How Can Prognosis for Diabetic ESRD Be Improved?

Comparison of long-term outcomes between Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients with and without diabetes: A 10-year cohort study

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with and without diabetes in southern China.

METHODS

This retrospective and observational cohort study included all adult patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received PD in our center from January 2009 to December 2017 and were followed until December 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and cumulative incidence function, and risk factors were estimated using Cox regression analyses and competing risk models.

RESULTS

Of 401 patients receiving PD, 120 (29.9%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and 281 (70.1%) did not have diabetes mellitus (NDM). Patients with DM were older and had more cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidities than patients without DM. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with DM had shorter survival (Log-rank 3.215, P < 0.0001) compared with patients without DM. Patients with DM had a lower death-censored technique survival (Log-rank 2.029, P = 0.0180), however, there was no significant difference in peritonitis-free period (Log rank 1.375, P = 0.1133). These results were reproduced after taking competing events into account. Both on multivariate Cox analysis and on multivariate competing risk regression, diabetes was an independent predictor for increased mortality and technique failure, but not for peritonitis-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing PD with DM had increased risk of mortality and technique failure, and closer monitoring and additional focus in patients with DM treated by PD are, therefore, warranted.

Barriers to Effective Case Management for Disabled Patients on Hemodialysis

The present study examined the performance level and its related factors on the process of case management for disabled patients on hemodialysis. Case management performance was evaluated at three stages: patient assessment, making a care plan, and monitoring/evaluation. Candidates for targeting the factors relating to performance included four dimensions: nursing care level, physical malfunction, cognitive malfunction, and barriers to service were used as patient factors; the period of case management for the patient and the knowledge of dialysis emerged as case manager factors; work load was included as an organizational factor; and community resources for these services and communication with surrounding persons were included as system factors. Self-administrated questionnaires were collected from 391 case managers of patients with hemodialysis certified long-term insurance. These were introduced by the dialysis facilities that a member of the Japanese Association of Dialysis Physicians belonged to. Case managers were asked questions about their management of each individual case. The results indicate, for example, that poor knowledge of dialysis is significantly related to poor patient assessment, inadequate development of a care plan, and lower levels of monitoring/evaluation. In addition, work overload and diabetic nephropathy as the primary kidney disease were also found to be significantly related to poor patient assessment. Increasing the opportunity for case managers to learn about dialysis may be needed for better case management performance in respect of the hemodialysis of disabled patients.

Outcome of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on chronic dialysis: an observational study of incident patients of the French National Registry 2002–2012

Objectives

The objective of this article is to describe the outcome (mortality, kidney transplantation) of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on chronic dialysis.

Methods

The overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and access to kidney transplantation were studied in all SLE patients incident on chronic dialysis in France between 2002 and 2012 (REIN registry). They were compared to age- and sex-matched patients with diabetic nephropathy and with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD) on chronic dialysis.

Results

A total of 368 SLE patients were included in the national REIN registry between 2002 and 2012. Cumulative incidence of death was 16.9% at five years, with no difference between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Independent risk factors of death were age, past history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic respiratory insufficiency. At five years, CV and all-cause mortality in SLE patients were lower than in matched diabetic patients, but three-fold higher than in matched PKD patients. Access to the kidney transplant waiting list and to kidney transplantation was higher in SLE patients than in matched diabetic patients, but lower than in matched PKD patients.

Conclusions

SLE patients on chronic dialysis are a population at high risk of death influenced by CV burden and chronic respiratory failure, but not by the method of dialysis. Their outcome, in terms of mortality and access to kidney transplantation, is intermediate between diabetic patients and patients with PKD.

Clinical outcomes in elderly patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective study from a single center in china

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify the predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all incident CAPD patients treated at our center from 2006 to 2009. Demographic and clinical data on initiation of CAPD and clinical events during the study period were collected. Survival probabilities were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 805 patients on CAPD, the elderly group (≥65 years; mean age: 71.3 ± 4.3 years) consisted of 148 patients, and the younger group (<65 years; mean age: 43.1 ± 12.2years) consisted of 657 patients. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 97%, 92%, 88%, and 73% for the younger group, and 79%, 67%, 56%, and 30% for elderly group. The patient survival rates were significantly lower for the elderly group than for the younger group (p = 0.000). However, technique survival did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.559). In the patients overall, the independent predictors of death were old age (p = 0.003), diabetes (p = 0.000), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.006), lower hemoglobin (p = 0.010), and lower serum albumin (p = 0.024). Mortality in the elderly patients was associated with advanced age [relative risk (RR): 1.088; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.027 to 1.153; p = 0.004], diabetes (RR: 2.064; 95% CI: 1.236 to 3.445; p = 0.006), and lower serum albumin (RR: 0.940; 95% CI: 0.897 to 0.985; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly patients on CAPD experienced technique survival comparable with that of younger patients, but their patient survival was lower. In elderly patients, mortality was determined predominantly by greater age, diabetes, and lower serum albumin. Our results indicate that chronic peritoneal dialysis is a viable dialysis option for elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Better management of hypoalbuminemia and comorbid conditions might improve survival in elderly PD patients.

Clinical outcome and risk factors for mortality in Chinese patients with diabetes on peritoneal dialysis: a 5-year clinical cohort study

AIMS

We evaluated clinical outcome and risk factors affecting survival in patients with diabetes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in Southern China.

METHODS

This longitudinal cohort study enrolled all incident patients who used CAPD as their first renal replacement therapy modality in our center from January 2006 to December 2009 and who were followed until December 2011. Clinical outcomes were compared and risk factors for mortality in patients with diabetes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 809 incident CAPD patients, 189 (23.4%) had diabetes. Death-censored technique survival showed no significant difference between patients with and without diabetes (p=0.271). The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year patient survival rates were 90%, 72%, 63% and 36% in patients with diabetes and 95%, 92%, 87% and 73% in patients without diabetes, respectively (p=0.000). Presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [hazard ratio (HR) 2.130, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.199-3.786, p=0.010], advanced age (HR 1.042, 95% CI 1.008-1.078, p=0.014), higher glycated hemoglobin (HR 1.309, 95% CI 1.045-1.640, p=0.019), lower hemoglobin (HR 0.978, 95% CI 0.964-0.992, p=0.003) and lower serum albumin (HR 0.924, 95% CI 0.876-0.976, p=0.004) at the initiation of CAPD were independent risk factors of mortality in CAPD patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Technique survival in CAPD patients with diabetes was similar to those without diabetes. Although patients with diabetes had higher risk of mortality, the patient survival in our study seems to be improved compared with most other reports. Older age, presence of CVD, hyperglycemia, anemia and hypoalbuminemia at the commencement of CAPD affected survival in patients with diabetes.

Pre-emptive kidney transplantation to improve survival in patients with type 1 diabetes and imminent risk of ESRD

Despite significant improvements in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy over the past 20 years, patients with type 1 diabetes are at high risk of developing end-stage renal disease and high mortality once end-stage renal disease develops. Type 1 diabetic patients treated with predialysis (pre-emptive) transplantation have a lower death rate than type 1 diabetic patients treated with dialysis. Living donor kidney transplantation is possible before starting dialysis and is associated with better kidney and patient outcomes as compared with transplantation while on dialysis. In addition, a variety of potential donors can be used, not just young, well-matched family members. Through paired kidney donation, blood group ABO-incompatible transplants and transplants across the barrier of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, diabetic patients can receive living donor kidney transplants even if their intended donor is not a good match for them. Despite these expanded options making living donation possible, only a minority of type 1 diabetic patients receive a pre-emptive kidney transplant. Multiple barriers remain that prevent type 1 diabetic patients from enjoying the reduced risk of death afforded by a pre-emptive kidney transplant, including lack of knowledge by primary care physicians, endocrinologists, and nephrologists; late referral for transplantation; patient and family misconceptions about timing of transplantation; and who can be a donor. The vast majority of type 1 diabetic patients are listed for kidney transplantation after the initiation of dialysis. Of these patients, thousands subsequently receive a live donor kidney transplant. We believe that the appropriate agencies and societies should address the barriers to pre-emptive kidney transplantation through nationwide educational initiatives and study the causes of failure to be transplanted before dialysis initiation.

The timing of dialysis and kidney transplantation in type 1 diabetes

Despite significant improvements in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy over the last 20 years, patients with type 1 diabetes are at high risk of developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and high mortality once ESRD develops. The timing of dialysis initiation has occurred earlier over the years, but a recent study has led to a re-evaluation of that approach. People with type 1 diabetes treated with pre-dialysis (pre-emptive) transplantation have a lower death rate than people with type 1 diabetes treated with dialysis. Living donor kidney transplantation is possible before starting dialysis and is associated with better kidney and patient outcomes as compared to transplantation while on dialysis. Multiple barriers remain that prevent people with type 1 diabetes from enjoying the reduced risk of death afforded by a pre-emptive kidney transplant, including lack of knowledge by primary care physicians, endocrinologists and nephrologists, late referral for transplantation, patient and family misconceptions about timing of transplantation and who can be a donor. New data on both the optimal time to initiate dialysis or to pursue transplantation will be reviewed.

Left ventricular morphology and function in diabetic and nondiabetic hemodialyzed patients

Morbidity in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) diabetic patients is worse than in patients without diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aims to compare clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic features between the ESRD patients with and without DM. Fifty-eight ESRD patients on dialysis were prospectively divided into two groups according to the presence of DM. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic features (ejection fraction and wall motion score index) were compared between the two groups. Overall, 20 out of 58 patients (37.8%) with ESRD had DM. There were no significant differences between the patients with DM and those without DM when it comes to age (60.6 ± 10.6 vs. 59.0 ± 10.6 years, P = 0.665), ejection fraction (52.6% ± 12.8% vs. 54.2% ± 12.8%, P = 0.59), and wall motion score index (1.21 ± 0.3 vs.1.15 ± 0.3, P = 0.37). In multivariant analysis of the interventricular septum, posterior wall thickness and left atrium size correlated positively with DM. There was also no statistical difference in myocardial perfusion disturbances on real-time contrast echocardiography between the groups with and without DM (12 (60%) patients vs. 14 patients (36.8%), P = 0.079). Among diabetics 77.8% had significant atherosclerotic changes, while in the group without DM, only 38.1%, P = 0.01. From the laboratory parameters ferritin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the group with DM, P = 0.014 and P = 0.026, respectively. Patients with ESRD and DM have significantly bigger left atrial size, thicker left ventricular walls, and higher serum ferritin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels than the patients without DM. The aforementioned features may be possible risk factors for the development of adverse cardiac events in patients on hemodialysis.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on survival in patients with end-stage renal disease: a three-year follow-up

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To assess the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on clinical outcome in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on a 3-year follow-up.

METHODS

58 ESRD patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of DM. We analyzed following end points: death, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes, revascularization, and combined end point.

RESULTS

Among diabetics, 14 (77.8%) had significant atherosclerotic changes, in the group without DM only 8 (38.1%), p = 0.01. In the group without DM, 14 (46.7%) patients reached combined end point, while in the group with DM 16 (53.3%) patients, p = 0.0013. There were no statistical differences in mortality (p = 0.423).

CONCLUSION

Survival of hemodialyzed diabetic patients is not inferior to nondiabetics; however, morbidity is significantly higher due to adverse cardiac events.