1
|
Wu N, Li L. A review on wound management strategies in enhanced recovery after craniotomy: An in-depth analysis of their influence on patient recovery and surgical outcomes. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14595. [PMID: 38272808 PMCID: PMC10789584 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Craniotomy, an essential neurosurgical operation, poses distinct difficulties in the realm of post-operative care, specifically with regard to the management of wounds. Efficient wound management is critical in order to optimize the surgical outcomes, reduce complications and facilitate a speedier recovery. The purpose of this comprehensive review was to assess contemporary wound management approaches as they pertain to improved recovery following craniotomy. This was achieved by contrasting conventional methods with more recent and innovative techniques and analysing the effects of these approaches on patient recovery and surgical results. An exhaustive literature search was undertaken, comprising narrative reviews, clinical studies, peer-reviewed articles and expert opinions. The emphasis was on the evolution of wound management strategies and techniques utilized after cranial section, as well as their contributions to patient recovery. The analysis reveals that while conventional wound management methods, including suturing and antiseptics, continue to be essential, innovative strategies such as negative pressure wound therapy, skin adhesives and advanced pain management protocols are becoming increasingly recognized. It has been demonstrated that these novel approaches improve recovery by decreasing the incidence of infections, enhancing patient comfort and producing superior cosmetic results. Nevertheless, obstacles continue to endure, including patient-specific variables, technological and financial considerations and the enduring consequences of recovery. Thus the treatment of wounds during craniotomy recuperation necessitates an integrated strategy that incorporates conventional techniques alongside contemporary advancements. Progress in this domain necessitates the customization of approaches to suit the unique requirements of each patient, the resolution of identified obstacles and an emphasis on ongoing investigation and interdisciplinary cooperation. The ever-changing terrain of wound management approaches underscores the ever-changing character of neurosurgical treatment and the continuous endeavour to enhance patient results following cranial resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Wu
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw HospitalZhejiang University School of MedicineZhejiangHangzhouChina
| | - Luping Li
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw HospitalZhejiang University School of MedicineZhejiangHangzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muir R, Carlini J, Crilly J, Ranse J. Patient and public involvement in emergency care research: a scoping review of the literature. Emerg Med J 2023; 40:596-605. [PMID: 37280045 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Establishing the benefits of patient and public involvement (PPI) in emergency care research is important to improve the quality and relevance of research. Little is known about the extent of PPI in emergency care research, its methodological and reporting quality. This scoping review aimed to establish the extent of PPI in emergency care research, identify PPI strategies and processes and assess the quality of reporting on PPI in emergency care research. METHODS Keyword searches of five databases (OVID MEDLINE, Elsevier EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials); hand searches of 12 specialist journals and citation searches of the included journal articles were performed. A patient representative contributed to research design and co-authored this review. RESULTS A total of 28 studies reporting PPI from the USA, Canada, UK, Australia and Ghana were included. The quality of reporting was variable, with only seven studies satisfying all Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public short form reporting criteria. None of the included studies adequately described all the key aspects of reporting the impact of PPI. CONCLUSION Relatively few emergency care studies comprehensively describe PPI. Opportunity exists to improve the consistency and quality of reporting of PPI in emergency care research. Further research is required to better understand the specific challenges for implementing PPI in emergency care research, and to determine whether emergency care researchers have adequate resources, education and funding to undertake and report involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Muir
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joan Carlini
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Consumer Advisory Group, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Marketing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Julia Crilly
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jamie Ranse
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tobiano G, Chaboyer W, Carlini J, Eskes AM, McInnes E, Latimer S, Boorman R, Moore Z, Fagerdahl AM, Walker RM, Erichsen Andersson A, O'Connor T, Kang E, Probert R, Gillespie BM. Development and validation of a survey designed to measure patient experience of and preference for surgical wound care discharge education: A pilot study. J Tissue Viability 2023:S0965-206X(23)00068-2. [PMID: 37349230 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To develop and undertake validation testing of a survey designed to measure patients' experiences of and preferences for surgical wound care discharge education. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature review and content analysis was undertaken on patients' experiences of and preferences for surgical wound care discharge education. Four themes were uncovered in the literature (wound care discharge education, preferences for discharge education delivery, participation in wound care decisions and patient ability to manage their surgical wound to prevent wound complications), which guided item generation. Three types of validity testing occurred including: 1) face validity testing by the research team; 2) content validity testing (using Delphi study) with an international panel of experts including patients, clinicians and researchers; and 3) content validity (using pilot-testing) of the survey with seven patients from the target population. RESULTS Initially 106 items were generated from the literature, and of these, 55 items were subjected to content validity testing by an international panel of 41 experts. After two Delphi rounds, 18 items were retained. Most patients provided limited and very minor feedback during pilot-testing. However, pilot-testing resulted in a revised survey administration plan to deliver the survey via telephone, including adding prompts and preambles to items. CONCLUSION An 18-item survey comprised of three groups of items and an individual item was rigorously developed. The survey requires further testing among a larger sample of patients to confirm the items reflect important aspects of patients' experiences of and preferences for surgical wound care discharge education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Tobiano
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Australia.
| | - Wendy Chaboyer
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Skin Wounds and Trauma (SWaT) Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ireland
| | - Joan Carlini
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; Department of Marketing, Griffith University, Australia; Consumer Advisory Group, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Australia
| | - Anne M Eskes
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth McInnes
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (SVHM), Australia; Australian Catholic University, Australia
| | - Sharon Latimer
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Rhonda Boorman
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Zena Moore
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Skin Wounds and Trauma (SWaT) Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ireland; School of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ireland; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences Ulster University, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium; Lida Institute, Shanghai, China; Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom; Fakeeh College of Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ann-Mari Fagerdahl
- Department of Clinical Research and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Rachel M Walker
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Division of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Australia
| | | | - Tom O'Connor
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Skin Wounds and Trauma (SWaT) Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ireland; School of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ireland; Lida Institute, Shanghai, China; Fakeeh College of Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Evelyn Kang
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Rosalind Probert
- Stomal Therapy Wound Management Department Division of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Australia
| | - Brigid M Gillespie
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gould DJ, Glanville-Hearst M, Bunzli S, Choong PFM, Dowsey MM. Research Buddy partnership in a MD-PhD program: lessons learned. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:4. [PMID: 36803954 PMCID: PMC9938357 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is increasing recognition of the importance of patient involvement in research. In recent years, there has also been growing interest in patient partnerships with doctoral studies students. However, it can be difficult to know where to start and how to go about such involvement activities. The purpose of this perspective piece was to share experiential insight of the experience of a patient involvement program such that others can learn from this experience. BODY: This is a co-authored perspective piece centred on the experience of MGH, a patient who has had hip replacement surgery, and DG, a medical student completing a PhD, participating in a Research Buddy partnership over the course of over 3 years. The context in which this partnership took place was also described to facilitate comparison with readers' own circumstances and contexts. DG and MGH met regularly to discuss, and work together on, various aspects of DG's PhD research project. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on reflections from DG and MGH regarding their experience in the Research Buddy program to synthesise nine lessons which were then corroborated with reference to published literature on patient involvement in research. These lessons were: learn from experience; tailor the program; get involved early; embrace uniqueness; meet regularly; build rapport; ensure mutual benefit; broad involvement; regularly reflect and review. CONCLUSIONS In this perspective piece, a patient and a medical student completing a PhD reflected upon their experience co-designing a Research Buddy partnership within a patient involvement program. A series of nine lessons was identified and presented to inform readers seeking to develop or enhance their own patient involvement programs. Researcher-patient rapport is foundational to all other aspects of the patient's involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Gould
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Marion Glanville-Hearst
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samantha Bunzli
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter F M Choong
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle M Dowsey
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Penile necrosis associated with aortic dissection: A case report. Urol Case Rep 2022; 46:102291. [PMID: 36568632 PMCID: PMC9772545 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aorta dissection (AD) is a rare, life-threatening disorder resulting from a tear in the aortic wall and can blocking the circulation below the tear. The paired internal pudendal arteries, which are branches of the internal iliac arteries from the aortic branches, supply the penis with blood. Ischemia of the penis is uncommon due to its superior collateral arteries. In this case, we discuss a rare case of 30-year-old male with acute limb ischemia, necrosis of the penis, and scrotum gangrene that associated with ischemic related to aortic dissection.
Collapse
|
6
|
DeBortoli E, Soyer HP, Milne D, Dissanayaka N, Gartner C, Holt J, Rae K, Robison L, Wallingford CK, McInerney-Leo AM. Measurable outcomes of consumer engagement in health research: A scoping review. Front Public Health 2022; 10:994547. [PMID: 36324444 PMCID: PMC9621387 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Consumer engagement is increasingly recognized as an instrumental component of health research, with many institutions and international bodies mandating it as part of the research and funding process. Given an increasing utilization of consumer engagement in health research, it is critical to identify the literature which support its value and tools that capture successful outcomes. To develop an overview of the literature, we conducted an umbrella scoping review exploring important outcomes of consumer engagement in health research combined with a scoping review of relevant frameworks. Specifically, we aimed to capture outcomes which reflect authentic and meaningful consumer engagement. Methods Four databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were searched using key search terms. Records were included if they were review articles or frameworks that addressed outcomes of consumer engagement in health research. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and an inductive qualitative content analysis. Identified outcomes were sorted based on the three most relevant stakeholder groups (consumer, researcher, institution). Results A total of twenty articles that explored a variety of health disciplines were included. We identified fifteen measurable outcomes of consumer engagement in health research. Eight core outcomes were relevant to all stakeholder groups, and were considered fundamental to authentic consumer engagement including (1) trust, (2) empowerment, (3) respect, (4) confidence in the outcomes of the research, (5) transparency of the research process, (6) satisfaction with the consumer engagement program, (7) knowledge and experiences of consumers, and (8) degree of consumer engagement. Outcomes pertaining to specific stakeholder groups included representativeness and diversity of the consumer groups, research relevance to consumers, funding opportunities, quality/validity of the research, recruitment/retention rates, translation and dissemination of research, and interpretation of results. Conclusion This review identified key measurable outcomes that could be captured when evaluating the impacts of consumer engagement on health research and the success of consumer engagement programs. All outcomes identified were relatively underexplored within the literature, and inadequately and/or inconsistently evaluated amongst studies. Future research should consult all stakeholder groups to identify outcomes perceived to be reflective of optimal consumer engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily DeBortoli
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - H. Peter Soyer
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Dermatology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David Milne
- Human Research Ethics Committee, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nadeeka Dissanayaka
- Faculty of Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Coral Gartner
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jeanette Holt
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kym Rae
- Aubigny Place, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Laura Robison
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Translational Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Courtney K. Wallingford
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- *Correspondence: Courtney K. Wallingford
| | - Aideen M. McInerney-Leo
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A Systematic Review of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Bariatric Research Trials: The Need for More Work. Obes Surg 2022; 32:3740-3751. [PMID: 36057021 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06259-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Patient and public involvement (PPI) has gained increased attention in research circles. The consistency of PPI reporting has been addressed by the development of validated checklists such as GRIPP and GRIPP2. The primary aim of this study was to identify the incidence of PPI reporting in bariatric research. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL/Cochrane databases were searched for publications between 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2021 for "bariatric surgery" OR "weight loss surgery" OR "obesity surgery" AND "randomized controlled trials." Ninety studies fulfilled exclusion criteria; two studies reported direct PPI involvement, one indirectly used PPI and one reported not using PPI methods. No other study made direct or indirect mention of PPI. Concluding, that GRIPP2 and PPI reporting in bariatric surgery trials is lacking.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lang I, King A, Jenkins G, Boddy K, Khan Z, Liabo K. How common is patient and public involvement (PPI)? Cross-sectional analysis of frequency of PPI reporting in health research papers and associations with methods, funding sources and other factors. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063356. [PMID: 35613748 PMCID: PMC9131100 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research is required by some funders and publications but we know little about how common it is. In this study we estimated the frequency of PPI inclusion in health research papers and analysed how it varied in relation to research topics, methods, funding sources and geographical regions. DESIGN Cross-sectional. METHODS Our sample consisted of 3000 research papers published in 2020 in a general health-research journal (BMJ Open) that requires a statement on whether studies included PPI. We classified each paper as 'included PPI' or 'did not include PPI' and analysed the association of this classification with location (country or region of the world), methods used, research topic (journal section) and funding source. We used adjusted regression models to estimate incident rate ratios of PPI inclusion in relation to these differences. RESULTS 618 (20.6%) of the papers in our sample included PPI. The proportion of papers including PPI varied in relation to location (from 44.5% (95% CI 40.8% to 48.5%) in papers from the UK to 3.4% (95% CI 1.5% to 5.3%) in papers from China), method (from 38.6% (95% CI 27.1% to 50.1%) of mixed-methods papers to 5.3% (95% CI -1.9% to 12.5%) of simulation papers), topic (from 36.9% (95% CI 29.1% to 44.7%) of papers on mental health to 3.4% (95% CI -1.3% to 8.2%) of papers on medical education and training, and funding source (from 57.2% (95% CI 51.8% to 62.6%) in papers that received funding from the UK's National Institute for Health Research to 3.4% (95% CI 0.7% to 6.0%) in papers that received funding from a Chinese state funder). CONCLUSIONS Most research papers in our sample did not include PPI and PPI inclusion varied widely in relation to location, methods, topic and funding source.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain Lang
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Angela King
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Georgia Jenkins
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Kate Boddy
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Zohrah Khan
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Kristin Liabo
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pollock D, Alexander L, Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Synnot A, Tricco AC. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:969-979. [PMID: 35477565 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Knowledge user consultation is often limited or omitted in the conduct of scoping reviews. Not including knowledge users within the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews could be due to a lack of guidance or understanding about what consultation requires and the subsequent benefits. Knowledge user engagement in evidence synthesis, including consultation approaches, has many associated benefits, including improved relevance of the research and better dissemination and implementation of research findings. Scoping reviews, however, have not been specifically focused on in terms of research into knowledge user consultation and evidence syntheses. In this paper, we will present JBI's guidance for knowledge user engagement in scoping reviews based on the expert opinion of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. We offer specific guidance on how this can occur and provide information regarding how to report and evaluate knowledge user engagement within scoping reviews. We believe that scoping review authors should embed knowledge user engagement into all scoping reviews and strive towards a co-creation model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Pollock
- JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lyndsay Alexander
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.,The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based Multi-professional Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Zachary Munn
- JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Micah D J Peters
- University of South Australia, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,The Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): A JBI Centre of Excellence, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hanan Khalil
- School of Psychology and Public Health, Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,The Queensland Centre for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Christina M Godfrey
- Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia McInerney
- The Wits-JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: A JBI Affiliated Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Anneliese Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, School of Nursing, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Management, Policy, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mbamalu O, Bonaconsa C, Nampoothiri V, Surendran S, Veepanattu P, Singh S, Dhar P, Carter V, Boutall A, Pennel T, Hampton M, Holmes A, Mendelson M, Charani E. Patient understanding of and participation in infection-related care across surgical pathways: a scoping review. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 110:123-134. [PMID: 34293491 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the existing evidence on patient understanding of and/or participation in infection-related care in surgical specialties. METHOD A scoping review of the literature was conducted. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature sources were searched using predefined search criteria for policies, guidelines, and studies in the English language. Data synthesis was done through content and thematic analysis to identify key themes in the included studies. RESULTS The initial search identified 604 studies, of which 41 (36 from high-income and five from low- and middle-income countries) were included in the final review. Most of the included studies focused on measures to engage patients in infection prevention and control (IPC) activities, with few examples of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) engagement strategies. While patient engagement interventions in infection-related care varied depending on study goals, surgical wound management was the most common intervention. AMS engagement was primarily limited to needs assessment, without follow-up to address such needs. CONCLUSION Existing evidence highlights a gap in patient participation in infection-related care in the surgical pathway. Standardization of patient engagement strategies is challenging, particularly in the context of surgery, where several factors influence how the patient can engage and retain information. Infection-related patient engagement and participation strategies in surgery need to be inclusive and contextually fit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluchi Mbamalu
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Candice Bonaconsa
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Vrinda Nampoothiri
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Surya Surendran
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Pranav Veepanattu
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Sanjeev Singh
- Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Puneet Dhar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi (Kerala), India
| | - Vanessa Carter
- e-Patient Scholar and Africa CDC Civil Society Champion for Antimicrobial Resistance; Healthcare Communications and Social Media, South Africa
| | - Adam Boutall
- Colorectal Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Timothy Pennel
- Chris Barnard Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mark Hampton
- Dr Matley & Partners Surgical Practice, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alison Holmes
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Marc Mendelson
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Esmita Charani
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Muir R, Carlini JJ, Harbeck EL, Gillespie BM, Tuffaha HW, Walker RM, McInnes EC, Latimer SL, Lin FF, Pearcy JM, Chaboyer WP. Patient involvement in surgical wound care research: A scoping review. Int Wound J 2020; 17:1462-1482. [PMID: 32537915 PMCID: PMC7948725 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Active involvement of patients in planning, conducting, and disseminating research has been adopted by many organisations internationally, but the extent to which this occurs in surgical wound care is not evident. This scoping review aimed to identify how patients have been involved in surgical wound care research and the quality of its reporting. Full-text studies focused on preoperative and postoperative surgical wound care in the acute care setting, published in English between 2004 and 2019, were included in the review. Screening, data charting, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers independently, adjudicated by a third, and then reviewed by five others. Thematic analysis synthesised the findings. Of the eight included studies, seven explained the methods for patient involvement and five described aims related to patient involvement and commented on patient involvement in the discussion. None met all of the quality assessment criteria. Three themes emerged: involvement in modifying and refining research processes, connecting and balancing expert and patient views, and sharing personal insights. Recommendations to improve patient involvement in surgical wounds research include the following: using framework and tools to inform future research; training researcher and patients in their respective research roles; and ongoing monitoring of patient involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Muir
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyGriffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative CareKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Joan Julie Carlini
- Department of MarketingGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
- Consumer Advisory GroupGold Coast HealthGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Brigid Mary Gillespie
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyGriffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health ServiceGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Haitham Wadah Tuffaha
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
- Centre for the Business and Economics of HealthThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Rachel Michell Walker
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyGriffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia
- Centre for the Business and Economics of HealthThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Catherine McInnes
- Division of SurgeryPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South HealthBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Nursing Research InstituteSt Vincent's Health Australia, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne & Australian Catholic UniversitySydneyAustralia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, and ParamedicineAustralian Catholic UniversitySydneyAustralia
| | - Sharon Leanne Latimer
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyGriffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health ServiceGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Frances Fengzhi Lin
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, and ParamedicineUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSunshine CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Wendy Pearl Chaboyer
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyGriffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|