Radiotherapy regimens in patients with nonmelanoma head and neck skin cancers

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp in the elderly: Efficacy and tolerance, preliminary results

PURPOSE

Skin squamous cells carcinomas (SCC) are frequently tumor, especially in the elderly population. Surgical excision is the standard treatment. But for patients suffering large tumor or/with comorbidity, a conservative approach with irradiation can be proposed. The hypofractionated schedule is used to shorten the overall treatment time with same results and without compromising therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of hypofractionated radiotherapy for invasive SCC of the scalp in elderly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients suffering from SCC of the scalp and treated by hypofractionated radiotherapy at the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine or centre Émile-Durkeim d'Épinal, from January 2019 to December 2021. Characteristics of patients, size of the lesion and side effects were collected retrospectively. Tumor size at 6 months corresponded to the primary endpoint. Toxicity was collected for the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with a median age of 85 years old were included. The mean size was 4,5cm with a bone invasion in 2/3 of cases. Radiotherapy was delivered after surgical excision for half of the patient. The dose delivered was 54Gy in 18 daily fractions size. Six months after irradiation: 6/11 patients had no residual lesion, 2/11 had a partial response with a residual lesion of about 1cm. 3 patients presented local recurrence. One patient died within 6 months of radiotherapy because of another comorbidity. In total, 25% had presented a grade 3 acute radiation dermatitis, no grade 4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Short term of moderately hypofractionated schedule radiotherapy was a success with complete or partial response for more than 70% of the patients in squamous cell carcinomas. There is no major side effect.

A SHort course Accelerated RadiatiON therapy (SHARON) dose-escalation trial in older adults head and neck non-melanoma skin cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility and safety of a SHort-course Accelerated RadiatiON therapy (SHARON) regimen, in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) in older patients.

METHODS

Old patients (age ≥ 80 years) with histological confirmed non-melanoma skin cancers were enrolled. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Radiotherapy regimen was based on the delivery of four radiotherapy fractions (5 Gy per fraction) with a twice daily fractionation in two consecutive days. Three different level of dose were administered: 20 Gy (one cycle), 40 Gy (two cycles) and 60 Gy (three cycles).

RESULTS

Thirty patients (median age: 91 years; range: 80-96) were included in this analysis. Among fourteen patients who completed the one cycle, only one (7%) experimented acute G4 skin toxicity. Twelve patients reported an improvement or resolution of baseline symptoms (overall palliative response rate: 85.8%). Nine and seven patients underwent to two and three RT cycles, respectively: of these, no G3 toxicities were recorded. The overall response rate was 100% when three cycles were delivered. The overall six-month symptom-free survival was 78.7% and 77.8% in patients treated with one course and more courses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-course accelerated radiotherapy in older patients with non-melanoma skin cancers is well tolerated. High doses seem to be more effective in terms of response rate.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This approach could represent an option for older adults with NMSC, being both palliative (one course) or potentially curative (more courses) in the aim, accordingly to the patient's condition.

Management of a recurrence of a squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp with extension to the brain: A case report and literature review

Background:

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common form of nonmelanoma skin cancer after basal cell carcinoma. Simple excision can be the treatment at early stages of diagnosis. However, at late stages, treatment is more complex due to extension to the skull and the dura. In extremely rare cases, it can invade the brain making it a challenging situation for treatment.

Case Description:

We present the case of a 54-year-old man with a history of cutaneous SCC who presented an invasive left frontal recurrence with brain invasion 19 years after initial surgery. The patient underwent surgery which consisted in tumor removal and bone and skin reconstruction. Immediate and late outcomes were favorable.

Conclusion:

Multidisciplinary treatment for SCC diagnosed in advanced stages is the best way to obtain encouraging results. Although significant advancements have been made, further study is needed for cases with advanced disease.

Localized Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: Risk Factors of Post-surgical Relapse and Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy

The mainstay treatment of localized non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is surgical excision or Mohs surgery. However, approximately 5% of patients with NMSC harbor high-risk clinicopathologic features for loco-regional recurrence, and distant metastasis. Prognostic factors such as close or positive margins, tumor size ≥ 2 cm, poor tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, depth of invasion, and immunosuppression have all been associated with increased loco-regional recurrence and impaired survival rates. In these patients more aggressive treatments are needed and radiotherapy (RT) is often discussed as adjuvant therapy after surgical resection. Due to the retrospective setting and the heterogeneity of the available studies, indications for adjuvant RT in patients with localized resected NMSC harboring high-risk features remain debated. Studies highlighting the limitations of our current understanding of the independent prognosis of each risk factor are needed to better define the role of adjuvant RT on outcome of localized NMSC and standardize its indications in the clinical setting.

Complex oncologic resection and reconstruction of the scalp: Predictors of morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Oncologic resection of the scalp confers several obstacles to the reconstructive surgeon dependent upon patient-specific and wound-specific factors. We aim to describe our experiences with various reconstructive methods, and delineate risk factors for coverage failure and complications in the setting of scalp reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted, examining patients who underwent resection of fungating scalp tumors with subsequent soft-tissue reconstruction from 2003 to 2019. Patient demographics, wound and oncologic characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were appropriate for inclusion, undergoing a range of reconstructive methods from skin grafting to free flaps. Thirty-three patients (17.5%) underwent preoperative radiation. In all, 48 patients (25.4%) suffered wound site complications, 25 (13.2%) underwent reoperation, and 47 (24.9%) suffered from mortality. Preoperative radiation therapy was an independent risk factor for wound complications (odds ratio [OR], 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-7.3; p = 0.028) and reoperations (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.5-13.2; p = 0.007). Similarly, the presence of an underlying titanium mesh was an independent predictor of wound complications (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.1-5.6; p= 0.029) and reoperations (OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.2-9.7; p= 0.020). Both immunosuppressed status (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.2-7.1; p= 0.021) and preoperative radiation therapy (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.2-9.7; p= 0.022) were risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Both preoperative radiation and the presence of underlying titanium mesh are independent risk factors for wound site complications and increased reoperation rates following oncologic resection and reconstruction of the scalp. Additionally, preoperative radiation, along with an immunosuppressed state, may predict patient mortality following scalp resection and reconstruction.

Definitive and Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Basal and Squamous Cell Cancers of the Skin: Executive Summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline reviews the evidence for the use of definitive and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) in patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on indications for RT in the definitive and postoperative setting for BCC and cSCC, as well as dose-fractionation schemes, target volumes, basic aspects of treatment planning, choice of radiation modality, and the role of systemic therapy in combination with radiation. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

The guideline recommends definitive RT as primary treatment for patients with BCC and cSCC who are not surgical candidates while conditionally recommending RT with an emphasis on shared decision-making in those situations in which adequate resection can lead to a less than satisfactory cosmetic or functional outcome. In the postoperative setting, a number of indications for RT after an adequate resection are provided while distinguishing the strength of the recommendations between BCC and cSCC. One key question is dedicated to defining indications for regional nodal irradiation. The task force suggests a range of appropriate dose-fractionation schemes for treatment of primary and nodal volumes in definitive and postoperative scenarios. The guideline also recommends against the use of carboplatin concurrently with adjuvant RT and conditionally recommends the use of systemic therapies for unresectable primaries where treatment may need escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Defining the role of RT in the management of BCC and cSCC has been hindered by a lack of high-quality evidence. This document synthesizes available evidence to define practice guidelines for the most common clinical situations. We encourage practitioners to enroll patients in prospective trials and to approach care in a multidisciplinary fashion whenever possible.