Disposition of propofol after medetomidine premedication in beagle dogs

Two doses of dexmedetomidine in combination with buprenorphine for premedication in dogs; a comparison with acepromazine and buprenorphine

OBJECTIVE

To assess as premedicants, the sedative, cardiorespiratory and propofol-sparing effects in dogs of dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine compared to acepromazine and buprenorphine.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, blinded clinical study.

ANIMALS

Sixty healthy dogs (ASA grades I/II). Mean (SD) body mass 28.0 ± 9.1 kg, and mean age 3.4 ± 2.3 years.

METHODS

  Dogs were allocated randomly to receive 15 μg kg(-1) buprenorphine combined with either 30 μg kg(-1) acepromazine (group 1), 62.5 μg m(-2) dexmedetomidine (group 2), or 125 μg m(-2) dexmedetomidine (group 3) intramuscularly. After 30 minutes, anaesthesia was induced using a propofol target controlled infusion. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and oscillometric arterial blood pressure were recorded prior to induction, at endotracheal intubation and at 3 and 5 minutes post-intubation. Induction quality and pre-induction sedation were scored on 4 point scales. Propofol target required for endotracheal intubation was recorded. Data were analysed using Chi-squared tests, Kruskal-Wallis, one way and general linear model ANOVA (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Age was significantly lower in group 1 (1.0 (1.0-3.8) years) than group 2 (5.0 (2.0-7.0) years), (median, (IQR)). There were no significant differences in sedation or quality of induction between groups. After premedication, heart rate was significantly lower and arterial blood pressures higher in groups 2 and 3 than group 1, but there was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3. Propofol targets were significantly lower in group 3 (1.5 (1.0-2.5) μg mL(-1) ) than group 1 (2.5 (2.0-3.0) μg mL(-1) ); no significant differences existed between group 2 (2.0 (1.5-2.5) μg mL(-1) ) and the other groups (median, (interquartile range)).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When administered with buprenorphine, at these doses, dexmedetomidine had no advantages in terms of sedation and induction quality over acepromazine. Both doses of dexmedetomidine produced characteristic cardiovascular and respiratory effects of a similar magnitude.

A comparison of propofol infusion and propofol/isoflurane anaesthesia in dexmedetomidine premedicated dogs

The effects of propofol infusion were compared with propofol/isoflurane anaesthesia in six beagles premedicated with 10 microg/kg intramuscular (i.m.) dexmedetomidine. The suitability of a cold pressor test (CPT) as a stress stimulus in dogs was also studied. Each dog received isoflurane (end tidal 1.0%, induction with propofol) with and without CPT; propofol (200 microg/kg/min, induction with propofol) with and without CPT; premedication alone with and without CPT in a randomized block study in six separate sessions. Heart rate and arterial blood pressures and gases were monitored. Plasma catecholamine, beta-endorphin and cortisol concentrations were measured. Recovery profile was observed. Blood pressures stayed within normal reference range but the dogs were bradycardic (mean heart rate < 70 bpm). PaCO2 concentration during anaesthesia was higher in the propofol group (mean > 57 mmHg) when compared with isoflurane (mean < 52 mmHg). Recovery times were longer with propofol than when compared with the other treatments. The mean extubation times were 8 +/- 3.4 and 23 +/- 6.3 min after propofol/isoflurane and propofol anaesthesia, respectively. The endocrine stress response was similar in all treatments except for lower adrenaline level after propofol infusion at the end of the recovery period. Cold pressor test produced variable responses and was not a reliable stress stimulus in the present study. Propofol/isoflurane anaesthesia was considered more useful than propofol infusion because of milder degree of respiratory depression and faster recovery.

Cardiopulmonary effects of prolonged anesthesia via propofol-medetomidine infusion in ponies

OBJECTIVE

To determine cardiopulmonary effects of total IV anesthesia with propofol and medetomidine in ponies and effect of atipamezole on recovery.

ANIMALS

10 ponies.

PROCEDURE

After sedation was induced by IV administration of medetomidine (7 microg/kg of body weight), anesthesia was induced by IV administration of propofol 12 mg/kg) and maintained for 4 hours with infusions of medetomidine (3.5 microg/kg per hour) and propofol 10.07 to 0.11 mg/kg per minute). Spontaneous respiration was supplemented with oxygen. Cardiopulmonary measurements and blood concentrations of propofol were determined during anesthesia. Five ponies received atipamezole (60 microg/kg) during recovery.

RESULTS

During anesthesia, mean cardiac index and heart rate increased significantly until 150 minutes, then decreased until cessation of anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance index increased significantly between 150 minutes and 4 hours. In 4 ponies, PaO2 decreased to < 60 mm Hg. Mean blood propofol concentrations from 20 minutes after induction onwards ranged from 2.3 to 3.5 microg/ml. Recoveries were without complications and were complete within 28 minutes with atipamezole administration and 39 minutes without atipamezole administration.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

During total IV anesthesia of long duration with medetomidine-propofol, cardiovascular function is comparable to or better than under inhalation anesthesia. This technique may prove suitable in equids in which prompt recovery is essential; however, in some animals severe hypoxia may develop and oxygen supplementation may be necessary.

Infusion of a combination of propofol and medetomidine for long-term anesthesia in ponies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the minimal infusion rate of propofol in combination with medetomidine for long-term anesthesia in ponies and the effects of atipamezole on recovery.

ANIMALS

12 ponies.

PROCEDURE

Ponies were sedated with medetomidine (7 microg/kg of body weight, IV). Ten minutes later, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg/kg, IV). Anesthesia was maintained for 4 hours, using an infusion of medetomidine (3.5 microg/kg per hour, IV) and propofol at a rate sufficient to prevent ponies from moving after electrical stimulation. Arterial blood pressures and blood gas analysis, heart rates, and respiratory rates were monitored. For recovery, 6 ponies were given atipamezole (60 microg/kg, IV). Induction and recovery were scored.

RESULTS

Minimal propofol infusion rates ranged from 0.06 to 0.1 mg/kg per min. Mean arterial blood pressure was stable (range, 74 to 86 mm Hg), and heart rate (34 to 51 beats/min) had minimal variations. Variable breathing patterns were observed. Mean PaO2 (range, 116 to 146 mm Hg) and mean PaCO2 (range, 48 to 51 mm Hg) did not change significantly with time, but hypoxemia was evident in some ponies (minimal PaO2, 47 mm Hg). Recovery was fast and uneventful with and without atipamezole (completed in 20.2 and 20.9 minutes, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Infusion of a combination of medetomidine and propofol was suitable for prolonged anesthesia in ponies. Recovery was rapid and uneventful. A combination of propofol and medetomidine may prove suitable for long-term anesthesia in horses. Monitoring of blood gases is essential because of potential hypoxemia.