Does marriage between first cousins have any predictive value for maternal and perinatal outcomes in pre-eclampsia?

High rates of "atypical" single nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening results among consanguineous Arab American patients: A single center retrospective study

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS), using placental cell-free DNA from a maternal blood sample, is currently the most sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting common fetal aneuploidies. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of "atypical" single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPS results and subsequent pregnancy outcomes between Arab American and non-Arab American patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant Arab and non-Arab American patients who had SNP-based NIPS performed between September 2018 and January 2021 at an urban health system in Michigan. The rate of "atypical" results and other perinatal outcomes were compared between groups using descriptive statistics. "Atypical" results due to multifetal gestations, either undisclosed or unknown at time of ordering, were excluded. Five thousand eight hundred and seventy-three patients underwent SNP-based NIPS: 771 (13.1%) were identified as Arab American, 5102 (86.9%) were non-Arab American, and 49 (0.8%) patients received "atypical" results. Arab patients represented only 13.1% of patients screened (771/5873) but had a significantly higher rate of "atypical" results than non-Arab American patients (17/771 [2.2%] vs. 32/5102 [0.6%]; p < 0.001). Of the 17 Arab patients with "atypical" results, 9 (52.9%) were in known consanguineous relationships. No major congenital anomalies or chromosomal aberrations were identified for any patients who had "atypical" results, and no significant differences in other perinatal outcomes were observed between Arab and non-Arab American patients. A better understanding of the association between consanguinity and "atypical" SNP-based NIPS results would aid in appropriate test selection and interpretation and may help physicians and genetic counselors provide better perinatal counseling and follow-up care for patients in consanguineous relationships.

Could consanguineous marriage provide a cultural alleviation for the obstetric dilemma?

In placental mammals, a poor fit between the physical dimensions of the fetus and maternal pelvis increases the likelihood of obstructed labour. This problem is especially relevant to humans, as our species demonstrates both unique adaptations in pelvic shape and structure associated with bipedalism, and fetal encephalization. Natural selection is expected to have favoured adaptations that reduce the chances of such mismatch within individual mother-offspring dyads. Here, I hypothesise that the cultural practice of consanguineous marriage may have been favoured, on account of increasing the genetic similarity between mothers and offspring and hence the correlation between maternal and fetal physical dimensions. These benefits could be amplified if consanguineous marriage was accompanied by assortative mating for height. An additional benefit of consanguineous marriage for childbirth is the slight reduction in birth size of such offspring compared to non-consanguineous unions. Although the offspring of consanguineous unions have elevated risks of morbidity and mortality, these risks are moderate and the practice could still have been favoured by selection if the reduction in maternal mortality was greater than the increased mortality among individual offspring. This hypothesis could be tested directly by investigating whether rates of obstructed labour are lower in individuals and populations practising consanguineous marriage. At a broader level, phylogenetic analysis could be conducted to test whether consanguineous marriage appears to have originated in the areas where intensive agriculture was first practiced, as adult height typically fell in such populations, potentially exacerbating the risk of obstructed labour.

A review of the reproductive consequences of consanguinity

BACKGROUND

Consanguinity is the close union, sexual relationship or marriage between persons who have common biological ancestors usually up to about 2nd cousins. Contrary to general opinion consanguinity is quite common and is practiced worldwide. It is an important topic as while rates of consanguineous unions in certain society have decreased over time, rates have remained stable or increased in other societies with rates as high as 80.6% in some communities. Our aim was to conduct a review looking at general aspects of consanguinity and any published reproductive outcomes in literature. We also looked at possible future directions that could be relevant in the management of the consanguineous couple to help improve reproductive outcomes.

METHOD

We conducted a PUBMED, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar search looking at articles on consanguinity. Consanguinity articles related to pregnancy and reproduction were searched using additional filters looking at our specific areas of interest. All relevant publications up to March 2015 were reviewed. Additional search for relevant articles pertaining to pre implantation genetic diagnosis for future directions in the management of the consanguineous couple was done. Most publications were found in books, on line articles and journals. Most were retrospective, population or cohort studies.

RESULT

Consanguinity is practiced by up to 10% of the world's population with rates ranging from 80.6% in certain provinces in the Middle East to less than 1% in western societies. It predates Islam and has been practiced since Old Testament times. The most commonly cited reason for consanguinity is sociocultural and socioeconomic although it is also more common in certain religions. In areas where rates of Consanguinity are reducing urban migration and increasing education rates are thought to be contributory. Congenital malformations have long been established to be higher in consanguineous couples above the background rate (4.5% Vs 1%).Due to "Founder effect" or a common ancestor, Consanguinity is most commonly associated with Inborn errors of metabolism most of which are autosomal recessive. Consanguinity increases the incidence of multifactorial disorders such as diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, obesity and certain types of cancers. These may in turn affect reproductive outcomes. It may also affect fertility rates. Pregnancy outcomes like increased pregnancy wastages and preterm labor have been reported with consanguinity. Other studies produced conflicting evidence on its effect regarding outcomes like hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and Intrauterine growth restriction.

CONCLUSION

Consanguinity continues to be practiced worldwide and in some countries rates are increasing. The main reason for the practice appears to be sociocultural and socioeconomic although religious beliefs is a contributory factor. The most significant effects on reproductive outcomes are mostly due to autosomal recessive inherited conditions and inborn errors of metabolism. It also significantly increases the inheritance of certain multifactorial disorders like diabetes which may indirectly affect reproductive outcomes. In the future with the completion of the study of the whole human Genome and current advances in Pre implantation Genetic diagnosis and screening it may be possible to mitigate some of the adverse reproductive outcomes associated with consanguinity.

Risk Factors Associated with Neonatal Jaundice: A Cross-Sectional Study from Iran

BACKGROUND

Neonatal jaundice is one of the main causes of the patient's admission in the neonatal period and is potentially linked to morbidity.

AIM

This study aimed to determine the possible risk factors for neonatal jaundice.

METHODS

We investigated the case of infants who were admitted to the neonatal department of Ziyaeian hospital and Imam Khomeini Hospital for jaundice. Simple random sampling was used to evaluate variables related to maternal and neonatal predisposing factors based on the medical records and clinical profiles. All variables in this study were analysed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

In this study, about 200 mothers and neonates were examined. Our findings depicted that mother's WBC, Hb, PLT, and gestational age were associated with jaundice (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant relationships between different degrees of bilirubin with TSH, T4 levels and G6PD (P < 0.05). In fact, TSH, T4 levels and G6PD were found to be linked to neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The risk factors for jaundice in our study population comprise some predisposing factors such as WBC, Hb, PLT, gestational age, TSH, and T4 levels, as well as G6PD. Neonates at risk of jaundice are linked to some maternal and neonatal factors that can provide necessary interventions to reduce the burden of the disease. Therefore, identification of associated factors can facilitate early diagnosis, and reduce subsequent complications.

CONCLUSION

Neonatal jaundice should be considered as the main policy in all health care settings of the country. Therefore, identification of factors affecting the incidence of jaundice can be effective in preventing susceptible predisposing factors in newborns and high-risk mothers.

Consanguinity and adverse pregnancy outcomes: the north of Jordan experience

This cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the association between consanguineous marriages and adverse pregnancy outcome in the north of Jordan. Women delivered in four major hospitals in the north of Jordan between April 2007 and May 2007 were included in the study. Non-Jordanian women and women with multiple pregnancies were excluded. Mothers answered a pilot-tested structured questionnaire administered by trained personnel in the maternity ward. Data regarding pregnancy outcomes were obtained from the patients' individual records. A total of 3,269 women with a mean age of 27.2 (SD 6.6) years were included. About 49% of women had consanguineous marriages. Consanguineous marriages were significantly associated with low birth weight delivery (13.9% vs. 10.1%), preterm delivery (19.9% vs. 12.3%), and births with congenital anomalies (4.1% vs. 0.8%) compared with non-consanguineous marriages. In the multivariate analysis, consanguinity was significantly associated with preterm delivery (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2, 1.9), and congenital malformations (OR = 6.5, 95% CI 2.8, 15.3). In conclusions, this study supports the association between consanguinity and some adverse pregnancy outcomes.