Endocrine tumours of the pancreas: an update

The future: surgical advances in MEN1 therapeutic approaches and management strategies

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary autosomal dominant disorder associated with numerous neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recent advances in the management of MEN1 have led to a decrease in mortality due to excess hormones; however, they have also led to an increase in mortality from malignancy, particularly NETs. The main challenges are to localize these tumors, to select those that need therapy because of the risk of aggressive behavior and to select the appropriate therapy associated with minimal morbidity. This must be applied to a hereditary disease with a high risk of recurrence. The overall aim of management in MEN1 is to ensure that the patient remains disease- and symptom-free for as long as possible and maintains a good quality of life. Herein, we review the changes that occurred in the last 20 years in the surgical management of MEN1-associated functional and non-functional pancreatico-duodenal NETs and thymic and bronchial NETs.

Tumor-specific promoter-driven adenoviral therapy for insulinoma

BACKGROUND

Insulinomas are the most common type of neuroendocrine (NE) pancreatic islet tumors. Patients with insulinomas may develop complications associated with hyperinsulinemia. To increase the treatment options for insulinoma patients, we have tested a conditionally replicating adenovirus that has been engineered in such a way that it can specifically express therapeutic genes in NE tumors.

METHODS

We used a promoter-specific adenoviral vector delivery system that is regulated by an INSM1 (insulinoma-associated-1) promoter, which is silent in normal adult tissues but active in developing NE cells and tumors. Through a series of modifications, using an insulator (HS4) and neuron-restrictive silencer elements (NRSEs), an oncolytic adenoviral vector was generated that retains tumor specificity and drives the expression of a mutated adenovirus E1A gene (Δ24E1A) and the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene. The efficacy of this vector was tested in insulinoma-derived MIN, RIN, βTC-1 and pancreatic (Panc-1) cells using in vitro cell survival and in vivo tumor growth assays.

RESULTS

Using in vitro insulinoma-derived cell lines and an in vivo subcutaneous mouse tumor model we found that the INSM1 promoter-driven viruses were able to replicate specifically in INSM1-positive cells. INSM1-specific HSV-tk expression in combination with ganciclovir treatment resulted in dose-dependent tumor cell killing, leaving INSM1-negative cells unharmed. When we combined the INSM1-promoter driven HSV-tk with Δ24E1A and INSM1p-HSV-tk (K5) viruses, we found that the co-infected insulinoma-derived cells expressed higher levels of HSV-tk and exhibited more efficient tumor suppression than cells infected with INSM1p-HSV-tk virus alone.

CONCLUSIONS

INSM1 promoter-driven conditionally replicating adenoviruses may serve as a new tool for the treatment of insulinoma and may provide clinicians with additional options to combat this disease.

Tissue MicroArray Analyses of Pancreatic Duodenal Homeobox-1 in Human Cancers

In previous studies, we demonstrated that rat insulin promoter (RIP)-driven gene therapy successfully targeted human pancreatic tumor PANC-1 cells and mouse insulinoma NIT-1 cells, which are both pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 (PDX-1)-positive. The purpose of this study was to perform a human tissue array analysis to determine potential targets for RIP-driven gene therapy. A custom-designed tissue MicroArray analysis of various human cancer specimens was performed using a PDX-1 polyclonal antibody generated in our laboratory. The custom-designed Tissue MicroArray of human tumor specimens consists of human cancer specimens from different origins, such as the pancreas, breast, colon, prostate, kidney, liver, lung, and ovary. A panel of normal human specimens from 20 organs or tissues was used as a control. All tissues were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. The immunohistochemistry studies of the cytoplasm and the nuclear expression levels were compared using the Loda method and blind reviews. Data are presented as the mean +/- SEM (p < 0.05 was considered significant by the unpaired student t-test). PDX-1 expression intensity was elevated in both benign and malignant tissues from the same patient with pancreas, breast, colon, prostate, and kidney cancers, whereas normal human tissues from control subjects without cancer did not express PDX-1. These results suggest that PDX-1 is an early marker for these cancers and could be potentially used as a diagnostic parameter and perhaps could be targeted by PDX-1-activated gene therapies, such as RIP-TK.

Current concepts in functioning endocrine tumors of the pancreas

Duodenal and pancreatic endocrine tumors are uncommon and their surgical treatment is often difficult. The management of these tumors has changed with recent advancements in tumor localization, intraoperative hormone measurements, standardized surgical techniques, and a better understanding of the genetic basis of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome. We present our experience with 191 endocrine tumors and elaborate the contemporary management of functioning duodenopancreatic endocrine tumors.

[Genetically-driven or supposed genetic-related insulinomas in adults: validation of the surgical strategy proposed by the A.F.C.E./G.E.N.E.M]

Between 1971 and 2002, 80 patients underwent surgery for insulinoma at the Department of General and Endocrine Surgery of the Lille University Hospitals. The present report deals with 13 patients with proven multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN I) or supposed genetic-related insulinomas. This entity differs from spontaneous insulinoma by the presence of multiple foci in the pancreas. Enucleation is not advised in this setting due to the strong likelihood of persistence or recurrence. Various studies suggest different strategies for preoperative localization and surgical approach. We analyzed retrospectively the surgical strategy proposed by the A.F.C.E. and G.E.N.E.M. The purpose of this study was to validate the strategy, integrate the contribution of genotypic diagnosis, simplify preoperative imaging studies, and re-evaluate the value of intraoperative baseline secretin-stimulated insulin measurements. We recommend preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography of the pancreatic head only and routine left pancreatectomy with enucleation of cephalic tumors under intraoperative hormone monitoring. Preoperative invasive localization studies are proposed only if the endoscopic ultrasonography is negative for the pancreatic head. Intraoperative secretin stimulation test can be useful in difficult cases, especially with concurrent nesidioblastosis or in case of secondary surgery. All but one of the 13 patients achieved long-term cure with this strategy.

PDX-1 and the pancreas

Many transcription factors are critical for ensuring proper embryonic development of the endocrine pancreas and normal islet function. The transcription factor pancreatic duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX-1) is uniformly expressed in early pancreatic buds of embryos as well as the beta and delta cells of the islets of Langerhans. PDX-1 has also been found in dispersed endocrine cells of the duodenum in adults and plays a key role in pancreas formation. It has been reported that null mutation of PDX-1 in mice results in a failure of the pancreatic bud to expand; thus, the mice die 2-3 days after birth from hyperglycemia and dehydration. Heterozygous PDX-1 mice developed a pancreas but were diabetic. It has been shown that PDX-1 is required for maintaining the pancreatic islet functions by activating gene transcriptions including insulin, somatostatin (SST), islet amyloid polypeptide, glucose transporter type 2, and glucokinase. PDX-1 serves a dual role in pancreatic development. It initially contributes to pancreatic formation during embryogenesis and subsequently regulates the pancreatic islet cell physiology in mature islet cells. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of pancreas formation, especially the function of PDX-1, may contribute to the enhanced treatment and prevention of debilitating diseases such as diabetes, insulinomas, and pancreatic carcinomas.

[Diabetes mellitus and pancreatic tumor]

A 68 year old Ecuadorian man was investigated for polyuria, polydipsia and weight loss of 3 kg during the previous two months. Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus was diagnosed 10 year before admission and treated with appropriate diet and insulin (35 U/d). 18 months before was diagnosed in El Ecuador of "multiple liver nodes non-suggestive of malignancy". Physical examination showed a large multinodular petrous hepatomegaly. There was no evidence of skin lesions. Results of laboratory studies included a basal plasma glucose level that ranged between 275-367 mg/dl (N=60-100), glycosylated haemoglobin of 8.9% (N<5) and a serum albumin of 2.8 gr./dl (N=3.4-4.8). At admission non-other laboratory alterations were detected. Computed tomography showed a mass on the head of the pancreas with loco-regional lymph nodes and liver metastases. Tumor markers were normal. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the liver masses revealed the presence of liver metastases of a non-differentiated malignant tumor. A 111In-DTPAOC scintigraphy revealed the presence of somatostatin receptors in the liver metastases, also detecting the presence of multiple bone metastases in the axial and appendicular skeleton. Plasma glucagon level was 678 pg/ml (N<250). A diagnosis of metastatic glucagonoma was established and therapy with streptozocin, 5-FU, insulin and synthetic somatostatin analogs was initiated. Three months after the therapy initiation the patient was symptom free. Some weeks after the patient suffered from left hip pain, and a control 111In-DTPA scintigraphy showed progression of his bone metastases. In conclusion, glucagonoma must be suspected in all diabetic patients with metastatic liver, even in absence of necrotic migratory erythema. In these circumstances, plasmatic glucagon level and somatostatin receptors scintigraphy will be a useful tool for establishing the final diagnosis.

Differentiation of neuroendocrine tumors from other pancreatic lesions by echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography is a noninvasive procedure that has been increasingly used for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. However, to our knowledge, the diagnostic accuracy of this procedure in comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for the differentiation of neuroendocrine lesions from other pancreatic tumors has never been investigated in a prospective, controlled study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the study; the patients were selected from 190 consecutive patients (mean age, 59.8 years; range, 16-85 years) who presented to our department from January 1998 through June 2001 with suspicion of a pancreatic tumor. An experienced examiner who was unaware of the patients' clinical diagnoses performed sonography. Twenty-nine patients with sonographically and/or clinically suspected neuroendocrine tumors were investigated additionally by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. The exact diagnosis was based upon histologic evidence from biopsy examination (surgical and transabdominal fine-needle biopsy) or a follow-up of at least 18 months.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography for diagnosing a neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor was 94%, and its specificity was 96%. The corresponding values for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy were 54% and 81%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography has high sensitivity and high specificity for the differentiation of neuroendocrine lesions from other pancreatic tumors. However, histologic evidence is the standard of reference for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.

Insulinoma-induced hypoglycemic death in mice is prevented with beta cell-specific gene therapy

OBJECTIVE AND SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Tumor-specific gene therapy can be achieved if a tumor-specific promoter can be identified. In this study the authors investigated the use of the rat insulin promoter (RIP) for insulinoma-specific expression of a reporter gene. Insulinoma-specific cytotoxicity using the suicide gene thymidine kinase (tk) was studied both in vitro and in vivo. RIPtk gene therapy, delivered by a nontoxic, noninflammatory liposomal delivery system, was used in an insulinoma ICR/SCID mouse model to prevent hypoglycemic death.

METHODS

Rat insulin promoter (0.502 kb) was ligated to the reporter gene lacZ and ligated to the tk gene. These two genes were transfected into a mouse insulinoma (NIT) cell line to ascertain insulinoma-specific expression and insulinoma-specific cytotoxicity in vitro. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and electrophoretic mobility-shift assays were performed on NIT-1 cell RNA and nuclear extract, respectively, to determine the transcription factors present and responsible for RIP activation in NIT-1 cells. A mouse insulinoma model was created with NIT-1 cells. These mice were treated with the RIPtk gene, and both blood sugars and animal viability were monitored.

RESULTS

Only NIT-1 cells stained blue after X-gal staining or had detectable levels of beta-galactosidase protein. A significant decrease in cell survival was observed in NIT-1 cells transfected with RIPtk in vitro. Messenger RNA for both BETA2 and PDX-1 was found in NIT-1 cells, and a supershift was observed for both BETA2 and PDX-1. Experimental mice treated with the RIPtk gene, delivered by a liposomal gene delivery system, maintained their blood glucose levels, and the animals did not die of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the RIP is an insulinoma-specific promoter. An ICR/SCID mouse insulinoma model was used to show that insulinoma-specific cytotoxicity can be accomplished by RIP coupled to a suicide gene in vivo, preventing hypoglycemic death.

[Endocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas: "prerequisites", imaging, and intraoperative detection]

Non-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and diarrheogenic tumors are usually bulky and easy to recognize thanks to somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy and hormonal dosages. The real difficulty concerns insulinomas and particularly gastrinomas, which are found at the level of the duodenum and can be very small. Diagnosis is based on biological examinations, and the search for MEN I must be done systematically. Their localization is based on two essential and noninvasive exams: echoendoscopy and somatostatin-receptor imaging, though the surgeon's skill in the operative field, aided by an intraoperioperative echography, is indispensable. Surgical treatment of insulinomas gives excellent results. However, for sporadic gastrinomas, there was only a 34% recovery rate, and still less for MEN I gastrinomas.

Noninvasive imaging of insulinomas and gastrinomas with endoscopic ultrasonography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

BACKGROUND

Classic morphological techniques are of limited value for imaging endocrine duodenopancreatic tumors, and invasive procedures such as intraarterial stimulation are often used. Two noninvasive procedures, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), were recently described with promising results.

METHODS

In this study we correlated the results of preoperative EUS (n = 34) and SRS (n = 30) with operative findings in patients with histologically proven insulinoma (n = 20) or gastrinoma (n = 21).

RESULTS

The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of EUS were respectively 77% and 94% for pancreatic tumors (insulinomas and gastrinomas), 40% and 100% for duodenal gastrinomas, and 58% and 78% for metastatic lymph nodes. The sensitivity and PPV of SRS for insulinoma were 60% and 100%, respectively. In patients with gastrinoma, the sensitivity and PPV of SRS were respectively 25% and 100% for pancreatic gastrinomas, 72% and 100% for duodenal gastrinomas or periduodenal metastatic lymph nodes, and 67% and 80% for liver metastasis. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia, neither one of the two techniques detected all tumors. Overall sensitivity of combined EUS and SRS was 89% for insulinoma (n = 9) and 93% for gastrinoma (n = 14).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS and SRS for gastrinomas and insulinomas should be considered as the initial preoperative imaging procedures and may render invasive procedures unnecessary for most patients.