Optimising management of deferasirox therapy for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

A Cross-Sectional, Multicentric, Disease-Specific, Health-Related Quality of Life Study in Greek Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia Patients

The assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in thalassemia offers a holistic approach to the disease and facilitates better communication between physicians and patients. This study aimed to evaluate the HRQoL of transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) patients in Greece. This was a multicentric, cross-sectional study conducted in 2017 involving 283 adult TDT patients. All participants completed a set of two QoL questionnaires, the generic SF-36v2 and the disease-specific TranQol. Demographic and clinical characteristics were used to predefine patient subgroups. Significant factors identified in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis to assess their effect on HRQoL. The SF-36 scores of TDT patients were consistently lower compared to the general population in Greece. The mean summary score of TranQol was relatively high (71 ± 14%), exceeding levels observed in national surveys in other countries. Employment emerged as the most significant independent factor associated with better HRQoL, whereas age had the most significant negative effect. This study represents the first comprehensive QoL assessment of a representative sample of the TDT population in Greece. The implementation of TranQol allowed for the quantification of HRQoL in Greece, establishing a baseline for future follow-up, and identifying more vulnerable patient subgroups.

Combination chelation therapy

Combination chelation therapies are considered in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients for whom monotherapy regimens have failed to achieve iron balance or intensification of iron chelation therapy is required for the rapid reduction of excess iron to avoid permanent organ damage. Combination chelation may provide a more flexible approach for individualizing chelation therapy, thereby improving tolerability, adherence, and quality of life. In principle, iron chelators can be combined with an infinite number of dosing regimens; these involve simultaneous or sequential exposure to the chelators on the same day or alternating the drugs on different days. Clinical studies have established the safety and efficacy of chelation combinations. However, real-life data with combination therapies indicate the significance of compliance for a meaningful reduction in iron overload compared to monotherapies.

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Regularly transfused people with sickle cell disease (SCD) and people with thalassaemia are at risk of iron overload. Iron overload can lead to iron toxicity in vulnerable organs such as the heart, liver and endocrine glands, which can be prevented and treated with iron-chelating agents. The intensive demands and uncomfortable side effects of therapy can have a negative impact on daily activities and wellbeing, which may affect adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and assess the effectiveness of different types of interventions (psychological and psychosocial, educational, medication interventions, or multi-component interventions) and interventions specific to different age groups, to improve adherence to iron chelation therapy compared to another listed intervention, or standard care in people with SCD or thalassaemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations & Global Theses, Web of Science & Social Sciences Conference Proceedings Indexes and ongoing trial databases (13 December 2021). We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register (1 August 2022).

SELECTION CRITERIA

For trials comparing medications or medication changes, only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion. For studies including psychological and psychosocial interventions, educational interventions, or multi-component interventions, non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs), controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies with adherence as a primary outcome were also eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 19 RCTs and one NRSI published between 1997 and 2021. One trial assessed medication management, one assessed an education intervention (NRSI) and 18 RCTs were of medication interventions. Medications assessed were subcutaneous deferoxamine, and two oral chelating agents, deferiprone and deferasirox. We rated the certainty of evidence as very low to low across all outcomes identified in this review. Four trials measured quality of life (QoL) with validated instruments, but provided no analysable data and reported no difference in QoL. We identified nine comparisons of interest. 1. Deferiprone versus deferoxamine We are uncertain whether or not deferiprone affects adherence to iron chelation therapy (four RCTs, unpooled, very low-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.21; 3 RCTs, 376 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.46; 1 RCT, 228 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Adherence was reported as "good", "high" or "excellent" by all seven trials, though the data could not be analysed formally: adherence ranged from 69% to 95% (deferiprone, mean 86.6%), and 71% to 93% (deferoxamine, mean 78.8%), based on five trials (474 participants) only. 2. Deferasirox versus deferoxamine We are uncertain whether or not deferasirox affects adherence to iron chelation therapy (three RCTs, unpooled, very low-certainty evidence), although medication adherence was high in all trials. We are uncertain whether or not there is any difference between the drug therapies in serious adverse events (SAEs) (SCD or thalassaemia) or all-cause mortality (thalassaemia). 3. Deferiprone versus deferasirox We are uncertain if there is a difference between oral deferiprone and deferasirox based on a single trial in children (average age 9 to 10 years) with any hereditary haemoglobinopathy in adherence, SAEs and all-cause mortality. 4. Deferasirox film-coated tablet (FCT) versus deferasirox dispersible tablet (DT) One RCT compared deferasirox in different tablet forms. There may be a preference for FCTs, shown through a trend for greater adherence (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.22; 1 RCT, 88 participants), although medication adherence was high in both groups (FCT 92.9%; DT 85.3%). We are uncertain if there is a benefit in chelation-related AEs with FCTs. We are uncertain if there is a difference in the incidence of SAEs, all-cause mortality or sustained adherence. 5. Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferiprone alone We are uncertain if there is a difference in adherence, though reporting was usually narrative as triallists report it was "excellent" in both groups (three RCTs, unpooled). We are uncertain if there is a difference in the incidence of SAEs and all-cause mortality.  6. Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferoxamine alone We are uncertain if there is a difference in adherence (four RCTs), SAEs (none reported in the trial period) and all-cause mortality (no deaths reported in the trial period). There was high adherence in all trials. 7. Deferiprone and deferoxamine combined versus deferiprone and deferasirox combined There may be a difference in favour of deferiprone and deferasirox (combined) in rates of adherence (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99) (one RCT), although it was high (> 80%) in both groups. We are uncertain if there is a difference in SAEs, and no deaths were reported in the trial, so we cannot draw conclusions based on these data (one RCT). 8. Medication management versus standard care We are uncertain if there is a difference in QoL (one RCT), and we could not assess adherence due to a lack of reporting in the control group. 9. Education versus standard care One quasi-experimental (NRSI) study could not be analysed due to the severe baseline confounding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The medication comparisons included in this review had higher than average adherence rates not accounted for by differences in medication administration or side effects, though often follow-up was not good (high dropout over longer trials), with adherence based on a per protocol analysis. Participants may have been selected based on higher adherence to trial medications at baseline. Also, within the clinical trial context, there is increased attention and involvement of clinicians, thus high adherence rates may be an artefact of trial participation. Real-world, pragmatic trials in community and clinic settings are needed that examine both confirmed or unconfirmed adherence strategies that may increase adherence to iron chelation therapy. Due to lack of evidence this review cannot comment on intervention strategies for different age groups.

Effect of Aging on Deferasirox Therapy in Transfusion-dependent Patients. A Prospective- Retrospective, Cohort-study

BACKGROUND

Iron-chelation therapy is life-saving in patients on a chronic transfusion regimen as it reduces organ damage related to iron deposition in the tissues. Deferasirox, an iron-chelator, is characterized by pharmacokinetics variability, and some patients may discontinue the treatment due to toxicities.

OBJECTIVE

Understanding whether deferasirox plasma levels are related to patients' specific characteristics could help to optimize DFX dosage.

METHODS

We analyzed deferasirox plasma concentration in 57 transfusion-dependent anemic patients using the HPLC method in this prospective-retrospective cohort study. All outpatients (3 to 98 years) were treated with deferasirox (film-coated tablet) for at least one year (median dose, 16.5 mg/Kg once a day). Deferasirox plasma concentration was normalized for dose/Kg (C/dose) and corrected with a linear regression model that relates C/dose and the time of blood sampling (Cref/dose).

RESULTS

No significant differences in Cref/dose were found between males and females, either between different types of hemoglobinopathies or depending on the presence of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism. Cref/dose has a positive and significant correlation with age, creatinine, and direct bilirubin. Cref/dose, instead, has a negative and significant correlation with Liver Iron Concentration (LIC), ferritin, and eGFR. Cref/dose was significantly different between three age categories <18yrs, 18-50yrs, and >50yrs, with Cref/dose median values of 1.0, 1.2, and 1.5, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study evidenced that to ensure the efficacy of deferasirox in terms of control over LIC and, at the same time, a lesser influence on renal function, the dose of the drug to be administered to an elderly patient could be reduced.

From Biology to Clinical Practice: Iron Chelation Therapy With Deferasirox

Iron chelation therapy (ICT) has become a mainstay in heavily transfused hematological patients, with the aim to reduce iron overload (IOL) and prevent organ damage. This therapeutic approach is already widely used in thalassemic patients and in low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients. More recently, ICT has been proposed for high-risk MDS, especially when an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation has been planned. Furthermore, other hematological and hereditary disorders, characterized by considerable transfusion support to manage anemia, could benefit from this therapy. Meanwhile, data accumulated on how iron toxicity could exacerbate anemia and other clinical comorbidities due to oxidative stress radical oxygen species (ROS) mediated by free iron species. Taking all into consideration, together with the availability of approved oral iron chelators, we envision a larger use of ICT in the near future. The aim of this review is to better identify those non-thalassemic patients who can benefit from ICT and give practical tips for management of this therapeutic strategy.

Luspatercept for β-thalassemia: beyond red blood cell transfusions

INTRODUCTION

Red blood cell transfusions and iron chelation therapy are the cornerstone of treatment for β-thalassemia, with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and gene therapy offering further disease-management options for eligible patients. With up to 90% of severe cases of β-thalassemia occurring in resource-constrained countries, and estimates indicating that 22,500 deaths occur annually as a direct consequence of undertransfusion, provision of adequate treatment remains a major issue.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of luspatercept, a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent, and present the available clinical data related to the treatment of β-thalassemia.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent approval of luspatercept offers a new, long-term therapeutic option for adult patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia to reduce red blood cell transfusion burden, anemia, and iron overload.

Prescribing patterns and drug-related problems (DRPs) in transfusion-dependent paediatric thalassemia patients: A prospective interventional study from a tertiary care hospital in India

Background

Each year nearly 10,000 children with thalassaemia major are born in India, but among them, very few are optimally managed mainly in urban regions even though the Government of India has incorporated their care and treatment in the 12th Five-Year Plan. Data on prescribing patterns and drug-related problems (DRPs) in paediatric thalassaemia patients in India are limited.

Methods

In this prospective interventional study, the medications prescribed were recorded after reviewing the treatment charts, thalassaemia register, thalassaemia card, nurses’ notes, as well as discharge summaries. When DRPs and/or medication errors were identified, the same was discussed with the concerned health care professionals and suitable suggestions were made at the earliest.

Results

Out of the enrolled 54 patients, only 94% (n = 51) of the patients received iron chelation therapy with deferasirox and/or deferiprone, Folic acid tablet was prescribed for 100% of the patients (n = 54). Five percent of patients (n = 3) had undergone splenectomy and was prescribed with amoxicillin prophylactically. There were a total of 16 DRPs and 15 medication errors were identified and suitable measurements were taken to solve these problems.

Conclusions

The prescribing patterns, DRPs and medication errors in transfusion-dependent paediatric thalassaemia patients were discussed in this study. Our study was effective in identifying and solving the DRPs and medication problems that occurred in thalassaemia patients.

Effectiveness and tolerability of twice daily dosing of deferasirox in unresponsive and intolerant transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia patients: A narrative review

Chronic iron overload in beta-thalassemia patients after continuous blood transfusions has caused notable morbidity and mortality in these patients. The once-a-day oral iron chelator, deferasirox has established efficacy and bearable safety in adults and pediatric thalassemia patients. It is now extensively used for the management of transfusional hemosiderosis. However, a number of studies have revealed a few patients continued to be none respondent or intolerant toward the once-a-day regimen of deferasirox even after the administration of maximum dose recommended by the World Health Organization. In the literature, there were three studies showing the boon of twice in a day dosing of deferasirox among transfusional-dependent beta thalassemia patients. Therefore, a nonsystematic review was conducted on above three studies to ascertain the enhanced effectiveness and tolerability of twice per day regimen of deferasirox with the same total dose as that of once daily regimen of deferasirox in unresponsive or intolerant transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) patients. All the above studies concluded that the twice per day regimen of deferasirox was more efficacious and tolerable among TDT patients when compared to the once-a-day regimen with the same total daily dose. Although there was a significant good results from these studies, there is a need to conduct either muticenter study or randomized control study in a larger number of patients for the better confirmation of the results as all the above studies were conducted in the small number of TDT patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag and Romiplostim in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim

Many studies indicated that eltrombopag and romiplostim could improve hematopoietic function in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but their toxicity and efficacy were not known. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag and romiplostim in MDS.

Methods

A full-scale search strategy was used to search relevant published studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library until January 2020 using a random-effects model and the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval as the effect indicator. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results

This meta-analysis included eight studies comprising 1047 patients. A lower RR of overall response rate (ORR) (RR: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47–0.9) and grade ≥3 bleeding events (RR: 0.36; 95% CI, 0.36–0.92) were observed after romiplostim and eltrombopag treatment compared with placebo. The pooled RR for the ORR and grade ≥3 bleeding events were 0.58 (95% CI: 0.41–0.83, P = 0.003) and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.37–0.96, P = 0.03) in eltrombopag, respectively. A lower ORR in intermediate- or high-risk MDS (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45–0.88, P = 0.006) was observed. No difference in mortality, serious adverse events, platelet transfusion, hematologic improvement, and AML transformation was observed.

Conclusions

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) romiplostim and eltrombopag were effective in reducing bleeding events, especially grade ≥3 bleeding events. However, it might reduce the ORR of MDS, especially in eltrombopag treatment group or high-risk MDS group. Due to the limited treatment of MDS and the poor response to the drug, this may be a selection method for MDS combined with fatal bleeding, although further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this approach.

Two-year long safety and efficacy of deferasirox film-coated tablets in patients with thalassemia or lower/intermediate risk MDS: phase 3 results from a subset of patients previously treated with deferasirox in the ECLIPSE study

Background

Despite the proven benefits of iron chelation therapy (ICT) in the management of chronic iron overload and related complications, compliance to long-term ICT is challenging. Results from the ECLIPSE study, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, 2-arm, phase 2 study evaluated the safety of deferasirox dispersible tablet and film-coated tablet (FCT) formulations in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) or very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) treated over 24 weeks.

Methods

The aim of the current study (a 2-year, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 3 study) is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of deferasirox FCT in a subset of patients with TDT or lower/intermediate-risk MDS treated for 2 years after the completion of 24 weeks of treatment with deferasirox in the ECLIPSE phase 2 study.

Results

Of 53 patients enrolled, 34 (64.2%) completed treatment and study. Adverse events (AEs) reported in most patients (~ 70%) were of mild to moderate severity. Headache and diarrhea were the most frequently (> 25%) reported AEs. None of the serious AEs (including 1 death) were considered treatment related. No new safety signal was identified, and long-term safety of deferasirox FCT was consistent with the known safety profile of deferasirox. No major concerns associated with gastrointestinal tolerability, renal safety, or hematological abnormalities (thrombocytopenia/neutropenia) were reported during the 2 years. Patients receiving deferasirox FCT had a treatment compliance (by pill count) of ~ 90% and persistence (continuous use for ≥ 30 days) of > 95%. Reduction in serum ferritin level was almost consistent starting from week 2 across all post-baseline time points (relative reduction: month 6, 19%; month 12, 29%).

Conclusions

The results from this 2-year interventional study suggest that the recommended dosing of deferasirox FCT, with better tolerability, palatability, and compliance, offers a favorable option of ICT for long-term management of iron overload and associated complications in TDT.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02720536. Registered 28 March 2016, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720536

Overexpression of TIGIT in NK and T Cells Contributes to Tumor Immune Escape in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Objective

Targeting immune checkpoints, such as PD-1, represents a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy, achieving long-term disease remission rates in numerous types of cancer. T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a checkpoint receptor associated with the antitumor roles of NK and T cells. Notably, the blockade of TIGIT has been revealed as a potential promising approach in cancer immunotherapy. However, the therapeutic potential of blocking TIGIT in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains unclear and further research is required to reveal their role.

Methods

Fresh peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) were obtained from patients with MDS and healthy donors (HDs) at the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 21 2018 and March 22 2019. The present study investigated the expression levels of TIGIT on NK and T cells using flow cytometry (FCM) and PCR. In addition, other checkpoint receptors, such as CD226 and PD-1, were also investigated. To determine the mechanisms of antitumor immunity, the functions of NK and T cells expressing TIGIT were determined.

Results

TIGIT was found to be highly expressed on NK and T cells of the PB, where it was involved in disease progression and the immune escape of MDS. The high expression levels of TIGIT were associated with decreased NK and T cell function, and significantly lower secretions of activation factors, such as CD107a, IFN-γ and TNF-α. Notably, blocking TIGIT enhanced the antitumor effects of NK and T cells.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggested that targeting TIGIT alone or in combination with PD-1 may be a promising anticancer therapeutic strategy in MDS.

Deferasirox-induced liver injury and Fanconi syndrome in a beta-thalassemia major male

A 33-year-old male presenting with subacute abdominal pain was found to have hyperbilirubinaemia, hypokalaemia and hyponatraemia. This was in the setting of transitioning between deferasirox iron chelator formulations, from dispersible tablets to film-coated tablets for ongoing treatment of chronic iron overload secondary to transfusion requirement for beta-thalassemia major. A liver biopsy demonstrated acute cholestasis with patchy confluent hepatocellular necrosis and mild to moderate microvesicular steatosis. Based on the histological, biochemical and clinical findings, the diagnosis of hepatotoxicity and Fanconi-like syndrome was made. The patient improved clinically and biochemically with cessation of the deferasirox film-coated tablets and supportive management. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of hepatotoxicity and Fanconi-like syndrome occurring due to deferasirox film-coated tablets with previous tolerance of dispersible deferasirox tablets. It is important to raise clinical awareness of this potentially severe complication.

Iron chelation therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Iron overload remains a concern in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients especially those requiring recurrent blood transfusions. Whether iron chelating therapy (ICT) is beneficial to the long-term survival of myelodysplastic syndrome is still a controversial issue. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between ICT and long-term survival in patients with MDS. A total of 14 studies involving 7242 participants were identified; the outcomes revealed that for patients with MDS, ICT resulted in a lower risk of mortality compared to those with no ICT (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.70; P < 0.001); what is more, ICT led to a lower risk of leukemia transformation (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.93; P = 0.016). Results of subgroup analyses based on adequate ICT or any ICT, low/int-1 IPSS or unclassified IPSS and study types indicated that the ICT had a beneficial role in all these groups of patients.