• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4630704)   Today's Articles (4)   Subscriber (49818)
For: Katz S, Lautenschlager GJ, Blackburn AB, Harris FH. Answering Reading Comprehension Items without Passages on the SAT. Psychol Sci 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00080.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Patel SP, Winston M, Guilfoyle J, Nicol T, Martin GE, Nayar K, Kraus N, Losh M. Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives. J Autism Dev Disord 2023;53:3257-3271. [PMID: 35672616 PMCID: PMC10019095 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05562-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
2
Goecke B, Staab M, Schittenhelm C, Wilhelm O. Stop Worrying about Multiple-Choice: Fact Knowledge Does Not Change with Response Format. J Intell 2022;10:102. [PMID: 36412782 PMCID: PMC9680349 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence10040102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]  Open
3
Hogan AL, Winston M, Barstein J, Losh M. Slower Peak Pupillary Response to Emotional Faces in Parents of Autistic Individuals. Front Psychol 2022;13:836719. [PMID: 36304881 PMCID: PMC9595282 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]  Open
4
Krumm S, Hüffmeier J, Lievens F. Experimental Test Validation. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
5
Hartung J, Weiss S, Wilhelm O. Individual differences in performance on comprehension and knowledge tests with and without passages and questions. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
6
Brainerd C, Reyna V. Explaining “Memory Free” Reasoning. Psychol Sci 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00042.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
7
Katz S, Johnson C, Pohl E. Answering Reading Comprehension Items without the Passages on the SAT–I. Psychol Rep 2016. [DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
8
Katz S, Lautenschlager GJ. The SAT Reading Task in Question: Reply to Freedle and Kostin. Psychol Sci 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00319.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]  Open
9
Freedle R, Kostin I. Can Multiple-Choice Reading Tests Be Construct-Valid? A Reply to Katz, Lautenschlager, Blackburn, and Harris. Psychol Sci 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00640.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]  Open
10
Schroeder S, Tiffin-Richards SP. Kognitive Verarbeitung von Leseverständnisitems mit und ohne Text. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE 2014. [DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
11
Coleman C, Lindstrom J, Nelson J, Lindstrom W, Gregg KN. Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students. JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES 2010;43:244-249. [PMID: 19933897 DOI: 10.1177/0022219409345017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
12
Some implications of an experimental reading comprehension task. PSIHOLOGIJA 2008. [DOI: 10.2298/psi0804507l] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]  Open
13
Hambrick DZ, Meinz EJ, Oswald FL. Individual differences in current events knowledge: contributions of ability, personality, and interests. Mem Cognit 2007;35:304-16. [PMID: 17645171 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
14
Rost DH, Sparfeldt JR. Leseverständnis ohne Lesen? ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE 2007. [DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652.21.3.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
15
Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development. DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
16
Chan W, Chan DWL. Bootstrap Standard Error and Confidence Intervals for the Correlation Corrected for Range Restriction: A Simulation Study. Psychol Methods 2004;9:369-85. [PMID: 15355154 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.9.3.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
17
Magliano JP, Millis KK. Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION 2003. [DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2103_02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
18
Answering quasi-randomized reading items without the passages on the SAT—I. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2001. [DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
19
Epelboim J, Booth JR, Ashkenazy R, Taleghani A, Steinman RM. Fillers and spaces in text: the importance of word recognition during reading. Vision Res 1997;37:2899-914. [PMID: 9415369 DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00095-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
20
Freedle R. The relevance of multiple‐choice reading test data in studying expository passage comprehension: The saga of a 15 year effort towards an experimental/correlational merger. DISCOURSE PROCESSES 1997. [DOI: 10.1080/01638539709544998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
21
Powers DE, Leung SW. Answering the New SAT Reading Comprehension Questions Without the Passages. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT 1995. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00458.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
22
Brugger P, Baumann AT. Repetition avoidance in responses to imaginary questions: the effect of respondents' belief in ESP. Psychol Rep 1994;75:883-93. [PMID: 7862799 DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.2.883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA