Detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates by a sensitive flow cytometric assay (BactiFlow): a multicentre validation study

Current status of rapid bacterial detection methods for platelet components: A 20-year review by the ISBT Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party Subgroup on Bacteria

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bacterial contamination of platelet components (PCs) poses a safety challenge for transfusion patients. Despite mitigation interventions, the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections remains predominant. PC safety can be improved either by pathogen reduction or by implementation of bacterial detection methods. Detection methodologies include culture methods and rapid detection methods. The current review focuses on currently available rapid detection methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed published manuscripts since 2000 on rapid bacterial detection methods used for PC screening with result determination within 4 h. Methods meeting this criterion included Verax PGDprime, BacTx and nucleic amplification testing. The analytical and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of these systems were assessed.

RESULTS

The analytical sensitivity between the different detection methods ranged between 50 and 100,000 CFU/ml. The sample volume used by these testing systems varies between 0.5 and 1.0 ml of PCs. A delay of at least 48 h before sampling enhances detectability. All rapid detection methods generate results in a timely manner, allowing testing to be performed before transfusion with optimal sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Rapid detection methods improve PC safety regarding bacterial contamination. The assays are optimal for rapidly growing bacteria, which are more likely to cause septic transfusion reactions in patients. Because of the reduced diagnostic sensitivity, the sample collection should be late in shelf-life and ideally just before transfusion. The major benefit of these methods is that the test result can be obtained before releasing PCs for transfusion or to be used in combination with other screening methods applied early during PC storage.

Factors Involved in the onset of infection following bacterially contaminated platelet transfusions

Transfusion of platelet concentrates (PCs) is associated with several adverse patient reactions, the most common of which are febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) and transfusion-associated bacterial-infection/transfusion-associated sepsis (T-ABI/TA-S). Diagnosis of T-ABI/T-AS requires a positive blood culture (BC) result from the transfusion recipient and also a positive identification of bacterial contamination within a test aliquot of the transfused PC. In a significant number of cases, clinical symptoms post-transfusion are reported by the clinician, yet the BCs from the patient and/or PC are negative. The topic of 'missed bacterial detection' has therefore been the focus of several primary research studies and review articles, suggesting that biofilm formation in the blood bag and the presence of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) pathogens are the major causes of this missed detection. However, platelets are emerging as key players in early host responses to infection and as such, the aforementioned biofilm formation could elicit 'platelet priming', which could lead to significant immunological reactions in the host, in the absence of planktonic bacteria in the host bloodstream. This review reflects on what is known about missed detection and relates this to the emerging understanding of the effect of bacterial contamination on the platelets themselves and the significant role played by platelets in exacerbation of an immune response to infection within the transfusion setting.

Sterility Testing of Platelets Concentrate within Quality Control: Experiences and Opportunities to Extend the Application

Despite numerous measures, bacterial sepsis associated with the transfusion remains a major threat. The incidence of septic events induced by platelets transfusion is approximately 10 times higher than with transfused red blood cells due to their storage temperature. This caused new Standard that implements the methods for the detection and reduction of bacteria in the platelet concentrates (PC). The aim is to consider the possibility of wider application of this tests in order to extend the shelf-life of PC. Sterility testing of PC is done once or twice per month using BacT/Alert BPA and BacT/Alert BPN bottles. If positive, all products from the initial unit were tested to confirm or deny the status. During six years period, 67236 PC units were made and 872 of them were tested. Only two were found initially positive. After testing the other products from the same initial unit, results were negative so, final results proclaimed false positive. Pretransfusion bacterial detection is an important potential method for reducing the risk of bacteriemia and transfusion-associated septic reactions. In addition to routine measures, Mirasol PRT pathogen inactivation system, could be included. This allows certain amount of PC to be inactivated during the first 32 hours. Untreated PC units would be stored in standard conditions and for given time (three days) potentially present bacteria would reach a detectable level. This way the quantity of samples for sterility testing could be reduced, taking only 2 mL of each of four units of PC. Samples would be planted at the same vial-aerobic bottle, which would also, double the capacity in BacT/Alert 3D automated system.

Extension of the Storage Period of Platelet Concentrates in Germany to 5 Days by Bacterial Testing: Is it Worth the Effort?

The shelf life of platelet concentrates (PCs) was limited in Germany to 4 days after the day of production because platelet-related septic complications had been observed, mainly with PCs at the end of their shelf life. The reduction in PC shelf life gives rise to several problems, including an increased number of discarded products, accompanied by potential challenges of how to ensure an adequate supply of platelet products. The aim of this study was to show routine experience over the last 7 years using the Bactiflow (BF) assay to screen for bacterial contamination late in PC storage, followed by extension of PC shelf life.

Noninvasive pH monitoring for bacterial detection in platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND

Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates (PCs) remains the prevalent posttransfusion infectious risk. The pH SAFE system, a noninvasive method used to measure pH of PC for quality control, was evaluated herein as a rapid method to detect bacterial contamination in PCs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Pairs of ABO-D-matched apheresis and buffy coat PCs were pooled and split into two pH SAFE platelet bags. One of the bags served as the control unit, while the other was inoculated with one of nine clinically relevant bacteria (target concentration approx. 1 colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL). The pH of both PCs was measured over 7 days of storage at approximately 4-hour intervals during daytime. One-milliliter samples were taken at the testing points to determine bacterial concentration.

RESULTS

PCs with pH values of less than 6.6 or with a pH change over time (ΔpH/Δtime) greater or equal than 0.046 pH units/hr are suspected of being contaminated. pH decreased significantly during storage in all bacterially inoculated PC at concentrations of more than 10(7) CFUs/mL (p < 0.0001). A significant decrease in pH (p < 0.0001) was noticed as early as 28 hours in units with Bacillus cereus and as late as 125 hours in units containing Staphylococcus epidermidis. Interestingly, PCs containing Gram-negative species showed a decline in pH followed by a rebound.

CONCLUSIONS

The pH SAFE system allows for repeated, noninvasive pH screening during PC storage. A significant decrease in pH could serve as an indicator of clinically significant levels of bacterial contamination. Since differences in pH decline were observed among bacterial species, continuous pH monitoring in PCs is recommended.

Bench Test for the Detection of Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Concentrates Using Rapid and Cultural Detection Methods with a Standardized Proficiency Panel

BACKGROUND

The most frequent infectious complication in transfusion therapy in developed countries is related to the bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates (PCs). Rapid and cultural screening methods for bacterial detection in platelets are available, but external performance evaluation, especially of rapid methods, has been difficult to realize so far. Here we summarize the results of three individual collaborative trials using an external quality assessment program (EQAP) for the application of current rapid and cultural screening methods.

METHODS

Three different modules were available for the detection of bacterial contamination: module 1: rapid methods, module 2: culture methods, module 3: bacterial identification methods. The sample set-up included up to six different bacterial strains, 1-2 negative samples and 4-6 positive samples with stabilized bacterial cell counts (approximately 10(3)/10(4)/10(5) CFU/ml). Time schedule for testing was limited (module 1: 6 h, module 2 and 3: 7 days).

RESULTS

Samples of module 1 were analyzed with two different rapid methods (BactiFlow, NAT). The results of the three individual collaborative trials showed that all participants detected the negative samples with both assays correctly. Samples spiked with 10(4) to 10(5) CFU/ml of bacteria obtained positive results with both rapid screening methods, whereas samples spiked with only 10(3) CFU/ml disclosed a lower number of correctly identified positive results by NAT (86.6-93.8% sensitivity) compared to BactiFlow (100% sensitivity). The results for modules 2 and 3 revealed a 100% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in all three collaborative trials.

CONCLUSION

This proficiency panel facilitates the verification of the analytical sensitivity of rapid and cultural bacterial detection systems under controlled routine conditions. The concept of samples provided in this EQAP has three main advantages: i) samples can be examined by both rapid and culture methods, ii) the provided material is matrix-equivalent, and iii) the sample material is ready-to-use.

Clinical and quality evaluation of apheresis vs random-donor platelet concentrates stored for 7 days

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The clinical efficacy of different types of platelets remains under debate. We conducted a pilot study to prospectively evaluate the impact of subsequent storage on the in vitro quality and post-transfusion outcome of apheresis prepared platelets (APCs) vs random donor platelets (RDPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 30 units of APCs, and 30 units of RDPs. We performed assays on days 1, 3, 5 and 7, evaluating ADP aggregation, platelet count and pH. Fifteen thrombocytopenic patients with haematologic conditions were evaluated. Each patient received prophylactic transfusions of both components, and their post-transfusion platelet increments were compared. Twenty-five transfusions were apheresis prepared, and 35 transfusions were received as RDPs. None of the RDPs were leukoreduced.

RESULTS

The median platelet counts for APCs on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 were; 2070, 1990, 1680 and 1240 × 10(3)  µL(-1) , respectively, and were; 1290, 850, 499 and 284 × 10(3)  µL(-1) , respectively for RDPs. The pH of all units was more than 6·2. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease of ADP aggregation after 3 days of storage (P < 0·05). However, APCs provided satisfactory increments for 90·9% of transfusions. On the sixth and seventh days of storage, APCs provided significantly higher platelet increments (18·7 × 10(3)  µL(-1) ) compared with RDPs (3·20 × 10(3)  µL(-1) ) (P < 0·05). Significantly longer transfusion intervals were also achieved with APCs (P < 0·05).

CONCLUSION

Although other variables may have confounded the results, subsequent storage of APCs appeared to provide higher increments with longer intervals of transfusion compared with RDPs. Future prospective studies are needed, adjusting for other possible confounding variables.

Routine bacterial screening of platelet concentrates by flow cytometry and its impact on product safety and supply

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bacterial contamination represents the major infectious hazard associated with transfusion of platelet concentrates (PCs). As bacterial screening of PCs is not mandatory in Germany, the BactiFlow flow cytometry test has been introduced as a rapid detection method to increase product safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a period of 25 months, a total of 34 631 PCs (26 411 pooled and 8220 apheresis-derived PCs) were tested at the end of day 3 of their shelf life using the BactiFlow system. PCs initially reactive in BactiFlow testing and expired PCs not reactive in BactiFlow on day 3 were also investigated by the BacT/ALERT system and by microbiological cultivation in order to identify the contaminating bacterial species and to confirm reactive BactiFlow results.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-eight PCs (0.7%) had an initially reactive result, 24 of them remained reactive in a second test run. Out of these reproducible reactive BactiFlow results, 12 could not be verified by parallel BacT/ALERT culturing, resulting in a confirmed false-positive rate of 0.03%. The bacterial species were identified as S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. dysgalactiae ssp. equisimilis and B. cereus. In 10 out of 9017 expired PCs (0.11%), a confirmed-positive result was obtained in the BacT/ALERT system which had a negative result in the BactiFlow system.

CONCLUSION

Testing of PCs by BactiFlow was successfully implemented in our blood donation service and proved sufficient as a rapid and reliable screening method. False reactive results are in an acceptable range since the transfusion of 12 bacterially contaminated PCs was prevented.

Bacterial screening of platelet concentrates on day 2 and 3 with flow cytometry: the optimal sampling time point?

BACKGROUND

There is growing concern on the residual risk of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates in Germany, despite the reduction of the shelf-life of these concentrates and the introduction of bacterial screening. In this study, the applicability of the BactiFlow flow cytometric assay for bacterial screening of platelet concentrates on day 2 or 3 of their shelf-life was assessed in two German blood services. The results were used to evaluate currently implemented or newly discussed screening strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two thousand and ten apheresis platelet concentrates were tested on day 2 or day 3 after donation using BactiFlow flow cytometry. Reactive samples were confirmed by the BacT/Alert culture system.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of the 2,100 platelet concentrates tested were reactive in the first test by BactiFlow. Of these 24 platelet concentrates, 12 were false-positive and the other 12 were initially reactive. None of the microbiological cultures of the initially reactive samples was positive. Parallel examination of 1,026 platelet concentrates by culture revealed three positive platelet concentrates with bacteria detected only in the anaerobic culture bottle and identified as Staphylococcus species. Two platelet concentrates were confirmed positive for Staphylcoccus epidermidis by culture. Retrospective analysis of the growth kinetics of the bacteria indicated that the bacterial titres were most likely below the diagnostic sensitivity of the BactiFlow assay (<300 CFU/mL) and probably had no transfusion relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

The BactiFlow assay is very convenient for bacterial screening of platelet concentrates independently of the testing day and the screening strategy. Although the optimal screening strategy could not be defined, this study provides further data to help achieve this goal.

Diagnostic methods for platelet bacteria screening: current status and developments

Bacterial contamination of blood components and the prevention of transfusion-associated bacterial infection still remains a major challenge in transfusion medicine. Over the past few decades, a significant reduction in the transmission of viral infections has been achieved due to the introduction of mandatory virus screening. Platelet concentrates (PCs) represent one of the highest risks for bacterial infection. This is due to the required storage conditions for PCs in gas-permeable containers at room temperature with constant agitation, which support bacterial proliferation from low contamination levels to high titers. In contrast to virus screening, since 1997 in Germany bacterial testing of PCs is only performed as a routine quality control or, since 2008, to prolong the shelf life to 5 days. In general, bacterial screening of PCs by cultivation methods is implemented by the various blood services. Although these culturing systems will remain the gold standard, the significance of rapid methods for screening for bacterial contamination has increased over the last few years. These new methods provide powerful tools for increasing the bacterial safety of blood components. This article summarizes the course of policies and provisions introduced to increase bacterial safety of blood components in Germany. Furthermore, we give an overview of the different diagnostic methods for bacterial screening of PCs and their current applicability in routine screening processes.

[Prevention of bacterial risk: pathogen inactivation/detection of bacteria]

Bacterial contamination of blood products remains the most important infectious risk of blood transfusion in 2013. Platelet concentrates (PC) are in cause in the majority of the transfusion reaction due to bacterial contaminations. A lot of prevention methods have been developed over the last 10 years (pre-donation interview, skin decontamination, diversion of the first 30 mL of the donation, leuko-reduction...), they have focused on limiting the contamination of the donations and prevent the bacterial growth in donations and/or in the blood products. These measures were effective and led to significantly reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with bacterial growth. However, every year there are about six accidents (with a high level of imputability) and one death. The reduction of the bacterial risk remains a priority for the French Blood Establishment (EFS). The procedure for skin disinfection is going to be improved in order to further strengthen this crucial step to avoid the contamination of donation. Methods of pathogen inactivation applied to plasma and PC are available in France and their effectiveness is demonstrated on the bacterial risk. Methods for bacterial detection of PC are used in many countries now. Automated culture is the most common. Alternatives are now available in the form of rapid tests able to analyze the PC just before the delivery and avoid false negatives observed with automated culture. Assessments are under way to confirm these benefits in 2013.