Effect of intravenous ketoprofen on pain after outpatient laparoscopic sterilisation

Laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review of pharmacotherapy in pain management

Laparoscopic surgery is widespread, and an increasing number of surgeries are performed laparoscopically. Early pain after laparoscopy can be similar or even more severe than that after open surgery. Thus, proactive pain management should be provided. Pain after laparoscopic surgery is derived from multiple origins; therefore, a single agent is seldom sufficient. Pain is most effectively controlled by a multimodal, preventive analgesia approach, such as combining opioids with non-opioid analgesics and local anaesthetics. Wound and port site local anaesthetic injections decrease abdominal wall pain by 1-1.5 units on a 0-10 pain scale. Inflammatory pain and shoulder pain can be controlled by NSAIDs or corticosteroids. In some patient groups, adjuvant drugs, ketamine and α2-adrenergic agonists can be helpful, but evidence on gabapentinoids is conflicting. In the present review, the types of pain that need to be taken into account while planning pain management protocols and the wide range of analgesic options that have been assessed in laparoscopic surgery are critically assessed. Recommendations to the clinician will be made regarding how to manage acute pain and how to prevent persistent postoperative pain. It is important to identify patients at the highest risk for severe and prolonged post-operative pain, and to have a proactive strategy in place for these individuals.

Efficacy of preventive analgesia with tramadol or lornoxicam for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Prevention of postoperative pain provides better and more rapid convalescence for patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the preventive analgesic effect of tramadol and lornoxicam in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

Patients who were scheduled for elective PCNL at the Cumhuriyet University Hospital, Sivas, Turkey, were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: tramadol, lornoxicam, and normal saline (NS). Ten minutes before induction of anesthesia, the tramadol group received tramadol 100 mg IV, the lornoxicam group received lornoxicam 8 mg IV, and the NS group received NS 2 mL IV. Anesthesia was induced using fentanyl 1 μg/kg and thiopental sodium 4 to 7 mg/kg. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was used for muscle relaxation. Desflurane 4% to 6% and 50%:50% oxygen/nitrous oxide were used for maintenance. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, and mean blood pressure were recorded before induction and during the postoperative period. During the postoperative period, visual analogue scale O/AS) scores, time to first analgesic (TFA), total analgesic consumption (TAC), and patient satisfaction scores were determined. Data about postoperative nausea and vomiting and other adverse events and complications were also collected.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were assessed for enrollment and 60 (33 women, 27 men; mean [SD] age, 44.69 [11.27] years; age range, 20-62 years) were included in the study. The baseline demographic characteristics and duration of surgery were similar in all 3 groups. The mean (SD) VAS scores in the tramadol group were significantly lower than in the NS group at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, and 12 hours after surgery (all, P < 0.05). The VAS scores in the lornoxicam group were significantly lower than in the NS group at 15 and 30 minutes and 1 hour (all, P < 0.05). The VAS score at 1 hour after surgery was significantly lower in the tramadol group than in the lornoxicam group (18 [8] vs 32 [16]; P < 0.05); however, there were no other significant differences in VAS scores between the active groups. A significantly shorter TFA was associated with the NS group when compared with the tramadol and lornoxicam groups (46 [27] vs 354 [187] and 180 [118], respectively; both, P < 0.05). TFA was significantly shorter in the lornoxicam group when compared with the tramadol roup (180 [118] vs 354 [187]; P < 0.05). TAC was significantly higher in the NS group than in the tramadol and lornoxicam groups (270 [47] vs 115 [74] and 145 [72], respectively; both, P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction score (range) was significantly lower in the NS group when compared with the tramadol and lornoxicam groups (0 [0-1] vs 3 [0-3] and 2 [0-3], respectively; both, P < 0.05). There were no other significant between-group differences observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadol and lornoxicam were more effective than NS in preventing early postoperative pain. The preventive analgesic effect of tramadol was comparable with that of lornoxicam, except at 1 hour when tramadol was more effective among these patients undergoing PCNL. Both drugs were well tolerated.

The preoperative administration of ketoprofen improves analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with propacetamol or postoperative ketoprofen

BACKGROUND

Non-opioid analgesics, paracetamol and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are proposed for pain relief after laparoscopy. We compared perioperative propacetamol (P) and ketoprofen (K) to provide analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

After ethical committee approval, we included 104 ASA I-II patients, without preoperative analgesic drugs, who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia was standardized using propofol, fentanyl, atracurium, isoflurane and N(2)O 50%. Ketoprofen 100 mg or propacetamol 2 g or a saline drip (a 100-ml unit of saline in 10 min) was infused blindly and randomly. Patients received either ketoprofen (group K1) or propacetamol (group P1) before induction of anaesthesia and saline after surgery, or saline before surgery and ketoprofen (group K2) or propacetamol (group P2) after surgery. Postoperative visual analogue pain scores (VAS 0-100 mm) were recorded during 24 h. If VAS was >30, a second dose (placebo, ketoprofen or propacetamol) was infused. Nalbuphine 0.2 mg kg(-1) i.v. was given as rescue analgesic if VAS was > or =50.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were studied The number of patients not requiring the second analgesic was greater in K1 (33.5%) than the others (K2 0%, P1 0%, P2 7.5%). VAS scores were significantly lower in K1 (P=0.001), with less nalbuphine consumption compared with P1. VAS and opioid request were similar in K2 and P2.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative administration of ketoprofen improves postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with its postoperative administration and pre- and postoperative propacetamol.

Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia After Postpartum Bilateral Tubal Ligation

Postpartum bilateral tubal ligation (PPBTL) causes postoperative pain. We designed this study to determine the efficacy of 50 microg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after PPBTL. Sixty-five women received spinal anesthesia with 12.75 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 20 microg of fentanyl, and either 50 microg of morphine (morphine group) or 0.05 mL of saline (control group). Postoperative analgesia was provided with regular naproxen 500 mg and oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg mixture as needed. Overall, satisfaction was higher (P=0.003) and pain was less intense at rest (P=0.008) and on movement (P <0.0001) in the morphine group. There was no significant overall difference in nausea, pruritus, or sedation scores, but vomiting occurred more frequently in the morphine group (21.4% versus 3.5%; P=0.052). In post hoc comparisons, pain at rest within the morphine group was significantly less at 4 h (P=0.006), pain on movement was significantly less at 4 h (P=0.002) and 12 h (P=0.0004), and pruritus was significantly more frequent at 12 h (P=0.002) compared with the control group. Oxycodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg mixture consumption was significantly smaller (P=0.006) and the time to first request of analgesia was significantly longer (P=0.006) in the morphine group. We conclude that the addition of 50 microg of morphine to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl provides improved postoperative analgesia in women undergoing PPBTL.

Postoperative pain control in ambulatory surgery

Optimizing postoperative pain control is the key to further advancement in the field of ambulatory anesthesia. The current situation in postoperative pain management indicates room for improvement, especially in the area of patient education and the development of individualized discharge analgesic packages. Multimodal analgesia provides superior analgesia with a lower side-effect profile. Preoperative administration of analgesia would decrease the intraoperative analgesic requirement, which may lead to a smooth and rapid recovery. Finally, new, portable analgesic delivery systems are under investigation and may prove to be the method of choice for future postoperative pain, management in ambulatory anesthesia.

[Role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in the perioperative period. Usefulness and limitations]

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including various chemical families of drugs, inhibit prostaglandin synthesis and act on the central nervous system. Prostaglandins are involved in regulation of regional circulations, cell turn-over in the gastrointestinal tract, and in primary haemostasis. The patterns of action of NSAIDs result in analgesic properties, but also in adverse effects. NSAIDs are increasingly used perioperatively, alone or associated with opioids or local anaesthetics, because of their analgesic and opioid sparing properties. Some of their adverse effects, especially ischaemic acute renal failure and gastrointestinal complications, can be life-threatening, and increased haemorrhagic risk is an issue for spinal or epidural anaesthesia in patients taking aspirin. Safe use of NSAIDs is possible in consideration of contraindications (elderly patient, hypovolaemia, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, renal failure, active gastrointestinal ulcer, bleeding diathesis, pregnancy), and requires close monitoring of renal function if they must be used in patients at risk for renal failure. NSAIDs are not ulcerogenic in the short-term in healthy subjects. They must be used with caution in patients with a preexisting haemostatic defect or undergoing haemorrhagic surgical procedures.

[Conventional techniques for analgesia: opioids and non-opioids. Indications, adverse effects and monitoring]

Morphine dosage must be carefully adapted in patients with renal failure or severe liver failure. The i.v. route is used for morphine titration in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU), or for analgesia in children. Systematic (not on demand) intramuscular or subcutaneous morphine must be administered at intervals not longer than 4 hours. Dosage is best determined after i.v. titration in the PACU. Codeine, administered orally, is metabolised into morphine. Codeine has almost no effect in 7% of Caucasians and at least 15% of Asians. Nalbuphine, which has a sedative effect and a short half-life, is mainly used in children. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is used orally or rectally, most often in combination with codeine. Paracetamol dosage is 60-90 mg.kg-1.d-1, including a 20 mg (orally), or 40 mg (rectally) loading dose. Its therapeutic ratio is low, with a potential hepatic toxicity. Dosage must be lowered in alcoholics or in patients under isoniazide therapy. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are powerful antinociceptive agents. Their use must be restricted to the first 5 postoperative days. Their major contraindications are kidney failure, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, coagulation disorders, allergy. They also have a marked morphine sparing effect and reduce therefore the respiratory depression induced by morphine.

Balanced analgesia improves recovery and outcome after outpatient tubal ligation

Outpatient surgery benefits patients only if postoperative sequelae are effectively treated. After laparoscopic tubal ligation (TL) intense pain and consequent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has been a problem delaying recovery and resulting in hospital admission. Ninety patients were randomised to this double-blind study, the aim being to evaluate the effect of balanced analgesia on postoperative pain and recovery after sterilization. The balanced analgesia group received 5 ml of 2% lidocaine gel on the sterilization clips and perioperatively 200 mg of ketoprofen i.v. The lidocaine group received 5 ml of 2% lidocaine gel on the clips and placebo i.v. perioperatively. The placebo group received 5 ml of placebo gel on the clips and placebo i.v. perioperatively. Infusion of propofol and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen were used for maintenance of anesthesia. Succinylcholine and vecuronium were used for muscle relaxation and 0.1 mg of fentanyl i.v. was given to all patients at induction of anesthesia. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements, incidence of PONV and need for antiemetic medication were all significantly lower in the balanced analgesia group. Home readiness was consistently achieved 70-90 min sooner in the balanced analgesia group compared to the other groups (P < 0.01 between the balanced analgesia and the placebo group), and the patients were able to return to normal activity sooner (cumulatively 93% of the patients in the balanced analgesia group vs. 60% in the other two groups (P < 0.01 between the balanced analgesia and the other groups) had returned to normal activity on the 2nd postoperative day). It is concluded that in patients undergoing laparoscopic TL the combination of analgesic regimens with different mechanisms of action offer a simple and efficient way of postoperative pain relief, as well as an improvement of quality (i.e. less PONV) and speed of recovery.