Effect of concurrent zidovudine use on the resistance pathway selected by abacavir-containing regimens

[Genetic diversity of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) in the Kaliningrad region]

INTRODUCTION

As is currently known, the epidemic process in the Kaliningrad Region was mainly associated with the spread of the recombinant form of HIV-1 (CRF03_AB); however, regular HIV importations from other countries and continents has created favorable conditions for emergence and spread of various recombinant forms of the virus.The most complete information on the diversity of recombinant forms in the region is also necessary to understand the structure of drug resistance (DR). The aim of the study was to explore the HIV-1 genetic diversity in the Kaliningrad Region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 162 blood plasma samples obtained from patients from the Kaliningrad Region, both with confirmed virological failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and with newly diagnosed HIV infection. For reverse transcription and amplification of HIV genome fragments, diagnostic «AmpliSense HIVResist-Seq».

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The various recombinants between subtypes A and B (74%) were predominant in study group: recombinant was between CRF03_AB and subtype A (33.95%) and CRF03_AB-like (13.58%) were the most common. Among the "pure" subtypes of the virus, subtype A6 (16.67%). The circulation of subtypes B (3.70%) and G (1.23%) was also noted.Ninety-six patients (59.26%) were identified with at least one mutation associated with antiretroviral (ARV) drug resistance.

CONCLUSION

The observed diversity of subtypes and recombinant forms of the virus implies that the new recombinants are actively emerging in the studied region, both between existing recombinant forms and "pure" subtypes, as well as between "pure" subtypes.

The crosstalk between antiretrovirals pharmacology and HIV drug resistance

INTRODUCTION

The clinical development of antiretroviral drugs has been followed by a rapid and concomitant development of HIV drug resistance. The development and spread of HIV drug resistance is due on the one hand to the within-host intrinsic HIV evolutionary rate and on the other to the wide use of low genetic barrier antiretrovirals.

AREAS COVERED

We searched PubMed and Embase on 31 January 2020, for studies reporting antiretroviral resistance and pharmacology. In this review, we assessed the molecular target and mechanism of drug resistance development of the different antiretroviral classes focusing on the currently approved antiretroviral drugs. Then, we assessed the main pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic of the antiretrovirals. Finally, we retraced the history of antiretroviral treatment and its interconnection with antiretroviral worldwide resistance development both in , and middle-income countries in the perspective of 90-90-90 World Health Organization target.

EXPERT OPINION

Drug resistance development is an invariably evolutionary driven phenomenon, which challenge the 90-90-90 target. In high-income countries, the antiretroviral drug resistance seems to be stable since the last decade. On the contrary, multi-intervention strategies comprehensive of broad availability of high genetic barrier regimens should be implemented in resource-limited setting to curb the rise of drug resistance.

Apricitabine: A Novel Deoxycytidine Analogue Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Nucleoside-Resistant HIV Infection

Existing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV disease are limited by problems of resistance and, in some cases, long-term toxicity. Apricitabine (ATC; formerly BCH10618, SPD754 and AVX754) is a deoxycytidine analogue nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in clinical development. ATC retains substantial in vitro activity against HIV-1 containing many mutations associated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance, showing a less than twofold reduction in susceptibility in the presence of either up to five thymidine analogue mutations or the M184V mutation. ATC showed a low potential for cellular or mitochondrial toxicity in vitro. ATC is well absorbed orally, with a bioavailability of 65–80%. Its plasma elimination half-life (approximately 3 h), and the intracellular half-life of its triphosphate (TP) metabolite (6–7 h) support twice-daily dosing. Intracellular ATC-TP levels are markedly reduced in the presence of lamivudine or emtricitabine, indicating that clinical co-administration of ATC together with these agents will not be possible. The drug is renally eliminated, giving a low potential for hepatic drug interactions. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II monotherapy trial in antiretroviral-naive patients, ATC doses of 1,200 and 1,600 mg/day reduced plasma viral load levels by 1.65 and 1.58 log10 HIV RNA copies/ml, respectively, after 10 days of treatment ( P<0.0001 versus placebo). ATC showed a low propensity to select for resistance mutants in vitro and during clinical monotherapy. ATC was well tolerated in volunteers and in HIV-infected patients. This promising profile suggests that ATC may be useful in treating patients who have failed previous lamivudine- or emtricitabine-containing regimens. Further studies to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of ATC are underway.

Current perspectives on HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance

Current advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have turned HIV-1 infection into a chronic and manageable disease. However, treatment is only effective until HIV-1 develops resistance against the administered drugs. The most recent antiretroviral drugs have become superior at delaying the evolution of acquired drug resistance. In this review, the viral fitness and its correlation to HIV-1 mutation rates and drug resistance are discussed while emphasizing the concept of lethal mutagenesis as an alternative therapy. The development of resistance to the different classes of approved drugs and the importance of monitoring antiretroviral drug resistance are also summarized briefly.

HIV-2 antiviral potency and selection of drug resistance mutations by the integrase strand transfer inhibitor elvitegravir and NRTIs emtricitabine and tenofovir in vitro

BACKGROUND

HIV-2 is susceptible to only a subset of approved antiretroviral drugs. A single tablet regimen containing the integrase strand transfer inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) boosted by cobicistat plus the nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) has potent activity against HIV-1 and may have utility against HIV-2.

METHODS

HIV-2 susceptibility to EVG, FTC, and tenofovir (TFV) and selection of resistance mutations were characterized in vitro using dose escalation and breakthrough methods. HIV-2 containing the selected mutations was constructed and phenotyped in vitro.

RESULTS

The inhibitors EVG, FTC, and TFV had potent activity against HIV-2 with EC50 values of 1.6 nM, 0.99 μM, and 3.5 μM, respectively. In resistance selections, EVG selected E92G/Q and S147N in integrase, FTC selected M184V/I in RT, and TFV selected K65R and Y115F in RT. HIV-2 site-directed mutant (SDM) viruses with E92G and E92Q integrase mutations showed 3.7- and 16-fold reduced susceptibilities to EVG, respectively. The RT M184I and M184V SDM viruses were both highly resistant to FTC (34- and >1000-fold, respectively). The RT K65R SDM virus had 2.2- and 9.1-fold reduced susceptibilities to TFV and FTC, respectively, and the addition of Y115F to K65R further decreased susceptibility to both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The antiretrovirals EVG, FTC, and TFV showed potent inhibition of HIV-1 and HIV-2 in vitro and selected analogous mutations in HIV-2 and HIV-1. This suggests that the single tablet regimen of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF should be studied as a treatment option for HIV-2 infection and would likely select for known resistance mutations.

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) polymorphism 172K suppresses the effect of clinically relevant drug resistance mutations to both nucleoside and non-nucleoside RT inhibitors

Polymorphisms have poorly understood effects on drug susceptibility and may affect the outcome of HIV treatment. We have discovered that an HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) polymorphism (RT(172K)) is present in clinical samples and in widely used laboratory strains (BH10), and it profoundly affects HIV-1 susceptibility to both nucleoside (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) when combined with certain mutations. Polymorphism 172K significantly suppressed zidovudine resistance caused by excision (e.g. thymidine-associated mutations) and not by discrimination mechanism mutations (e.g. Q151M complex). Moreover, it attenuated resistance to nevirapine or efavirenz imparted by NNRTI mutations. Although 172K favored RT-DNA binding at an excisable pre-translocation conformation, it decreased excision by thymidine-associated mutation-containing RT. 172K affected DNA handling and decreased RT processivity without significantly affecting the k(cat)/K(m) values for dNTP. Surface plasmon resonance experiments revealed that RT(172K) decreased DNA binding by increasing the dissociation rate. Hence, the increased zidovudine susceptibility of RT(172K) results from its increased dissociation from the chain-terminated DNA and reduced primer unblocking. We solved a high resolution (2.15 Å) crystal structure of RT mutated at 172 and compared crystal structures of RT(172R) and RT(172K) bound to NNRTIs or DNA/dNTP. Our structural analyses highlight differences in the interactions between α-helix E (where 172 resides) and the active site β9-strand that involve the YMDD loop and the NNRTI binding pocket. Such changes may increase dissociation of DNA, thus suppressing excision-based NRTI resistance and also offset the effect of NNRTI resistance mutations thereby restoring NNRTI binding.

Genetic Diversity and Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1 from Untreated Patients in Niamey, Niger

The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of transmitted resistance to antiretroviral of HIV-1 circulating in Niger. We collected plasmas from 96 drug-naive patients followed up in the main HIV/AIDS Care Center of Niamey, the capital city of Niger. After RNA extraction and retrotranscription to proviral DNA, nested PCR was performed to amplify PR (codons 1–99) and RT (codons 1–240) fragments for sequencing. Sequences were analysed for phylogeny, then for resistance-associated mutations according to IAS-USA and Stanford's lists of mutations. We characterized six HIV-1 genetic variants: CRF02-AG (56.3%), CRF30_0206 (15.6%), subtype G (15.6%), CRF06_cpx (9.4%), CRF11_cpx (2.1%), and CRF01_AE (1%). About 8.3% of HIV strains had at least 1 resistance mutation: 4 strains with at least 1 mutation to NRTI, 5 for NNRTI, and 1 for PI, respectiveley 4.2%, 5.2%, and 1.0%. These preliminary results gave enough information for the need of instauring HIV drug resistance national surveillance.

Antiviral activity and tolerability of amdoxovir with zidovudine in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study in HIV-1-infected individuals

BACKGROUND

Amdoxovir acts synergistically with zidovudine in vitro and the combination prevents or delays the selection of thymidine analogue and K65R mutations. In silico studies have shown that a reduced dose of zidovudine (200 mg) results in decreased zidovudine-monophosphate levels, associated with toxicity, while maintaining zidovudine-triphosphate levels, which are associated with antiviral effects. Here, we aimed to assess the short-term tolerability and antiviral activity of amdoxovir in combination with reduced and standard doses of zidovudine.

METHODS

The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in HIV-1-infected patients not receiving antiretroviral therapy and with plasma HIV-1 RNA > or =5,000 copies/ml. Patients were randomized to 10 days of twice-daily treatment with 200 mg zidovudine, 300 mg zidovudine, 500 mg amdoxovir, 500 mg amdoxovir plus 200 mg zidovudine or 500 mg amdoxovir plus 300 mg zidovudine. The mean change in viral load (VL) log(10) and area under the virus depletion curve (AUC(VL)) from baseline to day 10 were determined. Laboratory and clinical safety monitoring were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The mean VL log(10) change was 0.10 with placebo, -0.69 with zidovudine 200 mg, -0.55 with zidovudine 300 mg, -1.09 with amdoxovir, -2.00 with amdoxovir plus zidovudine (200 mg) and -1.69 with amdoxovir plus zidovudine (300 mg). Amdoxovir plus zidovudine (200 mg) was significantly more potent than amdoxovir monotherapy in AUC(VL) and mean VL decline (P=0.019 and P=0.021, respectively), suggesting synergy. There was markedly decreased VL variability with the combination compared with amdoxovir alone. All adverse events were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

The combination of amdoxovir plus zidovudine appeared synergistic with reduced VL variability. This combined therapy, including the use of a lower zidovudine dosage, warrants further development for the therapy of HIV infection.

Mechanisms of resistance associated with excision of incorporated nucleotide analogue inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors are important components in current drug regimens used to treat infection with HIV. Despite the potency of drug combinations that involve two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a non-nucleoside analogue or a protease inhibitor, the emergence of resistance remains a major reason for treatment failure. This article reviews biochemical mechanisms associated with resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The thymidine analogues zidovudine and stavudine select for mutational patterns that facilitate the phosphorolytic excision of literally all available nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Major progress has been made in defining genotypes that either support or counteract the reaction. Thymidine analogue-associated mutations were shown to increase rates of excision. In contrast, non-thymidine analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors select for different mutations, e.g. M184V, L74V, and K65R that diminish the effects of thymidine analogue-associated mutations. Possible underlying biochemical mechanisms are discussed in this review.

SUMMARY

The non-thymidine analogue-associated mutations M184V, L74V, and K65R show incompatibilities with thymidine-analogue-associated mutations. Maximizing these effects in clinical practice may help delay the emergence of resistance. Together, the clinical and biochemical data validate the excision reaction as a target for the development of novel compounds that interfere with the reaction.

The K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: genetic barriers, resistance profile and clinical implications

Resistance to antiviral therapy is the limiting factor in the successful management of HIV. In general, the K65R mutation is rarely selected (1.7-4%) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), abacavir (ABC), didanosine (ddI), and stavudine (d4T), as compared with the high incidence (>40%) of thymidine analog mutations associated with zidovudine and d4T. The high barrier to the development of K65R may reflect a combination of factors, including the high potency of K65R-selecting drugs, including recommended TDF/emtricitabine and ABC/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) combinations; the partial (low-intermediate level) profile of cross-resistance conferred by K65R to TDF, ABC and 3TC; the favorable viral fitness constraint imposed by K65R and the 3TC/emtricitabine-associated M184V mutations; the bidirectional antagonism between the K65R and thymidine analog mutation pathways; and unique RNA structural considerations in the region surrounding codon 65. Nevertheless, surprisingly high levels of treatment failures and K65R resistance may be associated with triple nucleoside analog regimens. The use of TDF + ABC, TDF + ddI and ABC + d4T in combination with 3TC or emtricitabine should be avoided. This selection of K65R may be reduced by the inclusion of zidovudine in two-four nucleoside reverse-transcriptase regimens. Clinical studies have demonstrated an increased frequency of K65R in association with suboptimal d4T and ddI regimens, as well as nevirapine and its resistance mutations Y181C and G190A. The potential for the development of the K65R mutation in subtype C is particularly problematic wherein a signature KKK nucleotide motif, at codons 64, 65 and 66 in reverse transcriptase, appear to lead to template pausing, facilitating the selection of K65R. Optimizing regimens may attenuate the emergence of K65R, leading to better long-term treatment management in different geographic settings. TDF-based regimens are the leading candidates for first- and second-line therapy, microbicides and chemoprophylaxis strategies.

Effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens containing abacavir with tenofovir in treatment-experienced patients: predictors of virological response and drug resistance evolution in a multi-cohort study

BACKGROUND

In treatment-naïve patients, a combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) containing tenofovir (TDF) and abacavir (ABC) with lamivudine leads to unacceptably high virological failure rates with frequent selection of reverse transcriptase mutations M184V and K65R. We explored the efficacy of at least 16 weeks of ABC + TDF-containing cART regimens in 307 antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1-infected individuals included in observational databases.

METHODS

Virological failure was defined as an HIV RNA > 400 copies/ml after at least 16 weeks of treatment. Patients had received a median of three prior cART regimens. Of these, 76% concomitantly received a potent or high genetic barrier regimen (with at least one protease inhibitor [PI]) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or thymidine analogue) while a third non-thymidine nucleoside analogue was used in the remaining patients.

RESULTS

The 1-year estimated probability of virological failure was 34% in 165 patients with HIV RNA > 400 copies/ ml at ABC + TDF regimen initiation. Independent predictors of virological failure were the absence of a potent or high genetic barrier cART, the higher number of cART regimens experienced, and the use of a new drug class. In the subset of 136 patients for whom there were genotypic resistance test results prior to ABC + TDF initiation, the virological failure (1-year estimated probability 46%) was independently predicted by the higher baseline viral load, the concomitant use of boosted PI, and the presence of reverse transcriptase mutation M41L. In 142 patients starting ABC + TDF therapy with HIV RNA pound < or =400 copies/ml, virological failure (1-year estimated probability 17%) was associated only with the transmission category. In a small subset of subjects for whom there were an available paired baseline and follow-up genotype (n = 28), the prevalence of most nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations decreased, suggesting a possible low adherence to treatment. No selection of K65R was detected.

CONCLUSION

The virological response to ABC + TDF-containing regimens in this moderately-to-heavily treatment experienced cohort was good. Higher viral load and the presence of M41L at baseline were associated with worse virological responses, while the concomitant prescription of drugs enhancing the genetic barrier of the regimen conveyed a reduced risk of virological failure. The Appendix provides the names of other members of the MASTER cohort.

Antiretroviral combinations implicated in emergence of the L74I and L74V resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Very little is known about the alternative L74I mutation. This lack of knowledge has led to contradictory and confusing attitudes to L74I; although this mutation is not listed by the International AIDS Society - USA, it is increasingly included in several resistance algorithms.

OBJECTIVE

To compare and clarify the role of each antiretroviral compound and the resistance background in the emergence of the L74I and L74V mutations.

METHODS

We focused on the treatment used at the exact time of any L74V or L74I emergences in 74 patients, and we compared the use of each nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) separately and in combination between the 74I and the 74V groups. The distribution of other NRTI and non-NRTI mutations between the two groups was also analysed.

RESULTS

A majority of L74I mutations is selected under the zidovudine plus abacavir combination or under tenofovir with thymidine analogue mutations in the resistance background. The K103N substitution also plays an important role in the L74I emergence when not associated with the other non-NRTI mutations seen in this study: L100I, G190A and Y181C. Didanosine plays the principal role in the L74V emergence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the L74I and the L74V correspond to two different mutation pathways, conferring probably different resistance and replication advantages on HIV depending on the context. Taking into account more systematically the L74I mutation, whose impact is certainly currently underestimated, would increase our understanding of this substitution and its effects on the drug activity in vivo.

Development of an optimized dose for coformulation of zidovudine with drugs that select for the K65R mutation using a population pharmacokinetic and enzyme kinetic simulation model

In vitro selection studies and data from large genotype databases from clinical studies have demonstrated that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and abacavir sulfate select for the K65R mutation in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 polymerase region. Furthermore, other novel non-thymine nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors also select for this mutation in vitro. Studies performed in vitro and in humans suggest that viruses containing the K65R mutation remained susceptible to zidovudine (ZDV) and other thymine nucleoside antiretroviral agents. Therefore, ZDV could be coformulated with these agents as a "resistance repellent" agent for the K65R mutation. The approved ZDV oral dose is 300 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) and is commonly associated with bone marrow toxicity thought to be secondary to ZDV-5'-monophosphate (ZDV-MP) accumulation. A simulation study was performed in silico to optimize the ZDV dose for b.i.d. administration with K65R-selecting antiretroviral agents in virtual subjects using the population pharmacokinetic and cellular enzyme kinetic parameters of ZDV. These simulations predicted that a reduction in the ZDV dose from 300 to 200 mg b.i.d. should produce similar amounts of ZDV-5'-triphosphate (ZDV-TP) associated with antiviral efficacy (>97% overlap) and reduced plasma ZDV and cellular amounts of ZDV-MP associated with toxicity. The simulations also predicted reduced peak and trough amounts of cellular ZDV-TP after treatment with 600 mg ZDV once a day (q.d.) rather than 300 or 200 mg ZDV b.i.d., indicating that q.d. dosing with ZDV should be avoided. These in silico predictions suggest that 200 mg ZDV b.i.d. is an efficacious and safe dose that could delay the emergence of the K65R mutation.

Mutations M184V and Y115F in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase discriminate against "nucleotide-competing reverse transcriptase inhibitors"

Indolopyridones are potent inhibitors of reverse transcriptase (RT) of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Although the structure of these compounds differs from established nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors (NRTIs), previous studies suggest that the prototype compound INDOPY-1 may bind in close proximity to the polymerase active site. NRTI-associated mutations that are clustered around the active site confer decreased, e.g. M184V and Y115F, or increased, e.g. K65R, susceptibility to INDOPY-1. Here we have studied the underlying biochemical mechanism. RT enzymes containing the isolated mutations M184V and Y115F cause 2-3-fold increases in IC(50) values, while the combination of the two mutations causes a >15-fold increase. K65R can partially counteract these effects. Binding studies revealed that the M184V change reduces the affinity to INDOPY-1, while Y115F facilitates binding of the natural nucleotide substrate and the combined effects enhance the ability of the enzyme to discriminate against the inhibitor. Studies with other strategic mutations at residues Phe-61 and Ala-62, as well as the use of chemically modified templates shed further light on the putative binding site of the inhibitor and ternary complex formation. An abasic site residue at position n, i.e. opposite the 3'-end of the primer, prevents binding of INDOPY-1, while an abasic site at the adjacent position n+1 has no effect. Collectively, our findings provide strong evidence to suggest that INDOPY-1 can compete with natural deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs). We therefore propose to refer to members of this class of compounds as "nucleotide-competing RT inhibitors" (NcRTIs).

The balance between NRTI discrimination and excision drives the susceptibility of HIV-1 RT mutants K65R, M184V and K65r+M184V

The HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) resistance mutations K65R and M184V occur individually and in combination, and can contribute to decreased treatment responses in patients. In order to understand how these mutations interact with one another to confer drug resistance, the susceptibilities and underlying resistance mechanisms of these mutants to nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) were determined. Virus carrying K65R have reduced susceptibility to most NRTIs, but retain full susceptibility to zidovudine (AZT). M184V mutants have reduced susceptibility to lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC) and didanosine (ddl), and contribute to reduced susceptibility to abacavir; however, they remain fully susceptible to tenofovir (TFV), AZT and stavudine (d4T). In cell culture, the K65R+M184V virus showed slightly increased susceptibility to TFV, AZT and d4T compared with K65R alone, but showed further decreases in susceptibility to 3TC, FTC, ddl and abacavir. There are two major biochemical mechanisms of resistance: altered NRTI binding/incorporation and altered NRTI excision after incorporation. For most NRTIs, the primary mechanism of resistance by K65R, M184V and K65R+M184V mutant RTs is to disrupt the NRTI-binding/incorporation steps. In the case of AZT, however, decreased binding/incorporation by K65R and K65R+M184V was counteracted by decreased AZT excision resulting in wild-type susceptibility. For TFV, decreased excision by K65R and K65R+M184V may partially counteract the K65R-driven decrease in incorporation relative to wild-type resulting in only low levels of TFV resistance. The K65R-mediated effect on decreasing NRTI excision was stronger than for M184V. These studies show that both mechanisms of resistance (binding/incorporation and excision) must be considered when defining resistance mechanisms.

Prevalence, Genotypic Associations and Phenotypic Characterization of K65R, L74V and other HIV-1 RT Resistance Mutations in a Commercial Database

Background

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-associated mutations (NAMs) can affect response to treatment with NRTIs and might also result in HIV-1 with reduced replication capacity.

Methods

A large commercial HIV-1 database ( n=60,487) was analysed for the prevalence of NAMs, antiviral drug susceptibilities and viral replication capacity.

Results

Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) and M184V were the most commonly observed NAMs (>25%). L74V/I was detected in 11% of isolates. K65R was detected in 3.3% of isolates and its frequency remained stable from 2003 to 2006, similar to trends observed for other NAMs. TAMs were rarely observed in combination with K65R, but frequently associated with L74V/I. HIV-1 with K65R or L74V/I alone were fully susceptible to zidovudine and stavudine. K65R was associated with reduced susceptibility to tenofovir, didanosine, abacavir and lamivudine; L74V/I was associated with reduced susceptibility to abacavir and didanosine. The addition of M184V to either K65R or L74V/I improved susceptibility to tenofovir, zidovudine and stavudine, but reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine and lamivudine. Other NAMs commonly associated with K65R were A62V, S68G and Y115F; their NRTI susceptibilities were similar to those of viruses containing K65R alone. The replication capacity for HIV-1 with M184V/I or K65R was significantly reduced compared with wild-type (median 68% and 72%, respectively; P<0.0001), whereas replication capacity for HIV-1 with L74V or TAMs was not significantly reduced (88% and 97%, respectively).

Conclusions

These results demonstrate a relative stability in the prevalence of HIV-1 clinical isolates with NAMs from 2003 to 2006. Differences between the genotypic patterns, phenotype and replication capacity associated with common NAMs are described.

Predictors of optimal viral suppression in patients switched to abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate predictors of continued HIV RNA viral load suppression in individuals switched to abacavir (ABC), lamivudine (3TC) and zidovudine (ZDV) after successful previous treatment with a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based combination antiretroviral therapy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

An observational cohort study, which included individuals in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study switching to ABC/3TC/ZDV following successful suppression of viral load. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure defined as the first of the following events: two consecutiveviral load measurements > 400 copies/ml under ABC/3TC/ZDV, one viral load measurement > 400 copies/ml and subsequent discontinuation of ABC/3TC/ZDV within 3 months, AIDS or death.

RESULTS

We included 495 individuals; 47 experienced treatment failure in 1459 person-years of follow-up [rate = 3.22 events/100 person-years; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.30-4.14]. Of all failures, 62% occurred in the first year after switching to ABC/3TC/ZDV. In a Cox regression analysis, treatment failure was independently associated with earlier exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mono or dual therapy [hazard ratio (HR), 8.02; 95% CI, 4.19-15.35) and low CD4 cell count at the time of the switch (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87 by +100 cells/microl up to 500 cells/microl). In patients without earlier exposure to mono or dual therapy, AIDS prior to switch to simplified maintenance therapy was an additional risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The failure rate was low in patients with suppressed viral load and switch to ABC/3TC/ZDV treatment. Patients with earlier exposure to mono or dual NRTI therapy, low CD4 cell count at time of switch, or AIDS are at increased risk of treatment failure, limiting the use of ABC/3TC/ZDV in these patient groups.

Quadruple Nucleoside Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, Abacavir and Tenofovir in the Treatment of HIV

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. However, problems such as short-term or long-term toxicity and the development of drug resistance could necessitate a change in the therapy regimen. Whereas various HAART options with low pill burden and favourable long-term tolerability profiles are available for naive patients, treatment of experienced patients tends to be more complex and remains a challenge. Treatment with class sparing nucleoside-only regimens could be an option in this context, but the combination of zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC) and abacavir (ABC) has shown to be inferior in terms of virological efficacy compared with the standard regimen. More promising data were obtained when AZT, 3TC and ABC were intensified with tenofovir (TDF), resulting in a quadruple nucleoside therapy. This regimen has demonstrated comparable potency to a standard regimen with AZT, 3TC and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients. Additionally, it has shown to be an efficient treatment option especially in moderately pretreated patients. This is accredited to the potency of the single components and the antagonistic selection pressure of AZT and TDF. The presence of L210W, or at least two of the mutations 41L, 67N, 70R, 215F/Y or 219Q/E, at or before baseline seems to be a predictor of non-response, whereas the presence of M184V does not impede virological response and might even be advantageous. This review summarizes current data on the combined use of AZT, 3TC, ABC and TDF in regard to virological and immunological outcome as well as genotypic predictors of response.

Lamivudine/abacavir maintains virological superiority over zidovudine/lamivudine and zidovudine/abacavir beyond 5 years in children

OBJECTIVE

To describe the long-term efficacy over 5 years of regimens including combinations of abacavir, lamivudine and/or zidovudine in previously untreated children in the PENTA 5 trial.

DESIGN

PENTA 5 was a 48-week randomised controlled trial comparing three dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combinations as part of first triple antiretroviral therapy (ART).

METHODS

128 ART-naïve children were randomised to zidovudine\lamivudine (n = 36), zidovudine\abacavir (45) or lamivudine\abacavir (47). Asymptomatic children (n = 55) were also randomised to nelfinavir or placebo; all other children received open-label nelfinavir. Analyses are intent-to-treat and adjusted for minor baseline imbalances and receipt of nelfinavir/placebo.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.8 years. By 5 years, 17 (47%), 28 (64%) and 18 (39%) children had changed their randomised NRTIs in the zidovudine\lamivudine, zidovudine\abacavir and lamivudine\abacavir groups respectively, but 18%, 50% and 50% of these changes were either early single drug substitutions for toxicity or switches with viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml; e.g. to simplify regimen delivery). At 5 years, 55%/32% zidovudine\lamivudine, 50%/25% zidovudine\abacavir and 79%/63% lamivudine\abacavir had HIV-1 RNA < 400/< 50 copies/ml respectively (p = 0.03/p = 0.003). Mean increase in height-for-age 0.42, 0.68, 1.05 (p = 0.02); weight-for-age 0.03, 0.13, 0.75 (p = 0.02). Reverse transcriptase resistance mutations emerging on therapy differed between the groups: zidovudine\lamivudine (M41L, D67N, K70R, M184V, L210W, T215Y); zidovudine\abacavir (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215F/Y, K219Q); lamivudine\abacavir (K65R, L74V, Y115F, M184V).

CONCLUSIONS

Five year data demonstrate that lamivudine\abacavir is more effective in terms of HIV-1 RNA suppression and growth changes, with lower rates of switching with detectable HIV-1 RNA than zidovudine\lamivudine or zidovudine\abacavir, and should be preferred as first-line NRTI backbone.

Long-term results of initial therapy with abacavir and Lamivudine combined with Efavirenz, Amprenavir/Ritonavir, or Stavudine

OBJECTIVE

To compare alternative class-sparing antiretroviral regimens in treatment-naive subjects.

DESIGN

Open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of up to 3 consecutive treatment regimens over 96 weeks.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-one subjects received abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine and efavirenz (nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]), ritonavir-boosted amprenavir (protease inhibitor [PI]), or stavudine (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI]) by random assignment. The primary end points were the percentages of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL and time to treatment failure over 96 weeks.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of subjects completed 96 weeks of follow-up, and 79% remained on study treatment. At week 96, there were no differences between arms in the percentages of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 and <50 copies/mL, mean changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, time to treatment failure, time to first or second virologic failure, or CD4 cell counts. The NNRTI arm had a greater percentages of subjects with RNA levels <or=50 copies/mL at weeks 24 and 48 and a greater overall duration of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL. Three subjects in the NNRTI arm had treatment failure on their first regimen and switched therapy compared with 16 in the NRTI arm and 13 in the PI arm. Twenty-one subjects had hypersensitivity reactions attributed to ABC (7.3%). Fewer drugs were used by subjects in the NNRTI arm, and fewer subjects in the NNRTI arm used 3 drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

All treatment regimens demonstrated excellent 96-week results. Secondary analyses favored the NNRTI regimen over the PI and NRTI regimens.

Abacavir/lamividune combination in the treatment of HIV-1 infection: a review

Consensus guidelines for the management of HIV infection recommend the use of two nucleoside analogues in combination with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in therapy-naive patients. As adherence is crucial for treatment success, regimens with fewer pills, simpler dosing schedules and fewer adverse events have become the first choice for antiretroviral therapy. Fixed-dose combinations further improve the convenience of therapy. There are three dual-nucleoside fixed-dose combinations licensed for treating HIV-infected individuals, which include a combination of abacavir and lamivudine. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, resistance profiles, safety and tolerability of abacavir focussing on its use in combination with lamivudine and discusses the role of this nucleoside backbone in antiretroviral therapy.

The K65R reverse transcriptase mutation in HIV-1 reverses the excision phenotype of zidovudine resistance mutations

The HIV-1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tenofovir (TFV), abacavir, didanosine and stavudine can select for K65R, whereas zidovudine (AZT) and stavudine can select for thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). HIV-1 with TAMs shows reduced susceptibility to all NRTIs, most notably AZT, whereas HIV-1 with K65R shows reduced susceptibility to all NRTIs except AZT. K65R and TAMs rarely occur together in patients. However, when present together, K65R can restore susceptibility to AZT. This study characterizes the underlying mechanisms of resistance of these RT mutants to TFV and AZT. K65R mediated decreased binding/incorporation of TFV and AZT (increased Ki/Km of 7.1- and 4.3-fold, respectively), but also decreased excision of TFV and AZT (0.7- and 0.3-fold, respectively) when compared with wild-type RT. By contrast, TAMs mediated increased TFV and AZT excision (11- and 5.4-fold, respectively), and showed no changes in binding/incorporation. When these mutations were combined, K65R reversed TAM-mediated AZT resistance by strongly reducing AZT excision. Molecular modelling studies suggest that K65R creates additional hydrogen bonds that reduce the conformational mobility of RT, resulting in reduced polymerization and excision. Thus, consistent with clinical HIV-1 genotyping data, there appears to be no net NRTI resistance benefit for TAMs and K65R to develop together in patients taking AZT and TFV disoproxil fumarate, where the TAM pathway alone provides the greatest resistance for both drugs.

Significance of the L74V mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Mutations that confer resistance to nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors of HIV-1 can be divided into two major classes: thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) and TAM suppressors. M184V, K65R and L74V are TAM suppressors that emerge under the selective pressure of non-thymidine analogs. Each of the three TAM suppressors have been shown to decrease the level of resistance to 3´-azido-3´-deoxythymidine against a background of certain combinations of TAMs. L74V and M184V have also been associated with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in vitro. In this review, the effects associated with the L74V mutation, which confer resistance to didanosine and abacavir, are discussed. The clinical significance of this mutation and the underlying biochemical mechanisms of inhibition, resistance and resensitization are also discussed in the context of drug regimens containing didanosine and/or abacavir, in combination with 3´-azido -3´-deoxythymidine and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

The K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase exhibits bidirectional phenotypic antagonism with thymidine analog mutations

The K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) is selected in vitro by many D-nucleoside analog RT inhibitors (NRTI) but has been rarely detected in treated patients. In recent clinical trials, the K65R mutation has emerged frequently in patients experiencing virologic failure on antiretroviral combinations that do not include 3'-azidothymidine (AZT). The reason for this change is uncertain. To gain insight, we examined trends in the frequency of K65R in a large genotype database, the association of K65R with thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) and other NRTI mutations, and the viral susceptibility profile of HIV-1 with K65R alone and in combination with TAMs. Among >60,000 clinical samples submitted for genotype analysis that contained one or more NRTI resistance mutations, the frequency of K65R increased from 0.4% in 1998 to 3.6% in 2003. Among samples with K65R, a strong negative association was evident with the TAMs M41L, D67N, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E (P<0.005) but not with other NRTI mutations, including the Q151M complex. This suggested that K65R and TAMs are antagonistic. To test this possibility, we generated recombinant HIV-1 encoding K65R in two different TAM backgrounds: M41L/L210W/T215Y and D67N/K70R/T215F/K219Q. K65R reduced AZT resistance from >50-fold to <2.5-fold in both backgrounds. In addition, TAMs antagonized the phenotypic effect of K65R, reducing resistance to tenofovir, abacavir, 2',3'-dideoxycytidine, dideoxyinosine, and stavudine. In conclusion, K65R and TAMs exhibit bidirectional phenotypic antagonism. This antagonism likely explains the negative association of these mutations in genotype databases, the rare emergence of K65R with antiretroviral therapies that contain AZT, and its more frequent emergence with combinations that exclude AZT.

Net benefits of resistance testing directed therapy compared with standard of care in HIV-infected patients with virological failure: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We incorporated the latest available information to evaluate the net benefit of using resistance testing in HIV-infected patients with virological failure.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical impact of selecting antiretroviral therapy according to results of resistance testing (phenotype or genotype) or according to the standard of care. The population studied included HIV-infected patients with virological failure. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients with HIV-RNA below the detection limit, and the decline in HIV-RNA and increase in CD4 lymphocyte count at the end of follow-up (< or = 24 weeks). Clinical trials were identified through searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE and proceedings from major infectious diseases meetings.

RESULTS

Eight trials including a total of 1810 patients were eligible. Therapy guided by resistance testing resulted in a higher percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA below the detection limit at the end of follow-up (< or = 24 weeks) as compared with the standard of care (40.2% vs. 32.9%). The pooled risk ratio was 1.23; 95% CI 1.09-1.40, p = 0.0009; test for heterogeneity I(2)=0%; p = 0.46). The number needed to treat [NNT] was 13 (95% CI: 9-25). Subgroup analysis showed greater benefits in therapy guided by genotype testing with expert interpretation, when compared with standard of care (NNT: 5; 95% CI: 3-9; p = 0.06). The heterogeneity among trials for evaluating HIV-1 RNA decline and CD4 lymphocyte cell count increase made unfeasible pooling the results across studies.

CONCLUSION

Genotype testing with expert interpretation showed the greatest benefit for guiding therapy in patients with HIV infection and virological failure.

Induction With Abacavir/Lamivudine/Zidovudine Plus Efavirenz for 48 Weeks Followed by 48-Week Maintenance With Abacavir/Lamivudine/Zidovudine Alone in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Patients

BACKGROUND

The ESS40013 study tested 4-drug induction followed by 3-drug maintenance as initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce HIV RNA rapidly and then to simplify to an effective yet more convenient and tolerable regimen.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-eight antiretroviral-naive adults were treated with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine (ABC/3TC/ZDV) and efavirenz (EFV) for the 48-week induction phase. Two hundred eighty-two patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue ABC/3TC/ZDV+EFV or to simplify to ABC/3TC/ZDV for the 48-week maintenance phase.

RESULTS

The baseline median HIV RNA level and CD4 cell count were 5.08 log10 copies/mL (56%>or=100,000 copies/mL) and 210 cells/mm (48% <200 cells/mm), respectively. No significant differences were noted between ABC/3TC/ZDV+EFV and ABC/3TC/ZDV for an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL (79% vs. 77% [intent to treat (ITT), missing=failure]; P=0.697) or time to treatment failure (P=0.75) at week 96. Drug-related adverse events were more commonly reported for ABC/3TC/ZDV+EFV than for ABC/3TC/ZDV (15% vs. 6%). Improvements in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were observed in the ABC/3TC/ZDV group. Virologic failure occurred in 22 patients during induction and in 24 patients (16 in ABC/3TC/ZDV group and 8 in ABC/3TC/ZDV+EFV group; P=0.134) during maintenance. A greater proportion of patients receiving ABC/3TC/ZDV than ABC/3TC/ZDV+EFV reported perfect adherence at week 96 (88.8% vs. 79.6%; P=0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

After induction with ABC/3TC/ZDV+EFV, simplification to ABC/3TC/ZDV alone maintained virologic control and immunologic response, reduced fasting lipids and ART-associated adverse events, and improved adherence.