Which parameters differ in very old patients with chronic atrial fibrillation treated by anticoagulant or aspirin?

Atrial Fibrillation and Cognitive Disorders

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation among older adults is increasing. Research has indicated that atrial fibrillation is linked to cognitive impairment disorders such as Alzheimer and vascular dementia, as well as Parkinson disease. Various mechanisms are believed to be shared between atrial fibrillation and cognitive impairment disorders. The specific pathologies and mechanisms of different cognitive disorders are still being studied. Potential mechanisms include cerebral hypoperfusion, ischemic or hemorrhagic infarction, and cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide. Additionally, circulatory biomarkers and certain infectious organisms appear to be involved. This review offers an examination of the overlapping epidemiology between atrial fibrillation and cognitive disorders, explores different cognitive disorders and their connections with this arrhythmia, and discusses trials and guidelines for preventing and treating atrial fibrillation in patients with cognitive disorders. It synthesizes existing knowledge on the management of atrial fibrillation and identifies areas that require further investigation to bridge the gap in understanding the complex relationship between dementia and atrial fibrillation.

Impact of frailty models on the prescription of oral anticoagulants and on the incidence of stroke, bleeding, and mortality in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) except in case of severe frailty or reduced life expectancy, but definitive evidence on which "frailty" tools may help to identify older AF patients expected to derive little or no benefit from OAT is still lacking. Some persistent uncertainties may derive from the different clinical implications that the two major models of frailty, namely the frail phenotype (FP) and the deficit accumulation model (DAM), underlie. We thus conducted a systematic review of published studies to examine the association of the presence of frailty, categorized according to the FP and DAM, with 1) OAT prescription and 2) incidence of clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, stroke and/or systemic embolism and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) in patients receiving OAT.

METHODS

Embase and MEDLINE were searched from inception until May 31st, 2022, for studies using a validated tool to identify frailty in subjects aged 65 years or older with a diagnosis of non-valvular AF; only studies on patients prescribed an OAT were considered eligible for the analyses involving clinical outcomes. The protocols for each review question have been registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42022308623 and CRD42022308628).

FINDINGS

Twenty-three studies exploring the association between frailty and OAT prescription on a total of 504 719 subjects were included. Patients with increasing severity of DAM frailty showed consistently lower OAT prescription rates than non-frail patients, whereas use of OAT did not significantly differ between patients with the FP compared with non-frail subjects. Eleven studies exploring the association between frailty and clinical outcomes on a total of 41 985 individuals receiving oral anticoagulation were included. Compared with non-frail subjects, a higher risk of all-cause mortality and clinical outcomes could be observed for AF patients prescribed with OAT with severe frailty according to the DAM, with inconclusive findings for the FP. High levels of heterogeneity were observed in both groups of studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the great heterogeneity among different validated frailty measures, indiscriminately relying on "frailty" should not be regarded as the gold standard for clinical decision-making about stroke prevention in older AF patients. Present findings suggest that severe frailty according to the DAM is associated with less use of OAT and increased risk of all-cause mortality, thereby representing at the moment the most reasonable tool to efficiently recognize patients with limited life expectancy and for whom there is so far scant, if any, evidence of a clinical benefit of OAT.

Management of atrial fibrillation for older people with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

despite a large and growing population of older people with frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF), there is a lack of guidance on optimal AF management in this high-risk group.

OBJECTIVE

to synthesise the existing evidence base on the association between frailty, AF and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

a systematic review of studies examining the association between validated measures of frailty, AF and clinical outcomes, and meta-analysis of the association between frailty and oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescription.

RESULTS

twenty studies (30,883 patients) were included, all observational. Fifteen were in hospital, four in the community, one in nursing care. Risk of bias was low-to-moderate. AF prevalence was 3%-38%. In people with AF, frailty was associated with increased stroke incidence, all-cause mortality, symptom severity and length of hospital stay.Meta-analysis of six studies showed frailty was associated with decreased OAC prescription at hospital admission (pooled adjusted OR 0.45 [95%CI 0.22-0.93], three studies), but not at discharge (pooled adjusted OR 0.40 [95%CI 0.13-1.23], three studies). A community-based study showed increased OAC prescription associated with frailty (OR 2.33 [95%CI 1.03-5.23]).

CONCLUSION

frailty is common, and associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AF. There is evidence of an association between frailty status and OAC prescription, with different direction of effect in community compared with hospital cohorts. Despite the majority of care for older people being provided in the community, there is a lack of evidence on the association between frailty, AF, anticoagulation and clinical outcomes to guide optimal care in this setting.

Associations between socioeconomic status, atrial fibrillation, and outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing epidemic and evidence of a relationship to socioeconomic status (SES) is inconsistent. We aimed to summarize the literature about SES and AF and defined two objectives: (1) To examine the association between SES and the risk of AF; (2) To examine the association between SES and AF-related outcomes in an AF-population.

METHODS

We performed a separate search for each objective in Ovid-MEDLINE and Ovid-Embase. For objective 1, the population included was healthy participants and outcome of interest was AF. For objective 2, the population included were patients with AF and outcome of interest was mortality, treatment, ablation for AF, knowledge about AF, and morbidity.

RESULTS

For objective 1, 12 studies were included. No consistent pattern for an association between SES and the risk of AF was discovered. For objective 2, 39 studies comprising 42 outcomes were included. The majority of studies showed an association between low SES and increased mortality and morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Low SES was associated with poorer outcomes when AF was present. These findings may imply that health-care professionals and policy interventions should focus on the promotion of AF-education and management among patients with AF and low SES.

Long-term outcomes in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Greater use of evidence-based therapies has improved outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in recent decades. Consequently, more ACS patients are surviving beyond 12 months; however, limited data exist to guide treatment in these patients. Long-term outcomes have not improved in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients at the same rate seen in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, possibly reflecting NSTEMI patients’ more complex clinical phenotype, including older age, greater burden of comorbidities and higher likelihood of a previous myocardial infarction (MI). This complexity impacts clinical decision-making, particularly in high-risk NSTEMI patients, in whom risk–benefit assessments are problematical. This review examines the need for more effective long-term management of NSTEMI patients who survive ≥12 months after MI. Ongoing risk assessment using objective measures of risk (for bleeding and ischemia) should be used in all post-MI patients. While 12 months appears to be the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for most patients, this may not be the case for high-risk patients, and more research is urgently needed in this population. A recent subgroup analysis from the DAPT study in patients with or without MI who had undergone coronary stenting (31 % presented with MI; 53 % had NSTEMI) and the prospective PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial in patients with a prior MI and at least one other risk factor (40 % had NSTEMI) demonstrated that long-term dual antiplatelet therapy improved cardiovascular outcomes but increased bleeding. Further studies will help clarify the role of dual antiplatelet therapy in stable post-NSTEMI patients.

Real-world characteristics of hospitalized frail elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: can we improve the current prescription of anticoagulants?

BACKGROUND

In elderly patients, especially those older than 80 years, atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an almost 25% increased risk of stroke. Stroke prophylaxis with anticoagulants is therefore highly recommended. The prevalence of factors that have been associated with a lower rate of prescription and adherence to anticoagulant therapy in these patients is little known. The objective of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics of elderly subjects, with and without AF, consecutively admitted to an acute geriatric unit, discussing factors that may decrease the persistence on stroke prophylaxis therapy. We also highlight possible strategies to overcome the barriers conditioning the current underuse of oral anticoagulants in this segment of the population.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed on a cohort of elderly patients with and without AF admitted to the Acute Geriatric Unit of San Gerardo Hospital (Monza, Italy).

RESULTS

Compared to patients without AF (n = 1216), those with AF (n = 403) had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 2, P < 0.001), number of administered drugs (4 vs. 3, P < 0.001), rate of heart failure (36.5% vs. 12%, P < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (20.6 vs. 13.2, P < 0.001). Many patients with AF were frail (54%) or pre-frail (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with AF have higher rates of conditions that affect adherence to traditional anticoagulant therapy (vitamin K antagonists, VKA). New direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) can help overcome this problem. In order to prescribe the most appropriate VKA or DOAs, with the best efficacy/safety profile and the highest compliance, a comprehensive geriatric assessment should always accompany the scores for thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk stratification.

Antiplatelet drugs in the elderly: prescriptions often inappropriate and reduced tolerance by associated diseases and drugs

To assess the conditions of prescriptions and tolerance of antiplatelet drugs (APD) in the elderly and to detail the parameters that influence the tolerance of these drugs. Prospective survey in a Department of Geriatric Medicine. Two hundred nineteen patients 70 years and older treated with one or two APD prior to admission were included during 7 months in 2008. We recorded the type of APD, associated diseases, main associated or co-prescribed drugs which could interact with APD and the bleeding adverse events including cutaneous bleeding. The mean age of the 219 patients was 84.5 ± 6.7 years (70-101 years), women 59.4%. Among patients 64.8% received aspirin (mainly 75 mg), 28.3% received clopidogrel and 6.8% received their combination; 16.9% of prescriptions were off-label; 51.6% of patients had an associated disease and/or an associated drug which could have increased risk of bleeding event. Among the patients who received a gastric-protective drug, the prescription followed the recommendations of the French Health Authority in 38.9%. We recorded bleeding events in 24.2% of patients at admission and in 18.3% of patients during the hospitalization. Bleeding events were significantly more frequent in patients treated with aspirin than clopidogrel (40.8 vs. 24.2%, P < 0.05) and/or with an associated drug (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.34-4.14, P < 0.01) and/or an associated disease (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-3.42, P < 0.05). APD treatment was stopped in 28.8% of patients, mainly because lack of indication or bleeding adverse events. Off-label prescriptions of APD were not rare in the elderly, and adverse events are frequent. The results of this preliminary study evoke that medical situations at increased risk of bleeding are perhaps insufficiently evaluated, either in case of prescription of associated drugs with increased bleeding risk or during the follow-up of patients with associated diseases. Cutaneous bleeding events should be more taken into account in prospective studies.

Preventing serious sequelae after an acute coronary syndrome: the consequences of thrombosis versus bleeding with antiplatelet therapy

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a persistent prothrombotic state, placing patients at high risk of subsequent ischemic events. Guidelines recommend the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin + a thienopyridine (clopidogrel) for at least a year after ACS in most patients, except those who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting. Clinical studies demonstrate that this strategy significantly reduces the risk of ischemic events at the expense of a small increase in the risk of bleeding. Physicians must balance the risk of bleeding against the benefit of ischemia prevention, bearing in mind that ischemic events are generally more common than major bleeding and often associated with more catastrophic consequences or ongoing morbidity. The relationship between bleeding and mortality is complicated by the fact that many risk factors for bleeding are also those for mortality and that bleeding may lead to discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy, thereby increasing the risk for an ischemic event. Data suggest that physicians tend to overestimate the risk of bleeding and underestimate the risk of ischemia. Careful patient selection and thorough patient education are the keys to managing antiplatelet therapy after ACS, especially as newer more potent antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel, become available.

Reasons for undertreatment with oral anticoagulants in frail geriatric outpatients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective, descriptive study

OBJECTIVES

The main aims of the study were to explore whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in geriatric outpatients is prescribed in accordance with international (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology [ACC/AHA/ESC]) and Dutch national guidelines for the general practitioner (GP) and to identify whether age and selected co-morbid conditions are associated with undertreatment. As a secondary objective, we wanted to establish how many patients discontinue OAC because of major bleeding.

METHODS

In 2004, at the first visit of all patients to the geriatric day clinic of the Slotervaart Hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, demographic data, Mini-Mental State Examination score, medical history, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and data on medication use and changes were documented. The presence of AF was established by assessment of medical history information obtained by the GP, the history taken from patients and their caregivers, and the results of clinical evaluation, including ECG findings. Associations between the use of OAC, demographic data and co-morbid conditions registered in the Dutch NHG (Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap [Dutch College of General Practitioners]) standard for GPs as risk factors for stroke or contraindications to the use of OAC were analysed. The reasons for discontinuing OAC were assessed after 4 years by requesting the information from the anticoagulation services or the GP.

RESULTS

At the time of the initial visit, 17.5% of the 807 outpatients had chronic AF (n = 135) or were known to have paroxysmal AF (n = 6). The mean age of the 141 patients in this cohort was 84.3 years (SD 6.2 years). Co-morbid conditions increasing the risk of stroke were present in 129 patients (91.5%). Contraindications to the use of OAC were observed in 118 patients (83.7%). Of the 116 patients with AF in their history before their visit, 57.8% were being treated with OAC at the time of their visit. After comprehensive geriatric assessment, 73 (51.8%) of the 141 patients with chronic or paroxysmal AF were continued on OAC. Of the 141 patients with chronic or paroxysmal AF, 110 (78.0%) had both extra stroke risk factors and contraindications to the use of OAC. Only increasing age was significantly and independently associated with not being prescribed anticoagulants (p < 0.001). At the 4-year follow-up, OAC had been discontinued in 5.5% of patients because of major bleeding; three patients (4.1%) taking OAC had died as a result of major bleeding, and one other patient had discontinued treatment because of a major, non-lethal bleeding episode.

CONCLUSION

Applying the NHG standard for appropriate prescription, and disregarding age as a risk factor or contraindication, in this population, 14 of 141 patients (9.9%) were inappropriately prescribed OAC, salicylates or no prophylaxis. Since only patient age was associated with not prescribing OAC in this study, higher age still seems to be considered the most important contraindication to anticoagulation therapy. Implementation of better models for stratifying bleeding risk in the frail elderly is needed. After 4 years, the cumulative rate of bleeding causing discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy in this usual-care study of frail older patients was not alarmingly higher than in other usual-care studies.