Youth Experience Tracker Instrument: A self-report measure of developmental antecedents to severe mental illness

Intracortical Myelin in Youths at Risk for Depression

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability. To understand why depression develops, it is important to distinguish between early neural markers of vulnerability that precede the onset of MDD and features that develop during depression. Recent neuroimaging findings suggest that reduced global and regional intracortical myelination (ICM), especially in the lateral prefrontal cortex, may be associated with depression, but it is unknown whether it is a precursor or a consequence of MDD. The study of offspring of affected parents offers the opportunity to distinguish between precursors and consequences by examining individuals who carry high risk at a time when they have not experienced depression.

Methods

We acquired 129 T1-weighted and T2-weighted scans from 56 (25 female) unaffected offspring of parents with depression and 114 scans from 63 (34 female) unaffected offspring of parents without a history of depression (ages 9 to 16 years). To assess scan quality, we calculated test-retest reliability. We used the scan ratios to calculate myelin maps for 68 cortical regions. We analyzed data using mixed-effects modeling.

Results

ICM did not differ between high and low familial risk youths in global (B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p = .06) or regional (B = 0.05, SE = 0.03, p = .08) analyses. Our pediatric sample had high ICM reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88).

Conclusions

Based on our results, reduced ICM does not appear to be a precursor of MDD. Future studies should examine ICM in familial high-risk youths across a broad developmental period.

The Danish High-Risk and Resilience Study-VIA 15 - A Study Protocol for the Third Clinical Assessment of a Cohort of 522 Children Born to Parents Diagnosed With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder and Population-Based Controls

BACKGROUND

Children born to parents with severe mental illness have gained more attention during the last decades because of increasing evidence documenting that these children constitute a population with an increased risk of developing mental illness and other negative life outcomes. Because of high-quality research with cohorts of offspring with familial risk and increased knowledge about gene-environment interactions, early interventions and preventive strategies are now being developed all over the world. Adolescence is a period characterized by massive changes, both in terms of physical, neurologic, psychological, social, and behavioral aspects. It is also the period of life with the highest risk of experiencing onset of a mental disorder. Therefore, investigating the impact of various risk and resilience factors in adolescence is important.

METHODS

The Danish High-Risk and Resilience Study started data collection in 2012, where 522 7-year-old children were enrolled in the first wave of the study, the VIA 7 study. The cohort was identified through Danish registers based on diagnoses of the parents. A total of 202 children had a parent diagnosed with schizophrenia, 120 children had a parent diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and 200 children had parents without these diagnoses. At age 11 years, all children were assessed for the second time in the VIA 11 study, with a follow-up retention rate of 89%. A comprehensive assessment battery covering domains of psychopathology, neurocognition, social cognition and behavior, motor development and physical health, genetic analyses, attachment, stress, parental functioning, and home environment was carried out at each wave. Magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain and electroencephalograms were included from age 11 years. This study protocol describes the third wave of assessment, the VIA 15 study, participants being 15 years of age and the full, 3-day-long assessment battery this time including also risk behavior, magnetoencephalography, sleep, and a white noise paradigm. Data collection started on May 1, 2021.

DISCUSSION

We will discuss the importance of longitudinal studies and cross-sectional data collection and how studies like this may inform us about unmet needs and windows of opportunity for future preventive interventions, early illness identification, and treatment in the future.

The developmental brain age is associated with adversity, depression, and functional outcomes among adolescents

BACKGROUND

Most psychiatric disorders emerge in the second decade of life. In the present study we examined whether environmental adversity, developmental antecedents, major depressive disorder (MDD), and functional impairment correlate with deviation from normative brain development in adolescence.

METHODS

We trained a brain age prediction model using 189 structural MRI brain features in 1299 typically developing adolescents (age range 9-19 years old, M = 13.5, SD = 3.04), validated the model in a holdout set of 322 adolescents (M = 13.5, SD = 3.07), and used it to predict age in an independent risk-enriched cohort of 150 adolescents (M = 13.6, SD = 2.82). We tested associations between the brain-age-gap and adversity, early antecedents, depression, and functional impairment.

RESULTS

We accurately predicted chronological age in typically developing adolescents (mean absolute error (MAE) = 1.53 years). The model generalized to the validation set (MAE = 1.55 years, 1.98 bias adjusted) and to the independent at-risk sample (MAE = 1.49 years, 1.86 bias adjusted). The brain age estimate was reliable in repeated scans (intra class correlation = 0.94). Experience of environmental advertises (β = 0.18, 95% CI [0.04, 0.31], p = 0.02), diagnosis of MDD (β = 0.61, 95% CI [0.23, 0.99], p = 0.01) and functional impairment (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], p = 0.01) were associated with a positive brain-age-gap.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors, diagnosis, and impact of mental illness are associated with an older appearing brain during development.