Reasons for creation of permanent ileostomy for the management of idiopathic chronic constipation

Diverting Loop Ileostomy in the Management of Medically Refractory Constipation Cases Not Falling Into Classical Categories

BACKGROUND

The approach to constipation refractory to medical management does not necessarily follow classical teaching and is challenging. Although the role of surgery is unclear, diverting loop ileostomy may be offered to gauge symptom response followed by colectomy for appropriate patients.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to examine outcomes in patients with constipation not falling into classical subtypes who underwent diverting loop ileostomy creation as the initial surgical intervention. Our secondary aim was to offer patients colectomy and anastomosis and examine their outcome if they improved after ileostomy.

DESIGN

The study design was a retrospective review.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in the pelvic floor center of our colorectal surgery department from January 2006 to December 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients with medically refractory constipation referred for surgical consideration and not falling into classical constipation categories (slow transit, normal transit, or pelvic floor dysfunction) underwent evaluation with transit marker study, cinedefecography, and anal physiology and were offered ileostomy as initial surgical management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary measures were symptom improvement and self-reported quality of life improvement with increased patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients underwent diverting loop ileostomy as initial surgical therapy. Group 1 had 54 (62%) patients who self-reported symptom improvement, discontinued anticonstipation medication, and had ileostomy output >200 mL/day. Of these 54 patients, 25 had colectomy with anastomosis, 16 (64%) of whom had symptom improvement, stayed off bowel medication, and had >1 bowel movement daily. Group 2 had 33 patients who did not meet the above criteria after initial ileostomy. Nine patients in group 2 elected colectomy with anastomosis after intensive counseling; 6 (66%) reported the same positive results above.

LIMITATIONS

The study limitations included: 1) no objective outcome measures of patient's perceived symptom improvement and satisfaction and 2) retrospective review.

CONCLUSION

Initial creation of diverting loop ileostomy may be offered to a subset of refractory constipation patients not falling into classical categories after thorough workup. Patients who self-report symptom improvement, have ileostomy output >200 mL/day, and do not require bowel medication may have acceptable results with subsequent colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B854.

ILEOSTOMA EN ASA DERIVATIVA EN CASOS DE ESTREIMIENTO REFRACTARIOS AL TRATAMIENTO MDICO, QUE NO PERTENECEN A LAS CATEGORAS CLSICAS

ANTECEDENTES:El enfoque del estreñimiento refractario al tratamiento médico, que no siempre se presenta como las formas descritas clasicamente, es un desafío. Si bien el papel de la cirugía no está claro, se puede ofrecer una ileostomía en asa para medir la respuesta de los síntomas, seguida de colectomía en pacientes seleccionados.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados de pacientes con estreñimiento, que no pertenecen a las formas clásicas de presentación, que se les realizó una ileostomía en asa de derivación, como intervención quirúrgica inicial. El objetivo secundario fue ofrecer a los pacientes una colectomía con anastomosis primaria y evaluar si mejoraban sus resultados después de la ileostomía.DISEÑO:El diseño del estudio fue una revisión retrospectiva.MARCO:Este estudio se realizó en el centro del piso pélvico de nuestro departamento de cirugía colorrectal, e incluyo los pacientes atendidos entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2018.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron los pacientes con estreñimiento refractario al tratamiento médico, derivados para evaluación quirúrgica, que no presentaban las formas clásicas de presentación (tránsito lento, tránsito normal, disfunción del suelo pélvico). Estos se sometieron a evaluación con estudio de tránsito colónico, cinedefecografía y fisiología anal, y se les ofreció una ileostomía en asa como tratamiento quirúrgico inicial.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las primeras medidas fueron la mejora de los síntomas y la calidad de vida informado por el paciente.RESULTADOS:Ochenta y siete pacientes fueron sometidos a ileostomía en asa como tratamiento quirúrgico inicial. El grupo 1 tenía 54 (62%) pacientes que informaron mejoría de los síntomas, interrumpieron la medicación proquinética y tuvieron un débito por la ileostomía >200 cc/día. De estos 54 pacientes, 25 se sometieron a colectomía más anastomosis primaria y 16 (64%) tuvieron una mejoría de los síntomas, dejaron de tomar medicamentos proquinéticos y tuvieron más de una evacuación al día. El grupo 2 tenía 33 pacientes que no cumplían con los criterios de mejoría de los síntomas después de la ileostomía inicial. Nueve pacientes del grupo 2 eligieron colectomía con anastomosis después de un asesoramiento intensivo, 6 (66%) informaron resultados positivos de mejoría de los síntomas.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del estudio incluyeron 1) ninguna medida de resultado objetiva de la mejora y satisfacción de los síntomas percibidos por el paciente 2) revisión retrospectiva.CONCLUSIÓNES:La creación inicial de una ileostomía en asa de derivación se puede ofrecer a un subgrupo de pacientes con estreñimiento refractario que no entran en las categorías clásicas después de un estudio exhaustivo. La mejoría de los síntomas, informado por los pacientes, producción de ileostomía >200 cc/día y que no requieren medicación proquinética, pueden tener resultados aceptables con colectomía y anastomosis ileorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/Bxxx. (Traducción-Dr. Rodrigo Azolas).

Stoma reversal in functional bowel disease: managing patient choice

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to assess the rate of stoma reversal in patients who have undergone stoma formation with permanent intent for functional bowel disorder. We also assessed the incidence of malignancy in defunctioned bowel.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing planned permanent stoma formation for functional bowel disorder over a 10-year period at a single tertiary centre.

RESULTS

Of 92 patients included in the study, 11 (12%) requested and underwent stoma reversal following stoma formation for functional bowel disorder. Of 84 patients with defunctioned bowel left in situ, two (2%) developed bowel malignancy during our study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Stoma formation may be necessary for patients with incontinence and constipation when conservative treatments fail. Some patients have very firm views about the need for a stoma, but a significant proportion of patients do not cope with a stoma and request reversal, therefore patient selection and pre-procedure counselling are important. The risk of developing malignant disease in the defunctioned colon is potentially significant, and consideration should be given to appropriate surveillance in this group of patients. Evidence for stoma formation in functional gastrointestinal disorders is lacking; this study reports outcomes in a large cohort of patients over a long period, and highlights areas where further research and practice guidelines are needed. If large numbers of patients are undergoing stoma reversal posing significant mortality and morbidity risks, this suggests that patient selection and preoperative counselling need refinement.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defaecation in adults

BACKGROUND

Dyssynergic defaecation is a common form of functional constipation that responds poorly to conservative interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defaecation using global clinical improvement as the primary outcome, and resolution of the dyssynergic pattern on anorectal physiology and quality of life as secondary outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2019 using a predefined strategy. Randomised controlled trials of adult patients with dyssynergic defaecation and a biofeedback treatment arm were eligible for review. Studies including patients with secondary forms of constipation were excluded. Data abstraction and risk of bias assessments were conducted by consensus between two authors.

RESULTS

Eleven trials including 725 participants were included in the narrative review. Sixty-three percent of patients treated with biofeedback reported clinical improvement. Six studies included in the meta-analysis showed biofeedback superior to non-biofeedback therapy for the primary outcome (OR 3.63, CI 1.10-11.93, p = 0.03). Heterogeneity between trials and overall risk of bias was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients referred to tertiary units with dyssynergic defaecation who fail conservative therapy. Future research should be directed towards identifying validated outcomes and the optimum method for delivering biofeedback therapy. Home biofeedback therapy may improve accessibility and recruitment to future clinical trials.

Surgery and sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and fecal incontinence

Fecal continence is a complex bodily function, which requires the interplay of sensation, rectal capacity, and anal neuromuscular function. Fecal incontinence affects approximately 2% of the population and has a prevalence of 15% in elderly patients. Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. The variety of symptoms and risk factors suggest a multifactorial origin. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a type of functional constipation. The effectiveness of biofeedback as a treatment remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review of all randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of biofeedback in adults with PFD was carried out. All online databases from 1950 to 2007 were searched. This was supplemented by hand searching references of retrieved articles.

RESULTS

Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three compared biofeedback with non-biofeedback treatments and four compared different biofeedback modalities. Electromyography feedback was most widely utilized. The trials were heterogeneous with varied inclusion criteria, treatment protocols and definitions of success. Most had methodological limitations. Quality of life and psychological morbidity were assessed rarely. Meta-analysis of the studies involving any form of biofeedback compared with any other treatment suggested that biofeedback conferred a sixfold increase in the odds of treatment success (odds ratio 5.861 (95 per cent confidence interval 2.175 to 15.794); random-effects model).

CONCLUSION

Although biofeedback is the recommended treatment for PFD, high-quality evidence of effectiveness is lacking. Meta-analysis of the available evidence suggests that biofeedback is the best option, but well designed trials that take into account quality of life and psychological morbidity are needed.