Cumulative analysis of inhibitor formation in patients with haemophilia A treated with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII

Baby hamster kidney cell-derived recombinant factor VIII: a quarter century of learning and clinical experience

INTRODUCTION

Management and care of individuals with hemophilia A advanced immensely with the introduction of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement products. This review provides a historical overview of rFVIII development with a focus on Bayer's rFVIII (with albumin) and sucrose-formulated rFVIII (rFVIII-FS), the only rFVIII products cloned in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells with >25 years of proven safety and efficacy. Areas covered: We review the advances in rFVIII technology and the efficacy and safety data for BHK-derived rFVIII/rFVIII-FS from clinical trials, investigator-initiated studies, and observational studies. Innovative products with new treatment potentials (eg, BAY 81-8973 and BAY 94-9027) built on this established safety and efficacy profile are also briefly discussed. The literature search strategy included targeted searches (PubMed) with manual article selection and other product-specific searches. Expert commentary: Development of rFVIII products and related improvements in viral safety and manufacturing efficiency have guaranteed an adequate supply of factor products worldwide and increased prophylaxis use. The net effects have been joint health preservation, reduction in morbidity and mortality, and quality-of-life enhancements. Current treatment challenges include lack of adherence to prophylaxis and inhibitor development; extended-half-life rFVIII products and non-FVIII replacement therapies in development may help overcome these challenges.

The role of previously untreated patient studies in understanding the development of FVIII inhibitors

Development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII), the major complication of haemophilia A treatment today, is influenced by multiple factors. Genetic (F8 mutation, family history, ethnicity, polymorphisms in immune modulating genes) and non-genetic (intensive exposure to FVIII, presence of pro-inflammatory signals as might occur with large bleeds, infections, surgery, or other immune stimulants [e.g. vaccines]) risk factors as well as their complex inter-relationships contribute to the inhibitor risk profile of haemophilia patients, particularly in the previously untreated patient (PUP) population. Studies in PUPs have been fundamental to furthering the understanding of FVIII inhibitor development, as well as discovering previously unappreciated risk factors. The multi-factorial nature of inhibitor development makes it difficult to ascertain the contribution of FVIII products in inhibitor development through individual PUP studies. Sufficiently powered studies of large cohorts may overcome these limitations but interpretations should be conducted cautiously. Proper design and implementation of PUP safety studies will become even more important with the introduction of new molecules, such as extended half-life or human cell-line derived FVIII that propose reduced immunogenicity. Despite these difficulties, carefully performed clinical studies in PUPs may provide important insights into the natural history of the immune response to FVIII and may suggest targets for intervention to reduce immunogenicity.

Can B-domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies

BACKGROUND

As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVES

A meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full-length recombinant FVIII (FL-rFVIII) and B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD-rFVIII).

METHODS

Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL-rFVIII or BDD-rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between-group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63-1.88%. The corresponding rate for high-titer de novo inhibitors [> 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01-0.57%). Exposure to BDD-rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12-24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high-titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17-53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL-rFVIII.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.