Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study*

Safety and metabolic advantages of steroid withdrawal after 6 months posttransplant in de novo kidney transplantation: A 1‐year prospective cohort study

Introduction

This prospective multicenter study aimed at investigating the safety and metabolic advantages of steroid withdrawal (SW) therapy in kidney transplant recipients with tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil‐based immunosuppression.

Methods

We analyzed 179 recipients who received kidney transplantation from March 2016 and September 2018. In 179 recipients, 114 patients maintained an immunosuppressive regimen including steroids (steroid continuation [SC] group). The remaining 65 patients were determined to withdraw steroid therapy after 6 months posttransplant (SW group). Metabolic parameters and graft functions of the two groups were evaluated.

Results

The estimated glomerular filtration rates at 12 months posttransplant were 67.29 ± 20.29 ml/min/1.73 m² in SC group and 73.72 ± 17.57 ml/min/1.73 m² in SW group (p < .001). The acute rejection occurred to four recipients in the SC group (3.5%) and no acute rejection occurred to SW group recipients during the 6–2 months posttransplant period. Oral glucose tolerance tests revealed that recipients in the SW group were more improved in glucose metabolism than the SC group during 6–12 months posttransplant. In addition, cholesterol levels and blood pressure decreased after the withdrawal of steroids in the SW group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a 6‐month withdrawal of steroids in recipients with low immunological risk and stable graft function can be safely conducted and result in improvement of metabolic profiles. Stable recipients without biopsy‐proven acute rejection and proteinuria can safely withdraw from steroids out of a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen 6‐months posttransplant. A long‐term follow‐up study is needed to verify our results.

Impact of Induction Immunosuppression on the Recurrence of Primary IgA Nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of induction immunosuppression on the incidence of recurrent IgA nephropathy (IgAN).

METHODS

We conducted recurrence-free survival analysis of recipients of a first kidney transplant for IgAN who received a graft between 1995 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to sort the significant risk factors for recurrence. A total of 226 recipients with biopsy-proven IgAN received a kidney transplant, and 218 recipients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Among the recipients, 29 cases of IgAN recurrence were observed. The recipients were categorized into 3 groups according to induction immunosuppression: no induction (group 1, n = 72), anti-CD25 (group 2, n = 86), and antithymocyte globulin (ATG, group 3, n = 60). The 5- and 10-year cumulative IgAN recurrence rates were 9.7% and 21.0%, respectively. Recipients receiving ATG (group 3) exhibited significantly higher 4- and 5-year recurrence-free graft survival rates (both 96.4%) than recipients who received anti-CD25 (group 2, both 85.1%, P = .03). However, the induction therapy used (ATG or basiliximab) was not the risk factor for IgAN recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, we concluded that ATG induction seems to postpone IgAN recurrence. These findings should be evaluated with well-designed prospective studies.

Ten-year observational follow-up of a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy combined with steroid withdrawal in living-donor renal transplantation

Although various strategies for steroid withdrawal after transplantation have been attempted, there are few reports of the long-term results of steroid withdrawal regimens in kidney transplantation. Earlier, we reported on a 5-year prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF, when steroids were withdrawn 6 months after kidney transplantation in low-risk patients. We now report the 10-year observational data on the study population. We collected data from the database of the Organ Transplantation Center, Samsung Medical Center for 5 years after completion of the original study (TAC group n = 62; CsA group n = 55). The 10-year patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection-free survival did not differ between groups (98% vs 96%; P = 0.49, 78% vs 85%; P = 0.75 and 84% vs 76%; P = 0.14 in the TAC group vs CsA group, respectively). In low-risk patients, there was no difference in long-term patient and graft survival between TAC- and CsA-based late steroid withdrawal regimens that included MMF treatment. More long-term randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the benefits of late steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation.

A randomized double-blind, placebo controlled trial of steroid withdrawal after pediatric renal transplantation

In an effort to reduce rejection, extend allograft survival and minimize complications, we hypothesized that robust immunosuppression during the first 6 months after transplantation would allow for the safe withdrawal of steroids. A total of 274 pediatric subjects were enrolled and received an anti-CD25 antibody, sirolimus, calcineurin inhibitor and steroids. At 6 months after transplantation, subjects were randomized to steroid withdrawal (n=73) versus continued low-dose steroids (n=59). This study was stopped prior to target enrollment because of the incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. At the time of study termination, 132 subjects had been randomized and were available for analysis. At 18 months after transplantation, there was no difference in the standardized height z score; however, the standardized height velocity was greater in the steroid withdrawal group compared to the control group (p=0.033). There were no differences in acute rejection episodes between treatment groups. The 3-year allograft survival rate was 84.5% in the control group and 98.6% in the steroid withdrawal group (p=0.002). The immunosuppressive protocol utilized in this study allowed for the withdrawal of steroids without an increased risk of rejection or allograft loss. However, the complications associated with the use of this immunosuppressive protocol were too high to recommend its routine use in pediatric patients.

Immunosuppressive medications, clinical and metabolic parameters in new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a growing concern in transplantation. All modifiable risk factors are not yet identified. We assessed the relationship between baseline clinical and biochemical parameters and NODAT. Eight-hundred and fifty-seven in-Caucasian renal transplant recipients were included. Charts were individually reviewed. The follow-up was 5.3 years (ranges: 0.25-20.8; 5613 patient-years). The incidence of NODAT was 15.0%, 18.4% and 22.0% at 10, 15 and 20 years following transplantation. Age, body mass index (BMI), glucose (all P < 0.0001) and triglycerides [hazard ratio (HR) per 1 mmol/l: 1.44 [1.17-1.77], P = 0.0006] were potent risk factors whereas steroid withdrawal (HR: 0.69 [0.47-1.01], P = 0.0601) reduced the risk. As compared to cyclosporine, sirolimus (HR: 3.26 [1.63-6.49], P = 0.0008) and tacrolimus (HR: 3.04 [2.02-4.59], P < 0.0001) were risk factors for NODAT. The risk of NODAT was comparable for sirolimus (HR: 2.35 [1.06-5.19], P = 0.0350) and tacrolimus (HR: 2.34 [1.46-3.75], P = 0.0004) after adjustments on age, BMI, glucose and steroid withdrawal; however, unlike sirolimus, tacrolimus remained significant after adjustment on triglycerides. The risk of NODAT appeared similar, but its pathophysiology seemed different in sirolimus- and tacrolimus-treated patients; this observation needs confirmation. However, main independent risk factors were age, BMI, initial glucose and triglycerides.

Corticosteroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation: the present status

Corticosteroids (CS) have played a vital role in organ transplantation, both for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection. However, the use of CS is associated with a wide range of adverse effects. With advances in immunosuppressive drug therapy, attempts have been made to minimize the use of CS to avoid or alleviate their side effects. Withdrawal of CS months after transplantation has transitioned to days. In low to intermediate risk renal allograft recipients, use of induction therapy and modern maintenance drug combinations allows safe withdrawal of CS within the first week of transplantation. In other groups, existing potent maintenance agents permit tapering of CS to low doses over the first few months. Withdrawal of these small doses may not add to the benefits.

Therapeutic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors for the nephrologist

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the backbone of immunosuppression for most kidney transplant recipients. Despite many years of experience, protocols that optimize efficacy with minimal toxicity remain a subject of debate. Nevertheless, studies of the pharmacokinetic properties of the CNI, particularly cyclosporine, have led to improved dosing strategies. The purpose of this article is to review the current understanding of CNI pharmacokinetics and its relevance to proper dosing and monitoring of these medications. This article also reviews the trials that have helped to define the optimal dosages and discusses the effect of adjunctive immunosuppressive agents on CNI pharmacokinetics and dosing.