1
|
Intramolecular proton transfer in channelrhodopsins. Biophys J 2013; 104:807-17. [PMID: 23442959 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Revised: 12/19/2012] [Accepted: 01/02/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Channelrhodopsins serve as photoreceptors that control the motility behavior of green flagellate algae and act as light-gated ion channels when heterologously expressed in animal cells. Here, we report direct measurements of proton transfer from the retinylidene Schiff base in several channelrhodopsin variants expressed in HEK293 cells. A fast outward-directed current precedes the passive channel current that has the opposite direction at physiological holding potentials. This rapid charge movement occurs on the timescale of the M intermediate formation in microbial rhodopsins, including that for channelrhodopsin from Chlamydomonas augustae and its mutants, reported in this study. Mutant analysis showed that the glutamate residue corresponding to Asp(85) in bacteriorhodopsin acts as the primary acceptor of the Schiff-base proton in low-efficiency channelrhodopsins. Another photoactive-site residue corresponding to Asp(212) in bacteriorhodopsin serves as an alternative proton acceptor and plays a more important role in channel opening than the primary acceptor. In more efficient channelrhodopsins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Mesostigma viride, and Platymonas (Tetraselmis) subcordiformis, the fast current was apparently absent. The inverse correlation of the outward proton transfer and channel activity is consistent with channel function evolving in channelrhodopsins at the expense of their capacity for active proton transport.
Collapse
|
2
|
Holterhues J, Bordignon E, Klose D, Rickert C, Klare JP, Martell S, Li L, Engelhard M, Steinhoff HJ. The signal transfer from the receptor NpSRII to the transducer NpHtrII is not hampered by the D75N mutation. Biophys J 2011; 100:2275-82. [PMID: 21539797 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2010] [Revised: 02/17/2011] [Accepted: 03/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensory rhodopsin II (NpSRII) is a phototaxis receptor of Natronomonas pharaonis that performs its function in complex with its cognate transducer (NpHtrII). Upon light activation NpSRII triggers by means of NpHtrII a signal transduction chain homologous to the two component system in eubacterial chemotaxis. The D75N mutant of NpSRII, which lacks the blue-shifted M intermediate and therefore exhibits a significantly faster photocycle compared to the wild-type, mediates normal phototaxis responses demonstrating that deprotonation of the Schiff base is not a prerequisite for transducer activation. Using site-directed spin labeling and time resolved electron paramagnetic-resonance spectroscopy, we show that the mechanism revealed for activation of the wild-type complex, namely an outward tilt motion of the cytoplasmic part of the receptor helix F and a concomitant rotation of the transmembrane transducer helix TM2, is also valid for the D75N variant. Apparently, the D75N mutation shifts the ground state conformation of NpSRII-D75N and its cognate transducer into the direction of the signaling state.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sasaki J, Tsai AL, Spudich JL. Opposite displacement of helix F in attractant and repellent signaling by sensory rhodopsin-Htr complexes. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:18868-77. [PMID: 21454480 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.200345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Two forms of the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I distinguished by differences in its photoactive site have been shown to be directly correlated with attractant and repellent signaling by the dual-signaling protein. In prior studies, differences in the photoactive site defined the two forms, namely the direction of light-induced proton transfer from the chromophore and the pK(a) of an Asp counterion to the protonated chromophore. Here, we show by both in vivo and in vitro measurements that the two forms are distinct protein conformers with structural similarities to two conformers seen in the light-driven proton transport cycle of the related protein bacteriorhodopsin. Measurements of spontaneous cell motility reversal frequencies, an in vivo measure of histidine kinase activity in the phototaxis system, indicate that the two forms are a photointerconvertible pair, with one conformer activating and the other inhibiting the kinase. Protein conformational changes in these photoconversions monitored by site-directed spin labeling show that opposite structural changes in helix F, distant from the photoactive site, correspond to the opposite phototaxis signals. The results provide the first direct evidence that displacements of helix F are directly correlated with signaling and impact our understanding of the sensory rhodopsin I signaling mechanism and the evolution of diverse functionality in this protein family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Sasaki
- Center for Membrane Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sineshchekov OA, Sasaki J, Wang J, Spudich JL. Attractant and repellent signaling conformers of sensory rhodopsin-transducer complexes. Biochemistry 2010; 49:6696-704. [PMID: 20590098 PMCID: PMC2914491 DOI: 10.1021/bi100798w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
![]()
Attractant and repellent signaling conformers of the dual-signaling phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin I and its transducer subunit (SRI−HtrI) have recently been distinguished experimentally by the opposite connection of their retinylidene protonated Schiff bases to the outwardly located periplasmic side and inwardly located cytoplasmic side. Here we show that the pKa of the outwardly located Asp76 counterion in the outwardly connected conformer is lowered by ∼1.5 units from that of the inwardly connected conformer. The pKa difference enables quantitative determination of the relative amounts of the two conformers in wild-type cells and behavioral mutants prior to photoexcitation, comparison of their absorption spectra, and determination of their relative signaling efficiency. We have shown that the one-photon excitation of the SRI−HtrI attractant conformer causes a Schiff base connectivity switch from inwardly connected to outwardly connected states in the attractant signaling photoreaction. Conversely, a second near-UV photon drives the complex back to the inwardly connected conformer in the repellent signaling photoreaction. The results suggest a model of the color-discriminating dual-signaling mechanism in which phototaxis responses (his-kinase modulation) result from the photointerconversion of the two oppositely connected SRI−HtrI conformers by one-photon and two-photon activation. Furthermore, we find that the related repellent phototaxis SRII−HtrII receptor complex has an outwardly connected retinylidene Schiff base like the repellent signaling forms of the SRI−HtrI complex, indicating the general applicability of macro conformational changes, which can be detected by the connectivity switch, to phototaxis signaling by sensory rhodopsin−transducer complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg A Sineshchekov
- Center for Membrane Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kitajima-Ihara T, Furutani Y, Suzuki D, Ihara K, Kandori H, Homma M, Sudo Y. Salinibacter sensory rhodopsin: sensory rhodopsin I-like protein from a eubacterium. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:23533-41. [PMID: 18566451 PMCID: PMC3259787 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m802990200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2008] [Revised: 06/05/2008] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Halobacterium salinarum sensory rhodopsin I (HsSRI), a dual receptor regulating both negative and positive phototaxis in haloarchaea, transmits light signals through changes in protein-protein interactions with its transducer, halobacterial transducer protein I (HtrI). Haloarchaea also have another sensor pigment, sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), which functions as a receptor regulating negative phototaxis. Compared with HsSRI, the signal relay mechanism of SRII is well characterized because SRII from Natronomonus pharaonis (NpSRII) is much more stable than HsSRI and HsSRII, especially in dilute salt solutions and is much more resistant to detergents. Two genes encoding SRI homologs were identified from the genome sequence of the eubacterium Salinibacter ruber. Those sequences are distantly related to HsSRI ( approximately 40% identity) and contain most of the amino acid residues identified as necessary for its function. To determine whether those genes encode functional protein(s), we cloned and expressed them in Escherichia coli. One of them (SrSRI) was expressed well as a recombinant protein having all-trans retinal as a chromophore. UV-Vis, low-temperature UV-Vis, pH-titration, and flash photolysis experiments revealed that the photochemical properties of SrSRI are similar to those of HsSRI. In addition to the expression system, the high stability of SrSRI makes it possible to prepare large amounts of protein and enables studies of mutant proteins that will allow new approaches to investigate the photosignaling process of SRI-HtrI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomomi Kitajima-Ihara
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| | - Yuji Furutani
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| | - Daisuke Suzuki
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| | - Kunio Ihara
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| | - Hideki Kandori
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| | - Michio Homma
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| | - Yuki Sudo
- Division of Biological Science, Graduate
School of Science and the Center for Gene
Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan and the
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|