Prophylactic and Empiric Use of Antibiotics in Dermatologic Surgery: A Review of the Literature and Practical Considerations

Shared decision making for perioperative antibiotic use during Mohs micrographic surgery on the lower extremities

Background

While there is a higher risk of surgical site infection (SSI) on the lower extremities following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) is debated.

Objective

To determine the role of shared decision making (SDM) in guiding AP usage during MMS on the lower extremities.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted whereby patients received a standardized SDM discussion or routine counseling. Patient satisfaction quantified by the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDMQ9) survey, rate of SSI, and rate of AP prescription were recorded.

Results

In total, 51 patients were included. While there were less antibiotics prescribed in the treatment group (20% versus 50%, P = .025), this did not affect incidence of SSI (8% in treatment group versus 7.7% in control group, P = .668). Patient satisfaction was statistically greater in SDM group (4.73 versus 2.18 in control (P < .001).

Conclusion

Patient satisfaction scores were higher among the patients who received SDM. While the usage of AP was lower in the SDM group, this did not affect incidence of SSI. This study allows the opportunity to apply SDM in the setting of MMS, which to our knowledge has not yet been attempted in the field of dermatologic surgery.

Microbiology of surgical site infections (SSIs) following skin cancer surgery

BACKGROUNDS

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent one of the most common and potentially preventable sources of morbidity and healthcare cost escalation associated with skin cancer surgery. There is a lack of data reporting organisms cultured from SSIs in skin surgery, with guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis based on common skin pathogens rather than actual cultured organisms. In this study, we sought to define the cultured microbiology of SSIs specific to skin cancer surgery and test these against empiric treatment guidelines.

METHODS

All consenting patients presenting to the Auckland regional skin cancer treatment centre over a 6-month period were included. Patients receiving any form of antibiotics within a week prior to surgery were excluded. All wounds were assessed postoperatively, with clinically significant infections identified as those with a standardized wound infection score of 4 (range 0-7) and/or prescribed post-operative antibiotics within 3 weeks of surgery. Wound cultures were recorded.

RESULTS

About 104 clinically significant SSIs were identified from 333 lesions treated, with cultures available in 27%. Cultured organisms included MSSA (79%), MRSA (14%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (11%), and 'skin flora' (14%). Empiric guidelines inaccurately predicted effective treatment in 14% of cases, exclusively due to MRSA.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this is the first comprehensive report of SSI microbiology following skin cancer surgery. The overwhelmingly predominant organisms were Staphylococcus sp. (76%), with the rate of MRSA approaching prevalence warranting empiric first-line treatment. These data help inform effective rationalized empiric antibiotic treatment, when indicated, for optimal outcome following skin surgery.

Characteristics of Lower Extremity Infection Rates Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Lower extremity surgical sites are at an increased risk for developing SSI.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate lower extremity SSI rates post-MMS based on closure type and antibiotic usage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all lower extremity MMS cases from 2011 to 2016 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patient history, surgical details, and follow-up appointments were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty MMS lower extremity surgeries were eligible. Review identified an overall lower extremity SSI rate of 7.4%. Infection rates were significantly increased in wound closed by flaps/grafts (p < .001). Although wound size and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis were initially associated with increased infection rate (p = .03, p = .015), the associations were fully attenuated when adjusting for closure type.

CONCLUSION

More complicated repair techniques (flap/graft) for larger wound sizes contribute to increased SSI risk among lower extremity MMS cases. Providers can use this information to guide antibiotic prophylaxis.

Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns

The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews the evidence regarding the intraoperative and postoperative risks for patients and health care workers. We share the most up-to-date recommendations for risk management and postoperative complication management to ensure optimal surgical efficacy and patient safety.

Preoperative Considerations for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Superficial Cutaneous Surgeries: A Systematic Review

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose challenges to the outcome of superficial cutaneous procedures. Objective: The objective of this study was to summarize published data regarding appropriate perioperative considerations to decrease SSI, including antiseptic use, topical decolonization, antibiotic prophylaxis, and clean versus sterile technique in superficial cutaneous procedures. A literature search was performed via PubMed and Cochrane Library by using relevant keywords. A total of 37 articles met the inclusion criteria. Strength of data was assessed according to the Oxford Centre criteria and a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: Chlorhexidine is the antiseptic of choice in clean or outpatient superficial cutaneous procedures. Decolonization of carriers of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin is warranted for all superficial cutaneous procedures. Minor procedure rooms may be considered for superficial cutaneous procedures that possess an inherently low risk of SSI. Surgeons may consider nonsterile gloves instead of sterile gloves for clean or outpatient superficial cutaneous procedures. Postoperative use of topical antibiotics may be discontinued, as there are risks of adverse effects and increasing bacterial resistance without a significant reduction in SSI. Conclusion and Relevance: This systematic review provides new and updated evidence for the prevention of SSI in superficial cutaneous procedures through antiseptic use, antibiotic use, topical agents, and the surgical environment. The overall quality of evidence is good, with most articles being original research or systematic reviews. However, there is a need for dermatologic- and plastic surgery-specific studies regarding the prevention of SSI.

Positive Bacterial Culture Results at a Dermatologic Surgery Center: A Single-Site Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Typical prophylactic coverage of suspected cutaneous surgical-site infections (SSIs) predominantly covers gram-positive bacteria. Data regarding the frequency of infection with unusual bacteria, not covered by prophylaxis, are not available.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective 10-year review of culture-positive infections at a single academic site was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All positive bacterial culture results at the Washington University Center for Dermatologic and Cosmetic Surgery between October 31, 2007, and October 31, 2017, were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Coagulase-negative staphylococcus accounted for 20.8% of positive culture results. Staphylococcus aureus caused 45.4% of infections. The remaining 33.8% were due to non-S. aureus bacteria, most frequently with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.8%). Numerous other gram-negative organisms and unusual gram-positive organisms were cultured. The lower extremity and ear were the only sites more likely to be infected with non-S. aureus bacteria. Smokers and immunosuppressed individuals were not more likely to have an SSI with non-S. aureus bacteria.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of all SSIs with positive culture results was due to bacteria that are not sensitive to beta-lactam prophylaxis. Broader coverage for suspected SSI should be considered, particularly on the lower extremity and ear.

Analysis of the status quo of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatosurgery in Germany: results of the DESSI-study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is recommended for the prevention of postoperative infections by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute. However, how PAP is currently used in the field of dermatosurgery in Germany is unclear.

METHODS

All members of the German Society for Dermatosurgery (DGDC) were asked to participate in a web-based survey in order to investigate the use of PAP by German dermatological surgeons.

RESULTS

78 DGDC members completed the questionnaire. Of these, 89.7 % (70/78) were medical specialists with a median work experience of 15 years in the field of dermatosurgery, and 53.8 % (42/78) of the respondents regularly use PAP in dermatosurgery. Of these, 35.7 % (15/42) reported that they perform PAP for immunocompromised patients. Only a small proportion of skin surgeons stated that they administer PAP parenterally (5.9 %, 4/67). The most commonly used drug was cephalosporin cefuroxime. The duration of the PAP varied between single-dose and prolonged administration for more than five days.

CONCLUSION

Currently, the use of PAP in dermatosurgical procedures in Germany is not standardized. Prospective randomized dermatosurgical studies are needed in order to investigate whether the PAP recommendations of KRINKO are applicable to the field of dermatological surgery.

Effect of a Single Preoperative Dose of Oral Antibiotic to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Below-Knee Dermatological Flap and Graft Repair

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) rates for below-knee dermatological surgery are unacceptably high, particularly following complex flap and graft closures. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis for these surgical cases is uncertain.

Objective

To determine whether SSI following complex dermatological closures on the leg could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis administered as a single oral preoperative dose.

Methods

A total of 115 participants were randomized to 2 g of oral cephalexin or placebo 40–60 minutes prior to surgical incision in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a primary care skin cancer clinic in North Queensland, Australia.

Results

Overall 17/55 (30.9%) controls and 14/55 (25.5%) intervention participants developed infection (P = 0.525). There was no difference between the study groups in adverse symptoms that could be attributed to high-dose antibiotic administration (P = 1).

Conclusion

A single oral 2-g dose of cephalexin given before complex below-knee dermatological closure did not reduce SSI.

Effect of a single prophylactic preoperative oral antibiotic dose on surgical site infection following complex dermatological procedures on the nose and ear: a prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded trial

OBJECTIVES

There is limited published research studying the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infection (SSI) in dermatological surgery, and there is no consensus for its use in higher-risk cases. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a single oral preoperative 2 g dose of cephalexin in preventing SSI following flap and graft dermatological closures on the nose and ear.

DESIGN

Prospective double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial testing for difference in infection rates.

SETTING

Primary care skin cancer clinics in North Queensland, Australia, were randomised to 2 g oral cephalexin or placebo 40-60 min prior to skin incision.

PARTICIPANTS

154 consecutive eligible patients booked for flap or graft closure following skin cancer excision on the ear and nose.

INTERVENTION

2 g dose of cephalexin administered 40-60 min prior to surgery.

RESULTS

Overall 8/69 (11.6%) controls and 1/73 (1.4%) in the intervention group developed SSI (p=0.015; absolute SSI reduction 10.2%; number needed to treat (NNT) for benefit 9.8, 95% CI 5.5 to 45.5). In males, 7/44 controls and 0/33 in the intervention group developed SSI (p=0.018; absolute SSI reduction 15.9%; NNT for benefit 6.3, 95% CI 3.8 to 19.2). SSI was much lower in female controls (1/25) and antibiotic prophylaxis did not further reduce this (p=1.0). There was no difference between the study groups in adverse symptoms attributable to high-dose antibiotic administration (p=0.871).

CONCLUSION

A single oral 2 g dose of cephalexin given before complex skin closure on the nose and ear reduced SSI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ANZCTR 365115; Post-results.

Can dressings soaked with polyhexanide reduce bacterial loads in full-thickness skin grafting? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-based antiseptic solutions can reduce bacterial loads in different clinical settings and are believed to lower risk of infections.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the efficacy of a PHMB-based solution in lowering bacterial loads of full-thickness skin grafting wounds and the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs).

METHODS

In this double-blinded clinical trial, 40 patients planned for facial full-thickness skin grafting were randomized 1:1 to receive tie-over dressings soaked with either PHMB-based solution or sterile water. Quantitative and qualitative bacterial analysis was performed on all wounds before surgery, at the end of surgery, and 7 days postoperatively. In addition, all patients were screened for nasal colonization of Staphylococcus aureus.

RESULTS

Analysis of wounds showed no statistically significant difference in bacterial reductions between the groups. The SSI rates were significantly higher in the intervention group (8/20) than in the control group (2/20) (P = .028). Higher postoperative bacterial loads were a common finding in SSIs (P = .011). This was more frequent when S aureus was present postoperatively (P = .034), intraoperatively (P = .03), and in patients with intranasal S aureus colonization (P = .007).

LIMITATIONS

Assessment of SSIs is largely subjective. In addition, this was a single-center study and the total number of participants was 40.

CONCLUSION

Soaking tie-over dressings with PHMB solution in full-thickness skin grafting had no effect on postoperative bacterial loads and increased the risk of SSI development. The presence of S aureus intranasally and in wounds preoperatively and postoperatively increased postoperative bacterial loads, which in turn resulted in significantly more SSIs.

Surgical Site Infection After Skin Excisions in Children: Is Field Sterility Sufficient?

Skin excisions are common procedures in children. They may be performed in the clinic using field sterility or the operating room with strict sterile technique. We compared the effect of these locations and the use of antibiotics on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after skin excisions. Patients ages 0-18 years presenting to our department for the excision of lesions from 2006 to 2010 with complete medical records were included in our study. Records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, presentation, perioperative conditions, and postoperative SSI and other wound complications. Analyses were performed to estimate the costs associated with sterility technique and perioperative antibiotic use. We identified 700 patients with a mean age of 9.1 years. Of 872 lesions excised, 0.3% resulted in SSI and 1.8% had other wound complications. The incidence of SSI did not vary according to sterility technique, antibiotic usage, surgeon, age, or lesion size, type, or location. The equipment costs to excise a lesion in the operating room were 200% greater than in the clinic. The incidence of SSI after excision of benign lesions in children did not differ between those performed using clinic field sterility and those using the standard aseptic sterile technique in the operating room. A considerable cost savings could be realized by adopting field sterility for simple excisions performed in the operating room and avoiding routine perioperative antibiotics in pediatric skin excisions.

Surgical site infections in dermatologic surgery: etiology, pathogenesis, and current preventative measures

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after dermatologic surgery continue to represent undesirable complications that affect patients in several aspects. The etiology and pathogenesis of SSIs are not completely understood, and as a result, current preventative measures are debatable.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the current available literature specific to SSIs in dermatologic surgery. The pathogenesis of SSIs, factors contributing to SSIs, current preventative guidelines, and evidence supporting their use are explored.

METHODS

A review of the medical literature.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Most measures used to prevent SSIs in dermatologic surgery are based on studies of wounds in general surgery. Evidence specific to dermatologic surgery is scarce. More research related to the pathogenesis of SSIs is needed to establish effective preventative measures that are key to reducing incidences of SSIs.

Focused ultrasound treatment of abscesses induced by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: feasibility study in a mouse model

PURPOSE

To study the therapeutic effect of focused ultrasound on abscesses induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). MRSA is a major nosocomial pathogen where immunocompromised patients are prone to develop infections that are less and less responsive to regular treatments. Because of its capability to induce a rise of temperature at a very precise location, the use of focused ultrasound represents a considerable opportunity for therapy of localized MRSA-related infections.

METHODS

50 μl of MRSA strain USA400 bacteria suspension at a concentration of 1.32 ± 0.5 × 10(5) colony forming units (cfu)/μl was injected subcutaneously in the left flank of BALB/c mice. An abscess of 6 ± 2 mm in diameter formed after 48 h. A transducer operating at 3 MHz with a focal length of 50 mm and diameter of 32 mm was used to treat the abscess. The focal point was positioned 2 mm under the skin at the abscess center. Forty-eight hours after injection four ultrasound exposures of 9 s each were applied to each abscess under magnetic resonance imaging guidance. Each exposure was followed by a 1 min pause. These parameters were based on preliminary experiments to ensure repetitive accurate heating of the abscess. Real-time estimation of change of temperature was done using water-proton resonance frequency and a communication toolbox (matMRI) developed inhouse. Three experimental groups of animals each were tested: control, moderate temperature (MT), and high temperature (HT). MT and HT groups reached, respectively, 52.3 ± 5.1 and 63.8 ± 7.5 °C at the end of exposure. Effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by evaluating the bacteria amount of the treated abscess 1 and 4 days after treatment. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) assay evaluating the neutrophil amount was performed to assess the local neutrophil recruitment and the white blood cell count was used to evaluate the systemic inflammatory response after focused ultrasound treatment.

RESULTS

Macroscopic evaluation of treated abscess indicated a diminution of external size of abscess 1 day after treatment. Treatment did not cause open wounds. The median (lower to upper quartile) bacterial count 1 day after treatment was 6.18 × 10(3) (0.76 × 10(3)-11.18 × 10(3)), 2.86 × 10(3) (1.22 × 10(3)-7.07 × 10(3)), and 3.52 × 10(3) (1.18 × 10(3)-6.72 × 10(3)) cfu/100 μl for control, MT and HT groups, respectively; for the 4-day end point, the count was 1.37 × 10(3) (0.67 × 10(3)-2.89 × 10(3)), 1.35 × 10(3) (0.09 × 10(3)-2.96 × 10(3)), and 0.07 × 10(3) (0.03 × 10(3)-0.36 × 10(3)) cfu/100 μl for control, MT and HT, showing a significant reduction (p = 0.002) on the bacterial load four days after focused ultrasound treatment when treating at high temperature (HT). The MPO amount remained unchanged between groups and days, indicating no change on local neutrophil recruitment in the abscess caused by the treatment. The white blood cell count remained unchanged between groups and days indicating that no systemic inflammatory response was caused by the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Focused ultrasound induces a therapeutic effect in abscesses induced by MRSA. This effect is observed as a reduction of the number bacteria without significantly altering the amount of MPO at the site of a MRSA-induced abscess. These initial results suggest that focused ultrasound is a viable option for the treatment of localized MRSA-related infections.