Efficacy and safety of an anti-retroviral combination regimen including either efavirenz or lopinavir–ritonavir with a backbone of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Nanotechnology-based antiviral therapeutics

The host immune system is highly compromised in case of viral infections and relapses are very common. The capacity of the virus to destroy the host cell by liberating its own DNA or RNA and replicating inside the host cell poses challenges in the development of antiviral therapeutics. In recent years, many new technologies have been explored for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of viral infections. Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most promising technologies on account of its ability to deal with viral diseases in an effective manner, addressing the limitations of traditional antiviral medicines. It has not only helped us to overcome problems related to solubility and toxicity of drugs, but also imparted unique properties to drugs, which in turn has increased their potency and selectivity toward viral cells against the host cells. The initial part of the paper focuses on some important proteins of influenza, Ebola, HIV, herpes, Zika, dengue, and corona virus and those of the host cells important for their entry and replication into the host cells. This is followed by different types of nanomaterials which have served as delivery vehicles for the antiviral drugs. It includes various lipid-based, polymer-based, lipid-polymer hybrid-based, carbon-based, inorganic metal-based, surface-modified, and stimuli-sensitive nanomaterials and their application in antiviral therapeutics. The authors also highlight newer promising treatment approaches like nanotraps, nanorobots, nanobubbles, nanofibers, nanodiamonds, nanovaccines, and mathematical modeling for the future. The paper has been updated with the recent developments in nanotechnology-based approaches in view of the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19.Graphical abstract.

Lopinavir/ritonavir as a third agent in the antiviral regimen for SARS-CoV-2 infection

Corona Virus Disease (CoVID-19) is an emerging public health problem rapidly spread globally. New treatment options for patients with severe symptoms and ways of reducing transmission in the community are taken into consideration. A retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Infectious Diseases of Alexandroupolis (Greece) including 16 patients with CoVID-19. They were classified into two groups, A and B. Group A received lopinavir/ritonavir as a third agent in the antiviral regimen, while group B did not. Lymphocytes were more significantly increased in patients of group A. Ferritin serum levels were also decreased significantly in these patients. Number of days needed for a first negative result of Real Time- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) was lower for Group A. The present study suggests that lopinavir/ritonavir may reduce the viral carriage in a shorter period of time compared with other antiviral regimens. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

A review of the safety and tolerability profile of the next-generation NNRTI etravirine

The next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine (TMC125) has demonstrated durable virologic efficacy in clinical trials involving >1000 treatment-experienced, NNRTI-resistant, HIV-1-infected patients. In this clinical safety review, we show etravirine to be well tolerated with a proven safety record. The nature and magnitude of adverse events observed during treatment suggest that etravirine may offer improved tolerability over existing antiretrovirals, including NNRTIs. Notably, adverse events reported with etravirine treatment are generally mild to moderate in severity. Rash has been shown to occur with a higher incidence in etravirine-treated patients versus placebo, but cases are generally mild to moderate, occur within the first few weeks, and resolve with continued use. In addition, the rate of adverse event-related discontinuations is low with etravirine. In summary, the safety and tolerability profile of etravirine, combined with its virologic efficacy, suggest that the drug may be a valuable option for treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection.

Observational study to evaluate clinical outcomes after first-line efavirenz-or lopinavir-ritonavir-based HAART in treatment-naive patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical, immunological, and virological outcomes after first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with a regimen including either efavirenz (EFV) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-naive adult patients in routine clinical care.

METHOD

An ongoing prospective, observational follow-up study included all patients starting their first antiretroviral therapy (ART) with any of the studied regimens from July 1998 to July 2004. The follow-up period was finalized in September 2006, when all patients completed an observation of at least 96 weeks. Mortality rates, CD4 counts, viral suppression (HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL), and discontinuation of any component of the regimen were compared at 48 and 96 weeks.

RESULTS

Despite the worst immunological status of the LPV/r group patients at baseline, this regimen was at least as effective as the one based on EFV not only in terms of treatment durability but also in terms of virological responses, nevertheless with an apparently quicker immune recovery. In general terms, both regimens present similar tolerability and safety outcomes except for the higher risk of increasing triglyceride (TG) levels in the LPV/r group. Low durability was observed in both regimens.

CONCLUSION

In a routine clinical care setting, initial HAART containing LPV/r seems to present an effectiveness, tolerability, and toxicity similar to the one containing EFV.

Two-year outcomes of children on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and protease inhibitor regimens in a South African pediatric antiretroviral program

BACKGROUND

Few data exist on the efficacy of the limited regimens for children with HIV, which are available in sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical and laboratory outcomes of 391 children who received protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor (nNRTI)-containing highly active antiretroviral regimens (HAART) from a Cape Town clinic. Endpoints included CD4% and count, viral loads, weight-for-age Z score (WAZ), survival, drug changes, and loss to follow-up over 24 months. A generalized estimating equation population-averaged model was used to identify associations with virological suppression, and a log-rank test explored associations with survival.

RESULTS

Overall, this cohort achieved a sustained doubling of median CD4% from baseline, steady increase of median WAZ, and survival of 91%, despite only 49% virologic suppression at 24 months. However, when analyzed according to regimen, PI-containing regimens had better virologic suppression at all time points. There were no differences in immunologic and growth endpoints between regimens or in survival. In a multivariate model predicting virologic suppression at any duration up to 24 months and adjusting for baseline CD4%, regimen, age, baseline WAZ, duration of HAART, and year of HAART initiation, nNRTI-based regimens (odds ratio [OR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.77) and length of time on HAART were inversely associated with virologic suppression. Age (OR: 1.23 per year; 95% CI: 1.09-1.39) was positively associated with virologic suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of HAART are substantial in this setting, although PI regimens achieved greater virologic suppression than nNRTIs. Further exploration of regimens and dosing of antiretrovirals for children in these settings is needed.