Effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose telaprevir-based triple therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients

Postoperative low hepatitis C virus load predicts long-term outcomes after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load is known to predict long-term outcomes after hepatectomy for HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study sought to examine the hypothesis that postoperative and preoperative HCV viral-load have similar prognostic implications, as well as determine a target viral-load that will improve long-term postoperative outcomes.

METHOD

One hundred and eighty-one patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for HCV-related HCC were divided into five groups according to time-weighted average viral load. The cumulative-recurrence curves of the five groups were compared to identify prognostic trends. The optimal cut-off viral load value related to recurrence was also investigated.

RESULTS

The five cumulative-recurrence curves were separated into two clusters according to viral load. Patients with a negative viral load had comparable recurrence curves to patients with the lowest viral-load (P = 0.907); both of these patient groups had more favorable outcomes than patients with a viral load categorized in the other groups (all P < 0.050). The optimal cut-off based on maximum HR method (> or ≤4.0 log₁₀ IU/mL) was a strong prognostic indicator of recurrence in multivariate analysis (HR 3.09; 95%CI 1.96-5.04; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative HCV viral load correlated with long-term surgical outcomes. A low viral load (≤4.0 log₁₀ IU/mL) independently predicted better long-term outcomes.

Safety Profile of Telaprevir-Based Triple Therapy in Elderly Patients: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study

To compare the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events for telaprevir-based triple (T/PR) and pegylated interferon-alfa-2b and ribavirin (PR) therapy for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients over the age of 65 years, in Japan. Retrospective analysis of the health data of patients over the age of 65 years treated for a HCV infection genotype 1 using T/PR or PR therapy, from 38 prefectures in Japan. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events for T/PR and PR. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the prevalence and type of adverse events during the treatment period that resulted in treatment discontinuation for both therapies. For comparison, the T/PR and PR populations were matched using the propensity score method, and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for treatment discontinuation calculated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The study group included 1330 patients, 328 in the T/PR group and 1002 in the PR group. The rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events in the matched population was lower for T/PR (19.82%) than PR (35.98%) therapy, (adjusted OR, 0.418; 95% confidence interval, 0.292-0.599; p<0.01). Malaise was the principal cause of treatment discontinuation in both groups (T/PR, 30.77%, and PR, 42.37%). Using real-world health data of elderly individuals in Japan, we identified a lower rate of treatment discontinuation for T/PR than PR. Our outcomes provide information for a segment of the population that is generally excluded for clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of telaprevir with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin in Japanese patients

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) and ribavirin (RBV) for treatment-naïve patients and relapsed patients compared to previous TVR-based triple therapy in Japan.

METHODS

The study group included 35 treatment-naïve (median age, 55 years) and 19 relapsed (median age, 55 years) patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection. Patients received TVR (750 mg every 8 h) for 12 weeks, in combination with PEG-IFNα-2a and RBV.

RESULTS

The sustained virological response (SVR₂₄ ) rates for naïve and relapsed patients were 85.7% (30/35) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The discontinuation rate of all study drugs due to adverse events was 5.6% (3/54). Among the 54 patients, grade 3 skin disorders and grade 3 anemia (<8.0 g/dL) were reported in 2 (3.7%) and 6 patients (11.1%), respectively. Although the overall safety profiles were similar for the TVR/PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV and TVR/PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV regimens (previous study), the proportion of patients discontinuing all study drugs due to adverse events was lower in the patients treated with the TVR/PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV regimen (3/54, 5.6%) than TVR/PEG-IFNα-2b/RBV regimen (44/267, 16.5%).

CONCLUSION

Telaprevir in combination with PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV provided a high sustained virological response rate for the treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus in both treatment-naïve and relapsed patients in Japan. Telaprevir-based therapy may provide a useful treatment option for patients who are difficult to treat due to NS5A (Y93, L31) and NS3/4A (D168) variants.

The Safety Profile of Telaprevir-Based Triple Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This study was designed to evaluate the safety profile of adding telaprevir to therapy using pegylated interferon-alfa-2b and ribavirin (PR) using real world patient data obtained from a nationwide Japanese interferon database. This retrospective cohort study compared telaprevir-based triple therapy (T/PR) with PR therapy. The study population comprised patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C represented in the database between December 2009 and August 2015. The primary endpoint was dropout from treatment due to adverse events during the relevant standard treatment duration based on guidelines from the Japan Society of Hepatology. The dropout odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using univariate logistic regression analysis. Covariates were detected using a stepwise logistic regression analysis, and the adjusted OR and 95% CI were calculated. A total of 25989 patients were registered, and 4619 patients (T/PR: 1334, PR: 3285) were appropriate for primary endpoint analysis. The dropout rate due to adverse events was lower in the T/PR group (13.4%) than in the PR group (22.6%) (OR: 0.530; 95% CI, 0.444-0.633). After adjustment for the covariates detected by stepwise selection, the OR was 0.529 (95% CI, 0.441-0.634). Our study showed that there was a difference in dropout rate between real world T/PR and PR therapy in Japan. Although the addition of telaprevir to PR therapy may improve treatment continuity under the care of hepatologists, this study could not fully determine which therapy was safer or the factors influencing this result. Therefore, additional research will be required to confirm this.

Comparison of peg-interferon, ribavirin plus telaprevir vs simeprevir by propensity score matching

AIM

To compare efficacy of telaprevir (TVR) and simeprevir (SMV) combined with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) while treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC).

METHODS

In all, 306 CHC patients were included in this study. There were 159 patients in the TVR combination therapy group and 147 patients in the SMV combination therapy group. To evaluate pretreatment factors contributing to sustained virological response at 12 wk (SVR12), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in TVR and SMV groups. To adjust for patient background between TVR and SMV groups, propensity score matching was performed. Virological response during treatment and SVR12 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall rates of SVR12 [undetectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels] were 79.2% and 69.4% in TVR and SMV groups, respectively. Patients in the SMV group were older, had higher serum HCV RNA levels, lower hemoglobin, higher prevalence of unfavorable interleukin-28B (IL28B) genotype (rs8099917), and poorer response to previous PEG-IFN and RBV treatment. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for backgrounds (n = 104) and demonstrated SVR12 rates of 74.0% and 73.1% in the TVR and SMV groups, respectively. In the TVR group, discontinuation rates were higher because of adverse events; however, breakthrough and nonresponse was more frequent in the in SMV group. Multivariate analysis revealed IL28B genotype (rs8099917) as the only independent predictive factor of SVR12 in both groups.

CONCLUSION

SVR12 rates were almost identical following propensity score matching.

Effectiveness of triple therapy with simeprevir for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b patients with prior telaprevir failure

Favourable efficacy and safety profiles for simeprevir in combination with pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) and ribavirin (triple therapy) have been shown in clinical trials. This study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of simeprevir-based triple therapy for patients with prior telaprevir treatment failure. This multicentre, observational cohort consisted of 345 consecutive Japanese patients infected with HCV genotype 1b, including 20 who had experienced telaprevir-based triple therapy. Amino acid substitutions in the NS3/4A region were identified by direct sequencing at the time of relapse or breakthrough in treatment with telaprevir and at the initiation of treatment with simeprevir. Patients were stratified according to prior response to PEG-IFNα and ribavirin. Of the 20 patients with telaprevir treatment failure, 10 (50.0%) achieved sustained virological response at week 12 after the end of treatment (SVR12). For patients treatment naïve [3/4 (75.0%)] or with prior relapse [1/1 (100%)] or partial response [5/6 (83.3%)] to PEG-IFNα and ribavirin, almost all achieved SVR12, mainly because of the improvement of treatment adherence, especially to direct-acting antiviral agent and ribavirin. However, of the nine patients with prior null response to PEG-IFNα and ribavirin, only one (11.1%) achieved SVR12, despite all having received an adequate treatment dosage, and five (55.6%) achieved rapid virological response. The treatment outcome of simeprevir-based triple therapy for HCV genotype 1b patients with prior telaprevir failure depended on the prior response to PEG-IFNα and ribavirin. For patients with prior null response to PEG-IFNα and ribavirin, retreatment with simeprevir-based triple therapy is not a useful option.

Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

AIM

Simeprevir (SMV) is an oral, once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. In phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in Japan, SMV, in combination with peginterferon-α and ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV), demonstrated potent efficacy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients relative to PEG IFN/RBV and was generally well tolerated. Telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PEG IFN/RBV is licensed for the treatment of HCV in Japan. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of TVR and SMV in a Japanese population, we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the relative efficacy and safety of SMV and TVR in combination with PEG IFN/RBV.

METHODS

A systematic review identified SMV and TVR RCT in Japanese treatment-naïve patients. Bayesian NMA was performed assuming fixed study effects.

RESULTS

Three studies met our inclusion criteria: two SMV and one TVR. SMV showed a higher mean odds ratio (OR) of achieving SVR versus TVR (OR, 1.68 (95% credible interval 0.66-4.26)). SMV showed a lower mean OR of discontinuation: overall, 0.35 (0.12-1.00); and due to AE, 0.87 (0.23-3.34) versus TVR. SMV showed a lower mean OR of experiencing anemia 0.20 (0.07-0.56) and rash 0.41 (0.17-0.99) but a higher mean OR of experiencing pruritus 1.26 (0.46-3.47) versus TVR.

CONCLUSION

In this indirect treatment comparison, SMV, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, showed a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with TVR with PEG IFN/RBV in Japanese treatment-naïve HCV patients.

Efficacy of telaprevir-based therapy for difficult-to-treat patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C in Japan

AIM

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of telaprevir in combination with peginterferon-α-2b (PEG IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), for Japanese difficult-to-treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 who had not achieved sustained virological response (SVR) during prior treatment.

METHODS

In total, 108 relapsed (median age, 59.0 years) and 10 non-responding (median age, 59.0 years) patients with genotype 2 HCV participated. Patients received telaprevir (750 mg, every 8 h) for 12 weeks and PEG IFN/RBV for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

The SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders were 88.0% (95/108) and 50.0% (5/10), respectively. The SVR rates did not differ significantly between patients with rs8099917 TT and non-TT. The SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders with extended rapid viral response (eRVR) were 97.6% (82/84) and 100% (5/5), respectively. On the other hand, the SVR rates for relapsers and non-responders completing the treatment protocol were 98.4% (61/62) and 100% (5/5), respectively. The overall safety profiles of telaprevir-based regimens were similar for Japanese patients with genotype 1 and 2 HCV infection who experienced treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Telaprevir, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, provided a high SVR rate for genotype 2 HCV, difficult-to-treat patients who had not achieved SVR during prior IFN-based treatment. The eRVR had a strong influence on the cure rate of telaprevir-based therapy. In addition, the continuation of telaprevir-based treatment for up to 24 weeks was a significant predictor of SVR.

Adjusting the starting dose of telaprevir according to renal function decreases adverse effects and affects the sustained virological response rate

BACKGROUND

Telaprevir (TVR) plays a major role in renal damage and anemia associated with TVR/pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Adjusting the TVR starting dose may reduce these adverse effects. We aimed to determine whether adjusting the starting dose according to renal function reduces TVR-associated renal damage and anemia and affects the sustained virological response (SVR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study included 112 patients infected with hepatitis C genotype 1 treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin/TVR triple therapy. The TVR starting dose adjusted according to renal function was calculated as TVR/unadjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ratio=TVR/(eGFR×body surface area/1.73).

RESULTS

A TVR/unadjusted eGFR ratio of 32 or greater was a predictor of renal impairment and anemia in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 12.09, P<0.001, and OR 4.14, P<0.001, respectively). Patients with a TVR/unadjusted eGFR ratio of 32 or greater developed significant renal impairment and anemia (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). SVR was significantly reduced in patients with a TVR/unadjusted eGFR ratio less than 23 versus 23 or greater (66.7 and 87.2%, respectively, P=0.045). SVR tended to increase stepwise [<23.0 (66.7%), ≥23 to <32 (84.8%), and ≥32 (89.6%), respectively]. The TVR/unadjusted eGFR ratio was correlated significantly with the serum TVR concentration (r=0.541, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adjusting the TVR starting dose according to the TVR/unadjusted eGFR ratio decreased adverse effects and affected the SVR rate. The TVR starting dose should be adjusted by a TVR/unadjusted eGFR ratio of 23 or greater to less than 32 to safely achieve SVR.

Prediction of Sustained Virological Response to Telaprevir-Based Triple Therapy Using Viral Response within 2 Weeks

The aim of the present study was to predict sustained virological response (SVR) to telaprevir with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin using viral response within 2 weeks after therapy initiation. Thirty-six patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) and high viral load were treated by telaprevir-based triple therapy. SVR was achieved in 72% (26/36) of patients. Significant differences between the SVR group and non-SVR group were noted regarding response to prior PEG-IFN plus ribavirin, interleukin (IL)28B polymorphism, amino acid substitution at core 70, cirrhosis, hyaluronic acid level, and HCV-RNA reduction within 2 weeks. Setting 4.56 logIU/mL as the cut-off value for HCV-RNA reduction at 2 weeks, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for predicting SVR were 77%, 86%, 95%, 50%, and 79%, respectively, and for neither the IL28B minor allele nor core 70 mutant were 80%, 71%, 91%, 50%, and 78%, respectively. In conclusion, evaluation of viral reduction at 2 weeks or the combination of IL28B polymorphism and amino acid substitution at core 70 are useful for predicting SVR to telaprevir with PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy.