Prevention of recurrent calcium stones: a rational approach

Comparison and efficacy of low-dose and standard-dose tamsulosin and alfuzosin in medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral calculi: prospective, randomized, comparative study

PURPOSE

Typically in Korea, for a standard dose (0.4 mg) of tamsulosin, two low doses (0.2 mg) are administered. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of tamsulosin (0.2 mg and 0.4 mg) and alfuzosin (10 mg) in the treatment of lower ureteral stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 141 patients presenting with a single 4- to 10-mm sized lower ureteral stone were randomly assigned to 4 groups. Patients in group 1 (n=41) and group 2 (n=30) received an oral dose of 0.2 mg tamsulosin once and twice daily, respectively, and patients in group 3 (n=36) received a daily oral dose of 10 mg alfuzosin. Patients in group 4 (n=34) received trospium chloride only. The spontaneous passage of stones, the stone expulsion time, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient background, including age, sex, BMI, stone size, stone side, and symptom duration. The spontaneous stone passage rate through the ureter was higher and the stone expulsion time was faster in groups 1, 2, and 3 than in group 4. There were no statistically different changes in groups 1, 2, and 3. The adverse effects observed in all groups were comparable and were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamsulosin at 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg and alfuzosin (10 mg) proved to be safe and effective. A first cycle of medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin 0.2 mg could be considered as an option in the management of single lower ureteral stone.

Effects of dietary fat on the urinary risk factors of calcium stone disease

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between dietary fat and various urinary risk factors of calcium stone disease in a group of calcium stoneformers attending an outpatient stone clinic.

METHODS

Mean daily fat intake from self-recorded 4-day dietary food records and mean 24-hour urinary risk factors from two separate collections were evaluated in 476 patients selected randomly from an adult population attending an outpatient stone clinic for the first time.

RESULTS

Mean daily total fat intake for men and women was significantly different at 105.6 and 78.1 g, respectively. Examination of the relationship between total fat intake and 24-hour urinary volume, pH, and excretions of magnesium, citrate, oxalate, calcium, and uric acid revealed no significant regressions in men and only a weak association between fat intake and urinary uric acid in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary fat does not have a significant effect on the urinary risk factors of calcium stone disease.

Metabolic evaluation of stone disease patients: a practical approach

In the last three decades, minimally invasive techniques have progressed significantly, replacing traditional open surgery as the mainstay of stone disease surgical treatment. The challenge for the next millennium remains medical prevention of calcium urolithiasis, a field where less dramatic progress has been achieved during the same period of time. The purpose of this article is to provide the practicing urologist with current practical guidelines for the assessment and management of calcium urolithiasis patients. The recommendations are based on the latest available information regarding the pathogenesis, medical treatment options, and decision-making rationale when managing these challenging patients. Every urolithiasis patient should undergo a basic evaluation, which is considered the minimal essential diagnostic work-up, in order to rule out obvious, treatable systemic causes of urinary stone disease. All patients should be advised about conservative nonspecific preventive measures. High-risk stone patients should have a more extensive metabolic evaluation based on two 24-hour urine samples. Treatment protocols for each patient are tailored individually according to the metabolic evaluation findings.