Effect of proximal gastric volume on hiatal hernia

Identifying hiatal hernia with impedance planimetry during esophageal distension testing

INTRODUCTION

Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry evaluates the esophageal response to distension involving biomechanics and motility. We have observed that hiatus hernia (HH) is evident during FLIP studies as a separation between the crural diaphragm (CD) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) like what is seen with high-resolution manometry (HRM). The aim of this study was to compare FLIP findings to endoscopy and HRM in the detection of HH.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients that completed FLIP during sedated endoscopy and HRM were included. LES-CD separation was assessed on FLIP and HRM with the presence of HH defined as LES-CD ≥1 cm. The agreement was evaluated using the kappa (κ) statistic.

RESULTS

Hiatal hernia was detected in 32% of patients on HRM and 44% of patients on FLIP with a substantial agreement between studies (84% agreement; κ = 0.667). On FLIP, a 'new' HH (i.e. HH not observed on HRM) occurred in 14 patients and an "enlarged" HH (i.e., LES-CD ≥2 cm larger than on HRM) occurred in 11 patients. Among patients that also completed, timed barium esophagogram (TBE), delayed esophageal emptying on TBE was more common in patients with new or enlarged HH on FLIP than those without: 7/11 (64%) versus 2/12 (17%); p = 0.017.

CONCLUSION

FLIP can detect HH with a substantial agreement with HRM, though esophageal distension with FLIP testing appeared to elicit and/or enlarge a HH in an additional 25% of patients. Although this unique response to esophageal distension may represent a mechanism of dysphagia or susceptibility to reflux, additional study is needed to clarify its significance.

Hiatal hernia prevalence and natural history on non-contrast CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence, risk factors and natural history of hiatal hernia (HH) on CT in the general population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) acquired full-lung CT on 3200 subjects, aged 53-94 years. Three blinded observers independently determined presence/absence and type (I-IV) of HH. Associations between HH and participant characteristics were assessed via unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted relative risk regression. HH natural history was assessed compared with prior MESA CT.

RESULTS

Excellent interobserver agreement was found for presence (κ=0.86) and type of HH (κ=0.97). Among 316 HH identified (prevalence=9.9%), 223 (71%) were type I and 93 (29%) were type III. HH prevalence increased with age, from 2.4% in 6th decade to 16.6% in 9th decade (unadjusted prevalence ratio (PR)=1.1 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.1)). HH prevalence was greater in women (12.7%) than men (7.0%) (unadjusted PR=1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.3)) and associated with proton pump inhibitor use (p<0.001). In 75 participants with HH with 10-year follow-up, median HH area increased from 9.9 cm2 to 17.9 cm2 (p=0.02) with a higher mean body mass index (BMI) in subjects with increasing HH size compared with HH decreasing in size: mean BMI=30.2±6.2 vs 26.8±7.2 (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

HH on non-contrast CT is prevalent in the general population, increasing with age, female gender and BMI. Its association with proton pump inhibitor use confirms a role in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and HH progression is associated with increased BMI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00005487.

Characteristics of esophageal motility measured by high resolution esophageal manometry in hiatal hernia patients

AIM: To investigate the functional change of esophageal motility in hiatal hernia (HH) patients using high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), in order to determine the possible pathogenesis of HH and provide more evidence for detection and treatment of HH.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 66 patients with hiatal hernia who underwent HRM from June 2014 to April 2015 as well as upper endoscopy and/or barium esophagogram within 3 mo at our hospital. Among them, 31 patients were diagnosed with reflux esophagitis (RE) by endoscopy. Besides, we selected 28 healthy volunteers as controls to compare clinical characteristics and HRM data between the three groups.

RESULTS: In total there were 35 patients with HH alone (Group A), of whom 16 had typical symptoms including acid reflux and heartburn, 12 suffered main symptoms resembling retrosternal pain, and the remainder had typical symptoms including dysphagia and belching. After HRM, 4 of them were diagnosed with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction, 1 with severe esophageal motility disorder, and 9 with mild esophageal motility disorder. In total there were 31 patients with RE (Group B), of whom 20 had typical symptoms including acid reflux and heartburn, 6 suffered main symptoms resembling retrosternal pain, and the remainder had typical symptoms including dysphagia and belching. After HRM, 2 of them were diagnosed with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction, 3 with severe esophageal motility disorder, and 10 with mild esophageal motility disorder. There was no significant difference in the above findings between groups A and B (P > 0.05). Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in groups A and B was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.016), especially group A (13.43 mmHg ± 8.75 mmHg vs 21.66 mmHg ± 7.19 mmHg, P = 0.004). Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure had no significant difference among the three groups (P = 0.854). However, the morbidity of UES hypotensive pressure was significantly higher in group A than the control group (25.7% vs 3.6%, P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION: About 40% of HH patients have esophageal motility disorders. HH patients have significantly lower LES and UES pressure than the health group. The reduced LES and UES pressure and esophageal motility disorder may play a crucial role in reflux events and even result in esophageal mucosal injury. HRM can provide accurate and exhaustive data to guide diagnosis and evaluate prognosis.

How the Body Position Can Influence High-resolution Manometry Results in the Study of Esophageal Dysphagia and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The body position can influence esophageal motility data obtained with high-resolution manometry (HRM). To examine whether the body position influences HRM diagnoses in patients with esophageal dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

HRM (Manoscan) was performed in 99 patients in the sitting and supine positions; 49 had dysphagia and 50 had GERD as-sessed by 24-hour pH monitoring. HRM plots were analyzed according to the Chicago classification.

RESULTS

HRM results varied in the final diagnoses of the esophageal body (EB) in patients with dysphagia (P = 0.024), the result being more distal spasm and weak peristalsis while sitting. In patients with GERD, the HRM diagnoses of the lower esophageal sphinc-ter (LES), the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology, and EB varied depending on the position; (P = 0.063, P = 0.017, P = 0.041 respectively). Hypotensive LES, EGJ type III (hiatal hernia), and weak peristalsis were more frequently identified in the sitting position. The reliability (kappa) of the position influencing HRM diagnoses was similar in dysphagia and GERD ("LES diagnosis": dysphagia 0.32 [0.14-0.49] and GERD 0.31 [0.10-0.52], P = 0.960; "EB diagnosis": dysphagia 0.49 [0.30-0.69] and GERD 0.39 [0.20-0.59], P = 0.480). The reliability in "EGJ morphology" studies was higher in dysphagia 0.81 (0.68-0.94) than in GERD 0.55 (0.37-0.73), P = 0.020.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM results varied according to the position in patients with dysphagia and GERD. Weak peristalsis was more frequently diagnosed while sitting in dysphagia and GERD. Hypotensive LES and EGJ type III (hiatal hernia) were also more frequently diagnosed in the sitting position in patients with GERD.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in type 2 diabetics: symptom load and pathophysiologic aspects - a retro-pro study

Background

Information about gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2D) is scarce, although the incidence of both disorders is increasing.

We aimed to determine GERD symptoms and their underlying pathophysiologic characteristics in T2D patients.

Methods

This “retro-pro” study compared 65 T2D patients to a control group of 130 age- and sex-matched non-diabetics. GERD was confirmed by gastroscopy, manometry, pH-metry and barium swallow.

Results

In patients with T2D compared to controls, dysphagia (32.3% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.001) and globus sensation (27.7% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.021) were found more frequently, whereas heartburn (76.9% vs. 88.5%; p = 0.046) and regurgitation (47.7% vs. 72.3%; p = 0.001) were predominant in non-diabetics. Despite higher body mass indices (31.1 ± 5.2 vs. 27.7 ± 3.7 kg/m²; p < 0.001), hiatal hernia was less frequent in T2D patients compared to controls (60.0% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.001). Lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was higher in patients with T2D (median 10.0 vs. 7.2 mmHg, p = 0.016). DeMeester scores did not differ between the groups. Helicobacter pylori infections were more common in T2D patients (26.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.001). Barrett metaplasia (21.5% vs. 17.7%), as well as low- (10.8% vs. 3.8%) and high-grade dysplasia (1.5% vs. 0%) were predominant in T2D patients.

Conclusions

T2D patients exhibit different GERD symptoms, higher LES pressures and a decreased prevalence of hiatal hernia than non-diabetics, which may be related to worse oesophageal motility and, thus, a more functional rather than anatomical cause of GERD. Low-grade dysplasia was more than twice as high in T2D than in non-diabetics patients.

Trial registration

Ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, IRB number 720/2011.