Fast and sensitive detection of Trichophyton rubrum in superficial tinea and onychomycosis by use of a direct polymerase chain reaction assay

Multiplex real-time PCR for skin fungal infections: The diagnostic reliability in a one-year non-interventional study

The skin fungal infection diagnostic workflow currently includes microscopic and culture-based methods as the gold standard. Recent published data described the possible limitations of these conventional techniques documenting the possibility of reducing response time intervals. The present study reports an evaluation of the DermaGenius® (DG) multiplex kit (PathoNostics) for rapid C. albicans and dermatophytes identification directly from skin samples. The investigations involved 90 specimens that underwent DNA extraction and amplification simultaneously to microscopic and culture methods. According to current guidelines, we defined a dermatophytic skin infection as the simultaneous presence of clinical evidence of skin lesions and positive results for dermatophyte elements from microscopy and/or cultures. The collected data remarked on the advantages of the molecular assay, especially in terms of sensitivity and rapidity. A statistical evaluation analysed a comparison between conventional and innovative diagnostic methods. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DG-PCR in the cutaneous dermatophytosis were, respectively, 94.7%, 78.8%, 88.5%, and 89.6%. Based on our experience, the molecular technique could represent a diagnostic confirmation in the case of previous antifungal treatment, little biological material available, or urgent clinical conditions.

Expression of epidermal antimicrobial peptides is increased in tinea pedis

BACKGROUND

Tinea pedis is often chronic or recurrent, but not all individuals are equally susceptible to this infection. Dermatophytes are able to induce the expression of antimicrobial peptides and proteins (AMPs) in human keratinocytes and certain AMPs can inhibit the growth of dermatophytes.

OBJECTIVE

The focus of this study was to analyse the secretion of relevant AMPs, especially RNase 7, human beta-defensin-2 (hBD-2) and the S-100 protein psoriasin (S100A7), in patients with confirmed tinea pedis.

METHODS

To verify the diagnosis, skin scales were obtained from all patients (n = 13) and the dermatophytes were identified by potassium hydroxide mount, culture and molecular analysis. To determine the AMP concentrations, the lesional skin area of the foot was rinsed with a buffer that was subsequently analysed by ELISA. The corresponding area of the other unaffected foot as well as defined healthy skin areas of the forearm and forehead and samples from age and gender-matched healthy volunteers served as controls.

RESULTS

In tinea pedis patients the AMP concentrations were higher in lesional skin than in non-lesional skin and in healthy skin of controls. In particular, concentrations of hBD-2 and psoriasin were significantly elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

The induction of AMPs in tinea pedis might be triggered directly by the dermatophytes; furthermore, attendant inflammation and/or differentiation processes may play a role. Our results indicate that there is no defect in the constitutive expression and induction of the analysed AMPs by dermatophytes in the epidermis of affected patients. However, it is not known why the elevated AMP concentrations fail to efficiently combat dermatophyte growth.

Recent trends in rapid diagnostic techniques for dermatophytosis

Dermatophytosis is a common contagious disease of both humans and animals. It is caused by a group of filamentous fungi known as dermatophytes, including several genera and various species. An accurate diagnosis of dermatophytes as a causative agent of a skin lesion requires up to one month of conventional laboratory diagnostics. The conventional gold standard diagnostic method is a direct microscopic examination followed by 3 to 4 weeks of Sabouraud's dextrose agar (SDA) culturing, and it may require further post-culturing identification through biochemical tests or microculture technique application. The laborious, exhaustive, and time-consuming gold standard method was a real challenge facing all dermatologists to achieve a rapid, accurate dermatophytosis diagnosis. Various studies developed more rapid, accurate, reliable, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tools. All developed techniques showed more rapidity than the classical method but variable specificities and sensitivities. An extensive bibliography is included and discussed through this review, showing recent variable dermatophytes diagnostic categories with an illustration of weaknesses, strengths, and prospects.

Major challenges and perspectives in the diagnostics and treatment of dermatophyte infections

Dermatophytes are the aetiological factors of a majority of superficial fungal infections. What distinguishes them from other pathogenic filamentous fungi is their unique ability to degrade keratin. The remarkable ability of this group of fungi to survive in different ecosystems results from their morphological and ecological diversity as well as high adaptability to changing environmental conditions. Paradoxically, despite the progress in medicine, the prevalence of dermatophyte infections is increasing from year to year. At the beginning of the third millennium, practical diagnostic and therapeutic options are still very limited. This review focuses on understanding the major problems in this aspect of dermatophyte infections and indicates future strategies and perspectives for novel approaches to identification and drugs for elimination of dermatophytes. Particular importance is placed on development of a strategy for a diagnostic pathway and implementation of rapid and reliable diagnostics methods designed by international teams. Furthermore, among compounds that currently arouse great interest, representatives of terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids and essential oils deserve attention. Many of these compounds are undergoing clinical trials as potential antifungal agents, and future research should focus on attempts at determination of the applicability of tested substances. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages in implementation of new diagnostic paths and medicinal substances for routine use are indicated.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis

Dermatophytosis is a disease of global significance caused by pathogenic keratinolytic fungi called dermatophytes in both animals and humans. The recent taxonomy of dermatophytes classifies them into six pathogenic genera, namely Microsporum, Trichophyton, Epidermophyton, Nannizzia, Lophophyton and Arthroderma. It is because of the delayed diagnostic nature and low accuracy of dermatophyte detection by conventional methods that paved the path for the evolution of molecular diagnostic techniques, which provide the accurate and rapid diagnosis of dermatophytosis for an appropriate, timely antifungal therapy that prevents the nonspecific over-the-counter self-medication. This review focuses on the importance of rapid and accurate diagnosis of dermatophytosis, limitations of conventional methods, selection of targets in diagnosis, and factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of various molecular diagnostic technologies in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis. Generally, all the molecular techniques have a significant edge over the conventional methods of culture and microscopy in the dermatophytosis diagnosis. However, in mycology laboratory, the suitability of any molecular diagnostic technique in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis is driven by the requirement of time, economy, complexity, the range of species spectrum detected and the scale of diagnostic output required. Thus, various choices involved in the pursuit of a diagnosis of dermatophytosis are determined by the available conditions and the facilities in the laboratory.

Recent Findings in Onychomycosis and Their Application for Appropriate Treatment

Onychomycosis is mainly caused by two dermatophyte species, Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton interdigitale. A study of nail invasion mechanisms revealed that the secreted subtilisin Sub6, which has never been detected under in vitro growth conditions, was the main protease secreted by T. rubrum and T. interdigitale during infection. In contrast, most of the proteases secreted during the digestion of keratin in vitro were not detected in infected nails. The hypothesis that proteases isolated from dermatophytes grown in a keratin medium are virulence factors is no longer supported. Non-dermatophyte fungi can also be infectious agents in nails. It is necessary to identify the infectious fungus in onychomycosis to prescribe adequate treatment, as moulds such as Fusarium spp. and Aspergillus spp. are insensitive to standard treatments with terbinafine or itraconazole, which are usually applied for dermatophytes. In these refractory cases, topical amphotericin B treatment has shown to be effective. Terbinafine treatment failure against dermatophytes is also possible, and is usually due to resistance caused by a missense mutation in the squalene epoxidase enzyme targeted by the drug. Trichophyton resistance to terbinafine treatment is an emerging problem, and a switch to azole-based treatment may be necessary to cure such cases of onychomycosis.

Diagnosis of Superficial Mycoses by a Rapid and Effective PCR Method from Samples of Scales, Nails and Hair

Superficial mycoses are the most frequently diagnosed affections of the stratum corneum of the skin, nails and hair. It is generally caused by the presence of yeasts and dermatophytes. Onychomycosis is the most common infection with an incidence of 80-90% in Europe generally produced by Trichophyton rubrum. The aim of this study is to compare the traditional diagnostic techniques of superficial mycoses with a homemade and wide-spectrum fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that amplifies a specific region of the 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) directly from samples of scales, nails and hair. A total of 626 clinical samples (obtained in the Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain) were analysed by traditional culture, microscopy and PCR. DNA extraction was carried out by using an extraction buffer and bovine serum, and amplification of samples and performance of the PCR were checked by conventional agarose gel electrophoresis with subsequent sequencing of amplified samples. A total of 211 samples (34%) resulted in positive diagnosis with at least one of the two applied methods: culture (21%) and PCR (22%). Despite the low percentage of identification achieved by the sequencing technique (40%), the value contributed by the amplification of the 18S region of the rRNA was considered important in the identification as it showed a high predictive values for both positive and negative diagnoses (90.9% and 94.6%, respectively). The proposed PCR method has been confirmed as a complementary, rapid, and effective method in the diagnosis of superficial mycoses. Additionally, it reduces the time to obtain satisfactory results from 4 weeks to 7 h.

Comparison of fungal fluorescent staining and ITS rDNA PCR-based sequencing with conventional methods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis

BACKGROUND

The current gold standard for diagnosing onychomycosis is direct microscopic examination and culturing. Fungal culture is a time-consuming procedure, while direct microscopy of potassium hydroxide (KOH) mounts suffers from low sensitivity. More rapid and sensitive methods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis are in high demand.

OBJECTIVE

To establish an effective method for the diagnosis of onychomycosis by assessing the efficacies of fungal fluorescent staining and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based sequencing.

METHODS

A total of 204 clinical specimens from patients with suspected onychomycosis were analysed. The gold standard for a true positive sample was positive by KOH, culturing or both methods. All specimens were also tested by fungal fluorescent staining and ITS rDNA PCR-based sequencing. We compared the detection, sensitivity and specificity for these two methods with conventional methods.

RESULTS

In total, 126 (62%) and 102 (50%) were detected by fluorescent staining and PCR-based sequencing, respectively. According to the conventional diagnostic standard, the sensitivity of fluorescent staining and PCR-based sequencing was 97% and 78%, respectively, and specificities of 89% and 90%, respectively. Use of fluorescence enhanced the sensitivity of direct examination by 12% compared with KOH. PCR-based sequencing increased the sensitivity by 6% compared with culturing.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence microscopy has a higher sensitivity for the detection of fungi in nail specimens compared with KOH and can be used as a rapid screening tool. PCR-based sequencing was faster and more sensitive compared with culture and when used in conjunction with fluorescence microscopy resulted in higher efficiency.

Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism as a Confirmatory Test for Onychomycosis

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of one or more units of the nail caused by dermatophytes, or mould and nondermatophytes yeast. Investigations are needed to establish the diagnosis of onychomycosis before starting treatment. Several investigations methods for diagnosing onychomycosis are microscopic examination with 20% KOH, fungal culture, histopathology examination with PAS staining (Periodic acid Schiff) and PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction). Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) is a method after PCR amplification allowing more specific results.

AIM

To determine the diagnostic value of PCR - RFLP in the diagnosis of onychomycosis using fungal culture as the gold standard and to find out the majority fungal species that cause onychomycosis.

METHODS

This study is a diagnostic test for the diagnosis of onychomycosis by using culture as the gold standard.

SUBJECTS

Thirty - five patients suspected of having onychomycosis from history and dermatological examination.

RESULTS

PCR - RFLP in the diagnosis of onychomycosis has a sensitivity of 85.71%, specificity of 28.57%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 82.76% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 33.33%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios are 1.20 and 0.5 with an accuracy of 74.29%.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR - RFLP may be considered for a faster and more accurate alternative examination in the diagnosis of onychomycosis.

Diagnosis of Dermatophytosis Using Molecular Biology

Identification of fungi in dermatological samples using PCR is reliable and provides significantly improved results in comparison with cultures. It is possible to identify the infectious agent when negative results are obtained from cultures. In addition, identification of the infectious agent can be obtained in 1 day. Conventional and real-time PCR methods used for direct fungus identification in collected samples vary by DNA extraction methods, targeted DNA and primers, and the way of analysing the PCR products. The choice of a unique method in a laboratory is complicated because the results expected from skin and hair sample analysis are different from those expected in cases of onychomycosis. In skin and hair samples, one dermatophyte among about a dozen possible species has to be identified. In onychomycosis, the infectious agents are mainly Trichophyton rubrum and, to a lesser extent, Trichophyton interdigitale, but also moulds insensitive to oral treatments used for dermatophytes, which renders fungal identification mandatory. The benefits obtained with the use of PCR methods for routine analysis of dermatological samples have to be put in balance with the relative importance of getting a result in a short time, the price of molecular biology reagents and equipment, and especially the time spent conducting laboratory manipulations.

Species identification of dermatophytes in paraffin-embedded biopsies with a new polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the internal transcribed spacer 2 region and comparison with histopathological features

BACKGROUND

Dermatophytosis is a very common skin infection with a broad clinical spectrum. Biopsies are often used to confirm the diagnosis, especially when the clinical presentation is unusual. Not uncommonly, organisms are hard to find even with periodic acid-Schiff stains. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for dermatophytes can be used in such cases.

OBJECTIVES

To test a new PCR assay allowing species identification of dermatophytes on paraffin-embedded biopsies, and to reassess histopathological criteria for diagnosis of dermatophytosis.

METHODS

In total, 121 biopsies of 92 patients with clinical suspicion of tinea were included. In 42 samples the clinical diagnosis had been confirmed histopathologically, and in 79 no fungal elements had been identified. PCRs targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)2 region of dermatophytes were performed on the biopsies with subsequent sequencing. Sections were reassessed for the presence/absence of hyphae/spores, pattern and composition of infiltrate, and epidermal/follicular changes. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical data.

RESULTS

The new ITS2 PCR assay detected 94% of the dermatophyte infections (compared with 79% identified by microscopy). Trichophyton rubrum was the dominant species (89%), and other species identified were Trichophyton verrucosum (2%), Microsporum canis (4%), Epidermophyton floccosum (2%) and Trichophyton interdigitale (4%). In particular, infections with T. interdigitale and manifestations with prominent spongiosis were not diagnosed histologically. Intracorneal neutrophils, which have been emphasized as a histopathological clue to dermatophytosis, were present in only 46% of PCR-positive samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular species identification of dermatophytes via ITS2 PCR can easily be implemented in a routine dermatopathology setting. It is fast and highly specific and improves the sensitivity of histopathological diagnosis of dermatophytosis.

[New apects in the diagnosis and therapy of dermatomycoses]

Recent observations indicate that Arthroderma benhamiae can cause bullous tinea, that onychomycosis increasingly occurs in children and that molds can cause tinea-like lesions. If a mycotic infection is suspected, the pathogen needs to be identified. The first genetic assays for the detection of dermatophytes have successfully been tested under routine conditions. Using appropriate techniques, genetic diagnosis is faster and more sensitive than a culture. Laboratory standards that would facilitate widespread implementation of genetic identification of dermatophytes have not yet been established. For the identification of yeasts, MALDI-TOF has already been established in many laboratories. This method is being refined for the diagnosis of hyphomycetes too. Newer antimycotics that are approved for certain systemic mycoses such as the triazoles voriconazole and posaconazole and the echinocandines caspofungin, micafungin und anidulafungin may be considered for dermatomycoses that cannot be treated by other therapies. Thermotherapy and photodynamic therapy are additional options in particularly difficult cases.

[Fungal nail infections - an update. Part 2 - From the causative agent to diagnosis - conventional and molecular procedures]

Trichophyton (T.) rubrum is the most frequently isolated dermatophyte in onychomycosis, both in Germany and worldwide. T. interdigitale (formerly T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale) follows in second place. A further however rarely isolated dermatophyte in onychomycosis is Epidermophyton floccosum. Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii, and Candida albicans, followed by Trichosporon spp. are the most important yeasts which are found in onychomycosis. The molds most often responsible include Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, and several Aspergillus species, e. g. Aspergillus versicolor, and Fusarium spp. These so called non-dermatophyte molds (NDM) are increasingly isolated as emerging pathogens in onychomycosis. The diagnosis of onychomycosis should be verified in the mycology laboratory. Conventional diagnostic methods include the direct examination, ideally using fluorescence staining with Calcofluor® or Blancophor®, and culture. However, new molecular biological methods primarily employing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for direct detection of dermatophyte DNA in skin scrapings and nail samples have been introduced into routine mycological diagnostics. The diagnostic sensitivity is higher when both conventional and molecular procedures are combined.

Molecular diagnosis of dermatophyte infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advances in the molecular diagnostics of dermatophytosis may improve speed, specificities and sensitivities. This review provides an update on the current available molecular techniques for the diagnosis of dermatophytosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular diagnostics of dermatophytosis relate to the direct detection of dermatophyte DNA in clinical specimens. Important challenges have been associated with the DNA extraction procedures, which despite improvement still lack consensus, and the fact that phenotypic species classification not always translates into distinct molecular taxonomic entities. Molecular methods are divided into conventional PCR, real-time PCR and post-PCR techniques. The former benefits from simplicity and being less expensive to implement, real-time PCR is less laborious, may enable a broader spectrum of simultaneous species detections and the closed system reduces contamination risk, whereas post-PCR strategies may increase the number of species identified but prolong the turnaround time, and the processing of PCR products increases the laboratory contamination risk.

SUMMARY

Current molecular methods are on the verge of overcoming most of the early challenges regarding dermatophyte taxonomy, DNA extraction procedures and species specificity, and thus may lead to an increased adoption of such methods. This may point towards a novel consensus in which molecular methods supplement or even replace classical diagnosis of dermatophytosis.

Identification of infectious agents in onychomycoses by PCR-terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism

A fast and reliable assay for the identification of dermatophyte fungi and nondermatophyte fungi (NDF) in onychomycosis is essential, since NDF are especially difficult to cure using standard treatment. Diagnosis is usually based on both direct microscopic examination of nail scrapings and macroscopic and microscopic identification of the infectious fungus in culture assays. In the last decade, PCR assays have been developed for the direct detection of fungi in nail samples. In this study, we describe a PCR-terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) assay to directly and routinely identify the infecting fungi in nails. Fungal DNA was easily extracted using a commercial kit after dissolving nail fragments in an Na(2)S solution. Trichophyton spp., as well as 12 NDF, could be unambiguously identified by the specific restriction fragment size of 5'-end-labeled amplified 28S DNA. This assay enables the distinction of different fungal infectious agents and their identification in mixed infections. Infectious agents could be identified in 74% (162/219) of cases in which the culture results were negative. The PCR-TRFLP assay described here is simple and reliable. Furthermore, it has the possibility to be automated and thus routinely applied to the rapid diagnosis of a large number of clinical specimens in dermatology laboratories.