Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--where next?

Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (p-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (U.S.A. and Brazil or Mexico, respectively).

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the current knowledge on p-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

p-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted p-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, microbial dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic p-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.

Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor-Acid Suppressive Treatment Can Cause Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES) Patients

Whether the long-term treatment of patients with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with different diseases [GERD, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), etc.] can result in vitamin B12 (VB12) deficiency is controversial. In this study, in 175 patients undergoing long-term ZES treatment with anti-acid therapies, drug-induced control acid secretory rates were correlated with the presence/absence of VB12 deficiency, determined by assessing serum VB12 levels, measurements of VB12 body stores (blood methylmalonic acid (MMA) and total homocysteine[tHYC]), and other features of ZES. After a mean of 10.2 yrs. of any acid treatment (5.6 yrs. with PPIs), 21% had VB12 deficiency with significantly lower serum and body VB12 levels (p < 0.0001). The presence of VB12 deficiency did not correlate with any feature of ZES but was associated with a 12-fold lower acid control rate, a 2-fold higher acid control pH (6.4 vs. 3.7), and acid control secretory rates below those required for the activation of pepsin (pH > 3.5). Over a 5-yr period, the patients with VB12 deficiency had a higher rate of achlorhydria (73% vs. 24%) and a lower rate of normal acid secretion (0% vs. 49%). In conclusion, in ZES patients, chronic long-term PPI treatment results in marked acid hyposecretion, resulting in decreased serum VB12 levels and decreased VB12-body stores, which can result in VB12 deficiency.

Comparative clinical feasibility of antireflux mucosectomy and antireflux mucosal ablation in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

No definitive treatment has been established for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) using argon plasma coagulation are promising methods. However, no study has compared these two. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the two procedures.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 274 patients; 96 and 178 patients underwent ARMA and ARMS, respectively. The primary outcome was subjective symptom improvement based on GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) scores. The secondary outcomes included changes in the presence of Barrett's esophagus, Los Angeles grade for reflux esophagitis, flap valve grade, and proton pump inhibitor withdrawal rates.

RESULTS

The ARMS group had higher baseline GERDQ scores (10.0 vs. 8.0, P < 0.001) and a greater median postprocedure improvement than the ARMA group (4.0 vs. 2.0, P = 0.002), and even after propensity score matching adjustment, these findings remained. ARMS significantly improved reflux esophagitis compared with ARMA, with notable changes in Los Angeles grade (P < 0.001) and flap valve grade scores (P < 0.001). Improvement in Barrett's esophagus was comparable between the groups (P = 0.337), with resolution rates of 94.7% and 77.8% in the ARMS and ARMA groups, respectively. Compared with the ARMA group, the ARMS group experienced higher bleeding rates (P = 0.034), comparable stricture rates (P = 0.957), and more proton pump inhibitor withdrawals (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Both ARMS and ARMA showed improvements in GERDQ scores, endoscopic esophagitis, flap valve grade, and the presence of Barrett's esophagus after the procedures. However, ARMS demonstrated better outcomes than ARMA in terms of both subjective and objective indicators.

In Vitro Metabolism and Transport Characteristics of Zastaprazan

Zastaprazan (JP-1366), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a new drug for the treatment of erosive esophagitis. JP-1366 is highly metabolized in human, mouse, and dog hepatocytes but moderately metabolized in rat and monkey hepatocytes when estimated from the metabolic stability of this compound in hepatocyte suspension and when 18 phase I metabolites and 5 phase II metabolites [i.e., N-dearylation (M6), hydroxylation (M1, M19, M21), dihydroxylation (M7, M8, M14, M22), trihydroxylation (M13, M18), hydroxylation and reduction (M20), dihydroxylation and reduction (M9, M16), hydrolysis (M23), hydroxylation and glucuronidation (M11, M15), hydroxylation and sulfation (M17), dihydroxylation and sulfation (M10, M12), N-dearylation and hydroxylation (M3, M4), N-dearylation and dihydroxylation (M5), and N-dearylation and trihydroxylation (M2)] were identified from JP-1366 incubation with the hepatocytes from humans, mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys. Based on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) screening test and immune-inhibition analysis with CYP antibodies, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 played major roles in the metabolism of JP-1366 to M1, M3, M4, M6, M8, M9, M13, M14, M16, M18, M19, M21, and M22. CYP1A2, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6 played minor roles in the metabolism of JP-1366. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 and UGT2B17 were responsible for the glucuronidation of M1 to M15. However, JP-1366 and active metabolite M1 were not substrates for drug transporters such as organic cation transporter (OCT) 1/2, organic anion transporter (OAT) 1/3, organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/1B3, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE)1/2K, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP). Only M1 showed substrate specificity for P-gp. The findings indicated that drug-metabolizing enzymes, particularly CYP3A4/3A5, may have a significant role in determining the pharmacokinetics of zastaprazan while drug transporters may only have a small impact on the absorption, distribution, and excretion of this compound.

P-CAB versus PPI in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) remains controversial when compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

Objectives

The current study set out to compare the differences in the eradication rate and adverse reactions between eradication regimens based on P-CAB or PPI drugs and the differences between the vonoprazan-based and the tegoprazan-based regimens to explore the efficacy and safety of different Hp eradication regimens.

Data sources and methods

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WOS were searched from the inception of these databases up to July 2023, and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The outcome measures were the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of different regimens in treating Hp. The results were estimated as relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and R 4.2.1 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis (NMA).

Results

A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis, involving 5815 patients with Hp. In terms of eradication rate, the 2-week vonoprazan-based triple regimen (V-Tri-2w) was the best, which was superior to the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 0.9, 95% CI: (0.85-0.95)] and the 1-week tegoprazan-based triple regimen [T-Tri-1w, RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.64-0.97)]; the 2-week tegoprazan-based quadruple regimen (T-Qua-2w) was superior to the 1-week PPI-based triple regimen [P-Tri-1w, RR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.67-0.99)], and there was no difference between the remaining tegoprazan-based regimens and the PPI-based or vonoprazan-based regimens. In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the 2-week vonoprazan-based binary regimen (V-Bi-2w) was lower than that of the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.57-2.52)]; there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 weeks for each regimen, such as the vonoprazan-based triple regimen [RR = 1.11, 95% CI: (0.82-1.52)].

Conclusion

In the eradication treatment of Hp, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens are generally better than those of PPI-based regimens. Among them, the V-Tri-2w regimen has the highest eradication rate and may be the preferred choice for Hp eradication.

Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly (2023)

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the elderly is characterized by atypical symptoms, relatively severe esophageal injury, and more complications, and when GERD is treated, it is also necessary to fully consider the general health condition of the elderly patients. This consensus summarized the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis and treatment characteristics of GERD in the elderly, and provided relevant recommendations, providing guidance for medical personnel to correctly understand and standardize the diagnosis and treatment of GERD in the elderly.

The Effect of Dexlansoprazole on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of dexlansoprazole (a proton pump inhibitor-PPI) in resolving heartburn, reflux, and other symptoms and complications resulting from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study followed PRISMA 2020 and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020206513). The search strategy used MeSH and free terms appropriately adapted for each database. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. Ten RCTs were included. Dexlansoprazole outperformed the placebo and other PPIs in the resolution of heartburn and reflux symptoms in patients with GERD, with benefits during and after treatment, especially in those with moderate and severe symptoms. The meta-analyses indicated that dexlansoprazole at doses of 30 and 60 mg had more 24 h heartburn-free days and nights compared to the placebo medications; no difference was reported between dexlansoprazole at doses of 30 and 60 mg in heartburn-free nights. A low bias risk and a moderate certainty of evidence were observed. This review confirms the therapeutic effect of dexlansoprazole (placebo-controlled) and its improvements in GERD symptoms compared to another PPI. However, the interpretation of the results should be carried out cautiously due to the small number of included studies and other reported limitations.

Relevance of early management by proton-pump inhibitor in acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorder: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently used in the emergency and general practice settings in several clinical presentations linked to acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorders as abdominal or chest pain without recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to assess pain reduction, diagnostic performance, and safety in the first 24 h-management in primary care or emergency medicine.

METHODS

Search was realized by 2 independent reviewers in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Only original articles or systematic reviews in English were included. Studies about chronic and/or bleeding conditions, therapeutic cocktails and studies without pain evaluation were excluded. Two methodologies were used for bias estimation.

RESULTS

From 4442 titles, 79 full-text articles were assessed, and 9 were included. There is no strong evidence supporting the use of PPI as a first line analgesic or diagnostic test in acute syndromes linked to acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorder. A small effect in pain reduction was retrieved in patients with low pain scores. A poor additional value in patients with gastric reflux, and a low specificity compared to other diagnostic tests were observed. A short-term PPI administration appears to be safe with low risk of serious allergic reactions, and poor adverse effects (moderate evidence).

CONCLUSION

Although PPIs may contribute to the multimodal analgesia in acute settings, with few and/or minor side effects, no recommendation can be drawn for their use as a primary analgesic. Data regarding the relevance of the PPI test are much less clear, no data regarding care pathways are available.

JP-1366: A novel and potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that is effective in the treatment of acid-related diseases

The global prevalence of GERD is substantially increasing each year, and GERD is a chronic disease that reduces the quality of life of patients. The efficacy of conventional drugs is diverse, and most require long-term or lifetime administration; thus, the development of more effective therapeutic agents is needed. Herein, a more effective treatment for GERD was tested. We investigated whether JP-1366 affected gastric H+/K+-ATPase activity and used the Na+/K+-ATPase assay to confirm the selectivity of H+/K+-ATPase inhibition. To clarify the mechanism of enzyme inhibition, JP-1366 and TAK-438 were analyzed by Lineweaver-Burk. Also, we investigated the effects of JP-1366 in various models involving reflux esophagitis. We found that JP-1366 mediates strong, selective, and dose-dependent inhibition of H+/K+-ATPase. We found that JP-1366 significantly suppressed gastric acid secretion in histamine-treated pylorus-ligated rats in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, we confirmed that JP-1366 inhibited histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion in the HPD model. JP-1366 exhibited a more than 2-fold higher inhibitory effect on esophageal injury than TAK-438 in GERD lesions and had a more potent inhibitory effect in indomethacin- or aspirin-induced gastric ulcer rat models than TAK-438. Additionally, JP-1366 inhibited gastric ulcers. These results support the possibility that JP-1366 is a good candidate drug for treating acid-related diseases.

Discovery of novel benzimidazole derivatives as potent potassium-competitive acid blockers for the treatment of acid-related diseases

H⁺, K⁺-ATPase, as the most critical enzyme in gastric acid secretion, has long been an attractive target for the treatment of acid-related diseases. In this study, a series of benzimidazole derivatives were designed and synthesized through conformational restriction and skeleton hopping strategies by using vonoprazan as the lead compound. Among them, compounds A12 (IC₅₀ = 9.32 μM) and A18 (IC₅₀ = 5.83 μM) showed better inhibition at the enzyme level. In addition, gastric acid secretion inhibition was assessed in vivo, and the results showed that A12 and A18 significantly inhibited basal gastric acid secretion, 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2DG) stimulated gastric acid secretion and histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion. In further in vitro metabolic experiments, A12 and A18 demonstrated excellent stability and low toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that the p.o. and i.v. half-lives of A18 were 3.21 h and 8.67 ± 1.15 h, respectively. In summary, A18 might be a novel and effective potassium-competitive acid blocker, and this study provides strong support for it use in the treatment of acid-related diseases.

The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry.

BACKGROUND

MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P < 0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P < 0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P < 0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P < 0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged ( P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance.

Randomized clinical trial: A double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 or 40 mg versus esomeprazole 40 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease and partial response to a healing dose of a proton-pump inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are cornerstone treatments for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evidence suggests that most patients exhibit partial response to PPIs, suggesting the need for novel therapies that can provide an improved and sustained increase in gastric pH.

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the effect of vonoprazan, a novel, orally active small-molecule potassium-competitive acid blocker, versus esomeprazole, a PPI, in preventing heartburn symptoms over a 4-week treatment period in patients with GERD and a partial response to esomeprazole treatment.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted between 2016 and 2018 at 39 sites across Europe and designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (q.d.) and 40 mg q.d. versus esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. after 1:1:1 randomization of symptomatic patients with GERD and a partial response to a healing dose of esomeprazole.

RESULTS

Overall, 256 eligible patients (female, 59.4%; mean age, 52.6 years) received vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 85), vonoprazan 40 mg (n = 85), or esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 86); mean (SD) percentages of heartburn-free 24-h periods during double-blind treatment were 36.7% (33.4%), 36.5% (35.6%), and 38.4% (34.8%), respectively, with no intergroup statistical significance. Vonoprazan exposure increased proportionally from the 20-mg to 40-mg dose (mean C_max : 23.3 ng/ml to 47.1 ng/ml, respectively). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild, with no deaths reported.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant difference in efficacy and safety was observed among treatment groups, and vonoprazan was well tolerated. The trial is registered with the National Board of Health (EudraCT: 2015-001154-14) database.

Trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease research: A bibliometric and visualized study

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a disorder resulting from the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the esophagus, affects an estimated 10-30% of the Western population, which is characterized by multifactorial pathogenesis. Over the past few decades, there have been many aspects of uncertainty regarding GERD leading to an ongoing interest in the field as reflected by a large number of publications, whose heterogeneity and variable quality may present a challenge for researchers to measure their scientific impact, identify scientific collaborations, and to grasp actively researched themes in the GERD field. Accordingly, we aim to evaluate the knowledge structure, evolution of research themes, and emerging topics of GERD research between 2012 and 2022 with the help of bibliometric approaches.

Methods

The literature focusing on GERD from 2012 to 2022 was retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection. The overall publication performance, the most prolific countries or regions, authors, journals and resources-, knowledge- and intellectual-networking, as well as the co-citation analysis of references and keywords, were analyzed through Microsoft Office Excel 2019, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer.

Results

A total of 8,964 publications were included in the study. The USA published the most articles (3,204, 35.74%). Mayo Clin ranked first in the number of articles published (201, 2.24%). EDOARDO SAVARINO was the most productive author (86, 0.96%). The most productive journal in this field was SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (304, 3.39%). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY had the most co-citations (4,953, 3.30%). Keywords with the ongoing strong citation bursts were transoral incision less fundoplication, eosinophilic esophagitis, baseline impedance, and functional heartburn.

Conclusion

For the first time, we obtained deep insights into GERD research through bibliometric analysis. Findings in this study will be helpful for scholars seeking to understand essential information in this field and identify research frontiers.

Comparison in Adherence to Treatment between Patients with Mild-Moderate and Severe Reflux Esophagitis: A Prospective Study

Purpose: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is prevalent and causes erosive esophagitis (EE) with varying degrees of severity (A to D according to the Los Angeles Classification). Adherence to medical therapy is crucial for treatment success. We compared adherence to treatment recommendations between patients with EE grades C/D and A/B. Methods: A follow-up study was conducted during 2019−2020 among GERD patients who underwent a diagnostic gastroscopy 1−4 years earlier. Telephone interviews were conducted with patients diagnosed with severe EE grades C/D (n = 99) and randomly selected patients with mild−moderate EE grades A/B (n = 50). Patients with grades A/B were classified as adherent if they took proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 2−3 months as recommended. Patients with grades C/D were classified as adherent if they took medications for a prolonged period (>6 months) and performed a follow-up endoscopy as recommended. Results: The mean age of the participants was 44.6 years (SD = 15.1). The mean duration of PPIs therapy in patients with EE grades A/B was 9.4 months (SD = 8.7). Fourteen (14.2%) patients with EE grades A/B were non-adherent to treatment, compared to 21 (40.8%) patients with EE grades of C/D: adjusted OR = 0.06; CI 95% 0.02−0.18, p < 0.001. Follow-up endoscopy was performed by 44% of EE−C/D patients. Unmarried patients compared to married ones were less adherent (adjusted OR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.08−0.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with esophagitis (EE−A/B) were more adherent to medical therapy when compared to patients with more severe esophagitis (EE−C/D).

Protective Mechanisms of Liquid Formulations for Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease in a Human Reconstructed Oesophageal Epithelium Model

Purpose

A novel experimental design based on a human-reconstructed oesophageal epithelium (HO2E) model has been applied to quantitively assess the properties of a set of liquid formulations, Device A (Gerdoff^® Protection), Device B (Esoxx^® One), and Device C (Marial^® gel) developed to form a temporary physical barrier on the oesophageal epithelium and modify epithelial permeability so to protect the oesophageal mucosa from refluxate components.

Methods

The formulations were applied to a prewetted HO2E model for 15 min. Then, a 0.5% caffeine solution was applied, and its penetration kinetics was assessed at 1 h and 2 h in acidic environments (pH= 3.3) to mirror exposure of the oesophageal mucosa to acidic reflux in GORD patients. Caffeine permeated into the basolateral compartment (evaluated by HPLC-UV) and Lucifer yellow (LY) permeability were quantified 15 min after application of the caffeine in acidic environments.

Results

At the 15 min timepoint, Device A reduced caffeine permeation by 77.2% and LY flux by 30.4% compared to the untreated control and with a faster mode of action than that of the other liquid formulations. Transepithelial caffeine flux was reduced, albeit with different timing and efficiency, by all three compounds up to the end of the 2 hour experiment. At 1 h, Device A reduced the caffeine flux by 79.2%; Device B, by 67.2%; and Device C, by 37%.

Conclusion

These results confirm the ability of the medical devices tested to interact with the oesophageal epithelium and create a temporary physical protective film for up to 2 hours after their application. The results underline differences in the mechanism of action of the three medical devices, with Device A performing faster than the other formulations. The overall results support the relevance of the reconstructed mucosal model to investigate oesophageal epithelium–product interactions and precisely differentiate liquid formulation performance.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Sustained-Release Formula of Mosapride-Plus-Esomeprazole Combination Therapy to Esomeprazole Monotherapy in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

We aimed to evaluate whether adding a sustained-release (SR) formula of mosapride to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) would be more effective in controlling symptoms than PPI alone in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Sixty patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation were randomly assigned to two groups: mosapride SR 15 mg combined with esomeprazole 20 mg once daily (ME group) and esomeprazole 20 mg once daily alone (E group). The primary endpoint was the complete-resolution rate of GERD symptoms after eight-week medication, and the secondary endpoints were the complete-resolution rate of GERD symptoms after four-week medication, symptom-improvement rates ≥ 50% after four- and eight-week medication, and change in reflux-disease-questionnaire (RDQ) and GERD-health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scores from baseline at four- and eight-week medication. No significant differences in complete-symptom-resolution rates at eight weeks and four weeks or in the changes in RDQ and GERD-HRQL scores from baseline at four- and eight-week medication were observed between the ME and E groups. The symptom-improvement rate of ≥50% after four and eight weeks was comparable between both groups. Adding mosapride SR to esomeprazole in patients with GERD provides no additional benefits in controlling GERD symptoms.

Association of CYP2C19 polymorphism with proton pump inhibitors effectiveness and with fractures in real‐life: retrospective cohort study

Symptom refractoriness of patients treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might be explained by polymorphism in CYP2C19. This is a retrospective cohort study in which we used the computerized database of Clalit Health Services to compose a cohort from cancer case‐control studies’ participants that had been genotyped, and that have been dispensed PPI (January 1, 2002 to November 10, 2020). We retrieved demographic and clinical variables on date of PPI initiation (cohort entry), and studies’ questionnaires‐reported consumption of foods/beverages known to increase peptic‐related symptoms. Primary outcome was an abdominal pain diagnosis; secondary outcome was a composite of abdominal pain, visit to a gastroenterology clinic, change to another PPI, PPI dose increase, or metoclopramide prescription, reflecting symptoms persistence/recurrence; in a 2‐year follow‐up. We also evaluated the association between genetic groups and hip/wrist/spine fractures, in a long‐term follow‐up. Of 3,326 PPI initiators, there were 66 (2.0%), 739 (22.2%), 1394 (41.9%), 947 (28.5%), and 180 (5.4%) CYP2C19 poor, intermediate, normal, rapid, and ultra‐rapid metabolizers, respectively. Being a poor metabolizer was associated with lower risk for the primary outcome, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27–0.91), HR = 0.52 (95% CI 0.28–0.94); and for the secondary outcome, HR = 0.57 (95% CI 0.38–0.86), HR = 0.58 (95% CI 0.39–0.87), in univariate and multivariable cox regression analyses, respectively. In long‐term follow‐up with 20,142 person‐years of follow‐up: 7.6% (5 cases) within the poor metabolizers group, and 11.6%, 12.9%, 12.8%, and 11.1% in the normal, intermediate, rapid, and ultra‐rapid metabolizers groups, respectively, had a new fracture (nonsignificant). We conclude that CYP2C19 poor metabolizer status is associated with higher effectiveness of PPIs, and is not associated with higher risk for fractures.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021

In Japan, with the increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and growing public interest, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology issued Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009 and a revised 2nd edition in 2015. A number of studies on GERD were subsequently conducted in Japan and abroad, and vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), became available for the first time in Japan in February 2015. The revised 3rd edition (Japanese edition), which incorporates new findings and information, was published in April 2021. These guidelines are summarized herein, particularly sections related to the treatment of GERD. The important clinical issues addressed in the present revision are (i) the introduction of treatment algorithms that classify GERD into reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease, (ii) the clarification of treatment algorithms based on to the severity of reflux esophagitis, and (iii) the positioning of vonoprazan in the treatment for GERD. The present guidelines propose vonoprazan as the initial/maintenance treatment for severe reflux esophagitis. They also recommend vonoprazan or PPI as an initial treatment for mild reflux esophagitis and recommended PPI and proposed vonoprazan as maintenance treatment. These updated guidelines offer the best clinical strategies for GERD patients in Japan and hope that they will be of global use for the diagnosis and treatment for GERD.

Degree of concordance on the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. A study among specialists that are members of the Sociedad Latinoamericana de Neurogastroenterología (SLNG)

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Due to its different clinical manifestations, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) requires diverse diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of agreement among Latin American specialists, with respect to the management of GERD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey with 42 statements (22 related to diagnosis and 20 to treatment) applied to 56 specialists from Latin America. There were 4 possible statement responses: in complete agreement, in partial agreement, in partial disagreement, and in complete disagreement. Reproducibility, level of agreement, and concordance were measured through the Kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The response rate was 81% (47/56). General concordance was low, given that there was complete concordance in only 12 statements (28.6%). There was partial concordance in 22 statements (52.4%) and no concordance in 8 (19%). The following themes had the most disagreement: the performance of endoscopy before beginning treatment, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with extraesophageal symptoms and with no typical symptoms, and the combined use of PPIs and prokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we found that there was agreement among the Latin American specialists for the diagnosis and management of GERD in less than one-third of the recommendations considered standard. The low concordance could be related to the fact that the availability of diagnostic tools and medications, as well as the prevalence of GERD phenotypes, are different in each country.

Role of Neuromodulators for the Management of Post-Gastric-Fundoplication Dyspepsia: A Retrospective Series

Post-fundoplication dyspepsia is a common complication of gastric fundoplication surgeries. This can be attributable to the loss of fundal relaxation, decreased gastric accommodation, and/or alterations in gastric motility and sensitivity following fundoplication. The role of neuromodulators in the management of such symptoms is unknown. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of neuromodulators such as tricyclic antidepressants, buspirone, and mirtazapine for the management of post-fundoplication dyspepsia.

2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition in which gastric contents regurgitate into the esophagus or beyond, resulting in either troublesome symptoms or complications. GERD is heterogeneous in terms of varied manifestations, test findings, and treatment responsiveness. GERD diagnosis can be established with symptomatology, pathology, or physiology. Recently the Lyon consensus defined the “proven GERD” with concrete evidence for reflux, including advanced grade erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles classification grades C and or D esophagitis), long-segment Barrett’s mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal esophageal acid exposure time > 6% on 24-hour ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring. However, some Asian researchers have different opinions on whether the same standards should be applied to the Asian population. The prevalence of GERD is increasing in Asia. The present evidence-based guidelines were developed using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. In GERD with typical symptoms, a proton pump inhibitor test can be recommended as a sensitive, cost-effective, and practical test for GERD diagnosis.

Based on a meta-analysis of 19 estimated acid-exposure time values in Asians, the reference range upper limit for esophageal acid exposure time was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-3.9%) in the Asian countries. Esophageal manometry and novel impedance measurements, including mucosal impedance and a post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave, are promising in discrimination of GERD among different reflux phenotypes, thus increasing its diagnostic yield. We also propose a long-term strategy of evidence-based GERD treatment with proton pump inhibitors and other drugs.

Degree of concordance on the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. A study among specialists that are members of the Sociedad Latinoamericana de Neurogastroenterología (SLNG)

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Due to its different clinical manifestations, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) requires diverse diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of concordance among Latin American specialists, with respect to the management of GERD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey with 42 statements (22 related to diagnosis and 20 to treatment) applied to 56 specialists from Latin America. There were 4 possible statement responses: in complete agreement, in partial agreement, in partial disagreement, and in complete disagreement. Reproducibility, level of agreement, and concordance were measured through the Kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The response rate was 81% (47/56). General concordance was low, given that there was complete concordance in only 12 statements (28.6%). There was partial concordance in 22 statements (52.4%) and no concordance in 8 (19%). The following themes had the most disagreement: the performance of endoscopy before beginning treatment, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with extraesophageal symptoms and with no typical symptoms, and the combined use of PPIs and prokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we found that there was agreement among the Latin American specialists for the diagnosis and management of GERD in less than one-third of the recommendations considered standard. The low concordance could be related to the fact that the availability of diagnostic tools and medications, as well as the prevalence of GERD phenotypes, are different in each country.

Umbrella review of 42 systematic reviews with meta-analyses: the safety of proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used to treat and prevent acid-related disorders. Despite high efficacy, PPI safety has been increasingly scrutinised. However, no comprehensive review summarising investigations of various adverse events is available.

AIMS

To perform an umbrella review to comprehensively assess associations between adverse events and PPI use.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA, an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses was conducted. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from 2015 to July 2019. AMSTAR 2 and GRADE were used to assess quality and certainty of evidence. Author-reported quality assessments were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-two systematic reviews with meta-analyses, supported predominantly by observational evidence, were included. The most comprehensive studies reported statistically significant associations with PPI use for several outcomes, including: fractures (eg, hip; RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.14-1.28; n = 2 103 800), kidney disease (eg, acute kidney injury; RR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.16-2.22; n = 2 396 640), infections (eg, Clostridioides difficile; OR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.73-2.30; n = 356 683), gastric cancer (OR = 2.50; 95% CI = 1.74-3.85; n = 943 070) and gastrointestinal events (eg, fundic gland polyps; OR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.42-4.27; n = 40 218). No associations with non-gastric cancers, or neurological disease were concluded, with conflicting evidence for cardiovascular outcomes. Certainty based on GRADE was very low for most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified several published associations between PPIs and adverse outcomes, however, further investigation is needed to understand their clinical significance and the likelihood of causal relationship. If higher quality evidence is generated substantiating the potential risks, it may be necessary for clinicians to consider alternative treatment strategies, especially when PPI efficacy is suboptimal.

Untangling Nonerosive Reflux Disease From Functional Heartburn

Heartburn is a common symptom in clinical practice, but as many as 70% of patients have normal findings from upper endoscopy. Most of these patients have nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) or functional esophageal disorders. NERD is the most common phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and functional heartburn is the most common cause for refractory heartburn. In patients with NERD, symptoms arise from gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal hypersensitivity, whereas in patients with functional heartburn, symptoms result from esophageal hypersensitivity. A diagnosis of NERD requires endoscopy and reflux testing, whereas a diagnosis of functional heartburn also requires esophageal manometry. NERD is treated most commonly with medical, endoscopic, and surgical antireflux approaches, whereas functional heartburn as well as NERD can be treated with neuromodulators, psychological intervention, and complementary medicine options.

Efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg for the initial treatment in patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg in patients with erosive esophagitis.

METHOD

Seventy-three patients with erosive esophagitis were randomly divided into two groups either vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 37) or 10 mg (n = 36). They were administered each dose for 4 weeks as the initial treatment followed by maintenance treatment with 10 mg for 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were mucosal healing rate and symptom relief at 4 weeks. The secondary endpoint was symptom relief at 12 weeks after the maintenance treatment. Mucosal healing was assessed endoscopically, and symptom relief was assessed using the FSSG score.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, the endoscopic healing rates of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were 94.6% and 94.4%, respectively. The FSSG scores of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were significantly decreased in both treatment groups from 13 (4-39) to 4 (0-25) and 14 (4-40) to 3 (0-29), respectively. At 12 weeks, the scores further decreased to 2 (0-13) and 2 (0-26), respectively. The vonoprazan 10 mg group showed a similar therapeutic effect to the 20 mg group in mucosal healing at 4 weeks and in symptom relief throughout the study period. When stratified by esophagitis grading, these findings were still demonstrated in grade A/B patients but not in grade C/D patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that initial treatment with vonoprazan 10 mg might be useful especially in patients with mild erosive esophagitis. Large controlled studies are warranted to confirm our investigation.

Management of patients with digestive diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Russian scientific medical society of internal medicine (RSMSIM) and the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia (2nd edition)

The presented clinical practice guidelines of the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia (GSSR), diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches for patients with digestive diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The guidelines were approved by the XXIII Congress of the GSSR and the 22nd International Slavonic-Baltic Scientifi c Forum “St. Petersburg - Gastro-2020 ON-LINE” (St. Petersburg, June 11, 2020). The presented clinical practice guidelines of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine (RSMSIM) and the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia (GSSR), diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches for patients with digestive diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recommendations were approved at the XV National Congress of Internal Medicine, XXIII Congress of NOGR on the basis of the 1st edition, adopted at the 22nd International Slavic- Baltic Scientific Forum “St. Petersburg - Gastro-2020 ON-LINE”.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials: Combination Treatment With Proton Pump Inhibitor Plus Prokinetic for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Background/Aims

Prokinetics can be used for treating patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), who exhibit suboptimal response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. We conducted a systematic review to assess the potential benefits of combination treatment with PPI plus prokinetics in GERD.

Methods

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for publications regarding randomized controlled trials comparing combination treatment of PPI plus prokinetics to PPI monotherapy with respect to global symptom improvement in GERD (until February 2020). The primary outcome was an absence or global symptom improvement in GERD. Adverse events and quality of life (QoL) scores were evaluated as secondary outcomes using a random effects model. Quality of evidence was rated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

This meta-analysis included 16 studies involving 1446 participants (719 in the PPI plus prokinetics group and 727 in the PPI monotherapy group). The PPI plus prokinetics treatment resulted in a significant reduction in global symptoms of GERD regardless of the prokinetic type, refractoriness, and ethnicity. Additionally, treatment with PPI plus prokinetics for at least 4 weeks was found to be more beneficial than PPI monotherapy with respect to global symptom improvement. However, the QoL scores were not improved with PPI plus prokinetics treatment. Adverse events observed in response to PPI plus prokinetics treatment did not differ from those observed with PPI monotherapy.

Conclusions

Combination of prokinetics with PPI treatment is more effective than PPI alone in GERD patients. Further high-quality trials with large sample sizes are needed to verify the effects based on prokinetic type.

ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Up to 40% of patients with symptoms suspicious of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond completely to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The term "refractory GERD" has been used loosely in the literature. A distinction should be made between refractory symptoms (ie, symptoms may or may not be GERD-related), refractory GERD symptoms (ie, persisting symptoms in patients with proven GERD, regardless of relationship to ongoing reflux), and refractory GERD (ie, objective evidence of GERD despite adequate medical management). The present ESNM/ANMS consensus paper proposes use the term "refractory GERD symptoms" only in patients with persisting symptoms and previously proven GERD by either endoscopy or esophageal pH monitoring. Even in this context, symptoms may or may not be reflux related. Objective evaluation, including endoscopy and esophageal physiologic testing, is requisite to provide insights into mechanisms of symptom generation and evidence of true refractory GERD. Some patients may have true ongoing refractory acid or weakly acidic reflux despite PPIs, while others have no evidence of ongoing reflux, and yet others have functional esophageal disorders (overlapping with proven GERD confirmed off therapy). In this context, attention should also be paid to supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which may be important contributors to refractory symptoms.

Effect of Food and Dosing Regimen on Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy-A Literature Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-choice drugs used to prevent and treat acid-related diseases. However, a lack of satisfactory response to the standard PPI dose ("PPI failure") is often reported, especially in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Poor compliance seems to be one of the main causes of PPI failure; hence, it is crucial to gain knowledge on how to properly administer PPIs. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the effect of food, beverages, and dosing regimen on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs and to frame recommendations for healthcare professionals to improve both patient's counseling and compliance to treatment with PPIs. A total of 201 papers were identified following a literature search. After full-text evaluation, 64 studies were included in the review. Co-administration of PPIs with a meal may affect both their bioavailability and effectiveness; however, the influence of food depends on the type of drug and its formulation. Except for pantoprazole, PPIs can be administered in the morning or evening; however, morning intake generally provides better daytime control of gastric acidity. In most cases, the choice of the proper schedule of administration should be based on the patient's symptoms and individual dosing preferences.

Endoscopic treatment of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with anti-reflux mucosectomy: Experience of 109 cases

OBJECTIVES

Some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for treatment of GERD. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of ARMS performed in patients with PPI-refractory GERD at our institution.

METHODS

A total of 109 patients with PPI-refractory GERD who underwent ARMS were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and post-ARMS questionnaire scores, acid exposure time (AET), DeMeester score, proximal extent, and PPI discontinuation rate were compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the symptom score (P < 0.01) and 40-50% of patients were able to discontinue PPI after ARMS. In patients who were followed up for 3 years, sustained improvement in subjective symptoms was observed. AET and DeMeester score significantly improved after ARMS (P < 0.01); however, there was no significant improvement in proximal extent (P = 0.0846).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-reflux mucosectomy is an effective minimally invasive therapy for patients with PPI-refractory GERD. The therapeutic efficacy is attributable to suppression of acid backflow due to contraction of the scar tissue in cardia.

The treatment efficacy of adding prokinetics to PPIs for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are first-line drugs for GERD. For those who fail to respond to PPIs, adding prokinetics to PPIs is recommended and several trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of prokinetic-PPI combination therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases before February 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared the efficacy of prokinetics plus PPI treatment with that of PPI monotherapy. Relevant studies were examined and data were extracted independently by two investigators. The risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were used to evaluate the responder rate, and standard mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were used for symptom score changes. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by the I² statistic. Either a fixed-effect or a random-effect model was established for calculating the pooled data.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies, comprising 1,437 patients were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that compared to PPI monotherapy, addition of prokinetics to PPI did not elevate the rate of endoscopic responders (RR = 0.996, 95% CI 0.929 - 1.068, p = 0.917), but improved symptom response (RR = 1.185, 95% CI 1.042 - 1.348, p = 0.010). Additionally, the combined therapy achieved a greater symptom relief than monotherapy both in FSSG and GERD-Q subgroups (MD =  - 2.978, 95% CI  - 3.319 to  - 2.638, p < 0.001; MD =  - 0.723, 95% CI  - 0.968 to  - 0.478, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding prokinetics to PPIs achieves symptomatic improvement compared to PPI monotherapy, thus can enhance life quality of GERD patients. However, the combined treatment seems to have no significant effect on mucosal healing.

Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Across the Spectrum of GERD Disease Severity

BACKGROUND

The performance and durability of various types of fundoplication are variable when stratified by disease severity. To date, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been evaluated in this context. We designed this study to determine the efficacy of MSA in the treatment of severe GERD.

STUDY DESIGN

Guided by previous studies, a DeMeester score (DMS) ≥ 50 was used as a cutoff point to define severe reflux disease. Subjects were divided into 2 groups using this cutoff, and outcomes of severe cases were compared with those with less severe disease (DMS < 50).

RESULTS

A total of 334 patients underwent MSA. Patients with severe disease had a higher mean preoperative DMS compared with those with mild to moderate GERD (79.2 [53.2] vs 22.8 [13.7], p < 0.0001). At a mean postoperative follow-up of 13.6 (10.4) months, there was no difference between the mean GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) total scores in patients with severe disease compared with those with less severe GERD (8.8 [10] vs 9.2 [10.8], p = 0.9204). Postoperative mean DMS was not different between groups (17.3[23.0] vs 14.1[33.9], p = 0.71), and there was no difference in the prevalence of esophagitis (p = 0.52). Patients with severe disease were less likely to be free from use of proton pump inhibitors after surgery (85% vs 93.1%, p = 0.041). There were similar rates of postoperative dysphagia (10% vs 14%, p = 0.42) and need for device removal (3% vs 5%, p = 0.7463).

CONCLUSIONS

MSA is an effective treatment in patients with severe GERD and leads to significant clinical improvement across the spectrum of disease severity, with few objective outcomes being superior in patients with mild-to-moderate reflux disease.

Efficacy of DA-5204 (Stillen 2X) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) alone is not satisfactory for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of DA-5204 (Stillen 2X, 90 mg of Artemisia asiatica 95% ethanol extract per tablet) and PPI combination therapy on GERD in comparison to PPI alone.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomly assigned 70 patients with endoscopically proven esophageal mucosal injury (Los Angeles classification grade A or B) into 2 groups: pantoprazole 40 mg once daily with DA-5204 twice daily (DA-5204 group) or pantoprazole 40 mg once daily with placebo twice daily (placebo group) for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was endoscopic healing rate. The secondary endpoint was sufficient relief (≥50% reduction) of symptoms using GERD Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Final analyses included 29 patients with the DA-5204 group and 30 patients with the placebo group. At weeks 4, there was no significant difference in the endoscopic healing rate between the 2 groups (DA-5204 vs placebo; 96.6% vs 93.3%; P = 1.000). However, the rate of residual minimal change was significantly lower in the DA-5204 group (5/28, 17.9%) than in the placebo group (17/28, 60.7%) (P < .001). The rates of symptom relief were not different between the DA-5204 group and the placebo group (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Combined therapy with PPI and DA-5204 has no additional effect on the endoscopic healing rate compared to PPI alone. However, it may be beneficial in resolving minimal change.

Management of patients with digestive diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia

The presented clinical practice guidelines of the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia (GSSR), diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches for patients with digestive diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The guidelines were approved by the XXIII Congress of the GSSR and the 22nd International Slavonic-Baltic Scientific Forum “St. Petersburg — Gastro-2020 ON-LINE” (St. Petersburg, June 11, 2020).

Trends in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: a Korea nationwide study

BACKGROUND

In 2014, the results derived from the nationwide data of the Korean Anti-reflux Surgery Study (KARS) demonstrated short-term feasibility and safety of anti-reflux surgery. This study aimed to update the longer-term safety and feasibility of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery up to 1-year follow-up with the KARS nationwide cohort.

METHODS

The data of 310 patients with GERD who received anti-reflux surgery up to 2018 were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics, postoperative symptom resolution, and postoperative complications were evaluated at postoperative 3 months and 1 year using the questionnaire designed by KARS. We divided the patients into two groups according to the operation period (up to and after 2014) to identify changes in the trends of the characteristics of surgical patients and operative qualities.

RESULTS

The typical preoperative symptoms were present in 275 patients (91.7%), and atypical symptoms were present in 208 patients (71.0%). Ninety-seven (35.5%) and 124 patients (46.1%) had inadequate PPI responses and hiatal hernia, respectively. At postoperative 1 year, typical and atypical symptoms were either completely or partially controlled in 90.3% and 73.5.0% of patients, respectively. Moderate-to-severe dysphagia, inability to belch, gas bloating, and flatulence at postoperative 1 year were identified in 23.5%, 29.4%, 23.2%, and 22.0% of patients, respectively. The number of surgical patients continuously increased from 2011 to 2018 in Korea. The proportion of patients with hiatal hernia and comorbidities increased (p < 0.01, p = 0.053), and the operation time decreased significantly (p < 0.01) in the late period (2015-2018) as compared with the early period (2011-2014). Symptom control and complication rate were equivalent between the two periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-reflux surgery was effective with > 90% of typical symptom resolution and posed a comparable postoperative complication rate with those in Western studies with mid-term to long-term follow-up. This result supports the feasibility and safety of anti-reflux surgery as a treatment for GERD in the Korean population.

Different Traditional Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Adults

Background/Aims

Traditional Herbal Medicines (THM) have been being used for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for a long time, but clinical evidence is still scarce. We evaluated different THM prescriptions for GERD in adults.

Methods

Data added to nine online databases from their inception to November 30, 2019, were systematically searched. All relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included and were combined with Bayesian network analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool and GRADE profiler version 3.6 were respectively employed to evaluate the quality of evidence of outcomes.

Results

Seventeen publications involving 1441 participants were retrieved. The results of our analysis suggested that Jianpi therapy+proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and Ligan Hewei therapy respectively ranked first in overall clinical efficacy and efficacy under gastroscope; Ligan Hewei therapy+PPIs was the optimum intervention in the improvement of acid regurgitation and heartburn.

Conclusion

This research indicates that Ligan Hewei therapy and Jianpi therapy, or these therapies separately combined with PPIs, should be recommended as appropriate complementary and alternative treatments based on the specific characteristics of GERD. However, additional well-designed RCTs with high methodological quality are still needed for future research.

Symptomatic response to GERDOFF® in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease and poor response to alginates: an exploratory, post-market, open-label study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A novel medical device based on hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulphate plus aluminum hydroxide (GERDOFF®, melt-in-mouth tablets) showed efficacy in reducing GER-related symptoms. This exploratory, open-label study evaluated symptomatic effects of a 14-day treatment with GERDOFF® in GERD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GERD Impact Scale (GIS) questionnaire was filled at baseline visit, after 7 and 14 days of treatment; patients' Global Satisfaction was evaluated at the final visit. Primary endpoint was the reduction of heartburn episodes per week; secondary endpoints were GERD-related symptoms, patients' satisfaction, and safety.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included, 22 were on stable therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Compared to baseline, the days with heartburn episodes and the GIS score progressively decreased during the first (p<0.0001) and the second week of treatment (p<0.0001). Heartburn episodes per week (p<0.0001) and the GIS score (p<0.0001) decreased in the first and the last 7 days of 14-day treatment and did not differ between patients on and off PPI. The treatment was safe and well-tolerated, and it was rated as very good (46.2%) or good (43.6%) on the satisfaction questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

GERDOFF® could effectively treat GER symptoms in patients not responding to PPI or alginate-based formulation. ISRCTN_15143752.

Anti-Heartburn Effects of Sugar Cane Flour: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects approximately 20% of Australians. Patients suffer a burning sensation known as heartburn due to the movement of acidic stomach content into the esophagus. There is anecdotal evidence of the effectiveness of prebiotic sugarcane flour in controlling symptoms of GERD. This pilot study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a prebiotic sugarcane flour in alleviating symptoms in medically-diagnosed GERD patients. This pilot study was a single center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted on 43 eligible participants. The intervention group (n = 22) were randomized to receive 3 g of sugarcane flour per day, and the control group (n = 21) received 3 g of cellulose placebo per day. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were assessed before and after three weeks treatment using the validated Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire (GERD-HRQL). After three weeks there were significant differences in symptoms for heartburn, regurgitation, and total symptoms scores (p < 0.05) between the sugarcane flour and placebo. Mean GERD-HRQL scores increased in the placebo group for regurgitation (mean increase 1.7; 95% CI 0.23 to 3.2; p = 0.015) and total symptom scores (2.9; 95% CI 0.26 to 5.7; p = 0.033). In contrast, there were significant reductions in heartburn (mean decrease −2.2; 95% CI −4.2 to −0.14; p = 0.037) and total symptom scores (−3.7; 95% CI −7.2 to −0.11; p = 0.044) in the intervention group. This pilot study has shown significant positive effects of sugarcane flour in the reduction of GERD symptoms, and a larger randomized controlled trial is warranted.

IW-3718 Reduces Heartburn Severity in Patients With Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) reduces quality of life and creates significant financial burden on the health care system. Approximately 30% of patients with GERD who receive label-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) still have symptoms. We performed a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IW-3718, a bile acid sequestrant, as an adjunct to PPI therapy.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, from March 2016 through April 2017, of 280 patients with confirmed GERD. The patients, stratified by esophagitis status, were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to groups given placebo or IW-3718 (500, 1000, or 1500 mg) twice daily, with ongoing label-dose PPI. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline to week 8 in weekly heartburn severity score. We also analyzed percent change from baseline to week 8 in weekly regurgitation frequency score.

RESULTS

Mean changes from baseline to week 8 in weekly heartburn severity scores were reductions of 46.0% in the placebo group, 49.0% in the 500 mg group, 55.1% in the 1000 mg group, and 58.0% in the 1500 mg IW-3718 group (dose-response P = .02). The treatment difference was 11.9% between the 1500 mg IW-3718 and placebo groups (P = .04, analysis of covariance). The mean change in weekly regurgitation frequency score from baseline to week 8 in the 1500 mg IW-3718 vs placebo groups was a reduction of 17.5% (95% confidence interval, reductions of 31.4% to 3.6%). The most common adverse event was constipation (in 8.1% of patients receiving IW-3718 and 7.1% of patients receiving placebo). There were no drug-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized trial of patients with refractory GERD, adding 1500 mg IW-3718 to label-dose PPIs significantly reduced heartburn symptoms compared with adding placebo. Regurgitation symptoms also decreased. IW-3718 was well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02637557).

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective and safe surgical method for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The device has been compared with twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy and laparoscopic fundoplication (in randomized trials and prospective cohort studies, respectively). Magnetic sphincter augmentation was superior to medical therapy and equivalent to surgery for the relief of GERD symptoms. Recent research focuses on implanting the device into more complex patients, such as those with larger hiatal hernias or those with Barrett's esophagus. Additional novel research topics include cost analysis and predicting and minimizing postoperative dysphagia.

Novel Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Beyond Proton Pump Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the many areas of unmet needs in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the cornerstone of medical therapy. However, since their introduction, the therapeutic limitations of PPIs in GERD management have been increasingly recognized.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review we discuss the new medical, endoscopic, and surgical therapeutic modalities that have been developed over the last decade. They include the potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) which provide a rapid onset, prolonged, and profound acid suppression, mucosal protectants which promote the physiological protective barrier of the esophageal mucosa, new prokinetics and neuromodulators. There are growing numbers of novel therapeutic endoscopic techniques that are under investigation or were recently introduced into the market, further expanding our therapeutic armamentarium for GERD. The development of diverse therapeutic modalities for GERD, despite the availability of PPIs, suggests that there are many areas of unmet need in GERD that will continue and drive future exploration for novel therapies.

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Postoperative Dysphagia: Characterization, Clinical Risk Factors, and Management

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) results in less severe side effects compared with Nissen fundoplication, but dysphagia remains the most common side effect reported by patients after MSA. This study aimed to characterize and review the management of postoperative dysphagia and identify the preoperative factors that predict persistent dysphagia after MSA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent MSA between 2013 and 2018. Preoperative objective evaluation included upper endoscopy, esophagram, high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and esophageal pH testing. Postoperative persistent dysphagia was defined as a postoperative score of > 3 for the dysphagia-specific item within the GERD-HRQL at a minimum of 3 months following MSA. A timeline of dysphagia and dilation rates was constructed and correlated with the evolution of our patient management practices and modifications in surgical technique.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients underwent MSA, at a mean (SD) follow up of 11.5 (8.7) months, 59 (15.5%) patients were experiencing persistent dysphagia. Thirty-one percent of patients required at least one dilation for dysphagia or chest pain and the overall response rate to this procedure was 67%, 7 (1.8%) patients required device removal specifically for dysphagia. Independent predictors of persistent dysphagia based on logistic regression model included (1) absence of a large hernia (OR 2.86 (95% CI 1.08-7.57, p = 0.035)); (2) the presence of preoperative dysphagia (OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.05-4.58, p = 0.037)); and (3) having less than 80% peristaltic contractions on HRIM (OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.09-5.73, p = 0.031)). Graded cutoffs of distal contractile integral (DCI), mean wave amplitude, DeMeester score, sex, and body mass index were evaluated within the model and did not predict postoperative dysphagia. Frequent eating after surgery, avoidance of early dilation, and increase in the size of the LINX device selected decreased the need for dilation.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of patients who underwent MSA, we report 15.5% rate of persistent postoperative dysphagia. The overall response rate to dilation therapy is 67%, and the efficacy of dilation with each subsequent procedure reduces. Patients with normal hiatal anatomy, significant preoperative dysphagia, and less than 80% peristaltic contractions of the smooth muscle portion of the esophagus should be counseled that they have an increased risk for persistent postoperative dysphagia.

Efficacy and safety of hangeshashinto for treatment of GERD refractory to proton pump inhibitors : Usual dose proton pump inhibitors plus hangeshashinto versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors: randomized, multicenter open label exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) leads to a clinical decline in the quality of life (QOL). Therefore, new treatment options are needed. We performed a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group exploratory trial to determine the efficacy of hangeshashinto (HST) in patients with PPI-refractory GERD.

METHODS

We enrolled 78 patients with PPI-refractory GERD for standard PPI regimens for at least 4 weeks and randomly assigned patients to receive either a combination of usual dose of rabeprazole (10 mg/day) + HST (7.5 g/day; HST group) or a double dose of rabeprazole (20 mg/day; double-dose PPI group). The primary end points were the extent of improvement in FSSG (Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD) score and the change over time in FSSG score.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of the improvement degree of the FSSG score between the two groups. Although the total FSSG score and reflux syndrome score decreased significantly for both groups over time (p < 0.001), the acid-related dyspepsia (ARD) score decreased significantly in the HST group from 1 week after drug administration (p < 0.05), indicating an improvement in the condition earlier than in the double-dose PPI group. Moreover, in examinations concerning BMI and age, the HST group had a significantly higher improvement degree of ARD score in patients with BMI < 22 (p < 0.05) and aged < 65 years (p < 0.05) than the double-dose PPI group.

CONCLUSIONS

HST may be beneficial for patients with PPI-refractory GERD, particularly in non-obese and non-elderly patients with dyspepsia symptoms.

Tangible pathologies in functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common, costly and complex disease, currently defined by symptoms, directed by the Rome consensus on functional bowel disorders, which has evolved over the past two decades. Symptoms include abdominal pain, are often meal related and there are two major subtypes, postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome, not attributed to pathology. Increasingly it is recognised that tangible pathologies occur in FD, for example Helicobacter pylori and other pathophysiological changes, most notably duodenal pathology, namely duodenal eosinophilia, permeability alterations, structural neuronal changes and microbial duodenal dysbiosis. This has led to the idea that FD is a true disease entity and triggers of this condition based on epidemiology studies point towards allergy, immune disorders and infection. Anxiety and depression may precede or follow FD, (brain-gut/gut-brain disorders). Currently most therapies for FD are inadequate but underlying pathology may lead to targeted treatment success as an attainable goal.

Efficacy of the four weeks treatment of omeprazole plus mosapride combination therapy compared with that of omeprazole monotherapy in patients with proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of omeprazole plus mosapride combination therapy with that of omeprazole monotherapy in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients.

Patients and methods

Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had experienced symptoms of heartburn and/or regurgitation more than twice weekly and were unresponsive to at least 8 weeks of a standard dose of PPI. A total of 44 consecutive patients were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg once daily plus either mosapride 5 mg or placebo three times daily for 4 weeks. We evaluated their clinical symptoms by means of frequency scale for symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaires completed at the beginning and the end of the study. The primary outcome was to compare changes in FSSG scores between treatment groups during the study period.

Results

Most of the study population had non-erosive reflux disease (91.0% in the combination group and 81.8% in the control group). The minority of patients had Los Angeles grade A or B erosive esophagitis (9% in the combination group and 18.2% in the control group). None of the patients had Los Angeles grade C or D erosive esophagitis. FSSG total scores significantly decreased both in the combination group and the control group, with no significant differences in improvement between the groups (−8.00±7.18 for the combination group versus −5.68±6.29 for the control group, p=0.129). As a secondary outcome, our data showed that the effect of combination therapy on a number of symptom-free days (heartburn-free days, regurgitation-free days, and night-time heartburn-free days) was not superior to PPI monotherapy.

Conclusion

Combining mosapride for four weeks with a standard dose of PPI is not more effective than PPI alone in patients with PPI-refractory GERD.

In search of the grail: A race for acid suppression

Proton pump inhibitors are the reference standards for the treatment of acid-related diseases. Acid suppression in gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with a high rate of mucosal cicatrization, but symptom response differs among endoscopic phenotypes. Extraesophageal manifestations have a good clinical response in patients that present with abnormal acid exposure (diagnostic test) in the esophagus. Proton pump inhibitors have shown their effectiveness for reducing symptom intensity in nighttime reflux and sleep disorders, improving quality of life and work productivity. That can sometimes be achieved through dose modifications by splitting or increasing the dose, or through galenic formulation. Proton pump inhibitors are not exempt from controversial aspects related to associated adverse events. Technological development is directed at improving proton pump inhibitor performance through increasing the half-life, maximum concentration, and area under the curve of the plasma concentrations through galenic formulation, as well as creating safer and more tolerable drugs. The present review is focused on the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and technological advances for increasing the pharmacologic performance of a proton pump inhibitor.

Efficacy and Safety of AlbisD Compared With Omeprazole 20 mg in Patients With Non-erosive Reflux Disease: A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, Pilot Study

Background/Aims

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently used to treat non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), but their effect is limited. It is not known whether a potential alternative, AlbisD, containing ranitidine hydrochloride, sucralfate hydrate, and tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate, is effective and safe in treating NERD. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AlbisD compared with omperazole in patients with NERD.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority comparative study. A total of 126 patients with NERD were randomly allocated to either AlbisD twice daily or omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks from February 2016 to August 2016. The study patients had histories of heartburn or regurgitation of moderate severity (> score 2) and a frequency of at least 2 episodes per week, and had no mucosal breaks of the esophagus on endoscopy. The primary efficacy variable was complete cure of heartburn at week 4. Secondary efficacy variables evaluating symptoms of heartburn and acid reflux as well as safety profiles were compared in the 2 groups at week 2 and 4 after treatment.

Results

A total of 113 patients completed the study (57 and 56 in AlbisD and omeprazole groups, respectively). The proportion of patients with complete cure of heartburn at week 4 was not significantly different between the AlbisD and omeprazole groups (35.1% vs 32.1% respectively, P = 0.740). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the any secondary variables including proportions of days without heartburn or acid reflux over 4 weeks (including daytime and nighttime). Adverse events were similarly reported in the 2 groups (7 [12.3%] vs 6 [10.7%]), and there were no serious adverse events.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of AlibsD in treating NERD patients are not inferior to those of omeprazole. Therefore, AlbisD can be an alternative to PPIs for NERD.

There might be a distinctive clinical phenotype of constipation with non-cardiac chest pain which responds to combination laxatives: A retrospective, longitudinal symptom analysis

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is often resolved when constipation was relieved. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of patients with both NCCP and constipated functional bowel disorders (FBD).Among 692 consecutive patients diagnosed with functional constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and underwent anorectal manometry (ARM) in our hospital, PPI-refractory NCCP was present in 37. The clinical course of various torso symptoms including NCCP and ARM findings were retrospectively evaluated.The mean age was lower in the NCCP than in the non-NCCP group (57.4 vs 61.3 years, respectively, P = .042). Back pain (16.2% vs 2.0%, P < .001) and sharp abdominal pain (13.5% vs 0.9%, P < .001) were more common in the NCCP group. Increased resting pressure (16.2% vs 6.9%, P = .036) and squeezing pressure (62.2% vs 50.7%, P = .049) of the anal sphincter, increased urgency volume (40.5% vs 23.2%, P = .004), and maximal volume (25.7% vs 15.0%, P = .032) for rectal sensation were more frequently observed in the NCCP group. After taking laxatives for 1 to 3 months, 81.1% of patients with NCCP reported improvement.Subjects with NCCP showed decreased rectal sensation more frequently at anorectal manometry. Majority of patients with NCCP reported improvement of symptom upon relief of constipation. Constipation might be a therapeutic target in patients with NCCP related to constipated functional bowel disorders.

Evaluation of symptomatic reflux esophagitis in proton pump inhibitor users

The aim of the present study was to evaluate symptomatic reflux esophagitis (RE) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users. The present study conducted a hospital-based, retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive RE cases in PPI users at Juntendo University Hospital recruited between 2008 and 2016. Eligible patients were PPI users with a complete patient profile, who completed the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) questionnaire, and who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the examination of RE, hiatal hernia (HH) and endoscopic gastric mucosal atrophy (EGA). The patients with RE who were administered PPIs were divided into two groups: Those with symptomatic RE (FSSG≥8) and those with non-symptomatic RE (FSSG<8). The present study investigated the risk factors for symptomatic RE among the patients with RE patients who were administered PPIs. Of the 13,052 cases who underwent patient profiling, the FSSG questionnaire and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, a total of 2,444 PPI users were eligible. Of the PPI users, 206 cases (8.4%) had RE. Among the 206 patients with RE, 115 (55.8%) had symptomatic RE. The profile of the symptomatic and non-symptomatic RE groups were as follows: A total of 45 females (39.1%) vs. 32 females (35.2%; non-significant); mean ± standard deviation age, 54.8±13.5 vs. 62.9±11.1 years (P<0.01); mean body mass index, 23.5±3.3 vs. 23.2±3.8 (non-significant); severe RE, 12 (10.4%) vs. 2 (2.2%; P<0.05); HH, 70 (60.9%) vs. 40 (44.0%; P<0.05); and mean score of EGA, 1.2±1.8 vs. 1.8±2.1 (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that a younger age [odds ratio (OR)=0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-0.97, P<0.01] and HH(+) (OR=2.37; 95% CI: 1.30-4.34, P<0.01) were associated with symptomatic RE among patients with RE who were administered PPIs. In conclusion, a younger age and HH were associated with symptomatic RE in patients with RE who were administered PPIs.