Rapid and long-lasting suppression of prolactin secretion and shrinkage of prolactinomas after injection of long-acting repeatable form of bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR)

Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinemia is a common endocrine disorder that can be associated with significant morbidity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of outcomes of hyperprolactinemic patients, including microadenomas and macroadenomas, to provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners. Through this review, we aimed to compare efficacy and adverse effects of medications, surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases, reviewed bibliographies of included articles, and contacted experts in the field. Eligible studies provided longitudinal follow-up of patients with hyperprolactinemia and evaluated outcomes of interest. We collected descriptive, quality and outcome data (tumor growth, visual field defects, infertility, sexual dysfunction, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea and prolactin levels).

RESULTS

After review, 8 randomized and 178 nonrandomized studies (over 3,000 patients) met inclusion criteria. Compared to no treatment, dopamine agonists significantly reduced prolactin level (weighted mean difference, -45; 95% confidence interval, -77 to -11) and the likelihood of persistent hyperprolactinemia (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.99). Cabergoline was more effective than bromocriptine in reducing persistent hyperprolactinemia, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea, and galactorrhea. A large body of noncomparative literature showed dopamine agonists improved other patient-important outcomes. Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports improved outcomes with surgery and radiotherapy compared to no treatment in patients who were resistant to or intolerant of dopamine agonists.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide evidence to support the use of dopamine agonists in reducing prolactin levels and persistent hyperprolactinemia, with cabergoline proving more efficacious than bromocriptine. Radiotherapy and surgery are useful in patients with resistance or intolerance to dopamine agonists.

Medical treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas, the most prevalent type of neuroendocrine disease, account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas. The most important clinical problems associated with prolactinomas are hypogonadism, infertility and hyposexuality. In patients with macroprolactinomas, mass effects, including visual field defects, headaches and neurological disturbances, can also occur. The objectives of therapy are normalization of prolactin levels, to restore eugonadism, and reduction of tumor mass, both of which can be achieved in the majority of patients by treatment with dopamine agonists. Given their association with minimal morbidity, these drugs currently represent the mainstay of treatment for prolactinomas. Novel data indicate that these agents can be successfully withdrawn in a subset of patients after normalization of prolactin levels and tumor disappearance, which suggests the possibility that medical therapy may not be required throughout life. Nevertheless, multimodal therapy that involves surgery, radiotherapy or both may be necessary in some cases, such as patients who are resistant to the effects of dopamine agonists or for those with atypical prolactinomas. This Review reports on efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in patients with prolactinomas.

Dopamine blocks stress-mediated ovarian carcinoma growth

PURPOSE

Increased adrenergic activity in response to chronic stress is known to promote tumor growth by stimulating the tumor microenvironment. The focus of the current study was to determine whether dopamine, an inhibitory catecholamine, could block the effects of chronic stress on tumor growth.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Expression of dopamine receptors (DR1-DR5) was analyzed by reverse transcriptase-PCR and by Western blotting. In vitro effects of dopamine on cell viability, apoptosis, and migration were examined. For in vivo therapy, murine and human DR2-siRNAs were incorporated into chitosan nanoparticles (CH-NP).

RESULTS

In this model of chronic stress, tumoral norepinephrine levels remained elevated whereas dopamine levels were significantly decreased compared with nonstressed animals. Daily restraint stress resulted in significantly increased tumor growth in both immunodeficient (SKOV3ip1 and HeyA8) and immunocompetent (ID8) ovarian cancer models. This increase was completely blocked with daily dopamine treatment. Dopamine treatment also blocked the stress-induced increase in angiogenesis. Endothelial and ovarian cancer cells expressed all dopamine receptors except for the lack of DR3 expression in ovarian cancer cells. DR2 was responsible for the inhibitory effects of dopamine on tumor growth and microvessel density as well as the stimulatory effect on apoptosis, as the DR2 antagonist eticlopride reversed these effects. Dopamine significantly inhibited cell viability and stimulated apoptosis in vitro. Moreover, dopamine reduced cyclic AMP levels and inhibited norepinephrine and vascular permeability factor/VEGF-induced Src kinase activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine depletion under chronic stress conditions creates a permissive microenvironment for tumor growth that can be reversed by dopamine replacement.

Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas and are an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility. The ultimate goal of therapy for prolactinomas is restoration or achievement of eugonadism through the normalization of hyperprolactinemia and control of tumor mass. Medical therapy with dopamine agonists is highly effective in the majority of cases and represents the mainstay of therapy. Recent data indicating successful withdrawal of these agents in a subset of patients challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is a lifelong requirement. Complicated situations, such as those encountered in resistance to dopamine agonists, pregnancy, and giant or malignant prolactinomas, may require multimodal therapy involving surgery, radiotherapy, or both. Progress in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of prolactinomas may enable future development of novel molecular therapies for treatment-resistant cases. This review provides a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of the various modes of therapy available for the treatment of patients with prolactinomas with an emphasis on challenging situations, a discussion of the data regarding withdrawal of medical therapy, and a foreshadowing of novel approaches to therapy that may become available in the future.

Pituitary disorders. Drug treatment options

Pituitary diseases are relatively common entities in the general population. They include pituitary adenomas and hypopituitarism. Pituitary tumours can cause symptoms of mass effect and hormonal hypersecretion that can be reversed with surgical resection or debulking of the adenoma, radiotherapy, or medical treatment. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is the treatment of choice for acromegaly, Cushing's disease, gonadotropin-secreting tumours; and thyrotropin (TSH)-secreting adenomas. Pituitary irradiation and medical therapy are secondary options. Conversely, medical treatment is the primary choice for prolactinomas. Dopamine agonists are very effective in the treatment of prolactin (PRL)-secreting tumours, with rates of control as high as 80 to 90% for microprolactinomas (< 10 mm) and 60 to 75% for macroprolactinomas (> or = 10 mm). Somatostatin analogues have also shown efficacy in patients with acromegaly who have not responded to surgery or in patients with TSH-secreting adenomas who have not improved with surgery and radiotherapy. In patients with Cushing's disease, who are not cured surgically or who relapse after pituitary adenomectomy and irradiation, steroidogenic inhibitors can be an efficient method of controlling the hypercortisolism. Pituitary insufficiency is the partial or complete loss of the anterior hypophyseal function, which is due to hypothalamic or pituitary disease. Although the classic sequence of loss of pituitary secretion is growth hormone (GH), gonadotropins, TSH, and corticotropin (ACTH), the order to begin the replacement therapy of the deficient hormone(s) is cortisol, thyroxine, androgens/estrogens and, if necessary, GH. There are multiple preparations that can be used to achieve clinical and biochemical improvement. In general, the hormone replacement therapy is lifelong.

Growth-hormone and prolactin excess

The treatment of acromegaly and hyperprolactinaemia has been improved by the availability of effective and well-tolerated slow-release somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists with long-lasting activity, such as cabergoline. The use of these drugs has extended the possibility of treatment to patients who would have responded poorly to the previously available compounds, such as octreotide or bromocriptine, and to those who were intolerant to pharmacotherapy. Moreover, the improvement in the management of acromegaly has enabled the reversal, at least partly, of cardiomyopathy and sleep apnoea, two important risk factors for morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Treatment of prolactinomas

The objectives of the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia are to suppress excessive hormone secretion and its clinical consequences, to remove tumour mass, to preserve the residual pituitary function and to prevent disease recurrence or progression. Prior to the advent of pharmacotherapy, therapy usually consisted of surgical resection and/or pituitary irradiation. In microprolactinomas, trans-sphenoidal surgical resection normalizes prolactin (PRL) levels, restores normal menses and produces the disappearance of galactorrhoea in a great majority of patients, but normalization of serum PRL levels varies from 35-70%. In macroprolactinomas, trans-sphenoidal surgery is less successful with only 32% of patients appearing to be cured initially. However, the recurrence rate is 19%, and the long-term cure rate is only 26%. In more than 80% of the patients with microprolactinoma, suppression of PRL levels and tumour shrinkage can be achieved with bromocriptine therapy given at doses of 2.5-5 mg per day. In 5-10% of the patients, the appearance of side-effects (nausea, dizziness and postural hypotension) is a limiting factor in continuing the treatment. Dopaminergic compounds cause notable tumour shrinkage in most macroprolactinomas. Treatment with cabergoline, a selective and long-lasting dopamine 2-receptor agonist at weekly doses of 0.5-2 mg has been shown to be effective both in normalizing PRL levels and in inducing tumour shrinkage. Pharmacotherapy with dopamine (DA) agonists is an appropriate first-line treatment for both micro- and macroprolactinomas. Surgery should be recommended for those patients who are severely intolerant of or resistant to DA agonists.

Long-term and low-dose treatment with cabergoline induces macroprolactinoma shrinkage

Cabergoline (CAB), a long-lasting dopamine-agonist, specific for the D2 receptor, is effective in normalizing serum PRL levels in most patients with microprolactinoma or idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Because few data are presently available on the effects of CAB treatment in macroprolactinomas, the aim of this open-label study was to investigate whether this drug was effective in producing tumor shrinkage, as well as in normalizing PRL levels. Twenty-three patients with macroprolactinoma entered this study 15 patients had had no treatment, whereas the remaining 8 patients had been previously treated with bromocriptine, which was with-drawn because of intolerance. Three of 23 patients had undergone unsuccessful surgery. Pretreatment serum PRL levels ranged from 100-3860 micrograms/L. CAB was administered at a dose of 0.5-3 mg once or twice a week for 12-24 months. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed before and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the beginning of treatment, to evaluate tumor shrinkage, defined as a decrease of at least 80% of baseline tumor volume. After 3-6 months of treatment with a low dose (0.5-1 mg/week), serum PRL levels normalized in 18 patients. In the remaining 5 patients, whose serum PRL levels were not normalized, the dose was increased to 2-3 mg/week. This schedule caused the normalization of PRL levels in 1 patient, whereas in the remaining 4 patients, PRL levels were reduced to 30-82 micrograms/L. A tumor volume reduction greater than 80% at MRI occurred in 14 of 23 patients (61%) after CAB treatment (from 2609.4 +/- 534.7 to 530.1 +/- 141.3 mm3 at the 12-24th month follow-up, P < 0.001). A volume reduction of 41.8 +/- 3.4% was already evident after 3 months (1436 +/- 285.9 mm3; P < 0.001). The complete disappearance of the tumor mass at MRI occurred after 6 months of treatment with CAB in 1 patient, and in 5 patients after 1 yr of treatment. An improvement of visual field defects was obtained in 9 of the 10 patients presenting visual impairment before CAB treatment. The drug was tolerated well by all patients. Only 1 patient experienced mild nausea, which disappeared spontaneously after the 2nd day of treatment. Long-term, a low dose of the D2 receptor agonist CAB significantly reduced tumor volume and normalized serum PRL levels in a great majority of patients bearing macroprolactinoma. This treatment met with excellent patient compliance. This study suggests that CAB can be used as a first choice drug treatment in macroprolactinomas, as already shown for microprolactinomas and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia.

Prolactin disorders

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, current diagnostic procedures, and treatment options for disorders involving PRL production. Common clinical dilemmas are discussed in a pragmatic fashion to guide the practitioner.

DESIGN

A world literature search of basic sciences and medical articles from the last three decades was performed using computerized MEDLINE. Recent endocrine and reproductive endocrine textbooks also were reviewed. Studies were selected for their degree of contribution to the basic sciences and clinical understanding of the disorder and for the quality of their study design and content. The information was summarized and grouped according to its relevance and application to specific sections of the manuscript. Studies were evaluated and critically used to support the views of the authors and to suggest specific clinical management strategies.

RESULT(S)

Disorders derived from abnormal PRL production are relatively common in clinical practice. Infertility, menstrual disorders, and galactorrhea are the most frequent manifestations encountered in women. Although frequently benign, the disorder occasionally may have severe consequences.

CONCLUSION(S)

An understanding of the underlying physiology and pathophysiology coupled with the awareness of the heterogeneous presentation of this disorder should help the clinician to approach it successfully.

Treatment with long acting repeatable bromocriptine (Parlodel-LAR*) in patients with macroprolactinomas: long-term study in 29 patients

The aim of the study was to evaluate the short term and long-term effects of long acting repeatable bromocriptine (= Parlodel-LAR*) in patients with macroprolactinomas. Twenty-nine patients (15 men and 14 women) aged 42 +/- 2.7 (M +/- SEM) years were injected with Parlodel-LAR* every 4 weeks during 3.3 +/- 0.3 years. The starting dose was 50 mg/injection, then it was increased to 100 mg in 11 patients and 150 mg in 9 patients. PRL levels decreased in all but one patient 4 weeks after the first injection (270 +/- 59 vs 934 +/- 210 ng/ml, p < 0.001), then became less than 20 ng/ml in 20/29 (69%) patients and finally became undetectable or low in 13/29 (45%) patients. Visual field defects were present in 12/29 patients before treatment. In 11/12 patients, treatment with Parlodel-LAR* resulted in an improvement and complete correction of visual field defects was observed in 8/12 patients. Adenoma size (2.5 +/- 0.2 cm before treatment) was reduced by at least 20% in 24/29 (83%) patients. Disappearance of adenoma was observed on CT scan in 8/29 (28%) patients after 28.7 +/- 5.3 months of treatment. Minor side effects occurred in 20 patients after the first injection then disappeared in 18 patients within the following 6 months of treatment. One patient had rhinorrhea after 3 months of treatment. Treatment with Parlodel-LAR* results in beneficial short-term effects (with rapid correction of recent onset visual field defects) and long-term effects (which can include complete disappearance of adenoma on CT scan evaluation) in patients with macroprolactinomas.

Diagnosis and drug therapy of prolactinoma

A prolactin-secreting pituitary tumour is the most frequent cause of hyperprolactinaemia that commonly occurs in clinical practice. Prolactinomas occur more frequently in women than in men and may differ in size, invasive growth and secretory activity. At presentation, macroadenomas are more frequently diagnosed in men. Specific immunohistochemical stains are necessary to prove the presence of prolactin in the tumour cells. The main investigations in the diagnosis of a prolactin-secreting adenoma are hormonal and radiological. As prolactin is a pulsatile hormone, it is a general rule to obtain several blood samples by taking a single sample on 3 separate days or 3 sequential samples (every 30 minutes) in restful conditions. Prolactin levels of 100 to 200 micrograms/L are commonly considered diagnostic for the presence of a prolactinoma; however, prolactinoma cannot be excluded in the presence of lower levels, and prolactin levels > 100 micrograms/L are present in some patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia. Several dynamic function tests have been proposed to differentiate idiopathic from tumorous hyperprolactinaemia. Although they could be used for group discrimination, these tests cannot be used for individual patients. To differentiate between a prolactinoma and a pseudoprolactinoma, thyrotrophin response to a dopamine receptor antagonist may be used, as only prolactinomas may have an increased response. A short course of dopaminergic drugs may also be of some help, as in macroprolactinomas only a shrinkage may be observed. After hyperprolactinaemia is confirmed, imaging with computerised tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are necessary to define the presence of a lesion compatible with a pituitary tumour. There is now a general agreement that medical therapy is of first choice in patients with prolactinomas. Bromocriptine, the most common drug used in this condition, is a semisynthetic ergot alkaloid that directly stimulates specific pituitary cell membrane dopamine D2 receptors and inhibits prolactin synthesis and secretion. In most patients, a reduction or normalisation of prolactin levels is usually observed, together with the disappearance or improvement of clinical symptoms. The sensitivity to bromocriptine is variable and patients may need different dose of the drug. Bromocriptine is also able to shrink the tumour in most patients; however, a few reports of disease progression during therapy have been described. The need for close follow-up, including prolactin levels and CT or MRI studies, is therefore emphasised. Bromocriptine is conventionally given in 2 or 3 daily doses; however, a single evening dose has been shown to be equally effective. Bromocriptine is usually well tolerated by the majority of patients; some adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, postural hypotension) may be initially present, but they usually wear off in time. To prevent such adverse effects it is advisable to start treatment with a low dose during the evening meal and gradually increase the dose over days or weeks. A few patients are unable to tolerate oral bromocriptine, so different formulations of bromocriptine or alternative dopamine agonist drugs (lisuride, terguride, metergoline, dihydroergocryptine, quinagolide, cabergoline, pergolide) have been proposed. Of particular clinical relevance because of their good tolerability and sustained activity are cabergoline and quinagolide. Particular attention should be paid to pregnancy in prolactinoma patients, as tumour enlargement has been reported. As the risk for this occurrence is low in patients with microprolactinoma, there is a general agreement that the drug can be stopped once pregnancy is diagnosed. In patients with macroprolactinoma the risk of tumour enlargement is higher. Therefore, primary therapy with bromocriptine until the tumour has shrank is suggested before pregnancy is attempted. Bromocriptine should be stopped as soon as pregnancy is confirmed, but re

Effectiveness of a long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine in patients with prolactin and growth hormone secreting macroadenomas

OBJECTIVE

With the development of new long-acting depot preparations of bromocriptine (bromocriptine LAR), we investigated the effectiveness of intramuscular injections of long-acting bromocriptine in patients with prolactin and GH secreting macroadenomas.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Fourteen patients with PRL secreting (8 patients) and GH secreting (6 patients) macroadenomas were treated with monthly intramuscular injections of a long-acting and repeatable form of bromocriptine for 3-6 months. A 50-mg monthly dose was administered in the majority of patients with PRL secreting macroadenomas. A 100-mg monthly dose was administered in all patients with GH secreting macroadenomas.

MEASUREMENTS

Plasma PRL and/or GH levels were measured 6 and 12 hours after the first injection and then on days 1, 2, 14 and 28 after each injection, up to a maximum period of 6 months. Patients were hospitalized for 48 hours after each injection and were specifically questioned with respect to side-effects. Pituitary imaging with MRI or CT scans was performed in all patients before commencing treatment and was subsequently repeated in 5/8 patients with macroprolactinomas and 5/6 patients with GH secreting macroadenomas after the completion of a 6-month course of treatment.

RESULTS

In all patients with macroprolactinomas, serum PRL levels decreased significantly after their first 50-mg injection with nadir levels obtained by 24-48 hours post injection (12815 +/- 8704 vs 1480 +/- 1859 mU/l; mean +/- SD, P < 0.01). At their latest follow-up, on a 50-mg monthly dose, 4 patients developed normoprolactinaemia (PRL levels < 360 mU/l) while two patients demonstrated a significant reduction in serum PRL levels (70 and 87% or pretreatment values). In two patients, although a substantial decrement of serum PRL levels was achieved 12-24 hours post injection, serum PRL levels increased to pretreatment values by day 14 post injection. Both patients received a higher (100 mg) monthly dose which was partially effective in one patient. In two patients with GH secreting macroadenomas, a sustained decrease of elevated GH levels was observed; in two patients, while a substantial reduction of the elevated serum GH levels was achieved 12-24 hours after the first and subsequent injections, serum GH levels increased to pretreatment values by day 14 post injection; in two patients there was no effect on the elevated serum GH levels. Significant tumour shrinkage (24-50%) was observed in 5/5 patients with PRL secreting macroadenomas assessed at completion of a 6-month course of treatment. Significant tumour shrinkage was also documented in 2/5 acromegalics tested (29 and 46% respectively).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that bromocriptine LAR is an effective treatment in the majority of patients with macroprolactinomas; it is also partially effective in some patients with GH secreting macroadenomas.

Long-acting repeatable bromocriptine in the treatment of patients with microprolactinoma intolerant or resistant to oral dopaminergics

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of long-acting repeatable bromocriptine in suppressing abnormal PRL secretion in microprolactinoma patients. To assess the incidence and nature of side effects induced by the product.

DESIGN

Longitudinal, open label, noncontrolled.

SETTING

Human hyperprolactinemic volunteers in an academic clinical research environment.

PATIENTS

Ten patients with radiologically proven microademonas resistant or intolerant to oral bromocriptine were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were treated with 50 to 150 mg of long-acting bromocriptine monthly during 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The serum PRL concentrations and the side-effects were assessed before and after each new injection.

RESULTS

Serum PRL levels decreased during the first cycle to normal values in four patients. At the end of the study the PRL levels were normalized in five cases and were only slightly increased in three. One patient was resistant to the treatment. Two among four infertile women became pregnant. In nine patients the accompanying symptoms disappeared after the 2nd month. Adverse events were mild or moderate and circumscribed to the 1st month of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The long-acting bromocriptine is both effective and well tolerated and is a good alternative to the oral approach in the management of microprolactinoma patients.

Positive response to compound CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinemic patients resistant to or intolerant of bromocriptine

The clinical effects of CV 205-502, a potent and non-ergot-derived dopamine agonist, were investigated in 24 selected patients with hyperprolactinemia previously treated with standard oral bromocriptine, the slow-release oral form of bromocriptine (BRC-SRO) and/or the long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine (BRC-LAR); 14 were chosen because of their resistance to treatment and ten because they were intolerant of the different forms of bromocriptine. A macroprolactinoma was present in seven patients and a microprolactinoma in ten, whereas seven had no radiological images of a pituitary tumor and were classified as having non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. All the 24 patients were treated with CV 205-502 at a daily dose of 0.075-0.6 mg for 3-12 months. All the patients had gonadal dysfunction and galactorrhea. Basal serum prolactin values ranged from 70 to 1677 ng/ml. CV 205-502 was effective in 11 of the 14 patients resistant bromocriptine, BRC-SRO and BRC-LAR; serum prolactin levels became normal within 6 months and a tumor shrinkage was obtained in five of the seven macroprolactinomas. In general, the drug was effective and well tolerated. Only three patients (two resistant and one intolerant) manifested nausea, vomiting and postural hypotension. In conclusion, this study shows that CV 205-502 is effective in bromocriptine-resistant hyperprolactinemic patients. Furthermore, CV 205-502 has insignificant and tolerable side-effects in patients intolerant of bromocriptine. CV 205-502 can, therefore, be considered a useful and effective drug, and an interesting therapeutic alternative to the ergot-derived dopamine-agonist drugs in use today.

Double blind randomized study using oral or injectable bromocriptine in patients with hyperprolactinaemia

OBJECTIVE

A new long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine has become available for long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemic patients. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of injectable and oral forms of bromocriptine.

DESIGN

A double-blind randomized study. All patients received either one injection of bromocriptine 50 mg intramuscularly and placebo tablets for 28 days (Group A) or one placebo injection and oral bromocriptine 7.5 mg daily for 28 days (Group B).

PATIENTS

Twenty-three (12 patients for Group A and 11 patients for Group B) hyperprolactinaemia patients with (19 patients) or without (4 patients) CT/MRI evidence of tumour were studied.

MEASUREMENTS

Plasma PRL levels and serum bromocriptine levels were assessed during a follow-up of 42 days. MRI and/or CT were evaluated before and 28 days after the beginning of the study.

RESULTS

All patients had significant reductions of PRL levels from 1000 h and 1100 h of day 1 to 2000 h of day 35. Normoprolactinaemia was shown in eight patients of Group A and six of Group B on days 1-28. Normal PRL levels were still present in five patients of Group A and in one patient of Group B on day 35; only three patients of Group A had normoprolactinaemia on day 42. A significantly greater decrease in Group A in comparison with Group B was shown at 1200 h on day 1 and at all times as a percentage decrease from basal levels. Significantly higher levels of bromocriptine were shown in Group A at all timepoints studied. No difference was shown in tolerability and incidence of side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that injectable bromocriptine more frequently induced a prolonged normoprolactinaemia than did the oral drug. Moreover, bromocriptine levels released during injectable bromocriptine were significantly higher than during oral bromocriptine. On the other hand no difference was shown in the tolerability of bromocriptine according to the route of administration.

CV 205-502 in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states

CV 205-502 (octahydrobenzol[g]quinoline), a non-ergot dopamine agonist drug, was administered to 40 patients with hyperprolactinemic syndrome: 16 patients with macroprolactinoma, 14 with microprolactinoma and 10 with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Twenty-four out of 40 patients had previously been treated by surgery and/or bromocriptine, with variable results. All had gonadal dysfunction and 22 patients had galactorrhea. Eight patients with macroprolactinoma had defects of the visual field. Pre-treatment serum PRL levels ranged from 60 to 2050 micrograms/l. The daily dose of CV 205-502 used in this trial ranged from 0.075 to 0.600 mg. After 6-12 months of treatment, serum PRL level decreased in all the patients reaching normoprolactinemia in 31 of them (77.5%) who demonstrated restoration of menses and disappearance of galactorrhea. The remaining nine patients (22.5%) had only a decrease of PRL levels without reaching normoprolactinemia and without any clinical effect. In 12 out of 16 patients with macroprolactinoma not previously surgically treated, a significant tumor shrinkage was shown by means of Computed Tomography and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The disappearance of visual defects was obtained in four out of eight patients. CV 205-502 was tolerated satisfactorily: mild side-effects occurred in four patients in the first week of treatment and spontaneously disappeared, whereas six patients (15%) needed to withdraw the therapy after 6 months because of side-effects. In conclusion CV 205-502 is a potent and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states and is an effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in use today.

The efficacy and tolerability of long-term cabergoline therapy in hyperprolactinaemic disorders: an open, uncontrolled, multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Study Group

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the efficacy and safety of the new, long-acting dopamine agonist drug cabergoline during long-term therapy of hyperprolactinaemia.

DESIGN

Open, prospective, multicentre study.

PATIENTS

One hundred and sixty-two females with either a microprolactinoma (n = 100), idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia (n = 54), empty sella syndrome (n = 7) or residual hyperprolactinaemia after surgery for a macroprolactinoma (n = 1). All had previously been treated with cabergoline or placebo for 4 weeks as part of a dose-finding study.

MEASUREMENTS

Menstrual pattern, adverse symptoms, blood pressure and pulse, serum PRL, blood count, liver and renal function were assessed after one month and subsequently at two-monthly intervals.

RESULTS

Treatment was started at doses of 0.25 mg (n = 3), 0.5 mg (n = 8), 1 mg (n = 150) or 2 mg (n = 1) per week, given either as a single weekly dose (n = 8) or divided into twice-weekly doses (n = 154), and was continued for at least 49 weeks in 123 patients. Final treatment doses ranged from 0.25 mg fortnightly to 2 mg twice weekly: most patients finished the study taking 0.5 mg once (n = 31) or twice (n = 77) weekly. Stable normalization of PRL levels was achieved in 138 subjects (85%), in 129 of whom the effective dose was < 1 mg per week. In the subset of 114 patients completing 49 weeks of therapy and having dose adjustments according to the protocol, the biochemical success rate was 92%. Fifty-nine of the 65 previously amenorrhoeic women (91%) and 44 of the 49 (90%) who were previously oligomenorrhoeic resumed regular menses and/or became pregnant during the study. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (39.5%). In 84% of cases with adverse events, the symptoms were of mild or moderate severity and most occurred during the first few weeks of therapy; five patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of poor tolerance. The most frequent symptoms were dizziness (13% of patients), headache (13%), nausea (10%) and weakness and/or fatigue (10%). Of 27 patients who had previously been poorly tolerant of other dopamine agonists, 17 (63%) did not experience any side-effects and only one was intolerant of cabergoline. No adverse haematological or biochemical effects were detected except for a slight downward trend in haemoglobin which may have been related to the resumption of regular menses in previously amenorrhoeic or oligomenorrhoeic women. A mild hypotensive effect was observed, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures falling by 5 and 4 mmHg respectively during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence for the long-term effectiveness and safety of cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia. Its ability to normalize PRL and restore gonadal function compares favourably with reported data on reference compounds while its tolerability profile and simple administration schedule offer potential advantages in terms of patient acceptability.

Dopaminergic resistance in a case of invasive macroprolactinoma

Invasive prolactinoma is a relatively infrequent variety of macroprolactinoma characterized by a fast and aggressive growth, with infiltration to adjacent structures, and whose management is frequently difficult. We present the case of a fatal invasive macroprolactinoma in whom resistance to different dopaminergic drugs developed.

Long-acting injectable bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR) in the chronic treatment of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Parlodel LAR (Sandoz, Basel, Switzerland), a long-acting injectable bromocriptine, in PRL-secreting macroadenomas.

DESIGN

Eleven patients with macroprolactinomas were studied in an academic environment in an open and prospective protocol. Ten patients were followed for 6 months and 8 for 1 year. Fifty to 200 mg IM of Parlodel LAR were administered every 28 days.

RESULTS

At the end of the 1st month, 64% of the patients had PRL suppression of > 75% of baseline values. After 1 year, 88% of the cases had PRL suppression of > 90%. Persistent PRL normalization was seen in three cases. Tumor shrinkage was seen in 64% of the patients on day 5, in 73% on day 28, and in 90% after 6 months of treatment. Early visual field improvement was seen in 83% of the cases. All patients had improvement of clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Parlodel LAR is well tolerated and very effective in the long-term treatment of patients with PRL-secreting macroadenomas.

Control of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas with parenteral, long-acting bromocriptine in 30 patients treated for up to 3 years

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of intramuscular injections of long-acting bromocriptine in patients with macroadenomas.

STUDY DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Thirty patients with PRL-secreting pituitary macroadenomas were treated with repeated 4-weekly intramuscular injections of 50 or 100 mg of a long-acting, repeatable bromocriptine formulation for six to 37 injections, amounting to a total of 473 injections. Twenty patients received parenteral bromocriptine as primary therapy, ten had persisting hyperprolactinemia after previous therapies including pituitary surgery (n = 7), oral bromocriptine (7), and pituitary irradiation (2).

MEASUREMENTS

A PRL day profile was obtained and the patients' clinical status and history were documented, at intervals. Detailed clinical, laboratory, and radiological (pituitary nuclear magnetic resonance or computed tomography scan) evaluations were performed at baseline, after 1 injection and every 6th injection thereafter.

RESULTS

In all patients PRL was suppressed from a mean +/- SEM pretreatment level of 32,620 +/- 8680 to 4480 +/- 1140 mU/I on the third day after the first injection. In 12 patients PRL levels normalized (< 400 mU/I) with the first to fourth injection, in three additional patients PRL levels normalized after 8-15 months. In 19 patients PRL was suppressed to less than 1000 mU/l. In three patients PRL did not decrease to less than 50% of pretreatment; in two of them on oral bromocriptine prior to this study there had been a comparable low efficacy. Of 28 patients with macroadenomas (median height 22 mm) tumour shrinkage was evident in 15 by nuclear magnetic resonance or computed tomography scan 28 days after the first injection, and in three additional patients after 6 months. There was further regression in seven cases after 12, 18 or 24 injections. Adenoma size (mean +/- SEM) decreased to 66 +/- 7% of the pretreatment value. The 40 adverse events noted in 20 of 30 patients during 24 hours after the first injection were similar to known side-effects of oral bromocriptine, nausea and postural hypotension being the most frequent. With repeated injections, on average 0.6 adverse events were noted per injection (mostly mild asthenia). There were no local adverse reactions at the injection site.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that long-acting repeatable bromocriptine in patients with macroprolactinomas offers a safe and efficacious primary treatment that ensures compliance and gives long-term control. Adverse reactions are comparable to oral bromocriptine but subside with repeated injections.

Dose-dependent suppression of serum prolactin by cabergoline in hyperprolactinaemia: a placebo controlled, double blind, multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Dose-finding Study Group

OBJECTIVE

Dopamine agonists have a well established place in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemic disorders but their use is associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. We have investigated the biochemical efficacy and side-effect profile of a range of doses of the novel, long-acting dopamine agonist, cabergoline, in suppressing prolactin (PRL) in hyperprolactinaemic women.

DESIGN

Multicentre, prospective, randomized, placebo controlled and double blind.

PATIENTS

One hundred and eighty-eight women with hyperprolactinaemia secondary to microprolactinoma (n = 113), idiopathic disease (n = 67), empty sella syndrome (n = 7) or following failed surgery for a macroprolactinoma (n = 1).

MEASUREMENTS

Weekly assessment of adverse symptoms, blood pressure and pulse, serum PRL, blood count, liver and renal function.

RESULTS

Patients received either placebo (n = 20) or cabergoline 0.125 (n = 43), 0.5 (n = 42), 0.75 (n = 42) or 1.0 mg (n = 41) twice weekly for 4 weeks. The five treatment groups were comparable in age (mean 31.8, range 16-46 years), diagnosis, previous therapy, and pretreatment serum PRL. PRL was suppressed to below half the pretreatment level in 5, 60, 90, 95 and 98% and normalized in 0, 30, 74, 74 and 95% of patients taking placebo or cabergoline 0.125, 0.5, 0.75 or 1.0 mg twice weekly respectively (Armitage's test, chi 2 = 39.3, P < 0.01). Cabergoline therapy (all doses) restored menses in 82% of the amenorrhoeic women not previously treated with dopamine agonists. Adverse events were recorded in 45% of patients in the placebo group and in 44, 50, 50 and 58% of those taking 0.125, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 mg cabergoline twice weekly (Armitage's test, P > 0.05). Over 95% of reported symptoms were relatively trivial, most frequently transient nausea, headache, dizziness, fatigue and constipation. More severe adverse events, interfering significantly with the patients' lifestyle, occurred in 13 (7.7%) patients taking cabergoline; treatment withdrawal was necessary in only one case. No adverse effects were detected on blood pressure or haematological or biochemical parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown a linear dose-response relationship for cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia in the range 0.125-1.0 mg twice weekly, with normalization of PRL in up to 95% of cases and acceptable tolerability throughout the dose range.

Clinical management of prolactinomas: a ten-year experience

A ten-year experience on 36 patients bearing macroprolactinomas (MP) and 86 others bearing microprolactinomas (mP) is reported in this study. Different therapeutical approaches were used: 1) trans-sphenoidal surgery in 24 patients with MP and in 25 with mP; 2) medical therapy with the oral form of bromocriptine (BRC) in all the 24 patients with MP previously subjected to surgery, in 48 patients with mP ab initio, and in 16 out of 25 patients with mP previously subjected to surgery; 3) medical therapy with the long-acting injectable forms of BRC in 12 MP- and 13 mP-bearing patients, and 4) conventional radiotherapy in 12 of the 24 patients with MP previously subjected to surgery. The follow-up, performed five years after surgery, showed that: a) all the 24 patients with MP but one had normal PRL levels during BRC administration, with a rebound of hyperprolactinemia in all cases after withdrawal; b) during the treatment BRC caused normalization of PRL in 15 of the 16 mP-bearing patients surgically treated and in all the 48 mP-bearing patients only treated with BRC; c) in 20 of the 25 patients the treatment with injectable retard BRC caused the normalization of plasma PRL and the shrinkage of the tumor mass in all the patients with MP but one, as revealed by seriate CT scans. In conclusion, the surgical treatment of prolactinomas was ineffective to normalize plasma PRL levels in most patients whereas BRC, in standard or in retard forms, was able to normalize plasma PRL levels, reduce the tumoral mass and preserve the pituitary residual tissue. BRC should be, therefore, used as first choice therapy both for MP and mP.

Effectiveness and long-term tolerability of the slow release oral form of bromocriptine on tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia

The effectiveness and long-term tolerability of a new formulation of bromocriptine with slow gastrointestinal release (Parlodel SRO) has been evaluated on ten patients with macroprolactinoma, seven patients with microprolactinoma and five patients with nontumoral hyperprolactinemia during a period of 1-30 months. Six out of ten macroprolactinoma-bearing patients obtained a rapid normalization of plasma PRL levels with reduction of the tumor size recorded by CT scan follow-up. Four of six microprolactinomas and all the five nontumoral hyperprolactinemic patients became normoprolactinemic with recovery of gonadal functions while in two other microprolactinomas Parlodel SRO significantly reduced plasma PRL levels with restoration of menses. Only in two patients the treatment was withdrawn for the appearance of side effects. In conclusion, Parlodel SRO is an effective drug in the management of tumoral and nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. The good long-term tolerability together with the hypoprolactinemic activity makes this drug a very good choice therapy in hyperprolactinemic syndromes even in case of poor tolerability to the standard formulation of the drug.

Oral and injectable long-lasting bromocriptine preparations in hyperprolactinemia: comparison of their prolactin lowering activity, tolerability and safety

Bromocriptine, a D2 receptor agonist, has been widely used in tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia, in reducing both plasma prolactin levels and in restoring fertility and/or menses in most patients. In this study a comparison between the injectable repeatable and the oral slow release formulations of bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR and Parlodel SRO) is reported, with respect to their effectiveness, tolerability and safety. Eleven patients with hyperprolactinemia, submitted to both treatments, were studied for a period of 1-24 months. Among the four patients with macroprolactinoma, three reached normoprolactinemia without complaining of side-effects, with both formulations, while the remaining patient became intolerant of the oral form after 1 year, and is presently being treated with the injectable formulation without presenting any side-effects. Among the five patients with microprolactinoma, two patients had a good response to both drugs; two patients did not reach normoprolactinemia with the injectable formulations, but a progressive decrease of prolactin levels was obtained with Parlodel SRO therapy, and the remaining patient was completely intolerant of the oral form without complaining of side-effects with Parlodel LAR. Two patients had non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia: one was intolerant of both drugs and one tolerated both formulations very well. In conclusion, Parlodel LAR and Parlodel SRO are very effective compounds in the medical treatment of hyperprolactinemic syndromes. The availability of these differing formulations improves the medical therapy, allowing a better choice of therapeutic regimen according to the effectiveness of, and tolerability to, the different drug formulations. In this way also, with poorly tolerant patients, it is possible to choose the better tolerated and more effective formulation of the drug.

Efficacy and tolerability of a long-acting intramuscularly injectable depot preparation of bromocriptine: the results of a double blind study

The tolerability and efficacy of a long-acting im applicable form of bromocriptine (Parlodel LAR) was tested in a double-blind approach in 20 patients with hyperprolactinemia or prolactinoma, 17 of them complaining of persistent side effects on oral treatment with dopamine agonists. The study-code revealed similar characteristics for age, sex, weight, clinical symptoms and previous therapy in both groups but prolactin serum levels were higher in the verum group even though the difference was not significant. In all 10 patients receiving Parlodel LAR prolactin serum concentrations were significantly suppressed and tumor size was reduced in 5 of the 9 patients with visible tumors when controlled after 28 days. In contrast, no significant change in serum prolactin levels was observed in the placebo group and tumor size of all visible tumors was not altered. Side effects typically reported for dopamine agonists started 3 h after application in the verum group and were significantly different to the unspecific side effects reported in the placebo group during the first 72 h. Thereafter systemic tolerability was indistinguishable between both groups. The local tolerability at the injection site was excellent for both, Parlodel LAR and placebo.