Thoughts and Progress. Protracted Bleeding After Hirudin Anticoagulation for Cardiac Surgery in a Patient With HIT II and Chronic Renal Failure

American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Development of Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice (2019)

The development of standards and guidelines by professional societies offers clinicians guidance toward providing evidence-based care. The ultimate goals of standards and guidelines are to standardize care and improve patient safety and outcomes while also minimizing risk. The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology (AmSECT) currently offers perfusionists several clinical resources, primarily the Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice; however, no document exists specific to pediatric perfusion. Historically, the development of a pediatric-specific document has been limited by available scientific evidence because of smaller patient populations, sample sizes, and variable techniques among congenital perfusionists. In the current setting of evolving clinical practices and increasingly complex cardiac operations, a subcommittee of pediatric perfusionists developed the Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice. The development process included a comprehensive literature review for supporting evidence to justify new recommendations or updates to the existing AmSECT Adult Standards and Guidelines document. Multiple revisions incorporating feedback from the community led to a finalized document accepted by the AmSECT member and made available electronically in May 2019. The Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice is an essential tool for pediatric perfusionists, serves as the backbone for institutionally based protocols, promotes improved decision-making, and identifies opportunities for future research and collaboration with other disciplines. The purpose of this article is to summarize the process of development, the content, and recommended utilization of AmSECT's Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice. AmSECT recommends adoption of the Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice to reduce practice variation and enhance clinical safety.

American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Development of Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice (2019)

The development of standards and guidelines by professional societies offers clinicians guidance toward providing evidence-based care. The ultimate goals of standards and guidelines are to standardize care and improve patient safety and outcomes while also minimizing risk. The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology (AmSECT) currently offers perfusionists several clinical resources, primarily the Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice; however, no document exists specific to pediatric perfusion. Historically, the development of a pediatric-specific document has been limited by available scientific evidence due to smaller patient populations, sample sizes, and variable techniques among congenital perfusionists. In the current setting of evolving clinical practices and increasingly complex cardiac operations, a subcommittee of pediatric perfusionists developed the Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice. The development process included a comprehensive literature review for supporting evidence to justify new recommendations or updates to the existing AmSECT Adult Standards and Guidelines document. Multiple revisions incorporating feedback from the community led to a finalized document accepted by the AmSECT membership and made available electronically in May 2019. The Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice is an essential tool for pediatric perfusionists and serves as the backbone for institutionally based protocols, promotes improved decision-making, and identifies opportunities for future research and collaboration with other disciplines. The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize the process of development, the content, and recommended utilization of AmSECT's Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice.

Recombinant Factor VIIa to Manage Major Bleeding from Newer Parenteral Anticoagulants

Objective

To evaluate the use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) to reverse major bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant therapy.

Data sources

MEDLINE/PubMed was searched from January 2000 through December 2009 using the terms recombinant factor VIIa, rFVIIa, NovoSeven, enoxaparin, argatroban, fondaparinux, lepirudin, bivalirudin, idraparinux, nadroparin, hirudin, and desirudin. References of identified articles were reviewed.

Data synthesis

Data evaluating the role of rFVIIa to reverse major bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant therapy is limited to case reports and small laboratory investigations. Laboratory investigations suggest that rFVIIa may be effective in reversing the hemostatic effects of newer parenteral anticoagulants. In most case reports analyzed, standard interventions for bleeding (eg, fresh frozen plasma, packed red blood cells) were attempted prior to using rFVIIa. Sixteen published cases describe the use of rFVIIa to reverse major bleeding from low-molecular-weight heparins, synthetic pentasaccharides, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Initial doses ranged from 20 to 120 μg/kg. rFVIIa was considered effective or partially effective based upon clinical response in 13 cases. Use was not effective in 3 cases because of a thrombotic event, no change in hemostasis, and death from bleeding complications. As thrombosis is the major safety concern, an individualized risk-benefit assessment is required prior to the use of rFVIIa therapy to restore hemostasis.

Conclusions

rFVIIa may be considered to manage major refractory bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant agents when the benefit is thought to outweigh the thrombotic risk.

Role of citrate and other methods of anticoagulation in patients with severe liver failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy

Anticoagulation is required during continuous renal replacement therapy to prevent filter clotting and optimize filter performance. However, anticoagulation may also be associated with serious bleeding complications. Patients with liver failure often suffer from underlying coagulopathy and are especially prone to anticoagulation complications. The aim of this review is to present the unique features of patients with hepatic injury in terms of anticoagulation disorders and to analyze data on safety and efficacy of the different anticoagulation methods for liver failure patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Lepirudin in the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Lepirudin, a recombinant hirudin, is a direct irreversible thrombin inhibitor by binding to both free and clot-bound thrombin. It is approved for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a serious antibody-mediated drug reaction mostly associated with the use of unfractionated heparin. Clinical experience during the last 10 years has proved the efficacy of lepirudin in the management of HIT. The major route of elimination of lepirudin is the kidney, accounting for approximately 90% of its systemic clearance. The most important adverse reactions are bleeding and the induction of immunologic reactions. The risk of bleeding can be reduced by implementing an optimal monitoring and dose adjustment strategy, particularly in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and in those with impaired renal function. Development of antihirudin antibodies may enhance the anticoagulant effect of lepirudin. Anaphylactic reactions associated with lepirudin therapy are rare. The lack of an antidote against lepirudin is still a concern, particularly during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery with a heart-lung machine and during artificial renal support. Currently, hemofiltration using high-flux filter systems is the only available and valid means to manage hirudin overdose. Nevertheless, the drug can be safely used if meticulous monitoring strategy is installed.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Recombinant factor VIIa for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery secondary to anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin

A 56-year-old man with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) received anticoagulation with recombinant hirudin (lepirudin) for emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and aortic valve replacement. The patient experienced life-threatening refractory bleeding that was successfully treated with recombinant factor VIIa. He had a history of infective endocarditis that resulted in severe aortic insufficiency, three-vessel coronary artery disease, and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. The patient was transferred from another hospital for the emergency surgery, but before his transfer, he developed HITTS secondary to therapeutic heparin for a deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. The presence of HITTS, the urgent nature of the case, and the availability of the direct thrombin inhibitor led the surgical team to select lepirudin for anticoagulation to facilitate cardiopulmonary bypass. After separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, the patient was in a coagulopathic state due to the inability to reverse the lepirudin and the slowed elimination of the drug secondary to inadequate renal function. As a result, the patient experienced excessive generalized oozing that was unresponsive to traditional therapies and blood product transfusions. Recombinant factor VIIa 35 microg/kg was given as rescue therapy. The bleeding slowed, which allowed placement of chest tubes and closing of the sternum. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit in stable condition with no evidence of thrombosis in the freshly placed bypass grafts or on the bioprosthetic valve. Recombinant factor VIIa appears to be a suitable option as salvage therapy in patients with refractory bleeding secondary to anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor during cardiac surgery.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: Anticoagulation and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

More than half of patients with acute renal failure in the intensive care unit require dialysis, and the majority of them have significant hemodynamic instability. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often the preferred dialysis modality in these patients. One requirement for CRRT is anticoagulation, which can expose patients to the risk of bleeding. However, absence of effective anticoagulation may result in clotting of the CRRT circuit and subsequently less effective treatment. While heparins are widely used for anticoagulation, because of potential side effects such as bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, alternative anticoagulation protocols should be considered. Citrate anticoagulation, regional heparin/protamine, predilution, r-hirudin, prostacyclin, and nafamostat are among these methods.