Vaginal birth after classical Caesarean section

Vaginal birth after cesarean section prediction model for Jordanian population

The rate of cesarean section has increased significantly worldwide, creating a group of women with one lower segment cesarean section concerned about the mode of delivery in their future pregnancies. This group of mothers will face a complex discussion because the likelihood for a successful vaginal birth after cesarean section provided to them is a general one. The probability of having a successful vaginal birth is the cornerstone factor of the mothers' decision. Therefore, providing a case-specific likelihood that respects the characteristics of each pregnancy will refine counseling, lower the decision conflict, and improve the success rate of vaginal birth trials eventually improving maternal and fetal outcomes. This paper aims to develop a clinical decision support system to evaluate the individualized likelihood mode of delivery for pregnant women with a previous lower segment cesarean section based on their unique characteristics. The study included six hundred fifty-nine pregnant women, where three hundred twenty-seven records had missing values. Various pre-processing steps, including missing data imputation and feature selection, were applied to the original dataset before model development to improve the data quality. Missing values were handled first, then a feature selection process using a genetic algorithm was applied to select the relevant features and to exclude features that may have been affected negatively by missing data imputation. After that, four machine learning classifiers, namely Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Logistic Regression, were used to build the prediction model. The results showed that imputing missing values followed by feature selection was more efficient than deleting them since the Area Under the Curve (AUC) has increased from 0.655 to 0.812 using the KNN classifier.

The influence of mode of birth on neonatal survival and maternal outcomes at extreme prematurity: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of published clinical data to guide obstetric decision-making regarding mode of birth at extreme prematurity.

AIMS

To evaluate whether neonatal survival or maternal outcomes were affected by the decision to perform a caesarean section (CS) between 23 + 0 and 26 + 6 weeks' gestation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-centre retrospective cohort study of all liveborn infants born with a plan for active resuscitation at 23-26 weeks' gestation was performed. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses compared outcomes after vaginal birth and CS. Subgroup analyses of nonfootling breech presentations, multiple pregnancies and singleton pregnancies in spontaneous preterm labour were performed.

RESULTS

Outcomes for 625 neonates delivered by 540 mothers were analysed. A total of 300 (48%) neonates were born vaginally and 325 (52%) by CS. Mode of birth was not associated independently with survival for any multivariate analysis; gestational age at birth was an independent predictor across all analyses. Adverse maternal outcomes were documented in 112 (21%) pregnancies; the rate of severe maternal complications was low. Maternal morbidity was not affected by mode of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Mode of birth did not affect neonatal survival or the rate of maternal morbidity for deliveries at 23-26 completed weeks' gestation.

Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean section: a retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of two methods for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.

METHODS

To compare 247 women with a previous cesarean section who were induced with a dinoprostone vaginal insert and 279 women with a previous cesarean section induced with oxytocin, between 2001 and 2008. We evaluated vaginal delivery rate, maternal morbidity and newborn morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The overall rate of vaginal delivery was 65.2%. We did not find significant differences between induction with dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin in the rate of cesarean section performed (35.6% vs. 34.1%, P=0.71). There were nine cases of uterine rupture (rate of 1.7%), of which four occurred with dinoprostone vaginal insert and five when using oxytocin (P=0.89). We found no significant differences in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both tested methods appear to be equally safe and effective for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section.

The clinical content of preconception care: reproductive history

A history of previous birth of a low birthweight infant, previous cesarean sections, multiple previous spontaneous abortions, prior stillbirth, or uterine anomaly identifies women at increased risk for recurrent abortion, preterm birth, or stillbirth. We review the evidence for the potential benefit of reproductive history in identifying strategies for evaluation and treatment to prevent recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome. We offer evidence-based recommendations for management of women with these histories.