immunotherapies are advantageous over conventional systemic therapies not only in their safety and selective functions but also in this aspect that many of them do not affect vaccines immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Aryanian
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran,Department of DermatologyBabol University of Medical SciencesBabolIran
| | - Kamran Balighi
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran,Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine Razi HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Zeinab Mohseni Afshar
- Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza HospitalKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran,Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Imam Reza HospitalKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Zamanian
- Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Imam Reza HospitalKermanshah University of Medical SciencesKermanshahIran
| | - Zahra Razavi
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran,Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine Razi HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Parvaneh Hatami
- Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gisondi P, Geat D, Bellinato F, Girolomoni G. Use of biologics during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from psoriasis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2022; 22:1521-1529. [PMID: 35930356 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2110467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the increased infectious risk associated with biologics, particularly with TNFα inhibitors, concerns were raised over the safety of these agents in relation to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, the impact of biologics on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was questioned. AREAS COVERED In this review, studies conducted on patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treated with biologics during the COVID-19 pandemic have been analyzed, including 1) the safety of biologics in psoriatic patients in terms of increased risk and/or worse outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection; and 2) whether biologic agents could affect the safety and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in psoriatic patients. EXPERT OPINION Current evidence indicates that the use of biologics in psoriatic patients does not seem to be associated with an increased COVID-19 infection risk or worse outcome, with TNFα inhibitors being even protective of severe COVID-19 relative to other treatments or no treatment at all. Furthermore, biologic treatment does not seem to have a significant impact on the response and safety of vaccines in patients with psoriasis treated with biologics. However, uncertainty remains given the limitations of current studies which are often of short duration, limited sample sizes and do not stratify on specific biologic classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Gisondi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Geat
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Bellinato
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giampiero Girolomoni
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graceffa D, Sperati F, Bonifati C, Spoletini G, Lora V, Pimpinelli F, Pontone M, Pellini R, Di Bella O, Morrone A, Cristaudo A. Immunogenicity of three doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in psoriasis patients treated with biologics. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:961904. [PMID: 36148445 PMCID: PMC9485492 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.961904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Psoriasis has not been directly linked to a poor prognosis for COVID-19, yet immunomodulatory agents used for its management may lead to increased vulnerability to the dangerous complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as impair the effectiveness of the recently introduced vaccines. The three-dose antibody response trend and the safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in psoriasis patients treated with biologic drugs have remained under-researched. Materials and methods Forty-five psoriatic patients on biologic treatment were enrolled to evaluate their humoral response to three doses of BNT162b2. IgG titers anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were evaluated at baseline (day 0, first dose), after 3 weeks (second dose), four weeks post-second dose, at the time of the third dose administration and 4 weeks post-third dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG ≥15 antibody-binding units (BAU)/mL. Data on vaccine safety were also collected by interview at each visit. Results A statistically significant increase in antibody titers was observed after each dose of vaccine compared with baseline, with no significant differences between patients and controls. Methotrexate used in combination with biologics has been shown to negatively influence the antibody response to the vaccine. On the contrary, increasing body mass index (BMI) positively influenced the antibody response. No adverse effects were reported, and no relapses of psoriasis were observed in the weeks following vaccine administration in our study population. Conclusions Our data are largely consistent with the recent literature on this topic confirming the substantial efficacy and safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine on psoriatic patients treated with biologics of different types and support the recommendation to perform additional doses in this specific subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Graceffa
- Department of Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Sperati
- Biostatistics Unit, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Bonifati
- Department of Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Spoletini
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Viviana Lora
- Department of Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvia Pimpinelli
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Dermatological Clinical and Research Department, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Pontone
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Dermatological Clinical and Research Department, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Raul Pellini
- Department Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Ornella Di Bella
- Medical Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Morrone
- Scientific Direction, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Cristaudo
- Department of Clinical Dermatology, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu PC, Huang IH, Wang CW, Tsai CC, Chung WH, Chen CB. New Onset and Exacerbations of Psoriasis Following COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2022; 23:775-799. [PMID: 36048409 PMCID: PMC9434078 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00721-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination has been promoted to control viral transmission in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Cases of new-onset or exacerbation of psoriasis, an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, were reported following COVID-19 vaccination. However, a comprehensive review examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the occurrence or exacerbation of psoriasis has yet to be performed. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes associated with psoriasis following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from database inception to April 25, 2022. The review included studies with relevant terms, including 'psoriasis,' 'psoriasis vulgaris,' 'guttate psoriasis,' 'pustular psoriasis,' 'palmoplantar pustulosis,' 'psoriatic erythroderma,' 'psoriatic arthritis,' 'COVID-19,' and 'vaccine.' We included all studies reporting at least one patient who developed new-onset psoriasis or experienced a psoriasis flare following at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. A flare was defined as the worsening of disease conditions after vaccination according to the study by Gregoire et al. The appraisal tool described by Murad et al. was used to assess the quality of case reports and series, whereas the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool was used to assess observational studies. RESULTS The initial search yielded 367 results, including 7 studies reporting new-onset psoriasis, 32 studies reporting psoriasis flares, and 4 studies reporting both. The most commonly observed psoriasis subtype was plaque-type psoriasis. mRNA vaccines, including those produced by Moderna and BioNTech/Pfizer, were frequently associated with subsequent psoriasis episodes. First, second, and third vaccine doses were associated with psoriasis incidents, with the second dose most frequently associated with psoriasis flares. Delayed onset was observed, ranging from 2 to 21 days in the new-onset group and from 1 to 90 days in the flare group. Most patients experienced favorable outcomes, with improvement or resolution occurring within 3 days to 4 months. CONCLUSIONS Both new-onset psoriasis and psoriasis flares were reported as cutaneous adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. Psoriatic patients may require regular follow-up before and after COVID-19 vaccination. TRIAL REGISTRATION Review registration number PROSPERO database: CRD42022304157.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Chien Wu
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taipei, Keelung, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsin Huang
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taipei, Keelung, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chuang-Wei Wang
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taipei, Keelung, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Cancer Vaccine and Immune Cell Therapy Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Chang Gung Immunology Consortium, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Dermatology, Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital, Xiamen, China.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chang Tsai
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taipei, Keelung, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hung Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taipei, Keelung, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Cancer Vaccine and Immune Cell Therapy Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Chang Gung Immunology Consortium, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Dermatology, Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital, Xiamen, China.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Whole-Genome Research Core Laboratory of Human Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.,Immune-Oncology Center of Excellence, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Dermatology, Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.,Department of Dermatology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Genomic Medicine Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Bing Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taipei, Keelung, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Cancer Vaccine and Immune Cell Therapy Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Chang Gung Immunology Consortium, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Department of Dermatology, Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital, Xiamen, China. .,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Whole-Genome Research Core Laboratory of Human Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan. .,Immune-Oncology Center of Excellence, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Genomic Medicine Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Curbing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy from a Dermatological Standpoint: Analysis of Cutaneous Reactions in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Database. Am J Clin Dermatol 2022; 23:729-737. [PMID: 35931925 PMCID: PMC9361907 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00715-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines have been of interest since their emergency authorization. Cutaneous manifestations of the vaccines are not well studied. We aimed to characterize cutaneous reactions to the Moderna (mRNA-1273) and the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccines on a large, national scale. METHODS The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System was filtered for cutaneous and hair and nail reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines. Patient demographics and past medical histories, vaccine manufacturer and dosing, symptom timing, reaction location, and patient outcomes were extracted from each report. RESULTS As of December 24, 2021, there were 67,273 cutaneous reactions to all COVID-19 vaccines, with most patients receiving the Moderna (mRNA-1273) or Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccines. The most common reactions overall were injection-site reaction, urticaria, and papular rash, with injection-site reaction more common after the Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccine, and all other cutaneous reactions more common after the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. Patients with past histories of psoriasis, urticaria, and local site reactions to a vaccine were more likely to report these same symptoms after the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION Patients should be counseled about these potential dermatologic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines. Most occur within the first few days after vaccination, and are mild and self-limiting. Patients should therefore be encouraged that it is safe to receive the COVID-19 vaccine from a dermatological perspective.
Collapse
|
11
|
Esposito S, Caminiti C, Giordano R, Argentiero A, Ramundo G, Principi N. Risks of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Immune Response to COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence. Front Immunol 2022; 13:933774. [PMID: 35812420 PMCID: PMC9260046 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.933774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease, are a group of chronic, immune mediated conditions that are presumed to occur in genetically susceptible individuals because of a dysregulated intestinal immune response to environmental factors. IBD patients can be considered subjects with an aberrant immune response that makes them at increased risk of infections, particularly those due to opportunistic pathogens. In many cases this risk is significantly increased by the therapy they receive. Aim of this narrative review is to describe the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD. Available data indicate that patients with IBD do not have an increased susceptibility to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and that, if infected, in the majority of the cases they must not modify the therapy in place because this does not negatively affect the COVID-19 course. Only corticosteroids should be reduced or suspended due to the risk of causing severe forms. Furthermore, COVID-19 seems to modify the course of IBD mainly due to the impact on intestinal disease of the psychological factors deriving from the measures implemented to deal with the pandemic. The data relating to the immune response induced by SARS-CoV-2 or by COVID-19 vaccines can be considered much less definitive. It seems certain that the immune response to disease and vaccines is not substantially different from that seen in healthy subjects, with the exception of patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alone or in combination with other immunosuppressants who showed a reduced immune response. How much, however, this problem reduces induced protection is not known. Moreover, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on IBD course and immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccines has not been studied and deserves attention. Further studies capable of facing and solving unanswered questions are needed in order to adequately protect IBD patients from the risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Caterina Caminiti
- Research and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Argentiero
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Greta Ramundo
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Opportunities. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092422. [PMID: 35566548 PMCID: PMC9101352 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinicians have been overwhelmed by questions beyond the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself. In dermatology practice, clinicians have been facing difficulties concerning therapeutic management of chronic immune-mediated skin disease, above all psoriasis. Major challenges arisen were to understand the role of immunosuppression or immunomodulation on COVID-19 evolution, the benefit/risk ratio related to discontinuation or modification of ongoing treatment, and the appropriateness of initiating new treatments, the optimization of timing in vaccination administration to patients under immunomodulatory treatments, and finally how to find new strategy of patients’ management through remote assistance. In this comprehensive review, we present the current evidence about the course and management of psoriasis during the COVID-19 pandemic. The general message from dermatologists was that data did not suggest that having PSO or its treatment significantly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or more severe COVID-19 course, the vaccination is highly recommended in all psoriatic patients, beyond ongoing treatment, and that the telehealth experience was a success overall.
Collapse
|
13
|
Garcillán B, Salavert M, Regueiro JR, Díaz-Castroverde S. Response to Vaccines in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:297. [PMID: 35214755 PMCID: PMC8877652 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, are at increased risk of infection. International guidelines recommend vaccination to limit this risk of infection, although live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated once immunosuppressive therapy has begun. Biologic therapies used to treat IMIDs target the immune system to stop chronic pathogenic process but may also attenuate the protective immune response to vaccines. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding vaccine responses in IMID patients receiving treatment with biologic therapies, with a focus on the interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors. B cell-depleting therapies, such as rituximab, strongly impair vaccines immunogenicity, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) fusion protein abatacept are also associated with attenuated antibody responses, which are further diminished in patients taking concomitant immunosuppressants. On the other hand, integrin, IL-6, IL-12/23, IL-17, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors do not appear to affect the immune response to several vaccines evaluated. Importantly, treatment with biologic therapies in IMID patients is not associated with an increased risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or developing severe disease. However, the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on IMID patients may be reduced compared with healthy individuals. The impact of biologic therapies on the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines seems to replicate what has been described for other vaccines. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination appears to be safe and well tolerated in IMID patients. Attenuated but, in general, still protective responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the context of certain therapies warrant current recommendations for a third primary dose in IMID patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miguel Salavert
- Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, La Fe Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - José R. Regueiro
- Department of Immunology, Ophthalmology and ENT, School of Medicine, Complutense University, 12 de Octubre Health Research Institute (imas12), 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Skin Manifestations in Psoriatic and HS Patients in Treatment with Biologicals during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10245841. [PMID: 34945136 PMCID: PMC8703332 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a global public health emergency, has changed dermatology practice and daily routine in just under two years. Much has been written in the literature about COVID-19-associated skin manifestations. Nevertheless, much less has been written regarding skin manifestations in patients affected by severe immune-mediated skin diseases, e.g., psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa, undergoing biological treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak. Thus, the aim of this article is to provide the reader with an overview of the cutaneous manifestations during the COVID-19 pandemic in this subset of patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Musumeci ML, Caruso G, Trecarichi AC, Micali G. Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in psoriatic patients treated with biologics: A real life experience. Dermatol Ther 2021; 35:e15177. [PMID: 34699117 PMCID: PMC8646328 DOI: 10.1111/dth.15177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination is the most effective method to prevent and control the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and biologics are not considered a contraindication for vaccination. The burning question is that safety data are lacking since patients taking drugs affecting the immune system were excluded from clinical trials leading to vaccine approbation. Moreover, it seems that vaccination could worsen psoriasis. We conducted a survey to investigate the safety of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines in psoriatic patients treated with biologics. A total of 150 patients with stable plaque psoriasis treated with biologics for at least 2 months were evaluated in a 3 months period. Fifty patients (22 F/28 M; age: 33–83 years) only underwent the first and second doses of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. All patients discontinued their biological agents 10 days before and 10 days after each dose of vaccine. Of these, 24 patients were treated with anti‐TNF, 14 with anti‐IL17, 7 with anti‐IL12‐23, and 5 with anti‐IL23. After the vaccines, all patients were evaluated at day 2, 7, and 14 for local and/or systemic side effects and/or adverse drug reactions to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines. None of the patients experienced any side effects or a psoriatic flare. Only one patient treated with infliximab biosimilar referred an exacerbation of psoriasis after vaccine. The remaining 100 patients reported that they did not get the vaccine yet. Our preliminary data confirm that SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA vaccines are safe for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with biologics and did not trigger psoriasis, although these data should be validated in a larger population. We encourage an early SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines administration in all psoriatic patients on immunosuppressant drugs.
Collapse
|