A case of prolonged human parvovirus B19 DNA-emia associated with polyclonal B cell activation

Positive predictive value of seroconversion or positive rubella IgM in diagnosis of maternal rubella infection: Seven-years review of French National Reference Laboratory for Rubella

BACKGROUND

In France, as in most developed countries, childbearing age women are routinely screened for rubella antibodies to identify and vaccinate susceptible women. Immunity to rubella is usually determined by measuring the rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin G (RV-IgG). In case of seroconversion for RV-IgG and/or positive RVIgM during pregnancy, laboratories usually send serum samples to the French National Reference Laboratory (FNRL) for Rubella in order to perform complementary investigations and confirm or exclude rubella infection during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to report results of these investigations during a seven-year period (2013-2019) and evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of RV-IgG seroconversion or positive RV-IgM to diagnose maternal rubella infection in France.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 2013 and 2019, 5398 serum samples collected from 4104 pregnant women, were addressed to FNRL because of RV-IgG seroconversion (N=899) or positive RV-IgM (N=3205). Additional serological tests were performed, mainly immunoblot (to look for the presence of anti-E1 protective antibody) and RV-IgG avidity (to exclude or confirm primary infection).

RESULTS

Overall, for 3724/4104 (90.8 %) women, rubella primary-infection during pregnancy was formally excluded and maternal rubella primary-infection was only confirmed in 46/4104 (1.1 %) cases.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians and biologists should be particularly aware that RV-IgG seroconversion or positive RV-IgM, in the current context of low RV circulation in France are most often not rubella primary infections. PPV of seroconversion to assess maternal rubella primary infection is as low as 0.2 % (95 % CI: 0 %; 0.5 %) and PPV of positive RV-IgM is only of 1.4 % (95 % CI: 0.99 %; 1.81 %).

The serological markers of acute infection with hepatitis A, B, C, D, E and G viruses revisited

Viral hepatitis is a liver infection caused by one of the six hepatitis viruses: hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, and G virus (HAV to HEV and HGV). These agents differ in their biological, immunological, pathological and epidemiological characteristics. They cause infections that, when symptomatic, lead to clinical manifestations and laboratory findings that are not specific to a particular virus, often making differential diagnosis difficult, especially when no knowledge is available regarding the patient's medical history or the epidemiological background. A number of acute-phase serological markers, such as anti-HAV, anti-HBc, anti-HDV and anti-HEV IgM antibodies, are able to provide a clear indication of an infection caused by HAV, HBV, HDV or HEV. Anti-HCV antibodies and HGV/RNA are used for the diagnosis of HCV and HGV infections. The importance of each of these markers will be reviewed, and different factors that can interfere with the diagnosis of acute infections caused by these viruses will be described.

Occurrence of Immunoglobulin M Antibodies against Several Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in Acute Hantavirus Infection

Elevated levels of immunoglobulin M antibodies against various pathogens, most frequently Epstein-Barr-virus and Coxiella burnetii , were detected by immunoassay in 15 of 48 patients (31.3%) with acute Puumala virus infections. Although the mechanisms leading to this IgM response are not clear yet, polyspecific immunoglobulin M antibodies have to be taken into account to avoid misinterpretation of serological results in acute hantavirus infection.

Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay for the detection of anti-hepatitis A virus IgM

Background

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a causative agent of acute hepatitis, which is transmitted by person-to-person contact and via the faecal-oral route. Acute HAV infection is usually confirmed by anti-HAV IgM detection. In order to detect anti-HAV IgM in the serum of patients infected with HAV, we developed a rapid assay based on immunochromatography (ICA) and evaluated the sensitivity of this assay by comparing it with a commercial microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) that is widely used for serological diagnosis.

Results

The newly developed ICA showed 100% sensitivity and specificity when used to test 150 anti-HAV IgM-positive sera collected from infected patients and 75 negative sera from healthy subjects. Also, the sensitivity of ICA is about 10 times higher than MEIA used in this study by determining end point to detect independent on infected genotype of HAV. In addition, the ICA was able to detect 1 positive sample from among 50 sera from acute hepatitis patients that had tested negative for anti-HAV IgM using the MEIA.

Conclusion

Conclusively, ICA for the detection of anti-HAV IgM will be very effective for rapid assay to apply clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigation on epidemics due to the simplicity, rapidity and specificity.

Concurrent detection of human herpesvirus type 6 and measles-specific IgMs during acute exanthematic human parvovirus B19 infection

A familial outbreak of human parvovirus B19 infection is described in which serological tests carried out routinely for determining the causal agent of febrile rashes of viral etiology failed to yield a definitive diagnosis. Concurrent detection of serum IgMs to parvovirus B19 and to heterologous viruses such as human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) and measles virus complicated interpretation of the data. IgG avidity tests and investigation and testing for the presence of viral DNA in sera by PCR were required to confirm parvovirus B19. The study stresses the importance of avidity and PCR tests to obtain a firm diagnosis of febrile exanthematic viral diseases.

Diagnostic relevance of immunoglobulin G avidity for hepatitis A virus

Diagnosis of acute hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection is based on the detection of HAV immunoglobulin M (IgM). However, IgM could be detected due to nonspecific polyclonal activation of the immune system. An avidity test for anti-HAV IgG was developed to distinguish acute infection, where low-avidity antibodies are detected, from immune reactivation. The assay was tested on 104 samples, including 11 sera from patients with past infection, 15 sera from patients with acute infection and 4 collected after recovery, 10 sera from vaccinated subjects, 4 sera from patients with suspected immune reactivation, and 60 unselected HAV-IgM positive sera, collected over 1 year in a routine laboratory. The avidity index (AI) was expressed as percentage. The results were provided as the mean +/- one standard deviation. Patients with a history of prior infection had AIs of >70% (mean, 86% +/- 10), whereas the mean AI was 36% +/- 16 during acute HAV infection (P < 0.001). Within the first month after the onset of hepatitis, avidity was either noncalculable due to a very low IgG titer or <50%. In patients with immune reactivation, avidity was >70% (88% +/- 10%), a finding consistent with a prior infection. Among the 60 unselected sera, 35 (58%) had a noncalculable or <50% avidity, and most of them had a detectable HAV RNA, confirming HAV infection. In contrast, 16 (27%) had an avidity of >70%, and none was reverse transcription-PCR positive, suggesting immune reactivation. These 16 patients were significantly older than the others (50 +/- 16 years versus 26 +/- 14 years). The new anti-HAV IgG avidity assay we developed could improve HAV infection diagnosis, particularly in elderly patients.