How occupational health care professionals experience evidence-based guidelines in Finland: a qualitative study

Developing evidence-based medication therapy management tools for psychiatric nurses: An evaluative qualitative case study

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical use of psychotropic medications involves diverse risks, addressable by nursing interventions. The research had a dual purpose: developing an "Evidence-Based Medication Therapy Management Guideline" and a "Medication Administration-Tracking Chart" and evaluating their use through an evaluative case study.

METHODS

Evidence-based guideline and chart development and evaluative case study. Initially, Evidence-Based Medication Therapy Management Guideline and Medication Administration Tracking Chart for managing medication in a psychiatric unit were developed. Subsequently, their efficacy was evaluated in a case study involving 10 participating nurses used in the psychiatric unit with 123-bed of a training and research hospital in Turkey. Data was collected through personal forms, interviews, medication charts, and researcher observations, and the analysis employed Merriam's case study method.

RESULTS

Three themes (inception, implementation, termination, and sustainers) and 12 sub-themes emerged. Nurses stated that the research tools filled their information gaps, enhancing the medication therapy management process's effectiveness and safety, improving nursing care quality and continuity, and benefiting patient outcomes. Nurses expressed a desire to consistently use the tools in the unit and provided suggestions.

CONCLUSION

Nurses highlighted the tools' potential to enhance medication safety, psychiatric care, and patient outcomes. However, their stance on using evidence-based tools revealed an approach/avoidance conflict, balancing benefits and barriers. Experience emerged as a hindrance in embracing evidence-based clinical tools. This study is among the first to comprehensively develop evidence-based medication management guideline and administration-tracking chart for psychiatric nurses globally and in our country. Routine use of the tools is expected to enhance nurses' expertise in psychotropic medication management, leading to improved patient outcomes in medication-related aspects.

Health check-ups as interventions for work disability management: supervisors and occupational healthcare follow the recommendations to a great extent

OBJECTIVES

Work disability management is a problem globally. This study was designed to find out whether the initiation, process and outcome of health check-ups (HCUs) follow the national legislation and whether supervisors and occupational healthcare (OHC) units act according to the legislation-based recommendations.

METHODS

Data of 1092 employees with reduced work ability were collected during 2013-2018 in 15 OHC units across Finland. Nine reasons for HCUs, eight process activities and three recommendations were analysed. Cross-tabulation and multinomial logistic regression analysis were used in the analyses.

RESULTS

Employees themselves initiated an HCU for early support more often (OR with 95% CI 2.37; 1.04 to 5.40) compared with supervisors. Personnel in OHC units initiated an HCU in musculoskeletal disorders more often (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.37) and in mental disorders less often (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.76) compared with supervisors. These findings were reflected in the recommendations after the HCU, where rehabilitation was recommended for employees with musculoskeletal disorders more often than for employees with mental disorders (ORs 5.48; 95% CI 1.91 to 15.67 and 1.59; 95% CI 0.74 to 3.43, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Supervisors and OHC units followed the recommendations for management of work disability to a great extent. Employees were active in looking for help early when they had problems with work ability. This positive finding should be promoted even more. OHC units did not initiate HCUs or recommend rehabilitation in mental disorders as actively as they did in musculoskeletal disorders. Support of employees with mental disorders should be improved and studied more. Registration of the study The study protocol was approved and registered on 22 September 2017 by the Doctoral Program of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, registration no. 189067.

Development of evidence-based practice in occupational health services in Sweden: a 3-year follow-up of attitudes, barriers and facilitators

PURPOSE

The Swedish government initiated an investigation of how to secure and develop the competence of the occupational health services. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether the development of evidence-based practice (EBP) in the Swedish occupational health services in relation to attitudes, knowledge and use improved during the first 3 years of the government's initiative.

METHODS

The study has a mixed methods design combining questionnaires and interviews with data collection at baseline and at 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The response rate was 66% at baseline and 63% at follow-up. The results show that practitioners' knowledge of EBP was moderate at baseline and improved at follow-up (p = 0.002; 95% CI 0.01; 0.21). Practitioners experienced lower levels of organizational and managerial support for EBP at follow-up (p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.18; 0.38). The results revealed that managers viewed responsibility for implementing EBP as a matter for individual practitioners rather than as an organizational issue.

CONCLUSIONS

Occupational health service managers and practitioners are generally positive to EBP. However, the findings emphasize the need to educate managers in how to support EBP at the organizational level by creating an infrastructure for EBP in the OHS.